— GRIO BLITZKRIEG: SO WHAT’S IT GOING TO BE MR MACRON (YES OR NO)?
(c) 2019 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 11 May, 2019
DOLF @ 0152 HOURS ON 9 MAY 2019: Your democracy is at risk ...
YOUTUBE: “Danger Will Robinson”
So what’s it going to be Mr Macron: 'Yes or No?'"
MACRON CAMP SEEKS RESET AFTER EU CAMPAIGN 'FALSE START'
“By picking European affairs minister Nathalie Loiseau, a career
diplomat once described as "Macron's secret weapon" in Brexit talks, the
president was hoping to capitalize on her expert knowledge of EU affairs
and her Catholic background to expand his appeal beyond centrists to
more conservative voters.
But Loiseau, who has no political campaign experience, has got off to a
shaky start, with a series of gaffes that have put Macron's team on the
defensive on a subject the French leader considered his forte.
— HELL’S CLAMOUR —
“OH YELLOW SHIRTS.
PARIS IS BURNING.
AN OLD DAME FLIRTS.
HELL HAS YEARNING.
FOR YOUR COHORTS. {@6: Sup: 11 (#268); Ego: 45 (#312 - *CONTRADICTION*)}
A PAGE OF TURNING. {@7: Sup: 44 (#312 - *CONTRADICTION*); Ego: 46 (#358)}
FRATERNITÉ AU MORTS.”
YOUTUBE: "Paradise By The Dashboard Light (Meat Loaf)
http://youtu.be/C11MzbEcHlw
And Loiseau caused more unease in secular circles when she invited
journalists to join her for celebrations marking the Christian festival
Palm Sunday 14 April 2019.”
[<https://www.reuters.com/article/us-france-politics/macron-camp-seeks-reset-after-eu-campaign-false-start-idUSKCN1SD1YH>]
FASCIST IDENTITY IS A QUESTION ON LOVE AND NATURE FIRST POSED BY GERHARD
KITTEL WHO JOINED THE NAZI PARTY IN MAY 1933.
ADVANCED FORBIDDING MARRIAGE OR SEXUAL RELATIONS WITH NON-JEWS JUNE 1933
PRIOR TO NUREMBERG LAWS OF 15 SEPTEMBER 1935.
WITH NATURE-GENESIS DEFINED IN VOL 1 OF THE THEOLOGICAL DICTIONARY OF
THE NEW TESTAMENT (TWNT / TDNT) ON JULY 1933.
THAT CHRISTIAN BELIEF AS TO SEXUAL IDENTITY AND POLITICS BEING
NON-DIFFERENTIATED...
AS CHRISTIANS SUCH AS THOSE CELEBRATIONS MARKING THE CHRISTIAN FESTIVAL
PALM SUNDAY 14 APRIL 2019 WELL KNOW.
LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0559 HOURS
ON 11 MAY 2019: "That is gibberish."
ALEX SARANDANSKI @ 2106 HOURS ON 9 MAY 2019: "Dolf Boek incorrect. {@1:
Sup: 56 (#56); Ego: 49 (#49)},
But if u think that I ges that's why you're probably still single. {@2:
Sup: 73 (#129); Ego: 37 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10})},
I anticipated your reply which gave me a nice tickle just like
clockwork. {@3: Sup: 56 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR {%25});
Ego: 41 (#127)},
Take yr meds then see if u can think of something.. {@4: Sup: 73 (#258:
SEE KANT’S IDEA ON LACK OF REASON AND SELF DELUSION); Ego: 66 (#193)},
DOLF @ 2112 HOURS ON 9 MAY 2019: "I rest my case on your own self
justification being a delusional reality of nothing but fictions..."
IMMANUEL KANT’S PROLEGOMENA IDEA @258: “He indisputably proved that it
is wholly impossible for reason to think such a connection a priori and
from concepts, because this connection contains necessity; and it is
simply not to be seen how it could be, that because something is,
something else necessarily must also be, and therefore how the concept
of such a connection could be introduced a priori.
From this he concluded that reason completely and fully deceives
herself with this concept, falsely taking it for her own child, when it
is really nothing but a bastard of the imagination, which, impregnated
by experience, and having brought certain representations under the law
of association, passes off the resulting subjective necessity (i.e.,
habit) for an objective necessity (from insight).
From which he concluded that reason has no power at all to think such
connections, not even merely in general, because its concepts would then
be bare fictions, and all of its cognitions allegedly established a
priori would be nothing but falsely marked ordinary experiences; which
is so much as to say that there is no metaphysics at all, and cannot be any.
As premature and erroneous as his conclusion was, nevertheless it was at
least founded on inquiry, and this inquiry was of sufficient value, that
the best minds of his time might have come together to solve (more
happily if possible) the problem in the sense in which he presented it,
from which a complete reform of the science must soon have arisen.”
[pages 7-8]
Especially given the narrative of an earlier syncretism involving an
intervention over TRUMPS failed cemetery visit and prior to as
intersecting with MACRON's NATIONALISM v's PATRIOTISM speech at WORLD
WAR I CENTENNIAL COMMEMORATIONS within FRANCE ...
— TIME DIDN'T DENY —
“YE BE NOT
FORGOTTEN.
AS THEY ROT {ie. US corruption on the part of officials}.
SOIL SODDEN.
WE REMEMBER.
OF VALOUR BORN.
FAITHFUL FOREVER.
ER EVE NOR MORN.”
[ANZAC Centennial 25 April 2018]
<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Time%20Didn't%20Deny%2020180425.pdf>
NICK MILLER (SYDNEY MORNING HERALD) @ 2332 HOURS ON 11 NOVEMBER 2018:
"NATIONALISM IS A BETRAYAL OF PATRIOTISM: FRANCE'S PRESIDENT LECTURES
THE POWERFUL: (PARIS) By the grave of an unknown soldier, under
Napoleon’s grand arch, at the centenary of the end of a great, terrible
war, France’s president lectured the powerful.
The first world war’s lesson and legacy were clear, he said. Peace is
hard won and is fragile.
A century ago, after such loss, the world took a path of humiliation and
revenge and it fuelled the rise of nationalism and totalitarianism.
His audience, metres away, included presidents Donald Trump and Vladimir
Putin, and Recep Erdogan.
*NATIONALISM* *IS* *A* *BETRAYAL* *OF* *PATRIOTISM*, Emmanuel Macron
declared. A withdrawal into isolationism would be “a grave error that
future generations would very rightly make us responsible for”.
“The old demons are rising again, ready to wreak chaos and death,” he
warned. “History sometimes threatens to take its sinister course again.”
He wanted the 70 world leaders assembled there - including Australian
Governor-General Peter Cosgrove, seated just next to Putin - to renew a
pledge to honour the dead and “place peace above all else”.
Trump listened, leaning forward, his eyes narrow. He was one of the last
to applaud as the speech ended.”
MR MACRON YOU *TOLD* *LIES* UPON REMEMBRANCE / ARMISTICE 11 NOVEMBER
2018 COMMEMORATIONS TO SEVENTY SOVEREIGN HEADS OF STATE AND THE ROMAN
CATHOLIC CHURCH HAVE BEEN UNACCOUNTABLE ABOUT THE FRENCH PEOPLE’S
NATIONALISM BEING ENTIRELY AND ABSOLUTELY ANTI SEMITIC AS SOMETHING
DENIED FOR 86 YEARS.
— ALL HAIL THE POTUS —
[Written 1124 hours (AEDT) 11 November 2018]
“WITH TRUMP YOU KNOW.
IT’S EITHER *FIRE* OR FURY.
OR *WATER* LOGGED.
THE *WIND* DOTH BLOW.
YET *SOIL* MAKES MERRY.
BY FIELDS LEFT UNTROD.”
JUST A FEW WEEKS AGO, AT A RALLY IN TEXAS, HE HAD SAID “*YOU* *KNOW*
*WHAT* *I* *AM*? *I’M* *A* *NATIONALIST*. *OK*? *I’M* *A*
*NATIONALIST*…. *USE* *THAT* *WORD*. *USE* *THAT* *WORD*”.
REMEMBRANCE DAY 2018@{
@1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 80 (#80),
@2: Sup: 34 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 29 (#109),
@3: Sup: 8 (#92); Ego: 38 (#147),
@4: Sup: 5 (#97); Ego: 6 (#153),
@5: Sup: 33 (#130 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}); Ego: 20 (#173 - I
AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST {%27}),
@6: Sup: 14 (#144); Ego: 8 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE
WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
@7: Sup: 67 (#211); Ego: 19 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED
PROPERTY {%8}),
Male: #211; Feme: #200
} // TRUMP *CANCELS* WW1 MEMORIAL AT U.S. CEMETERY IN FRANCE *DUE* *TO*
*RAIN*
#211 as [#10, #200, #1] / #247 as [#10, #10, #200, #1, #6, #500] = yare'
(H3372): {UMBRA: #5 as #211 % #41 = #6} 1) to fear, revere, be afraid;
2) (TWOT) *TO* *SHOOT*, pour; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to fear, be afraid; 1a2)
to stand in awe of, be awed; 1a3) to fear, reverence, honour, respect;
1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be fearful, be dreadful, be feared; 1b2) *TO*
*CAUSE* *ASTONISHMENT* *AND* *AWE*, *BE* *HELD* *IN* *AWE*; 1b3) to
inspire reverence or godly fear or awe; 1c) (Piel) *TO* *MAKE* *AFRAID*,
*TERRIFY*;
#200 as [#40, #70, #40, #10, #40] = `am (H5971): {UMBRA: #10 as #110 %
#41 = #28} 1) nation, people; 2) kinsman, kindred; 1a) *PEOPLE*,
*NATION*; 1b) *PERSONS*, *MEMBERS* *OF* *ONE'S* *PEOPLE*, *COMPATRIOTS*,
*COUNTRY*-*MEN*;
OFF WITH HER HEAD
When the issue is a lack of #873 - PROBITY against the @115 - DIGNITY
ROYAL of which rampant anti-semitism within the Labor Party is
symptomatic. As similarly a soylent green mindset which has infected
France like an ebola contagion and casts its pall upon Europe as its
inevitable encroachment, then one must be cautious about revolutionary
mantras such as “off with her head.”
France is in turmoil with a sisyphus humour of clamorous unreason and
untrustworthiness as infidelity having betrayed her admirable ideals for
rapacious desire.
Theresa May has never done so...”
THE GHOSTS OF CHRISTMAS PAST: "THE THING THAT STRIKES ME ABOVE ALL IN
THE PRESENT-DAY POLICY OF THE *FRENCH* [ON #325 - *DETRUDE* *AS*
*FACEBOOK* *TOTALITARIANISM* *BY* *CENSORSHIP*] IS THE FACT THAT,
BECAUSE THEY WERE ANXIOUS TO SIT ON EVERY CHAIR AT THE SAME TIME, THEY
HAVE NOT SUCCEEDED IN SITTING FIRMLY ON ANY ONE OF THEM. THE EXPLANATION
IS THAT THE SOUL OF THE COUNTRY HAS BEEN TORN ASUNDER.
IN THE VICHY GOVERNMENT ALONE A WHOLE HEAP OF TENDENCIES IS APPARENT—
ANTI-SEMITIC NATIONALISM, CLERICAL PRO-SEMITISM, ROYALISM, THE SPIRIT OF
REVOLUTION AND SO ON.
AND AS A FINAL MISERY, IF AN ENERGETIC MAN MAKE A MISTAKE, THERE SEEMS
TO BE NO PROVISION IN THE POLITICAL PLAN WHEREBY A SWIFT AND CLEAR-CUT
DECISION CAN BE REACHED." [HITLER'S TABLE TALK IDEA: @216 on 13 MAY 1942]
SO WE HAVE TAKEN OUR GOODWILL AWAY FROM THE FRENCH AND DIRECTED IT TO
THE RUSSIANS INSTEAD WHOSE #74th remembrance parade is upon 9 May 2019
being the “sombre occasion will be a show of respect to the 27 million
Soviet soldiers and civilians who died during the defeat of the Nazis”
As exceeding the present population of the Australian Commonwealth...
<https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/9022259/russia-victory-day-parade-rehearsal-tanks-planes-thousands-troops-red-square/>
How we have given them by comprehensible CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE on the
day prior a means to distinguish the immateriality of the binomial
stasis: @1, @5, #65 - soldier, #175 - marriage as malefaction from its
trinomial metastasised grandeur without any discordance to their
national sensibilities (such transcendent thinking is above you) about
the notion of STATE:
#312 - CONTRADICTION
#315 - ORIGINAL SIN
#246 - NORMA OBLIGANS / ANGEL GABRIEL
#288 - REMEMBRANCE
God and me want to teach you a lesson in civil manners ✈️ ⚡️🔥 🧯
YOUTUBE: "Imagine Dragons (Thunder)"
http://youtu.be/fKopy74weus
Nous: #30
Time: 03:10 hrs
Date: 2019.5.8
Torah: [#8, #70, #40]@{
@1: Sup: 8 (#8); Ego: 8 (#8),
@2: Sup: 78 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 70 (#78),
@3: Sup: 37 (#123); Ego: 40 (#118),
Male: #123; Feme: #118
} // #118
Dao: Government without Coercion, Be Chary of War
Tetra: #59 - Massing
I-Ching: H45 - Gathering, Congregation, Clustering, Gathering together
(massing), Finished
Latin: Clemens ... {Clement God} Alt: Haladyah {Yonder is the Strife of
God} {
1. HELPS MAINTAIN PEACE & HARMONY BETWEEN COUNTRIES, PROTECTS CROWN
HEADS & MAKES SUBJECTS OBEDIENT TO SUPERIORS
2. FAITHFULNESS
3. RESPECT AND DEVOTION
4. Thopitus
}
Solomon {Peaceable; perfect; one who recompenses}
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#315 / #246} / HETEROS {#318 / #288} / TORAH {#335
/ #256}
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:3,row:2,col:4,nous:30>
***@zen: 3, row: 2, col: 4, nous: 30 [Date: 2019.5.8, Time: 03:10
hrs, Super: #315 / #34 - Great Guide, Trust in its Perfection; I-Ching:
H18 - Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay, Correcting, Work on what has
been spoiled (decay), Decaying, Branch; Tetra: 27 - Duties, Ego: #246 /
#30 - Government without Coercion, Be Chary of War; I-Ching: H45 -
Gathering, Congregation, Clustering, Gathering together (massing),
Finished; Tetra: 59 - Massing]
ROMINA MCGUINNESS (EXPRESS.CO.UK) @ 1608 HOURS ON 9 MAY 2019: “EU
ELECTIONS OUTRAGE AS MACRON PARTY’S LEAD CANDIDATE MAKES NAZI MILITARY
TACTIC COMMENT:
THE HEAD of French President Emmanuel Macron’s party list for the
upcoming European Parliament elections is facing a fierce backlash after
comparing the home stretch of her EU campaign to a military tactic used
by the Nazi regime in World War 2.
Speaking to a reporter on the sidelines of a rally on Monday, Nathalie
Loiseau said that she needed a “*BLITZKRIEG*” to relaunch her EU
campaign after a series of setbacks.
Blitzkrieg, a German term for “LIGHTNING-H1300 WAR,” refers to a
battlefield tactic favoured by the Nazis that consists in staging a
violent, surprise attack on your opponents.”
[<https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1125050/european-elections-macron-party-nathalie-loiseau-eu-news>]
“Then came to him the mother of Zebedee's children (ie. THE SONS OF
THUNDER} with her sons, worshipping him, and desiring a certain thing of
him.
And he said unto her, What wilt thou? She saith unto him, Grant that
these my two sons may sit, the one on thy right hand, and the other on
the left, in thy kingdom.
But Jesus answered and said, Ye know not what ye ask. Are ye able to
drink of the cup that I shall drink of, and to be baptized with the
baptism that I am baptized with? They say unto him, We are able.
And he saith unto them, Ye shall drink indeed of my cup, and be baptized
with the baptism that I am baptized with: but to sit on my right hand,
and on my left, is not mine to give, *BUT* *IT* *SHALL* *BE* *GIVEN*
*TO* *THEM* *FOR* *WHOM* *IT* *IS* *PREPARED* *OF* *MY* *FATHER*.
YOUTUBE: “THUNDERSTRUCK (MILITARY MONTAGE): AC DC”
<https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2q631h>
And when the ten heard it, they were moved with indignation against the
two brethren. But Jesus called them unto him, and said, Ye know that the
princes of the Gentiles exercise dominion over them, and they that are
great exercise authority upon them.” [Matthew 20:20-25 (KJV)]
LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1020 HOURS
ON 10 MAY 2019: "That's just gibberish."
DOLF @ 1402 HOURS ON 10 MAY 2019: "Do you work for the INTELLIGENCE
AGENCIES?"
HUGH SCHOFIELD (BBC NEWS) @ 1107 HOURS ON 10 MAY 2019: "FRANCE ASKS: CAN
YOU SOLVE THE RIDDLE OF THE ROCK?
A village in western France is offering a €2,000 (£1,726) prize for help
in deciphering a 230-year-old inscription found on a rock on a remote
beach. Until now no-one has been able to make out the meaning of the 20
lines of writing, discovered a few years ago.
The metre-high slab is in a cove accessible only at low tide near the
Brittany village of Plougastel. Among the normal French letters some are
reversed or upside-down. There are also some Scandinavian-style Ø letters.
Two years are visible - 1786 and 1787 - dating the inscription to a few
years before the French Revolution. There is also the image of a ship
with sails and rudder, and a sacred heart - a heart surmounted by a cross.
Nous: #3
Time: 20:10 hrs
Date: 2019.1.23
Torah: [#5, #200, #8]@{
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 43 (#48); Ego: 38 (#43),
@3: Sup: 51 (#99); Ego: 8 (#51),
Male: #99; Feme: #51
} // #213
Dao: Political Prescriptions, Quietude Tetra: #8 - Opposition
I-Ching: H46 - Climbing, Moving/Pushing Upward, Ascending
Latin: Facies {God above all things} Alt: Anael {Ship of God} {
1. SERVES TO OBTAIN THE FRIENDSHIP OF A PERSON
2. ASTRONOMY & PHYSICS
3. THE SENSITIVITY OF THE HEART
4. Ptiau
}
#34 CE
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#322 / #291} / HETEROS {#270 / #265} / TORAH {#326
/ #293}
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:3,row:8,col:7,nous:3&lexicon:H2142>
***@zen: 3, row: 8, col: 7, nous: 3 [Date: 2019.1.23, Time: 20:10
hrs, Super: #322 / #27 - Greatest Functional Skill in Paradoxes;
I-Ching: H21 - Bite Together, Biting Through, Gnawing Bite; Tetra: 74 -
Closure, Ego: #291 / #3 - Political Prescriptions, Quietude; I-Ching:
H46 - Climbing, Moving/Pushing Upward, Ascending; Tetra: 8 - Opposition]
H2142@{
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 45 (#50); Ego: 40 (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}),
@3: Sup: 52 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}); Ego: 7 (#52),
@4: Sup: 72 (#174); Ego: 20 (#72),
@5: Sup: 29 (#203); Ego: 38 (#110),
@6: Sup: 39 (#242); Ego: 10 (#120),
@7: Sup: 72 (#314); Ego: 33 (#153),
Male: #314; Feme: #153
} // #322
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #227 % #41 = #22 - Point to Reversal?, Humility's Increase;
I-Ching: H8 - Closeness, Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together,
Alliance; Tetra: 34 - Kinship;
THOTH MEASURE: #22 - Oh Chemiu, who makest thine appearance in Kauu; I
am not a transgressor.
#VIRTUE: What Resistance (no. #22) approves is right while
#TOOLS: What Doubt (no. #62) abhors is wrong.
#POSITION: With Advance (no. #20), the desire to proceed.
#TIME: With Stoppage (no. #71), the desire for constraints.
#CANON: #175
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_175@{
@1: Sup: 22 (#22); Ego: 22 (#22),
@2: Sup: 3 (#25); Ego: 62 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
@3: Sup: 23 (#48); Ego: 20 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
@4: Sup: 13 (#61); Ego: 71 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
Male: #61; Feme: #175
} // #175 - *MARRIAGE*
#273 as [#6, #30, #7, #20, #200, #10] / #322 as [#5, #40, #7, #20, #200,
#10, #600] = zâkar (H2142): {UMBRA: #0 as #227 % #41 = #22} 1) to
remember, recall, call to mind; 1a) (Qal) to remember, recall; 1b)
(Niphal) to be brought to remembrance, be remembered, be thought of, be
brought to mind; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to cause to remember, remind; 1c2)
to cause to be remembered, keep in remembrance; 1c3) to mention; 1c4) to
record; 1c5) to make a memorial, make remembrance;
THERE WAS THUNDER IN OUR VILLAGE @ 2011 HOURS
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:3,row:8,col:7,nous:3&lexicon:h1300>
But the writing has defied all attempts at interpretation by local
academics. Some think it may be in old Breton or Basque, and that the
person who wrote it may only have been semi-literate. The letters may
relate to the sounds of words as he or she heard them.
In one section the letters read: "ROC AR B … DRE AR GRIO SE EVELOH AR
VIRIONES BAOAVEL".
Another reads: "OBBIIE: BRISBVILAR ... FROIK … AL".
[OBBIIE: {@1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 6 (#6)},
BRISBVILAR ... {@2: Sup: 53 (#55); Ego: 4 (#10)},
FROIK … {@3: Sup: 13 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY
DOMAIN {%42}); Ego: 23 (#33)},
AL] {@4: Sup: 45 (#113: *EMANATION* *FUNCTION* <— *ETHICAL*
*ENGAGEMENT*); Ego: 31 (#64)},
@6 - FORMULA OF EMANATION: @41 / #113 - EMANATION FUNCTION <— ETHICAL
ENGAGEMENT / #6 - OBLIGATING NORM {PRINCIPLE OF CONTRADICTION}: BINOMIAL
{@1 - RETAINED, @5 - CENTRE AS EMANATION} STASIS NOMENCLATURE @3 -
ANTI-THESIS;
One theory is that the inscription is linked to the building of naval
defences near this point. A fort and gun emplacements - whose remains
can still be seen - were erected here in the 1780s to protect the Bay of
Brest. Until 1783 France and England were at war."
[<https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-48212442>]
DOLF @ 1736 HOURS ON 10 MAY 2019: "KANT’s implementation of SYMBOLICAL
associator to the NOUMENON as having a #41 - *ONTIC* necessity with
CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING which incontrovertibly conform to a
COGNITION of a trinomial as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER that has a
definitive impetus from 1783 and thusly we can by such APRIORITY CASCADE
against subsequent HISTORY and is capable of BEREAVING SOVEREIGN STATES
of IDENTITY which as MARRIAGE / SOVEREIGN DYNAMIC has been built on
castles of SAND which deploys a microcosm binomial redefinition (HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER) of those APRIORITY trinomial CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING."
[ROC, AR, B … DRE, AR, GRIO, SE, EVELOH, AR, VIRIONES, BAOAVEL]
[ROC, {@1: Sup: 78 (#78); Ego: 72 (#72: *ANTHROPIC* *PROTOTYPE*)},
AR, {@2: Sup: 8 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 10 (#82:
*ONTIC* *PROSCRIPTION* *EQUIVALENCIES* TO #491 - SECTION IX <— TERMS OF
CONTINUITY)},
B … {@3: Sup: 10 (#96); Ego: 2 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2})},
DRE, {@4: Sup: 49 (#145); Ego: 18 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4})},
AR, {@5: Sup: 60 (#205: *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *PERSISTENT* *SUBSTANCE*); Ego:
10 (#112)},
GRIO, {@6: Sup: 68 (#273: *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *SYNCRETIC* *SUCCESSION*);
Ego: 4 (#116)},
SE, {@7: Sup: 30 (#303: SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA *ON* *LOGICAL*
*JUDGMENTS* / *TRANSCENDENT* *CONCEPTS* *OF* *THE* *UNDERSTANDING* /
*UNIVERSAL* *PRINCIPLES* *OF* *NATURAL* *SCIENCE*); Ego: 24 (#140 - I
DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} / I AM NOT AN EAVES-DROPPER {%16})},
EVELOH, {@8: Sup: 74 (#377: SEE KANT'S IDEA *ON* *AWARENESS* *OF*
*IMPORTANT* *AND* *EXQUISITE* *INSIGHTS*); Ego: 22 (#162)},
AR, {@9: Sup: 4 (#381: SEE KANT'S *PROPOSAL* *FOR* *AN* *INVESTIGATION*
*OF* *THE* *CRITIQUE*, *AFTER* *WHICH* *THE* *JUDGMENT* *CAN* *FOLLOW*);
Ego: 10 (#172)},
VIRIONES, {@10: Sup: 28 (#409: *PROTECTS* *AGAINST* *LIGHTNING* *AND*
*INFERNAL* *SPIRITS* *OF* *RELIGIOUS* *CULTS* / *CREED* / *INFLUENCES*
*AND* *PROTECTS* *THOSE* *WHO* *SEEK* *THE* *TRUTH*}); Ego: 75 (#247:
ALSO 28 FEBRUARY AS H2142: *TO* *REMEMBER*, *RECALL*, *CALL* *TO* *MIND*
@115 - DIGNITY ROYAL)},
BAOAVEL] {@11: Sup: 42 (#451: JUDGEMENT AS *JUSTICE*, *RIGHT*,
*RECTITUDE* *ATTRIBUTES* *OF* *GOD* *OR* *MAN*); Ego: 13 (#260: SEE
KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA)},
#451 - *ABYSS* / *PRE-TEMPORAL* *VOID* + #41 x n - ONTIC FACULTY = #492
- VOLUNTARY FREE WILL {ie. 12 x #41 as CIRCULARITY of BEING: 12 JURORS
OF DIEU ET MON DROIT} and through inclusion of #41 x n - ONTIC FACULTY
as a cognitive conceptualisation then allows for stages of development.
#451 as [#6, #40, #300, #80, #9, #10, #6] = mishpat (H4941): {UMBRA: #18
as #451 % #41 = #41} 1) judgment, justice, ordinance; 1a) judgment; 1a1)
act of deciding a case; 1a2) place, court, seat of judgment; 1a3)
process, procedure, litigation (before judges); 1a4) case, cause
(presented for judgment); 1a5) sentence, decision (of judgment); 1a6)
execution (of judgment); 1a7) time (of judgment); 1b) *JUSTICE*,
*RIGHT*, *RECTITUDE* (*ATTRIBUTES* *OF* *GOD* *OR* *MAN*); 1c)
ordinance; 1d) decision (in law); 1e) right, privilege, due (legal); 1f)
proper, fitting, measure, fitness, custom, manner, plan;
Nous: #18
Time:
Date:
Torah: [#30, #20, #2]@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 50 (#80); Ego: 20 (#50),
@3: Sup: 52 (#132); Ego: 2 (#52),
Male: #132; Feme: #52
} // #52
Dao: Origin of Ethical Concepts, Palliation of Vulgarity
Tetra: #49 - Flight
I-Ching: H33 - Withdrawal, Retiring, Retreat, Yielding
Latin: Exaltator {God who gives wisdom} Alt: Vahavyah {Cry unto God Who
is God} {
1. SERVES TO OBTAIN WISDOM & DISCOVER TRUTH OF HIDDEN SECRETS
2. THE OCCULT SCIENCES, REVELATIONS IN DREAMS, PROPHECIES IN RHYME
3. THE WISE WHO LOVE SOLITUDE, MAGIC PRACTICED BY SAGES
4. Charcumis
}
Hezron {The dart of joy; the division of the song}
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#247 / #259} / HETEROS {#297 / #284} / TORAH {#343
/ #226}
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:7,row:4,col:8,nous:18>
***@zen: 7, row: 4, col: 8, nous: 18 [Date: (none), Time: (none),
Super: #247 / #48 - Forgetting Knowledge; I-Ching: H35 - Advance,
Progress, Prospering, Aquas; Tetra: 20 - Advance, Ego: #259 / #18 -
Origin of Ethical Concepts, Palliation of Vulgarity; I-Ching: H33 -
Withdrawal, Retiring, Retreat, Yielding; Tetra: 49 - Flight]
H3372@{
@1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
@2: Sup: 20 (#30); Ego: 10 (#20),
@3: Sup: 58 (#88); Ego: 38 (#58),
@4: Sup: 59 (#147); Ego: 1 (#59),
@5: Sup: 65 (#212); Ego: 6 (#65),
@6: Sup: 79 (#291); Ego: 14 (#79),
Male: #291; Feme: #79
} // #247
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #211 % #41 = #6 - Female Superiority, Completion of Form;
I-Ching: H25 - No Errancy, Without Embroiling, Innocence, Pestilence;
Tetra: 66 - Departure;
THOTH MEASURE: #6 - Oh thou of Lion form, who makest thine appearance in
Heaven; I am not fraudulent in measures of grain.
#VIRTUE: With Contrariety (no. #6), internal contradiction.
#TOOLS: Enlargement (no. #46) means external opposition.
#POSITION: As to Watch (no. #63), it is the apparent.
#TIME: As to Darkening (no. #67), it is the indistinct.
#CANON: #182
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_182@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 52 (#58); Ego: 46 (#52),
@3: Sup: 34 (#92); Ego: 63 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}),
@4: Sup: 20 (#112); Ego: 67 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES
OF GRAIN {%6}),
Male: #112; Feme: #182
} // #182
#211 as [#10, #200, #1] / #247 as [#10, #10, #200, #1, #6, #500] =
yârêʼ (H3372): {UMBRA: #5 as #211 % #41 = #6} 1) to fear, revere, be
afraid; 2) (TWOT) *TO* *SHOOT*, pour; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to fear, be
afraid; 1a2) to stand in awe of, be awed; 1a3) to fear, reverence,
honour, respect; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be fearful, be dreadful, be
feared; 1b2) *TO* *CAUSE* *ASTONISHMENT* *AND* *AWE*, *BE* *HELD* *IN*
*AWE*; 1b3) to inspire reverence or godly fear or awe; 1c) (Piel) *TO*
*MAKE* *AFRAID*, *TERRIFY*;
YOUTUBE: "Beethoven - Symphony No.9 - Freude schöner Götterfunken (10000
Japanese)"
http://youtu.be/X6s6YKlTpfw
GOVERNMENT SHILL #2 (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1013 HOURS ON 8 DECEMBER
2018: "THERE IS NO TRUTH TO THE SOYLENT GREEN RUMOUR THAT IN ORDER TO
COMPLY WITH HALAL CERTIFICATION WASABI IS BEING MARKETED AS KHASHOGGI:
Who the hell are you replying to?
Please learn to Usenet."
DOLF @ 0408 HOURS ON 12 DECEMBER 2018: "YOU ARE NOT AN #343 -
*UBERMENSCH* ...
But understand this our FINAL SOLUTION that as a narcissistic imbecile
with an infatuation of self-bestowed dignity which is ignorance as #231
- JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL.
It is little wonder that the Dutch capitulated to the Nazi’s within 5
days but at least the French #22 - *RESISTANCE* will be sufficient to
withstand the hysteria of the SOYLENT GREEN ANARCHIST RIOTING.
We are here to render assistance but that you should to get use to the
idea your ego ought NOT to impose itself by any means whatsoever upon my
SELF-IDENTITY AS FORMULA AS AUTONOMY.
— APPLE RELISH —
"GUILTY AS SIN,
NOT REALLY NICE.
OVERTAKE TIME.
TRUTH'S DEVICE.
HEAR IT RHYME
OUR NANO IS IN."
Otherwise I will give you a lesson which will leave you pickled and it
won't be relish.
Het lijkt erop dat u onderworpen bent aan een gemeenschappelijke stroom
semantiek als het lexicon van opportunisme:
Verzet is zinloos - you will be assimilated!
YOUTUBE: "The Borg Assimilation"
THE ÜBERMENSCH (GERMAN FOR "BEYOND-MAN", "SUPERMAN", "OVERMAN",
"SUPERHUMAN", "HYPERMAN", "HYPERHUMAN"); IS A CONCEPT IN THE PHILOSOPHY
OF FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE. IN HIS 1883 BOOK THUS SPOKE ZARATHUSTRA (GERMAN:
ALSO SPRACH ZARATHUSTRA), NIETZSCHE HAS HIS CHARACTER ZARATHUSTRA POSIT
THE ÜBERMENSCH AS A GOAL {
#343 - TELOS / *AUTONOMOUS* *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *COHESION*: @65 -
ANTHROPOCENTRIC PROTOTYPE AND HUMAN RELATIONS: H54 - MARRYING MAIDEN: #3
+ #6 = #9 as SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM VIRILE *AGAINST* *BOTH* *THE*
*PRINCIPLE* *OF* *JUXTAPOSITION*: @1 - SOVEREIGNTY: SECTION VIII TO
QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900: #27 + #54 = #81 AND
PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY @5 - SUCCESSIVE PRINCIPLE: SECTION IX TO QUEEN
VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900: #9 + #18 = #27 IN REGARD TO
THE SUCCESSION OF SOVEREIGNTY
} FOR HUMANITY TO SET FOR ITSELF. IT IS A WORK OF PHILOSOPHICAL ALLEGORY {
#288 - META SCHEMA ACQUIESCENCE: @1 - @728 - PASSOVER, @5 - PENTECOST,
@65, #175 THEURGIC SYNCRETISM OF NEOPLATONISM COMMONLY USED BY
PYTHAGOREAN NUMBER DERIVED GOVERNANCE (ROMAN CATHOLICISM / ISLAM etc)
THAT IS UNLAWFULLY DEPLOYING MY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AS #391 -
HOMOGENEOUS PARADIGM BY #288 - UMBRA RAW MAPPING TO THEIR ANKH HETEROS /
TORAH PROTOTYPES
}, WITH A STRUCTURAL SIMILARITY TO THE GATHAS OF ZOROASTER/ZARATHUSTRA:
According to Kant, the starting point, a reflection on our moral
concepts {#41 x n}, leads immediately to the first intermediate thesis,
that (1) a moral law “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 - *ONTIC*] NECESSITY
WITH IT” (GMS, 389,13). If this necessity is very narrowly interpreted,
that is, in the sense of the previously worked out modal status {
@1 - Nature Contains Nature [#328 - TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPE] {
HOMOIOS
HETEROS
KABBALAH
AS DEFINED
} ...
@5 - Act of Nature [#369 - REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE INHIBITOR WITH #164 -
CHRONOLOGICAL PLANE MAPPING] ...
#15 (@6 - Form of Nature: #260 - Transforming Nature [#41 - REMEMBER THE
SABBATH]) ...
45: [1 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG]
68: [42 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN]
#34 (@7 - Engendering Nature: #175 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE [#82 -
HONOUR YOUR PARENTS]) ...
84: [2 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE]
86: [10 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD]
102: [4 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS]
104: [7 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD]
115: [5 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN]
#65 (@2 - NATURE REJOICES IN ITS NATURE: #65 - NATURE REJOICES IN ITS
NATURE [#123 - DO NOT KILL]) ...
130: [3 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED]
139: [13 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED ANIMALS]
140: [14 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY, 16 - I AM NOT AN EAVES-DROPPER]
146: [15 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER]
148: [12 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR]
150: [28 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER]
156: [21 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS]
157: [17 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE, 41 - I HAVE NO STRONG
DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY]
158: [23 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH]
161: [9 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES]
#111 (@3 - Nature Surmounts Nature: #34 - Engendering Nature [#164 -
AVOID HETERONOMY AGAINST AUTONOMY]) ...
166: [11 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH]
168: [26 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY]
169: [18 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS]
171: [20 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE]
173: [27 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST]
175: [22 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR]
177: [29 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING]
180: [19 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE]
181: [24 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS, 35
- I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING]
182: [6 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN]
184: [36 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS FLOW]
185: [25 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR]
186: [31 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND]
191: [32 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS]
192: [39 - I AM NOT SWOLLEN WITH PRIDE]
196: [37 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE]
197: [33 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH]
200: [8 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY]
#175 (@4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE: #369 - Autonomous Nature [#205
- DO NOT STEAL]) ...
210: [30 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND]
215: [34 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER OF MISCHIEF]
220: [38 - I CURSE NOT A GOD]
228: [40 - I HAVE NO UNJUST PREFERENCES]
#260 (@8 - Transforming Nature: #111 - Nature Surmounts Nature [#246 -
BEAR NO FALSE WITNESS]) ...
#369 (@9 - Autonomous Nature: #15 - Form of Nature [#287 - COVET NOT])
} of an ethical principle, then two peculiarities of the total
argumentation will become more understandable as prescriptive of its
trinomial basis to nomenclature.
Jean Piaget (9 August 1896 – 16 September 1980) as Swiss Philosopher
being the originator of a seminal Cognitive Development Theory And
Epistemological View, wrote that within logic, juxtaposition {ie.
WE HOLD THE INFORMAL RESEARCH VIEW:
#41 - TO BE OR #81 - NOT TO BE THAT IS THE #364 - QUESTION AS #231 -
JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL MADE OF IGNORANCE AND IT’S ENDLESS #312 -
CONTRADICTION AGAINST THE #123 - SENSIBILITY OF #273 - REASON ITSELF
AS THEN THE PROVISIONAL PROPOSITION WHICH WE HAVE MADE OF
SELF-JUSTIFICATION:
#277 - *RIGHT* *TO* *PLACE* *A* *TEST* / #123 - *JUDGEMENT*
*SENSIBILITY* AS IT'S CONVEYANCE BY THE #400 - *RATIONALITY* *OF*
*SPEECH* BEING IMPLICITLY COMPLIANT WITH A #205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF*
*PERSISTENCE* *SUBSTANCE* EFFECTING MODERATION ENABLING THE TRAVERSAL OF
THE SELF-EGO WITHIN TEMPORAL CONTINUUM AND BY WHICH THE #164 - *REVERSE*
*TRANSCRIPTASE* *INHIBITOR* *PROCESS* AS ITS ONTOLOGICAL DYNAMIC
*PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY* IS THEN KEPT WITHIN REASONABLE BOUNDS AS
CIRCULARITY OF 22 ELEMENTS (RATIONAL PI) CONSTITUTED BY THE #41 - ONTIC
PROPOSITION.
} is a logical fallacy on the part of the observer, where two items
placed next to each other imply a correlation, when none is actually
claimed. He disagreed with the idea that intelligence was a fixed trait,
and regarded cognitive development as a process which occurs due to
biological maturation and interaction with the environment.
In the elaboration of the logical model of intellectual development,
Piaget argued that intelligence develops in a series of stages that are
related to age and are progressive because one stage must be
accomplished before the next can occur. For each stage of development
the child forms a view of reality for that age period. At the next
stage, the child must keep up with earlier level of mental abilities to
reconstruct concepts. Piaget conceived intellectual development as an
upward expanding spiral in which children must constantly reconstruct
the ideas formed at earlier levels with new, higher order concepts
acquired at the next level.
GIVE ME A CHILD TILL HIS SEVENTH YEAR AND I WILL SHOW YOU THE MAN IS A
MAXIM OF THE CHURCH.
The action of *CASTRATO* which was practiced by ROMAN EMPEROR NERO {#666
as *PONTIFEX* *MAXIMUS*} (he replaced his wife with one) was only
outlawed within the 20th century and after the establishment of the
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA by QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT dated 29
OCTOBER 1900 as conveying the FIRST PRINCIPLE @492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL
{@369 / @123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY (#3 x #3 - CENTRE INTERLOCK)} which
is in concordance with women's suffrage ...
...such MALAKOS against the SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM VIRILE RIGHT AS PRO
DOMO entitlement of the person of another epitomises the depravity of
the Roman Catholic Church...
But wait a minute Pope Benedict XVI was in the #231 - Hitler youth {ie.
Adolf Hitler said in Table Talk Ideas @1 and @5 that fascism was a
return to the traditions of ancient Rome: @1 - RETAINED, @5 - CENTRE OF
VALUE {#111 / #666 - *SUNDAY* *SACREDNESS*}, #65 - soldier, #175 - marriage}
And why is he besides self justification otherwise so incapable of
answers as the breaching of our Constitutional entitlement by his
erroneous religious beliefs?
I’M SURPRISED THAT THE FORMER POPE IS OF SUFFICIENTLY SOUND MIND TO
WRITE A COHERENT SENTENCE LET ALONE CONVEY ANY AFFECTIONS FOR TRUTH.
It was primarily the “Third Piaget” (the logical model of intellectual
development) that was debated by *AMERICAN* *PSYCHOLOGISTS* when
Piaget’s ideas were “rediscovered” in the 1960s. In the 1950s, Clare
Graves extended Piaget’s psychology through adulthood. Don Beck and
Christopher Cowan developed Graves’s model further in Spiral Dynamics.
Graves argued that humans evolve new psychological stages in response to
changing life conditions. When a society contains a critical number of
people at a given stage, the society itself transforms, creating the
social conditions for yet another stage of psychological
development. [<https://fee.org/articles/spiral-dynamics-an-overview/>]
Christopher Cowan is now deceased, however if I were to correspond with
him [which I did @ 1230 hours on 27 August, 2016 in memory of him and
his accomplishments], I would then convey the following: "I've done some
considerable informal research in advancing the 4-Quadrant, 8-Tier
paradigm proposed by yourself and Don Beck within your book published in
1996 and titled, "Spiral Dynamics: Mastering Values, Leadership, and
Change". He had surmised of my own informal research efforts, "THOSE WHO
HAVE NOT RECENTLY VISITED DOLF BOEK'S WORK WILL FIND MUCH NEW AT
HTTP://.../TELOS. GIVEN THE SITUATION IN ISRAEL/PALESTINE AND ALL OF THE
RELIGIOUS UNDERCURRENTS IN TODAY'S WORLD, DOLF'S PERSPECTIVE OFFERS YET
ANOTHER WAY TO VIEW THE FORCES INFLUENCING HUMAN NATURE."
I was once asked by him, what I considered of Pythagoras's use of #36
and it has taken me many years of careful consideration and I feel that
I have now got an acceptable explanation: "In the process of
invalidating the original Letters Patent to the Australian Constitution
of 1901 and conveying it's dependency (ie. arch kai telos oida {1 + 2 +
3 + 4 = 10}) upon the Pythagorean Tetrad/Decad/Tetractys as the fount of
SOULS which is purveyed by the binary HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER, which I
have shown it to be a CANON OF TRANSPOSITION that is intellectually
dependent upon a superior conception of a ternary HOMOIOS THEORY OF
NUMBER."
In my view, it is concerned with the essential encapsulating knowledge
as the driver conveyed within the Pythagorean marriage (ie. being
expressed as the Harmony because it hath the power to in-generate a
vital habit as hymenealism) metathesis which has bought about it's
deployment as TETRAD OF MAGIC SQUARES {#15 ... #34 ... #65 ... #111} and
that which formed the foundational basis of Roman Imperial Governance
made in association with the adoption of the Julian Calendar and which
was made against the individual Human Characteristic of an Autonomy of
Will (eg: the 'forma corporis' as the issue conveyed by the embodiment,
judicial trial and crucifixion of the historical person of Jesus {He is
saved/A saviour; a deliverer} of Nazareth {Sovereign; one chosen or set
apart; separated; crowned; sanctified}).
Spiral Dynamics describes awareness development both at a personal and a
collective level, such as organisations. It is based on the works of
American Professor Emeritus of Psychology Clare W. Graves. Spiral
Dynamics describes eight levels, expressed in value systems each with
their own colours. These levels climb from simple structure to
increasing complexity. Spiral Dynamics is a registered trademark and is
mainly used in change management. It is used by advisory agencies for
personal development and organisational development. Spiral Dynamics
focuses on the development of these values.
MEMES AND GENES: Spiral Dynamics makes use of the terms from ‘memetics’;
the study of the evolution of culture and ideas. A meme is an idea that
spreads itself through information carriers, such as the human brain. It
is also described as a contagious information pattern.
Everyone is familiar with genes; the biological code carriers in human
DNA. Biologist Richard Dawkins first introduced the term ‘memes’ in his
book The Selfish Gene(1976). Genes underlie physical changes; they
multiply themselves and move from cell to cell. Memes are similar, they
move from brain to brain. They are thought systems that spread
themselves about society. Like viruses, they jump from mind to mind.
Like genes, they form the human personality. As such, memes affect
organisations and causes common thoughts. They may cause social
conflicts, but they also provide solutions. They are the driving force
behind new developments.
VALUES: In addition, according to Clare W. Graves, specific memes
represent the attractive and repulsive forces behind the development of
values. These are called value memes and within Spiral Dynamics they are
used to identify value systems. This determines how people think about
certain things and why they believe in something. It is not about what
they think. The value memes reveal the deeper value systems, on which
people judge and evaluate observations.
VALUE SYSTEMS: The value systems in Spiral Dynamics are colour coded.
The first system is the simplest and from there it gets increasingly
complex. Each value system has its own characteristic expression.
LEVEL 1 – SURVIVAL (BEIGE / BRONZE): This is the first and also the
lowest level of consciousness. It is the level of the group aimed at
survival. It focuses on the necessary biological survival needs. There
are no individuals, people organise themselves according to herd
behaviour. The strongest members are compassionate towards the weaker,
protecting them and making the decisions. The rest follows. In
situations of extreme stress or life threatening circumstances people
can regress to this level.
Characteristics: people in this level hardly communicate. Everything
that is communicated, focuses on survival (the primary necessities of life).
LEVEL 2 – SECURITY (PURPLE): This is the level of the tribe: the close
social unity in which people feel secure and, if necessary, will
sacrifice themselves for the benefit of the group. This is the security
that people seek and which is found in religion, for example. This level
creates a social unit.
Characteristics: Communication takes place verbally from the high level
to the lower level and vice versa. The leader speaks the truth and
opposition is not tolerated.
LEVEL 3 – ENERGY & POWER (RED): This is the level of divide and conquer
in which the hierarchical power structure is central. People are part of
a system and are directed by the highest power-holder. All social
relationships are power-oriented and occasionally a new order in
hierarchy takes place.
Characteristics: Communication is purely top-down. There is continuous
supervision of higher levels at lower levels. Orders are only effective
if there are sanctions. Logic and persuasion are therefore not addressed.
LEVEL 4 – ORDER (BLUE): This is the level of the conventional society,
which establishes what is right and wrong. Established conventions and
traditions are honoured and rules, procedures and structures are
strictly adhered to. At this level, the concept of deferred reward
occurs for the first time: if you do your best, you will be rewarded later.
Characteristics: Communication takes place from high to low and
horizontally. The control freak needs to know what needs to be done.
Consistent communication is very important. Intuition or feelings are
unimportant
LEVEL 5 – SUCCESS (ORANGE): This is the ideal of the individualistic
capitalist society. The truth lies in logical reasoning and (empirical)
research, after which the correct conclusion is left. People perceive
themselves as individuals. In this level, everything revolves around
success. Power equals prestige and position within the structure, which
is acquired by successful operation.
Characteristics: Communication in this level takes place from high to
low, low to high and horizontally. People are interested in each other
and want to know whether it will positively impact their career.
Communication is often focused on negotiation.
LEVEL 6 – COMMUNITY (GREEN): Green is the level of humanity and the
social network, in which man is interested in inner peace and peace with
others. In this level, people attach great importance to their social
environment and little to their own status. People make decisions as a
group, but each individual must be able to develop fully.
Characteristics: there is a lot of communication in all directions,
where the emphasis is on reaching a consensus. There is also sensitivity
to emotions and the needs of others.
LEVEL 7 – SYNERGY (YELLOW): AT this level, it is about system thinking;
realising that everything is interconnected. Tolerance is the key word
in this. People work together in a system in which they make their own
decisions. This makes it possible to work on a project basis.
Characteristics: Communication takes place as needed, and it is
important that information gets to the right place and is easily
accessible. Think about management information systems.
LEVEL 8 – HOLISTIC LIFE SUPPORT (TURQUOISE / CYAN): This is the highest
level. It is a holistic living system in which the world is seen as an
interactive, interconnected system. At this level, energy is focused on
sacrifice. Trust is put, not so much in a higher power, but in people.
People are organising themselves in order to cherish and renew the world
from macro level.
Characteristics: Communication is important in all layers; consensus and
competence are merged for the benefit of the public good.
[<https://www.toolshero.com/change-management/spiral-dynamics/>]
Here also is an attempt at integration of this centrist Sabbath values
based and ethereal belief within the framework of the 4 Quadrant-8 Tier
paradigm as model proposed in 1996 by Christopher Cowan and Don Beck as
authors of the book titled, 'Spiral Dynamics: Mastering Values,
Leadership, and Change', within an article titled: 'When We Disagree:
How Cultural Values Shape Our Conversation' dated 27 April, 2000 by
Caleb Rosado, Ph.D, as then principal lecturer in sociology and head of
the department of behavioral sciences at Newbold College in Binfield,
England.
THE QUESTION IS WHETHER THIS PRESENT ROMAN CATHOLIC LEGAL DILEMMA AS
IMPASSE IS A STUBBORN CRITERIA OF DETERMINISM OR A STAGE OF CULTURAL
DEVELOPMENT?
What we call 'culture' is actually a series of core beliefs or value
systems, with each level expressing a different understanding of the
world or the church. A “belief” or “value system” is a worldview, a set
of perspectives/priorities/paradigms, a mind-set, an organizing
framework for deep-level decision-making at the bottom line—which is why
you can’t compromise about it. Your value system is the threshold at
which you won’t negotiate.
Each level of cultural and human development represents a value system,
or to use a term coined by Richard Dawkins, a meme. Just as genes carry
the informational codes for our biological DNA, these value systems
supply the codes (or memes, rhymes with “themes”) that determine our
“cultural DNA.” Memes are ideas, beliefs, values, common ways of looking
at the world that, like contagious viruses, spread from brain to brain
through word of mouth, through media, through interaction between
people. The third angel’s message is a meme. Net ’98 was a global
memetic event infecting the world with the divine virus of the gospel.
There are more than 6 billion people in the world today, and though we
all come from some 100,000 genes—all of us—we share only a few basic
value systems or memes. Researchers studying this topic have identified
only eight thus far.
But we propose nine given that the #81 - PRINCIPLE OF JUXTAPOSITION AS
SOVEREIGNTY then gives rise to #492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL and IPSO FACTO
A TRINOMIAL RATHER THAN A BINOMIAL CONCEPTION OF NUMBER:
+ 0, 27 {IDEA: @311 *** SERIOUS BREACH OF THE SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY
DYNAMIC GIVEN THE INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN DYNAMIC OF 3 APRIL
33 AD}, 54 {IDEA: @348} {ie. REALM OF ITS NATURE AS HEAVEN - *FORMULA*
*FOR* *UNIVERSAL* *LAW*}
+ 0, 9 {IDEA: @282}, 18 {IDEA: @298} {ie. SYSTEM’S COSMOLOGY AS EARTH
- *FORMULA* *OF* *HUMANITY*}
+ 0, 3 {IDEA: @270}, 6 {IDEA: @280} {ie. SELF IDENTITY - *FORMULA*
*OF* *AUTONOMY* *AS* *SUI* *JURIS* / *MEMBRUM* *VIRILE*}
+ 1 {IDEA: @265, @266}, 2 {IDEA: @267, @268, @269, @272, @273 ***
*FORMULA* *FOR* *PRESERVING* *EUROPEAN* *AUTONOMY* ***, @274 - PERFUME},
3 {IDEA: @265 - PREAMBLE} {ie. *FORMULA* *OF* *PROGRESSION* OF
INDIVIDUAL PHENOMENA: *CONJECTURAL* *ONLY*}
@1 {#1} + @2 {#41} + @3 {#81} + @4 {#369} = #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL
{LIBERTÉ: 17 SEPTEMBER 1900 AS ADVICE OF THE PRIVY COUNCIL} IN THE
EXERCISE OF THE INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS: #205 - *PRINCIPLE*
*OF* *THE* *PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE* ☯️ / ✡️ #164 - *PRINCIPLE*
*OF* *MATERIALITY*]. For simplification of understanding, we can
colour-code them (Figure A).

<
Loading Image...
>
[IMAGE: These [nine rather than] eight memes or value systems are the
cultural magnets around which our “stuff” clusters and our lives are
aligned]
When something isn’t right at the surface level—where we interact with
others or with God—or when our priorities are distorted or our lives are
out of balance, we need to remember that we too are shaped by these deep
emotional, social, and spiritual messages we have received. For these
influence how people think and how they respond to the world around
them. These memes equal the whole set of the cultural and spiritual
forces that shape our thinking they tell us from a human perspective
what is right, wrong, and appropriate (Figure B).
Notice how the Focus column alternates between me-oriented
express-the-self (warm colours) and we-oriented sacrifice-the-self (cool
colours). Note also the differences people value the most in each system
as they flow from survival (Bronze), to safety and security (Purple), to
raw power and instant gratification (Red), to purpose in life (Blue), to
strategies for success (Orange), to community awareness (Green), to
alternative forms (Yellow), to global village (Cyan), to autonomy as its
natural form (Coral). The levels are open-ended; there isn’t a final
stage of development in this chart or any other useful one, for the
ideal that God sets before us is “higher than the highest human thought
can reach.” [Courtesy: Caleb Rosado, Ph.D, When We Disagree: Spiral
Dynamics on How Cultural Values Shape Our Conversation, Adventist
Review: 27th April 2000]
AUTONOMOUS NATURE {FORM OF NATURE}@[
C, {@1: Sup: 3 (#3); Ego: 3 (#3)},
O, {@2: Sup: 63 (#66); Ego: 60 (#63)},
R, {@3: Sup: 72 (#138: KANT'S METEMPIRICAL PREMISE - *PURE*
*CONCEPTS* *OF* *THE* *UNDERSTANDING*, IN COMPARISON WITH EMPIRICAL
INTUITIONS (INDEED, SENSORY INTUITIONS IN GENERAL), ARE COMPLETELY
HETEROGENEOUS: [AS #205 - MALE / #164 - FEME WITHIN THE #391 -
HOMOGENEOUS NOUMENON]); Ego: 9 (#72)},
A, {@4: Sup: 73 (#211); Ego: 1 (#73)},
L] {@5: Sup: 22 (#233: SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA: B233 -
PRINCIPLE OF TIME-SUCCESSION ACCORDING TO THE LAW OF CAUSALITY); Ego: 30
(#103: SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA: B103 - ON THE PURE CONCEPTS OF THE
UNDERSTANDING, OR CATEGORIES)}
EXCERPT FROM KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) THIRD SECTION: ON THE PURE
CONCEPTS OF THE UNDERSTANDING, OR CATEGORIES AS IDEA @B103: "[IDEA: @A76
/ @B102] General logic (as has already been said several times)
abstracts from all content of cognition, and awaits representations to
be given to it from somewhere else, wherever it may be, so that,
proceeding analytically, it can first transform these representations
into concepts. By contrast, transcendental logic has a manifold of
sensibility lying before it a priori, which transcendental aesthetic
offers to it in order to provide material [IDEA: @A77] for the pure
concepts of the understanding, without which they would be without any
content, hence completely empty. Now space and time contain a manifold
of pure a priori intuition, but they nonetheless belong to the
conditions of receptivity of our mind under which alone representations
of objects can be received, and which must therefore ever affect the
concept of objects. But the spontaneity of our thought demands that the
manifold first be gone through, taken up, and conjoined in a specific
manner, in order to make a cognition out of it. I call this act synthesis.
By synthesis in its most general signification, however, I understand
[IDEA: @B103] the act of adding diverse representations to one another,
and of comprehending their manifoldness in a cognition. Such a synthesis
is pure if the manifold is given, not empirically, but a priori (as is
the manifold in space and time). This synthesis must be given before all
analysis of our representations, and no concepts can, as regards
content, arise through analysis. But the synthesis of a manifold
(whether it be given empirically or a priori) first produces a
cognition, which can indeed still be raw and confused to begin with and
therefore requiring analysis; but synthesis is nonetheless that which
actually assembles the elements for cognitions and unifies them into a
specific content; it is therefore the first [IDEA: @A78] thing to which
we must attend if we want to judge the first origin of our cognition.
Synthesis in general, as we will later see, is an effect of the
imagination alone, a blind but indispensable function of the soul
without which we would have no cognition at all, but of which we are
hardly ever conscious. But, to bring this synthesis to concepts is a
function that pertains to the understanding, and through which it for
the first time furnishes us with cognition in the strict sense.
The pure synthesis, considered generally, yields the pure concept of the
[IDEA: @B104] understanding. Under this synthesis I include that which
rests on a basis of synthetic a priori unity: thus, our counting (as is
especially noticeable with larger numbers) is a synthesis according to
concepts, since this synthesis occurs in accordance with a common basis
of unity (e.g., *THE* *DECADE*). Under this concept the unity in the
synthesis of the manifold is, then, rendered necessary.


<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>
[IMAGE: INVALIDATING THE ORTHODOX AND ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH'S CLAIM TO
JUBILEE2000 AS BEING DELUSIONAL AND FRAUDULENT
This report dated 16th MAY 2000 was prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit
'GOOD DESIGN AND THE CONCEPTION/NOTION OF PARKING AGREEMENT IN A PRIVATE
#371 - SAINT ANDREWS STREET WITHIN AN AREA TO WHICH APPLIES A HISTORIC
OVERLAY']
Various representations are brought under a concept analytically (a
matter treated in general logic). But to bring, not the representations,
but the pure synthesis of representations to concepts, is taught by
transcendental logic. The first thing that must be given a priori for
the sake [IDEA: @A79] of the cognition of all objects is the manifold of
pure intuition; the second is the synthesis of this manifold through
imagination, though it still does not yield cognition. The concepts that
give unity to this pure synthesis, and that consist solely in the
representation of this necessary synthetic unity, make the third
requisite for the cognition of an occurrent object, and they rest on the
understanding." [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, KANT'S
PROLEGOMENA TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS, SECOND ANALOGY of ANALYTIC OF
PRINCIPLES, pp 164-166]
EXCERPT FROM KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) ON THE SYSTEM OF PRINCIPLES OF
THE PURE UNDERSTANDING / PRINCIPLE OF TIME-SUCCESSION ACCORDING TO THE
LAW OF CAUSALITY AS IDEA @B233: "ALL ALTERATIONS TAKE PLACE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW OF THE CONNECTION OF CAUSE AND EFFECT.
PROOF: I perceive that appearances succeed one another, that is, that
[IDEA: @B233] one state of a thing exists at one time, the opposite of
which existed in the previous state. I am therefore actually connecting
two perceptions in time. *NOW* *CONNECTION* *IS* *NO* *ACT* *OF* *MERE*
*SENSE* *AND* *INTUITION*, *BUT* *IS* *HERE* *THE* *PRODUCT* *OF* *A*
*SYNTHETIC* *FACULTY* *OF* *THE* *IMAGINATION* *THAT* *DETERMINES* *THE*
*INNER* *SENSE* *WITH* *RESPECT* *TO* *RELATION* *IN* *TIME* {ie. as
metempirics relating to matters beyond the range of empirical knowledge,
metaphysical; (occasionally) affirming the validity of concepts or
beliefs not based on experience which occurs within time}. The
imagination can however conjoin the aforementioned two states in two
different ways, so that either one or the other would precede in time;
for time cannot be perceived in itself and what precedes and what
follows in objects determined, as it were empirically, in relation to
it. I am therefore conscious only that my imagination places one state
before, the other after, not that in the object [IDEA: @B234] one
precedes the other; or, in other words, the objective relation of the
appearances that succeed one another remains undetermined through mere
perception. In order then for this relation to be cognized as
determined, the relation between the two states must be so thought that
it is thereby determined with necessity which of them must be placed
before, which after, and not the reverse. However, the concept that
carries with it a necessity of synthetic unity can only be a pure
concept of the understanding, which does not lie in perception – and
here it is the concept of the relation of cause and effect, in which the
former determines the latter in time as consequence, and not merely as
something that could precede it in the imagination (or not be perceived
at all). It is, then, only because we subject the succession of
appearances, hence all alterations, to the law of causality that
experience itself – i.e., empirical cognition of the appearances – is
possible; hence the appearances themselves as objects of experience are
possible only in accordance with this very law.
The apprehension of the manifold of appearances is always successive.
[IDEA: @A189] The representations of the parts succeed one another.
Whether they also succeed one another in the object is a further point
for reflection, which is not included in the first point. Now one can in
fact call everything, and even every representation insofar as one is
conscious of it, an object; but it is a matter for deeper investigation
what this word is to signify regarding [IDEA: @B235] appearances, not
insofar as they (as representations) [IDEA: @A190] are objects, but only
in so far as they designate an object. In as much as they, merely as
representations, are at the same time objects of consciousness, they are
not at all to be distinguished from apprehension, i.e., reception into
the synthesis of the imagination, and one must then say: that the
manifold of appearances is always generated successively in the mind.
Were appearances things in themselves, then no human being would be able
to conclude from the succession of representations how the manifold of
those appearances might be conjoined in the object. For in the end we
have to do only with our own representations; how things in themselves
may be (without regard to representations through which they affect us)
is completely beyond our sphere of cognition. Now although the
appearances are not things in themselves, and nevertheless are the only
thing that can be given to us for cognition, I still have to show what
in the appearances themselves may suit the manifold for a conjoining in
time, notwithstanding that its representation in apprehension is always
successive. Thus, for example, the apprehension of the manifold in the
appearances of a #311 - *HOUSE* that stands before me is successive. Now
the question is: whether the manifold of this #311 - *HOUSE* itself also
is successive in itself, which of course no one will grant. However, as
soon as I raise my concept of an object up to transcendental
significance, the #311 - *HOUSE* is now indeed no thing in itself, but
[IDEA: @A236] only an appearance, i.e., a representation, whose
transcendental object is [IDEA: @A191] unknown; what, then, shall I
understand by the question: how might the manifold be conjoined in the
appearance itself (which is still nothing in itself )? That which lies
in the successive apprehension is here viewed as representation, while
the appearance that is given to me, notwithstanding that it is nothing
more than a sum of such representations, is viewed as their object –
with which my concept, which I extract from the representations of
apprehension, has to agree. Since truth is the agreement of cognition
with object, it can easily be seen that here one can ask only about the
formal conditions of empirical truth, and that appearance, in
counter-relation with the representations of apprehension, can only be
represented as their object that is distinct from them if it falls under
a rule that distinguishes it from every other apprehension and makes one
way of conjoining the manifold necessary. That in the appearance which
contains the condition of this necessary rule of apprehension is the object.
Let us now proceed to our problem. That something happens – i.e., that
something, or some state, comes to be that wasn’t there before – [IDEA:
@B237] cannot be perceived empirically unless preceded by an appearance
that [IDEA: @A192] does not contain this state in itself; for a reality
following upon an empty time, hence, a coming to be that no state of
things precedes, can be apprehended just as little as empty time itself.
Every apprehension of an event is therefore a perception that follows
upon another perception. Since this is, though, the case with every
synthesis of apprehension, as I have shown above in the appearance of a
#311 - *HOUSE*, it does not in this way yet distinguish itself from the
others. But I also note: that if, in an appearance containing a
happening, I call the preceding state of perception A and the succeeding
one B, then B can only follow A in the apprehension, while the
perception a cannot follow but only precede B. I see for example a ship
drifting downstream. My perception of its location further down succeeds
the perception of its location further up the course of the river, and
it is impossible that in the apprehension of this appearance the ship
should first be perceived further downstream but afterwards further
upstream. Here, then, the order in the succession of perceptions in the
apprehension is determined, and the apprehension is bound by that order.
In the previous example of a #311 - *HOUSE*, in the apprehension my
perceptions could start at [IDEA: @B238] the top of the #311 - *HOUSE*
and end with the ground, or else start from below and end above, just as
they could apprehend the manifold of empirical intuition from the right
or the left. In the series of these perceptions there [IDEA: @A193] was,
then, no determined order making it necessary when in the apprehension I
had to begin in order to conjoin the manifold empirically. This rule is,
however, always to be met with in the perception of something that
happens, and it makes the order of the perceptions succeeding one
another (in the apprehension of this appearance) necessary.
In our case, therefore, I will have to derive the subjective sequence of
the apprehension from the objective sequence of the appearances, because
otherwise the former is completely undetermined and does not distinguish
any one appearance from the rest. By itself the former proves nothing
about the connection of the manifold in the object, because it is
completely arbitrary. This connection will therefore consist in the
order of the manifold of the appearance according to which the
apprehension of the one (what happens) follows upon that of the other
(which precedes) according to a rule. Only in this way can I gain the
right to say of the appearance itself, and not merely of my
apprehension: that in it a sequence is to be found – which is as much as
to say that I cannot institute the apprehension otherwise than exactly
in this sequence. [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, KANT'S
PROLEGOMENA TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS, SECOND ANALOGY of ANALYTIC OF
PRINCIPLES, pp 184-187]
OUGHT THEN TO BE UNLAWFUL CONDUCT BY A PUBLIC AUTHORITY ESTABLISHED AS
AN BINOMIAL STASIS BASIS TO STATUS AS EMANATION OF STATE {
@1 - RETENTION + @5 - CENTRE {ie. #33 / #77 AS #231 - JUXTAPOSITION
CONTROL} OF VALUE? + #65 - *DODECAHEDRON* / *SOLDIER* + #175 -
*ICOSAHEDRON* / *MARRIAGE* = #10 - TETRAKTYS
} as breaches made of Section 38(1) to (3) of the Charter of Human
Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006, which states: "(1)
Subject to this section, it is unlawful for a public authority to act in
a way that is incompatible with a human right or, in making a decision,
to fail to give proper consideration to a relevant human right.
(2) Subsection (1) does not apply if, as a result of a statutory
provision or a provision made by or under an Act of the Commonwealth or
otherwise under law, the public authority could not reasonably have
acted differently or made a different decision..
(3) This section does not apply to an act or decision of a private nature.
(4) Subsection (1) does not require a public authority to act in a way,
or make a decision, that has the effect of impeding or preventing a
religious body (including itself in the case of a public authority that
is a religious body) from acting in conformity with the religious
doctrines, beliefs or principles in accordance with which the religious
body operates.
(5) In this section religious body means—
(a) a body established for a religious purpose; or
(b) an entity that establishes, or directs, controls or administers, an
educational or other charitable entity that is intended to be, and is,
conducted in accordance with religious doctrines, beliefs or principles.
"BLOTTING OUT THE HANDWRITING OF ORDINANCES THAT WAS AGAINST US, WHICH
WAS CONTRARY TO US, AND TOOK IT OUT OF THE WAY, NAILING IT TO HIS CROSS;
AND HAVING SPOILED PRINCIPALITIES AND POWERS, HE MADE A SHOW OF THEM
OPENLY, TRIUMPHING OVER THEM IN IT. LET NO MAN THEREFORE JUDGE YOU IN
MEAT, OR IN DRINK, OR IN RESPECT OF AN HOLYDAY, OR OF THE NEW MOON, OR
OF THE SABBATH DAYS:
WHICH ARE A SHADOW OF THINGS TO COME; BUT THE BODY IS OF CHRIST.
LET NO MAN BEGUILE YOU OF YOUR REWARD IN A VOLUNTARY HUMILITY AND
WORSHIPPING OF ANGELS, INTRUDING INTO THOSE THINGS WHICH HE HATH NOT
SEEN, VAINLY PUFFED UP BY HIS FLESHLY MIND, AND NOT HOLDING THE HEAD,
FROM WHICH ALL THE BODY BY JOINTS AND BANDS HAVING NOURISHMENT
MINISTERED, AND KNIT TOGETHER, INCREASETH WITH THE INCREASE OF GOD.
WHEREFORE IF YE BE DEAD WITH CHRIST FROM THE RUDIMENTS OF THE WORLD,
WHY, AS THOUGH LIVING IN THE WORLD, ARE YE SUBJECT TO ORDINANCES, (TOUCH
NOT; TASTE NOT; HANDLE NOT; WHICH ALL ARE TO PERISH WITH THE USING;)
AFTER THE COMMANDMENTS AND DOCTRINES OF MEN? WHICH THINGS HAVE INDEED A
SHOW OF WISDOM IN WILL WORSHIP, AND HUMILITY, AND NEGLECTING OF THE
BODY; NOT IN ANY HONOUR TO THE SATISFYING OF THE FLESH." [Colossians
2:14-23 (KJV)]
Nous: #65
Time: 17:20 hrs
Date: 2019.12.13
Torah: [#30, #5, #8]@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 35 (#65); Ego: 5 (#35),
@3: Sup: 43 (#108); Ego: 8 (#43),
Male: #108; Feme: #43
} // #43
Dao: Unlearned Virtuosity as Simplicity
Tetra: #63 - Watch
I-Ching: H20 - Viewing, Contemplation (view), Looking up
Latin: Sublevator {God, the hope of all the children of the earth} Alt:
Mabhel {Emptiness of Things Before God} {
1. PROTECTS AGAINST LIGHTNING & INFERNAL SPIRITS OF RELIGIOUS CULTS
2. CREED
3. INFLUENCES & PROTECTS THOSE WHO SEEK THE TRUTH
4. Serucuth
}
Jehoshaphat {The Lord is judge}
Prototype: HOMOIOS {#432 / #431} / HETEROS {#454 / #361} / *TORAH* {#388
/ #409}
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:1,row:7,col:7&prototype:torah>
***@zen: 1, row: 7, col: 7, nous: 65 [Date: 2019.12.13, Time:
17:20 hrs, Super: #388 / #65 - Unlearned Virtuosity as Simplicity;
I-Ching: H20 - Viewing, Contemplation (view), Looking up; Tetra: 63 -
Watch, Ego: #409 / #65 - Unlearned Virtuosity as Simplicity; I-Ching:
H20 - Viewing, Contemplation (view), Looking up; Tetra: 63 - Watch]
H8199@{
@1: Sup: 57 (#57); Ego: 57 (#57),
@2: Sup: 56 (#113); Ego: 80 (#137),
@3: Sup: 65 (#178); Ego: 9 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
@4: Sup: 79 (#257); Ego: 14 (#160),
Male: #257; Feme: #160
} // #409
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #389 % #41 = #20 - Left without Language, Different From the
Vulgar; I-Ching: H33 - Withdrawal, Retiring, Retreat, Yielding; Tetra:
50 - Vastness/Wasting;
THOTH MEASURE: #20 - Oh Maa-antu-f, who makest thine appearance in
Pa-Amsu, I am not unchaste with any one.
#VIRTUE: With Advance (no. #20), many plans.
#TOOLS: With Accumulation (no. #60), much wealth.
#POSITION: With Decisiveness (no. #29), many decisions, but
#TIME: With Doubt (no. #62), some hesitation.
#CANON: #171
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_171@{
@1: Sup: 20 (#20); Ego: 20 (#20),
@2: Sup: 80 (#100); Ego: 60 (#80),
@3: Sup: 28 (#128); Ego: 29 (#109),
@4: Sup: 9 (#137); Ego: 62 (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE
{%20}),
Male: #137; Feme: #171
} // #171
#390 - *SOVEREIGN* as [#1, #300, #80, #9] / #409 as [#300, #80, #9,
#500] / #419 - *SLAUGHTER* as [#30, #300, #80, #9] / #451 - *RIGHT*,
*PRIVILEGE*, *DUE* (*LEGAL*: Y-M-T-A) as [#6, #300, #80, #9, #50, #6] /
#451 as [#300, #80, #9, #6, #50, #6] = shâphaṭ (H8199): {UMBRA: #20 as
#389 % #41 = #20} 1) to judge, govern, vindicate, punish; 1a) (Qal);
1a1) *TO* *ACT* *AS* *LAW*-*GIVER* *OR* *JUDGE* *OR* *GOVERNOR* (*OF*
*GOD*, *MAN*); i) *TO* *RULE*, *GOVERN*, *JUDGE*; 1a2) to decide
controversy (of God, man); 1a3) to execute judgment; i) discriminating
(of man); ii) vindicating; iii) condemning and punishing; iv) at
theophanic advent for final judgment; 1a4) (Niphal); i) to enter into
controversy, plead, have controversy together; ii) to be judged; 1a5)
(Poel) judge, opponent-at-law (participle);
G3623@{
@1: Sup: 70 (#70); Ego: 70 (#70),
@2: Sup: 80 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}); Ego: 10 (#80),
@3: Sup: 19 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS
{%18}); Ego: 20 (#100),
@4: Sup: 8 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}); Ego: 70 (#170),
@5: Sup: 58 (#235); Ego: 50 (#220 - I CURSE NOT A GOD {%38}),
@6: Sup: 47 (#282); Ego: 70 (#290),
@7: Sup: 6 (#288); Ego: 40 (#330),
@8: Sup: 76 (#364); Ego: 70 (#400),
@9: Sup: 45 (#409); Ego: 50 (#450),
Male: #409; Feme: #450
} // #450
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #600 % #41 = #26 - Ambiguous Reversals, Virtue of Gravity;
I-Ching: H3 - Birth Throes, Initial Difficulties, Sprouting, Difficulty
at the beginning, Gathering support, Hoarding; Tetra: 3 - Mired;
THOTH MEASURE: #26 - Oh Basit, who makest thine appearance at the
Shetait; I am not the cause of weeping to any.
#VIRTUE: If it is Endeavor (no. #26), then joy, but
#TOOLS: If it is Departure (no. #66), then sorrow.
#POSITION: As to Following (no. #19), it is dragged along.
#TIME: As to Guardedness (no. #57), it is secured.
#CANON: #168
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_168@{
@1: Sup: 26 (#26); Ego: 26 (#26),
@2: Sup: 11 (#37); Ego: 66 (#92),
@3: Sup: 30 (#67); Ego: 19 (#111),
@4: Sup: 6 (#73); Ego: 57 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO
ANY {%26}),
Male: #73; Feme: #168
} // #168
#450 as [#70, #10, #20, #70, #50, #70, #40, #70, #50] = oikonómos
(G3623): {UMBRA: #0 as #600 % #41 = #26} 1) the manager of household or
of household affairs; 1a) *ESP*. *A* *STEWARD*, *MANAGER*,
*SUPERINTENDENT* (*WHETHER* *FREE*-*BORN* *OR* *AS* *WAS* *USUALLY*
*THE* *CASE*, *A* *FREED*-*MAN* *OR* *A* *SLAVE*) *TO* *WHOM* *THE*
*HEAD* *OF* *THE* *HOUSE* *OR* *PROPRIETOR* *HAS* *INTRUSTED* *THE*
*MANAGEMENT* *OF* *HIS* *AFFAIRS*, the care of receipts and
expenditures, and the duty of dealing out the proper portion to every
servant and even to the children not yet of age; 1b) the manager of a
farm or landed estate, an overseer; 1c) the superintendent of the city's
finances, the treasurer of a city (or of treasurers or quaestors of
kings); 2) metaph. the apostles and other Christian teachers and bishops
and overseers;
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:7,row:7,col:7,nous:73&lexicon:G3623>
"AND THE LORD SAID, WHO THEN IS THAT FAITHFUL AND WISE STEWARD-G3623,
WHOM HIS LORD SHALL MAKE RULER OVER HIS HOUSEHOLD, TO GIVE THEM THEIR
PORTION OF MEAT IN DUE SEASON?" [Luke 12:42]
IMMANUEL KANT’S PROLEGOMENA (1783 AS APRIORITY TO FRENCH REVOLUTION
1789) AS IDEA @260: “Hammer and chisel {
#247 as [#6, #2, #2, #200, #7, #30] = barzel (H1270): {UMBRA: #10 as
#239 % #41 = #34} 1) iron; 1a) iron; 1a1) iron ore; 1a2) as material of
furniture, utensils, implements; 1b) tool of iron; 1c) harshness,
strength, oppression (fig.)
}are perfectly fine for working raw lumber, but for copperplate one must
use an etching needle. Likewise, sound common sense and speculative
understanding are both useful, but each in its own way; the one, when it
is a matter of judgments that find their immediate application in
experience, the other, however, when judgments are to be made in a
universal mode, out of mere concepts, as in metaphysics, where what
calls itself (but often *PER* *ANTIPHRASIN*) sound common sense has no
judgment whatsoever.” [pages 9-10]
#21 - *GUIDING* *THE* *PHYSICAL*, *EMPTYING* *THE* *HEART*; I-CHING: H31
- RECIPROCITY, CONJOINING, INFLUENCE (WOOING), FEELINGS; TETRA: 42 -
GOING TO MEET
#37 - NON-DEEMING ACTION, GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATION; I-CHING: H40 -
RELEASE, DELIVERANCE, TAKING-APART, UNTANGLED; TETRA: 21 - *RELEASE*
IMMANUEL KANT’S PROLEGOMENA (1783) SECTION #21 AS IDEA @303: "In order
therefore to explain the possibility of experience insofar as it rests
on pure a priori concepts of the understanding, we must first present
that which belongs to judgments in general, and the various moments of
the understanding therein, in a complete table; for the pure concepts of
the understanding – which are nothing more than concepts of intuitions
in general insofar as these intuitions are, with respect to one or
another of these moments, in themselves determined to judgments and
therefore determined necessarily and with universal validity – will come
out exactly parallel to them. By this means the a priori principles of
the possibility of all experience as objectively valid empirical
cognition will also be determined quite exactly. For they are nothing
other than propositions that subsume all perception (according to
certain universal conditions of intuition) under those pure concepts of
the understanding.
Experience consists of intuitions, which belong to sensibility, and of
judgments, which are solely the understanding’s business. Those
judgments that the understanding forms solely from sensory intuitions
are, however, still far from being judgments of experience. For in the
one case the judgment would only connect perceptions as they are given
in sensory intuition; but in the latter case the judgments are supposed
to say what experience in general contains, therefore not what mere
perception – whose validity is merely subjective – contains. The
judgment of experience must still therefore, beyond the sensory
intuition and its logical connection (in accordance with which the
intuition has been rendered universal through comparison in a judgment),
add something that determines the synthetic judgment as necessary, and
thereby as universally valid; and this can be nothing but that concept
which represents the intuition as in itself determined with respect to
one form of judgment rather than the others, i.e., a concept of that
synthetic unity of intuitions which can be represented only through a
given logical function of judgments." [pages 54-56]
IMMANUEL KANT’S PROLEGOMENA (1783) AS IDEA @377: "I find nothing else
worthy of note in the review of this book. Its author judges EN GROS
{ie. basically; (colloquial) in a nutshell, in summary, in short}
throughout, a mode that is cleverly chosen, since it does not betray
one’s own knowledge or ignorance; a single comprehensive judgment EN
DÉTAIL {ie. in detail}, if, as is proper, it had considered the main
question, would have perhaps exposed my error, perhaps also the degree
of the reviewer’s insight into investigations of this kind. It was no
ill-considered trick, for removing early on the desire to read the book
itself from readers who are used to forming a conception of books from
newspaper articles only, to recite one after another a great many
propositions, which, torn from the context of their arguments and
explications (especially as antipodean as these propositions are in
relation to all school metaphysics), must of necessity sound
nonsensical; to assault the reader’s patience to the point of disgust;
and then, after having introduced me to the witty proposition that
constant illusion is truth, to conclude with the harsh, though paternal,
reprimand: *TO* *WHAT* *END*, *THEN*, *THE* *CONFLICT* *WITH* *ACCEPTED*
*LANGUAGE*, *TO* *WHAT* *END*, *AND* *WHENCE*, *THE* *IDEALISTIC*
*DISTINCTION*? A judgment that ultimately renders everything peculiar to
my book into merely verbal innovation (though previously the book was
supposed to be metaphysically heretical), and that clearly proves that
my would-be judge has not correctly understood the least bit of it, and,
what’s more, has not correctly understood himself.
The reviewer, however, talks like *A* *MAN* *WHO* *MUST* *BE* *AWARE*
*OF* *IMPORTANT* *AND* *EXQUISITE* *INSIGHTS*, *WHICH*, *HOWEVER*, *HE*
*STILL* *KEEPS* *SECRET*; for nothing has become known to me of late
regarding metaphysics that could justify such a tone. But he is doing a
great wrong in withholding his discoveries from the world; for there are
doubtless many others like me who, with all the fine things that have
been written in this field for some time now, have still been unable to
find that the science has thereby been advanced a finger’s breadth. In
other respects, we do indeed find definitions being sharpened, lame
proofs provided with new crutches, the patchwork gar ment of metaphysics
given new pieces, or an altered cut – but that is not what the world
demands. The world is tired of metaphysical assertions; what’s wanted
are the possibility of this science, the sources from which certainty
could be derived in it, and sure criteria for distinguishing truth from
the dialectical illusion of pure reason. The reviewer must possess the
key to all this, otherwise he surely would never have spoken in so high
a tone." [pages 126-127]
IMMANUEL KANT’S PROLEGOMENA (1783) AS IDEA @381: "I am obliged to the
learned public for the silence with which it has honored my Critique for
so long a time; for this after all demonstrates a suspension of
judgment, and thus some suspicion that, in a work that abandons all the
usual paths and pursues a new one in which one cannot immediately find
one’s way, something might nonetheless perhaps be found through which an
important but now moribund branch of human knowledge could receive new
life and fertility, and so demonstrates a cautiousness, not to break off
and destroy the still fresh graft through an overly hasty judgment. A
specimen of a judgment that was delayed for such reasons has only just
now come before me in the Gothaische gelehrte Zeitung, a judgment whose
well-foundedness every reader will perceive for himself (without taking
into account my own suspect praise) from the clear and candid
presentation of a portion of the first principles of my work.
And now I propose, since a large edifice cannot possibly be instantly
judged as a whole through a quick once-over, that it be examined piece
by piece from its foundation, and that in this the present Prolegomena
be used as a general synopsis, with which the work itself could then be
compared on occasion. This suggestion, if it were based on nothing more
than the imagined importance that vanity customarily imparts to all
one’s own products, would be immodest and would deserve to be dismissed
with indignation. But the endeavors of all speculative philosophy now
stand at the point of total dissolution, although human reason clings to
them with undying affection, an affection that now seeks, though vainly,
to turn itself into indifference, only because it has been constantly
betrayed.
In our thinking age it is not to be expected but that many meritorious
men would use every good opportunity to work together toward the common
interest of an ever more enlightened reason, if only there appears some
hope of thereby attaining the goal. Mathematics, natural science, law,
the arts, even morals (and so on) do not completely fill up the soul;
there still remains a space in it that is marked off for mere pure and
speculative reason, and its emptiness drives us to seek out, in
grotesques and trivialities, or else in delusions, what seems to be
occupation and amusement, but is at bottom only distraction to drown out
the trouble- some call of reason, which, as befits its vocation, demands
something that satisfies it for itself, and does not merely stir it to
activity on behalf of other purposes or in the service of inclinations.
Therefore, for everyone who has even tried to enlarge his conception in
this way, contemplation that occupies itself only with this sphere of
reason existing for itself has a great attraction, because exactly in
this sphere all other areas of learning and even ends must, as I have
reason to suppose, join together and unite in a whole – and, I dare say,
it has a greater attraction than any other theoretical knowledge, for
which one would not readily exchange it.
But I propose these Prolegomena as the plan and guide for the
investigation, and not the work itself, because, with respect to the
latter, though I am even now quite satisfied as regards the content,
order, and method, and the care that was taken to weigh and test each
proposition accurately before setting it down (for it took years for me
to be fully satisfied not only with the whole, but sometimes also with
only a single proposition, as regards its sources), I am not fully
satisfied with my presentation in some chapters of the Doctrine of
Elements, e.g., the Deduction of the concepts of the understanding or
the chapter on the Paralogisms of pure reason, since in them a certain
prolixity obstructs the clarity, and in their stead the examination can
be based on what the Prolegomena here say with respect to these chapters.
The Germans are praised for being able to advance things further than
other peoples in matters where persistence and unremitting industry are
called for. If this opinion is well-founded, then an opportunity
presents itself here to bring to completion an endeavor whose happy
outcome is hardly to be doubted and in which all thinking persons share
equal interest, but which has not succeeded before now – and to confirm
that favorable opinion; especially since the science concerned is of
such a peculiar kind that it can be brought all at once to its full
completion, and into a permanent state such that it cannot be advanced
the least bit further and can be neither augmented nor altered by later
discovery (herein I do not include embellishment through enhanced
clarity here and there, or through added utility in all sorts of
respects): an advantage that no other science has or can have, since
none is concerned with a cognitive faculty that is so fully isolated
from, independent of, and unmingled with other faculties. The present
moment does not seem unfavorable to this expectation of mine, since in
Germany nowadays one hardly knows how he could keep himself otherwise
still occupied outside the so-called useful sciences and have it be, not
mere sport, but at the same time an endeavor through which an enduring
goal is reached.
I must leave it to others to contrive the means by which the efforts of
the learned could be united toward such an end. In the meantime it is
not my intention to expect of anyone a simple adherence to my theses,
nor even to flatter myself with hope of that; rather, whether it should,
as it happens, be attacks, revisions, and qualifications that bring it
about, or confirmation, completion, and extension, if only the matter is
investigated from the ground up, then it now can no longer fail that a
system would thereby come into being (even if it were not mine) that
could become a legacy to posterity for which it would have reason to be
thankful.
It would be too much to show here what sort of metaphysics could be
expected to follow if one were first right about the principles of a
critique, and how it would by no means have to appear paltry and cut
down to just a small figure because its false feathers had been plucked,
but could in other respects appear richly and respectably outfitted; but
other large benefits that such a reform would bring with it are apparent
at once. The ordinary metaphysics has indeed already produced benefits,
because it searched for the elementary concepts of the pure
understanding in order to render them clear through analysis and
determinate through explication. It was thereby a cultivation of reason,
wherever reason might subsequently think fit to direct itself. But that
was all the good that it did. For it undid this merit again by promoting
self-conceit through rash assertions, sophistry through subtle evasions
and glosses, and shallowness through the facility with which it overcame
the most difficult problems with a little school wisdom – a shallowness
that is all the more enticing the more it has the option of, on the one
hand, taking on something from the language of science, and, on the
other, from popularity, and thereby is everything to everyone, but in
fact is nothing at all. By contrast, through critique our judgment is
afforded a standard by which knowledge can be distinguished with
certainty from pseudo knowledge; and, as a result of being brought fully
into play in metaphysics, critique establishes a manner of thinking that
subsequently extends its wholesome influence to every other use of
reason, and for the first time excites the true philosophical spirit.
Moreover, the service it renders to theology, by making it independent
of the judgment of dogmatic speculation and in that way securing it
against all attacks from such opponents, is certainly not to be
underrated. For the ordinary metaphysics, although promising to assist
theology greatly, was subsequently unable to fulfill this promise, and
beyond this, in calling speculative dogmatism to its aid, had done
nothing other than to arm enemies against itself. FANATICISM, WHICH
CANNOT MAKE HEADWAY IN AN ENLIGHTENED AGE EXCEPT BY HIDING BEHIND A
SCHOOL METAPHYSICS, UNDER THE PROTECTION OF WHICH IT CAN VENTURE, AS IT
WERE, TO RAVE RATIONALLY, will be driven by critical philosophy from
this its final hiding place; and beyond all this it cannot fail to be
important to a teacher of metaphysics to be able, for once with
universal assent, to say that what he propounds is now at last science,
and that through it genuine benefit is rendered to the COMMONWEAL[TH]."
[pages 131-134]
— 👽👽👽👽👽👽👽 —
"THE WATCHERS WE ARE,
SO DO NOT DARE.
THOUGH IT BE FAR.
IT'S LIKE WE'RE THERE."
VOICE OF AMERICA (ASSOCIATED PRESS) @ 1226 HOURS ON 10 MAY 2019: "FRANCE
WELCOMES FACEBOOK'S ZUCKERBERG WITH THREAT OF NEW RULES:
France welcomed Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg on Friday with a threat of
sweeping new regulation.
With Facebook under fire on multiple fronts, Zuckerberg is in Paris to
show that his social media giant is working hard to limit violent
extremism and hate speech shared online.
But a group of French regulators and experts who spent weeks inside
Facebook facilities in Paris, Dublin and Barcelona say the company isn't
working hard enough.
Just before Zuckerberg met French President Emmanuel Macron in Paris,
the 10 officials released a report calling for laws allowing the
government to investigate and fine social networks that don't take
responsibility for the content that makes them money.
The French government wants the legislation to serve as a model for
Europe-wide management of social networks. Several countries have
introduced similar legislation, some tougher than what France is proposing.
The company says it is working on solutions, and the French regulators
praised Facebook for hiring more people and using artificial
intelligence to track and crack down on dangerous content.
But they said Facebook didn't provide the French officials enough
information about its algorithms to judge whether they were working, and
that a "lack of transparency ... justifies an intervention of public
authorities."
The regulators recommended legally requiring a "duty of care" for big
social networks, meaning they should moderate hate speech published on
their platforms. They insist that any law should respect freedom of
expression, but did not explain how Facebook should balance those
responsibilities in practice.
After meeting Macron, Zuckerberg said in a Facebook post that he
welcomed governments taking a more active role in drawing up regulations
for the internet. He made similar remarks earlier this year but has been
vague on what kind of regulation he favors.
Facebook faces "nuanced decisions" involving content that is harmful but
not illegal and the French recommendations, which set guidelines for
what's considered harmful, "would create a more consistent approach
across the tech industry and ensure companies are held accountable for
enforcing standards against this content," Zuckerberg said."
[<https://www.voanews.com/a/france-welcomes-facebook-s-zuckerberg-with-threat-of-new-rules/4912287.html>]
LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1647 HOURS
ON 10 MAY 2019: "Congratulations!
You just ran some gibberish through your nonsense-machine and it came
out as even more gibberish!
Well done!
Absolutely stunning, to think of all the people who completely failed to
see the obvious sense in turning gibberish into gibberish."
DOLF @ 1743 HOURS ON 10 MAY 2019: "Are you advocating such anti-semitic
opinion on politics and human identity {ie. Double Dutch} on behalf of
some institutional imperative which you subscribe to such as at#HEIStic
nazism {#215 / #235}?"
LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1856 HOURS
ON 10 MAY 2019: "Gibberish."
DOLF @ 1743 HOURS ON 10 MAY 2019: "HYPOTHETICAL PROPOSITION IS THAT ONE
MUST ASK GIVEN THE TWO YEARS THAT ARE VISIBLE WITHIN THE INSCRIPTION:
1786 AND 1787 AND "SOME SCANDINAVIAN-STYLE Ø LETTERS" WHETHER THE
WRITING IS ACCORDING TO KANT *PER* *ANTIPHRASIN* MEANING *AGAINST*
*DICTION* AND THEREFORE A LITERARY DEVICE IN THE USE OF WORDS OR PHRASES
TO CONVEY THEIR REAL MEANINGS AND WHETHER IT WAS A SCHEMA INITIATED BY
PERSONS ACQUAINTED WITH HIS WORKS AND OFFENDED BY AN INADEQUATE
APPRECIATION--BUT I AM ENTIRELY IGNORANT OF SUCH."
"THE FORMER PRIME MINISTER PAUL KEATING IS BEING ACCUSED OF HAVING A
'DONALD TRUMP' MOMENT AFTER HE LAUNCHED A BLISTERING ATTACK ON
AUSTRALIA'S SPY BOSSES, LABELLING THEM 'NUTTERS'."
[<https://www.abc.net.au/radio/programs/am/former-pm-paul-keating-attacks-security-agencies-on-china-stance/11081978>]
You seem to mostly post during work hours and probably only on paid
overtime ..."
- dolf
The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's
Ground Work for the Metaphysics of Morals are now available within the
directory:
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>
Initial Post: 10 May 2019
Post by unknown"Thus though art also the fountain of true light, the inexhaustible
treasury of life itself, the most fruitful source of blessing, who has won
for us and brought us all good things - though for a while thou wast
covered corporeally with death; nonetheless, thou dost pour out pure and
inexhaustible streams of immense light, immortal life and true happiness,
rivers of grace, fountains of healing and everlasting blessing."
St. John of Damascus, The Life of the Virgin Mary, the Theotokos.
"Show me a sign for good, That those who hate me may see it and be ashamed,
Because You, Lord, have helped me and comforted me." Psalm 86:17
Draw nigh unto God and He will draw nigh unto you.
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"
http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ
SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*
Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit
<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>
SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]
Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.
It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.
<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>
The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."
That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)
After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
