-- RACHEL MAKES A PLEA --
"NOW WAIT A TICK.
YOU'RE DRIBBLING.
WHY THE SHTICK.
ENDLESS QUIBBLING.
O'ER THE PUERILE.
IMPISH LIMP STICK.
PRISSY LOATH'G BILE.
CEASELESS BRICK.
INSANE PUSSY CALLS.
BY A SENILE PRICK.
WITHOUT ANY BALLS.
MY FANNY LICK."
YOUTUBE: "DISTURBED - THE SOUND OF SILENCE"
"Don't let your testicles turn to jelly and any night time perturbance
give you renewed understanding of what it means to cleave unto your wife.
But perhaps you ought to first learn that lesson of life, so as to cease
your self entitled pronouncements of ignorance...”
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Wilmour%20Motors%2020200601.pdf>
Initial Post: 3 June 2020Whilst our specific informal research interest
is concerned with the needs of an #491 - AGENCY (ie. POLICE, AMBULANCE,
COUNTRY / METROPOLITAN FIRE BRIGADE, STATE EMERGENCY SERVICE, HOSPITAL
EMERGENCY etc) as constituted by nuances of #237 - USE OF FORCE / #277 -
RIGHT TO PLACE A TEST...
SUCH HAS A RATIONAL RELATIVITY BY #5 (#0 - NIHILISM) + #6 (#364) + #7
(#312) + #8 (#273) TO THE #21 - PRINCIPLE OF LIABILITY (#9 - AUTONOMY)
AS IMPERATIVE.
IN HAVING REGARD FOR @1 - SELF ENTITLEMENT BEING IN #312 - CONTRADICTION
TO SUCH #491 - AGENCY (@84 + @86 + @102 + @104 + @115 - DIGNITY ROYAL) +
@1 - SELF = #492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL AND WHICH IS NOT ACTIONED IN
MAINTAINING CONTROL BY #261 - BINOMIAL CLAMPING (AS *SUBORDINATE* METHOD)
We will want to later expand this TELOS search capability to also
include TELOS intersections or distinct ONTIC (ie. till now we have only
been concerned with the FEME DEME instance but ought consider the MALE
DEME possibility) criteria and since we now can visualise the METALOGIC
(AUTONOMOUS DELIMITER) as #CENTRE of VALUE proposition to any delimiter,
we ought also consider the ability to search for any ego / super
instance beyond the TELOS association to the etelos / stelos.
But suffice to say, it's a question of priorities... And our next task
is to implement both the nousinfo and caduceus {} form ideas...
And whilst this is a simple proposition as no more complex semantically
than this:
this[5][0] = {
colspan: 7,
id: ["nousinfo-", obj.handle].join(''),
align: "center",
"grappleForm": {handle: obj.handle, portal: "nousinfo", panel:
obj.panel, template: FORMS.telos.forms, form: "NOUSINFO", data: "MESSAGE"}
}
We're going to put it off until tomorrow.
Once we've accomplished that form process, we'll then attend to the
consideration of acquiring a metalogic perspective for the temporal
heuristic (ie. on a given day for a designated time period) as an
enquiry '?' made via the SPIRAL SELECTOR@{CALENDAR: (HRUMACHIS CYCLE)}.
Essentially this will require obtaining the relevant GRAPPLE:
[58,46,8,53,76,62,74,3,24] PROTOTYPE for the designated time cycle and
aggregating them against the transcript.
We have thereby the possibility to existentially consider whether a
process of OSMOSIS {ie. the process of gradual or unconscious
assimilation of ideas, knowledge, etc} might be similarly viewed as a
#CENTRE of value PROPOSITION which is that any DELIMITER is relative to
the AUTONOMOUS PRINCIPLE, thereby as a METATHEORY OF LOGIC is a stratum
as dialectic of meta-descriptor prototypes which always precedes it:
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
#7
#8
#9 - PROPOSITIONAL DELIMITER RELATIVE TO THE AUTONOMOUS PRINCIPLE
In short, if the metalogic #CENTRE for a TELOS hierarchy and TEMPORAL
HEURISTIC are IDENTICAL {ie. PROPOSITIONAL DELIMITER RELATIVE TO THE
AUTONOMOUS PRINCIPLE IS THE SAME: #45 = #45} will that then be an anchor
for a propensity in either TRANSMUTATION (AUGMENTATION / AMELIORATION)
as then an interchange of the stratum as dialectic of meta-descriptor
prototypes?
That's a difficult philosophical proposition, but the possibility to
find an answer starts with our being able to visualise the temporal
continuum as then opportune for occurrence.
But we recognize that by publishing our capability to perceive any TELOS
hierarchy relative to the METALOGIC (AUTONOMOUS DELIMITER) that we are
introducing a TECHNOLOGICAL STIMULUS for a sapient economy and fiscal
prosperity ....
POSTSCRIPT 3 JUNE 2020: It's time now it return to our HRUMACHIS {ie.
SEPTET #322 - DEMOCRACY EQUILIBRIUM + #8 / #451 - JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT
DYNAMIC} CALENDAR so as to implement the various widget controls.
There will be two approaches undertaken for this... The first is the use
of a function() for the TROMPE L'OEIL interface itself, however for the
widget controls we will declare the discrete function within the form{}
object @WIDGET elements themselves.

The purpose for taking a calendar approach to obtain access to the
temporal heuristic, is simply because the time of day is designated by 4
x 5 minutes x 72 - ANTHROPIC PROTOTYPE = 1440 minutes whereas the day of
year segmentation has been known for several millennia to be a NORMA
OBLIGANS constituted by:
4 DAYS ON OBLIGANS #12 TO TETRA: #80 - LABOURING (CH'IN)
6 DAYS ON OBLIGANS #44 TO TETRA: #27 - DUTIES (SHIH) <-- *TRINOMIAL*
*CONCEPTION* *OF* #NUMBER
6 DAYS ON OBLIGANS #30 TO TETRA: #36 - STRENGTH (CH'IANG) <-- *BOER*
*WAR* *MEMORIAL* DAY 31 MAY
6 DAYS ON OBLIGANS #77 TO TETRA: #47 - PATTERN (WEN) <-- THE QUESTION IS
APRIORITY OF THE NATURAL ORDER [#47, #41] TO CALENDAR [#41, #47]
6 DAYS ON OBLIGANS #42 TO TETRA: #41 - RESPONSE (YING)
6 DAYS ON OBLIGANS #18 TO TETRA: #52 - MEASURE (TU)
6 DAYS ON OBLIGANS #37 TO TETRA: #55 - DEMINISHMENT (CHIEN)
6 DAYS ON OBLIGANS #48 TO TETRA: #61 - EMBELLISHMENT (SHIH)
ALL THE REST ARE DESIGNATED BY 5 DAYS...
It is unknown to us whether the first designations were known by
PYTHAGORAS at the time of Jewish captivity within Babylon as the
agreeable prototype to the binomial notion of #NUMBER:
#1 {#80 - LABOURING (CH'IN)} + #2 {#27 - DUTIES (SHIH)} = #3
#3 {#36 - STRENGTH (CH'IANG)} + #4 {#47 - PATTERN (WEN)} = #7
#5 {#41 - RESPONSE (YING)} + #6 {#52 - MEASURE (TU)} = #11
#7 {#55 - DEMINISHMENT (CHIEN)} + #8 {#61 - EMBELLISHMENT (SHIH)} = #15
NORMA OBLIGANS [#80, #27, #36, #47, #41, #52, #55, #61] TETRA
ASSOCIATORS (APRIORITY OF THE NATURAL ORDER [#47, #41]):
[#80, {@1: Sup: 80 - LABOURING: CH'IN (#80); Ego: 80 - LABOURING: CH'IN
(#80)}
#27, {@2: Sup: 26 - ENDEAVOUR: WU (#106); Ego: 27 - DUTIES: SHIH (#107)}
#36, {@3: Sup: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO
ANY {%26}); Ego: 36 - STRENGTH: CH'IANG (#143: *MENS* *REA* FOR
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY THEFT)}
#143 - *MENS* *REA* {male: [8, 56, 41, 38], feme: [8, 48, 66, 78]} //
MALE CONVEYS A CLEAR *CATEGORICAL* *IMPERATIVE* *AND* *INTELLECTUAL*
*PROPERTY* *THEFT* BY IRISH / SCOTTISH ROMAN CATHOLIC NATIONALISM AS
ASSOCIATED TO THE TARGETING OF MYSELF (#56 - BIRTHDAY NOUS) AND THE
IMPROPER ANZAC CENTENNIAL 2018 WREATH PLACEMENT UPON #38 - 8 JUNE 2017
#47, {@4: Sup: 28 - CHANGE: KENG (#196 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE
{%37}); Ego: 47 - PATTERN: WEN (#190)}
#41, {@5: Sup: 69 - EXHAUSTION: CH'IUNG (#265: KANT'S PROLEGOMENA
PREAMBLE ON THE DISTINGUISHING FEATURE OF ALL METAPHYSICAL COGNITION /
THE POSTULATES OF EMPIRICAL THINKING IN GENERAL); Ego: 41 - RESPONSE:
YING (#231: *JUXTAPOSITION* *CONTROL*)}
ONTIC CHECKSUM: @84 + @181 = #265 as [#40, #20, #200, #5] = mâkar
(H4376): {UMBRA: #26 as #260 % #41 = #14} 1) to sell; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to
sell; 1a2) seller (participle); 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be sold; 1b2) to
sell oneself; 1b3) *TO* *BE* *GIVEN* *OVER* *TO* *DEATH*; 1c) (Hithpael)
*TO* *SELL* *ONESELF*;
#52, {@6: Sup: 40 - LAW/MODEL: FA (#305: *BOER* *WAR* *MEMORIAL* *DAY*
28 MAY 2017); Ego: 52 - MEASURE: TU (#283: *UMBRA* *MAPPING* *TO*
*MONUMENT*, *STELA*)}
#283 as [#80, #3, #200] /
#288 - *REMEMBRANCE* as [#5, #80, #3, #200] /
#293 - SOLAR TROPICAL YEAR DETERMINED BY 49 - JUBILEE x #2184 days as
[#80, #3, #200, #10] /
#338 - *REMEMBRANCE* / *ARMISTICE* DAY 11 NOVEMBER as [#5, #80, #3,
#200, #10, #600] /
#339 - *REMEMBRANCE* / *ARMISTICE* DAY 11 NOVEMBER as [#6, #80, #3,
#200, #10, #600] /
#333 - *CENTRE* *PROTOTYPE* *OF* *THE* *ROMAN* *BINOMIAL* *PROTOTYPES*
#ONE / #FIVE as [#80, #3, #200, #10, #600] = peger (H6297): {UMBRA: #14
as #283 % #41 = #37} 1) corpse, carcass, *MONUMENT*, *STELA*; 1a) corpse
(of man); 1b) carcass (of animals);
#55, {@7: Sup: 14 - PENETRATION: JUI (#319: *TO* *COME* *UPON*, *FALL*
*OR* *LIGHT* *UPON*, *ATTACK* (*ENEMY*) / *TO* *TURN* *AWAY* (*OF*
*GOD*)); Ego: 55 - DIMINISHMENT: CHIEN (#338: *REMEMBRANCE* /
*ARMISTICE* DAY 11 NOVEMBER))}
#61] {@8: Sup: 75 - FAILURE: SHIH (#394); Ego: 61 - EMBELLISHMENT: SHIH
(#399)}
MALE: @168 + @196 = #364
ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #364
IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) INTRODUCTION ON THE TRANSCENDENTAL
POWER OF JUDGMENT IN GENERAL AS IDEA @A133: "If the understanding in
general is defined as the faculty of rules, then the power of judgment
is the faculty of subsuming under rules, that is, of deciding whether or
not something falls under a given rule (CASUS DATAE LEGIS: #364 -
QUESTION OF #430 - LAW). General logic contains no precepts at all for
the power of judgment, and indeed cannot contain any. For since it
abstracts from all content of cognition, nothing remains to it except
the business of analytically dividing [IDEA: @A133] the mere form of
cognition into concepts, judgments, and inferences, and [IDEA: @B172]
thereby achieving formal rules for every use of the understanding. Now
if it wanted to show in general how one should subsume under these
rules, that is, decide whether or not something falls under them, this
could happen again only through a rule. But just because it is a rule,
this once more requires instruction for the power of judgment, and so
shows that although the understanding is capable of being instructed and
equipped through rules, the power of judging is a special talent that
can by no means be taught, but only practiced.
Hence this is also what is specific to so-called mother wit, lack of
which cannot be remedied by any school; for, although such a school can
abundantly supply a limited understanding with rules derived from the
insight of others, and as it were graft them onto it, the faculty for
using them correctly must nonetheless belong to the pupil himself, and
no rule that one might prescribe for him in this regard is, in the
absence of such natural endowment, safe from [IDEA: @A134 / @B173]
misuse." [Page 172]
IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) ON THE POSTULATES OF EMPIRICAL
THINKING IN GENERAL AS IDEA @B265: "1. What agrees with the formal
conditions of experience (in intuitions and in concepts), is possible.
[IDEA @B266] 2. What connects with the material conditions of experience
(sensation) is real. 3. That whose connection with the real is
determined according to the universal conditions of experience, is
(exists as) necessary.
ELUCIDATION: [IDEA: @A219] The categories of modality have this
peculiarity: that, as a determination of the object, they do not in the
least augment the concept to which they are annexed as predicate, but
express only a relation to the faculty of cognition. If the concept of a
thing is already fully complete, I can nonetheless still ask of this
object whether it is merely possible, or else real, or, if it is the
latter, whether it is indeed also necessary. No additional
determinations are thought in the object itself by this, but it is only
a question of how the object (together with all its determinations) is
related to the understanding and its empirical use, to the empirical
power of judgment, and to reason (in its application to experience).
REFUTATION OF *IDEALISM*: [IDEA: @B274] Idealism (I mean material
idealism) is the theory that declares the existence of things in space
outside us either to be doubtful and unprovable or false and impossible;
the first is the problematic idealism of Descartes, which declares only
one empirical assertion (assertio), namely, I am, to be undoubted; the
second is the dogmatic idealism of Berkeley, which declares space, along
with all the things to which it attaches as an inseparable condition, to
be something in itself impossible, and therefore the things in space
also to be mere imaginings. Dogmatic idealism is inevitable if space is
regarded as a property that should be suited to things in themselves;
for then it, along with everything for which it serves as a condition,
is a non-thing. We however removed the basis for this idealism in the
TRANSCENDENTAL AESTHETIC. Problematic idealism, which asserts nothing
about this but pleads only the inability to prove through immediate
experience [IDEA: @B275] an existence beyond our own, is reasonable and
accords with a thorough manner of philosophical thinking; namely, not to
permit any decisive judgment before an adequate proof has been found.
The required proof must, then, establish that we indeed have experience
of outer things and not mere imagination; which perhaps will not happen
unless it can be proved that even our inner experience, which Descartes
did not doubt, is possible only under the presupposition of outer
experience." [Pages 188 to 189]
Nevertheless, because the 4 x time of day heuristic is encapsulated by
such designations, we are going to deploy this approach.
Given that are able to determine some anomalous / false claims of ROMAN
(catholic) EMPIRE GOVERNANCE as any HETEROS prototype prerogative of
#390 - SOVEREIGNTY within the context of the following ONTIC values as
TELOS criteria:
a) #168 - GIZMO[9.2.7] - SINGLE INSTANCE
b) #215 - NO INSTANCE (#288 - #215 = #73 - CANNOT BE CHANGED) / @1 -
SELF CONTRADICTION
c) #130 - GIZMO[6.7.8] - SINGLE INSTANCE
-------
#513 + #147 = #660 (+6: <-- FORMULA OF PROGRESSION {@6 - FORM OF NATURE
/ @3 - NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE}) = IT'S HUMAN CONCEPT {#666}?
ONTIC SYMPTOMS FOR #660 - CIVIL UNREST:
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?idea:{660}>
Is it possible then to view the ONTIC IMPETUS upon CIVIL SOCIETY by the
same process?
#513 + @196 = #709 as [#1, #100, #600, #8] = archḗ (G746): {UMBRA: #22
as #709 % #41 = #12} 1) beginning, origin; 2) the person or thing that
commences, the first person or thing in a series, the leader; 3) that by
which anything begins to be, the origin, the active cause; 4) the
extremity of a thing; 4a) of the corners of a sail; 5) *THE* *FIRST*
*PLACE*, *PRINCIPALITY*, *RULE*, *MAGISTRACY*; 5a) *OF* *ANGELS* *AND*
*DEMONS*;
#709 as [#400, #300, #3, #6] /
#308 as [#300, #3, #5] /
#309 as [#300, #3, #6] /
#315 as [#300, #3, #5] = shâgâh (H7686): {UMBRA: #17 as #308 % #41 =
#21} 1) to go astray, stray, err; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to err, stray; 1a2) to
swerve, meander, reel, roll, be intoxicated, err (in drunkenness); 1a3)
*TO* *GO* *ASTRAY* (*MORALLY*); 1a4) to commit sin of ignorance or
inadvertence, err (ignorantly); 1b) (Hiphil); 1b1) to lead astray; 1b2)
to lead astray, mislead (mentally); 1b3) to lead astray (morally);
#709 as [#30, #70, #9, #200, #400] = ʻăṭârâh (H5850): {UMBRA: #11 as
#284 % #41 = #38} 1) *CROWN*, *WREATH*;
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?idea:{709}>
NORMA OBLIGANS [#80, #27, #36, #41, #47, #52, #55, #61] TETRA
ASSOCIATORS (BY APRIORITY OF THE CALENDAR [#41, #47]):
[#80, {@1: Sup: 80 - LABOURING: CH'IN (#80); Ego: 80 - LABOURING: CH'IN
(#80)}
#27, {@2: Sup: 26 - ENDEAVOUR: WU (#106); Ego: 27 - DUTIES: SHIH (#107)}
#36, {@3: Sup: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO
ANY {%26}); Ego: 36 - STRENGTH: CH'IANG (#143)}
#41, {@4: Sup: 22 - RESISTANCE: KE (#190); Ego: 41 - RESPONSE: YING
(#184 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS FLOW {%36})}
#47, {@5: Sup: 69 - EXHAUSTION: CH'IUNG (#259); Ego: 47 - PATTERN: WEN
(#231)}
#52, {@6: Sup: 40 - LAW/MODEL: FA (#299); Ego: 52 - MEASURE: TU (#283)}
#55, {@7: Sup: 14 - PENETRATION: JUI (#313); Ego: 55 - DIMINISHMENT:
CHIEN (#338)}
#61] {@8: Sup: 75 - FAILURE: SHIH (#388); Ego: 61 - EMBELLISHMENT: SHIH
(#399)}
MALE: @168 = #168
FEME: @184 = #184
ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #352
#513 + @184 = #697 as [#300, #10, #2, #5, #100, #10, #70, #200] =
Tibérios (G5086): {UMBRA: #0 as #697 % #41 = #41} 0) Tiberius = 'from
the Tiber (as god-river)'; 1) the second Roman emperor;
#697 as [#80, #70, #30, #9, #300, #8, #200] = polítēs (G4177): {UMBRA:
#17 as #698 % #41 = #1} 1) a citizen; 1a) the inhabitant of any city or
country; 1b) *THE* *ASSOCIATION* *OF* *ANOTHER* *IN* *CITIZENSHIP*; 1b1)
a fellow citizen, fellow countryman;
#697 as [#1, #80, #300, #5, #300, #1, #10] = háptomai (G680): {UMBRA:
#12 as #502 % #41 = #10} 1) to fasten one's self to, adhere to, cling
to; 1a) to touch; 1b) *OF* *CARNAL* *INTERCOURSE* *WITH* *A* *WOMEN*
*OR* *COHABITATION*; 1c) *OF* *LEVITICAL* *PRACTICE* *OF* *HAVING* *NO*
*FELLOWSHIP* *WITH* *HEATHEN* *PRACTICES*. Things not to be touched
appear to be both women and certain kinds of food, so celibacy and
abstinence of certain kinds of food and drink are recommended.; 1d) to
touch, assail anyone;
#697 as [#400, #1, #40, #200, #6, #700] = ʼâmar (H559): {UMBRA: #1 as
#241 % #41 = #36} 1) to say, speak, utter; 1a) (Qal) *TO* *SAY*, *TO*
*ANSWER*, *TO* *SAY* *IN* *ONE'S* *HEART*, *TO* *THINK*, *TO* *COMMAND*,
*TO* *PROMISE*, *TO* *INTEND*; 1b) (Niphal) to be told, to be said, to
be called; 1c) (Hithpael) to boast, to act proudly; 1d) (Hiphil) to
avow, to avouch;
#697 as [#1, #200, #90, #6, #400] = ʼerets (H776): {UMBRA: #3 as #291 %
#41 = #4} 1) land, earth; 1a) earth; 1a1) whole earth (as opposed to a
part); 1a2) earth (as opposed to heaven); 1a3) earth (inhabitants); 1b)
land; 1b1) country, territory; 1b2) district, region; 1b3) tribal
territory; 1b4) piece of ground; 1b5) land of Canaan, Israel; 1b6)
inhabitants of land; 1b7) Sheol, land without return, (under) world;
1b8) city (-state); 1c) ground, surface of the earth; 1c1) ground; 1c2)
soil; 1d) (in phrases); 1d1) *PEOPLE* *OF* *THE* *LAND*; 1d2) space or
distance of country (in measurements of distance); 1d3) level or plain
country; 1d4) land of the living; 1d5) end(s) of the earth; 1e) (almost
wholly late in usage); 1e1) lands, countries; i) often in contrast to
Canaan;
#697 as [#6, #5, #70, #400, #10, #200, #6] = ʻâthar (H6279): {UMBRA: #4
as #670 % #41 = #14} 1) to pray, entreat, supplicate; 1a) (Qal) to pray,
entreat; 1b) (Niphal) to be supplicated, be entreated; 1c) (Hiphil) *TO*
*MAKE* *SUPPLICATION*, *PLEAD*
"Alexander Tschugguel, a 26-year-old Austrian Catholic convert from
Lutheranism who has worked for the pro-life movement in his country,
#697 - *REVEALED* himself 4 NOVEMBER 2019 to be the person behind
throwing the Pachamama idols into the #697 - *TIBER* *RIVER* during the
Synod of Bishops on the Pan-Amazon Region.
Tschugguel, who had been in Rome at the beginning of the Amazon Synod,
was disturbed by seeing #697 - *INDIGENOUS* *PEOPLE* *BOWING* *DOWN*
*TO* *THE* *STATUETTES* *IN* *THE* *VATICAN* *GARDENS*. He flew to Rome
to carry out what he saw as a #697 - *CORRECTION* *OF* *A* *GRIEVOUS*
*BREACH* of the First Commandment that had upset many faithful Catholics.
According to CATHOLIC NEWS AGENCY (CNA), the statues, which were
identical carved images of a #697 - *NAKED* *PREGNANT* *AMAZONIAN*
*WOMAN*, had been displayed in the Carmelite church of Santa Maria in
Traspontina, close to the Vatican, and used in several events, rituals,
and expression of spirituality taking place during the 6 to 27 OCTOBER
synod.
Pope Francis #697 - *ISSUED* *AN* *APOLOGY* 25 OCTOBER 2019 asking
forgiveness from those who were offended by the “Pachamama” statues
being thrown into the Tiber River, and said that they had been displayed
in the church “without idolatrous intentions.”
[<https://www.ncregister.com/blog/edward-pentin/austrian-catholic-why-i-threw-pachamama-statues-into-the-tiber>]
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?idea:{697}>
A DRAFT COPY OF THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE FOLLOWING URL:
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Will%20Be%20Done.pdf>
Initial Post: 22 May 2020
Post by Jeff HicklingWhere art thou, dolf?
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"
SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*
Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit
<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>
SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]
Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.
It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTASIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.
<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>
The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."
That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble.zip> (Download resources)
After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.