-- I'M GOING TO SAY A KIND WORD ABOUT EMMANUEL MACRON
(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 1 December, 2018
— PINOCCHIO’S PARADOX —
“THERE ONCE WAS A BOY.
WHO COULD TALK CROW.
AN EPIC BIG AS TOLSTOY.
FANNY TICKLE, NOSE GROW.
TWAS FOR LOVE OF RACH[I]EL.
SO DID NOT REALLY CARE.
OF ANY TRUTH TO COMPEL.
NOR OF CONCEIT DESPAIR.
VIVID PORTRAITS VAN GOGH.
EACH TIME TRUTH DISPLACE.
ONE DAY WAS MAD ENOUGH.
TO CUT AN EAR SPITING FACE.”
YOUTUBE: "Chances (Doctor Who)"
NOTES: Russian author Leo Tolstoy’s ‘War and Peace’ was serialized
within The Russian Messenger from 1865 to 1867. The entire novel was
published by 1869 as comprised some 1,225 pages being a substantial
accomplishment.
Adventures of Pinocchio was serially published by Italian author Carlo
Collodi between 1881 to 1882 and finally during February 1883. And the
Dutch artist Vincent Van Gogh at 35 yo cut off his ear on the evening of
23 December 1888 and gave it to a prostitute.
RACH[I]EL: is within the Cabala schema, one of the angelic luminaries
concerned with human sexuality (ie. Eros and Evil). Is one of the
presiding spirits of #175 - VENUS. Has been depicted as one of 3 angels
of Friday:
Sachiel {covering of God} is an angel of the Cherubim and the presiding
spirit of the planet #34 - JUPITER; Whereas Sachiel-Melek was a king of
the underworld hierarchy governing priesthoods and sacrifices.
ANAEL: controls kingdoms and kings on earth in having dominion over the
moon. And proclaims: “OPEN YE THE GATES, THAT THE RIGHTEOUS NATION
WHICH KEEPETH THE TRUTH MAY ENTER IN.
THOU WILT KEEP HIM IN PERFECT PEACE, WHOSE MIND IS STAYED ON THEE:
BECAUSE HE TRUSTETH IN THEE.
TRUST YE IN THE LORD FOR EVER: FOR IN THE LORD JEHOVAH IS EVERLASTING
STRENGTH:
FOR HE BRINGETH DOWN THEM THAT DWELL ON HIGH; THE LOFTY CITY, HE LAYETH
IT LOW; HE LAYETH IT LOW, EVEN TO THE GROUND; HE BRINGETH IT EVEN TO THE
DUST.” [Isaiah 26:2-5 (KJV)]
DOLF @ 0328 HOURS ON 30 NOVEMBER 2018: "MACRON’S POPALARITY AS A SYMPTOM
OF ROMAN CATHOLIC #1827 - IMPIETY"
JOS BERGER NOET (***@IAE.NL) @ 0516 HOURS ON 1 DECEMBER 2018:
"MACARONI POLARONITY AS ASYMPTOTIC OF ROMAN ALCOHOLIC #1827 - I'M PITY:
MACRON’S POPALARITY
Eh.. which popularity did you say..?"
— HOMO ERECTUS —
"SUCH LOAD OF WADDLE.
THE TRUTH JUST BEGS.
OVER DUCKING TWADDLE.
VENOM POSTURING DREGS.
WHAT CAN YOU SADDLE?
WITH ONLY FROGS 🐸 LEGS."
GUARDIANS OF DEMOCRACY STAFF @ 30 NOVEMBER 2018: "MACRON CONFRONTS SAUDI
CROWN PRINCE OVER KHASHOGGI KILLING, WARNS: ‘I AM A MAN OF MY WORD’:
French President Emmanuel Macron on Friday reportedly confronted Saudi
Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman about the murder of journalist Jamal
Khashoggi and the ongoing Yemen war at the Group of 20 (G-20) summit in
Buenos Aires, Argentina.
A French official said the two leaders discussed Khashoggi’s murder
during a five-minute exchange that took place on the sidelines of the
G-20 summit, where they also talked about the need to find a solution to
the situation in Yemen, Reuters reported.
In a video of the encounter shared by The Saudi Gazette newspaper,
Macron can be seen standing inches away from the crown prince, who
appears acquiescent, and the French president speaks with his hands
while the crown prince nods and smiles.
Salman is heard saying “Don’t worry,” to which the French president
responds: “I am worried”.
“I told you, I told you,” Macron is heard saying. “Yes, you told me,
thank you very much,” replied Mohammad bin Salman, who is smiling in the
video.
The crown prince then tells Macron that “we will meet you.”
Later in the one-minute clip posted on Twitter, Macron is heard saying:
“You never listen to me,” and Prince Mohammed replies: “I will listen,
of course.”
At the end of the video, Macron says: “I am a man of my word.”
Macron had previously suggested that he planned to confront the Saudi
leader about the murder of Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi in the Saudi
Consulate in Istanbul in early October.
The Saudi government recently admitted that its officials were
responsible for the murder of Khashoggi, who was a U.S. resident and a
columnist for The Washington Post. Saudi Arabia claims that the crown
prince was not responsible for the murder. At least five Saudi officials
have been handed the death penalty over the murder.
U.S. intelligence agencies have reportedly concluded that the crown
prince was responsible for ordering the murder.
President Donald Trump has continued to cast doubt on Salman’s
responsibility for the murder.
In a presidential statement released November 20, Trump sided with the
Saudi leader despite the conclusions of the American intelligence
community."
[<https://theguardiansofdemocracy.com/macron-confronts-saudi-crown-prince-over-khashoggi-killing-warns-i-am-a-man-of-my-word>]
— VIRTUAL CONCEIT WALL —
"SARCASM AND WIT.
IS FAVOURED HUMOUR.
TO NARCISSISTIC DECEIT.
OF DISEASE AND TUMOUR.
YOUR MURDEROUS HEAT.
AND SEDITIOUS CLAMOUR."
DOLF @ 0920 HOURS ON 1 DECEMBER 2018: "When you are laying in bed at
0328 hours and your eyes are barely open and you think to yourself: 'ALL
ALTERATIONS TAKE PLACE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW OF THE CONNECTION OF
CAUSE AND EFFECT':
-- WELL ***@CK YOU ALL, I'M GOING TO SAY A KIND WORD --
"YOUR EXTREMITIES ARE ENGORGED,
BUT FAT FINGERS ARE AN INDIGNITY.
BY WHICH REALITY IS AMBIGUATED.
BEING MAN OF YOUR WORD BY INTEGRITY.
DISCERNING ITS ALREADY CORRECTED.
NEVER LISTENING TO SUCH SIMPLICITY.
OF COURSE RATIONALITY IS DIVORCED."
-- WELL ***@CK YOU ALL, {@1: Sup: 26 (#26); Ego: 71 (#71)}
I'M GOING TO SAY A KIND WORD -- {@2: Sup: 4 (#30); Ego: 37 (#108 -
*PROGENITOR*)}
"YOUR EXTREMITIES ARE ENGORGED, {@3: Sup: 15 (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF
WRONG {%1}); Ego: 64 (#172)}
BUT FAT FINGERS ARE AN INDIGNITY. {@4: Sup: 24 (#69); Ego: 55 (#227)}
BY WHICH REALITY IS AMBIGUATED. {@5: Sup: 26 (#95); Ego: 27 (#254)}
BEING MAN OF YOUR WORD BY INTEGRITY. {@6: Sup: 27 (#122); Ego: 37 (#291)}
DISCERNING ITS ALREADY CORRECTED. {@7: Sup: 60 (#182 - I AM NOT
FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN {%6}); Ego: 64 (#355)}
NEVER LISTENING TO SUCH SIMPLICITY. {@8: Sup: 5 (#187); Ego: 16 (#371)}
OF COURSE RATIONALITY IS DIVORCED." {@9: Sup: 46 (#233 - *KANT'S*
*PROLEGOMENA* IDEA: ALL ALTERATIONS TAKE PLACE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
LAW OF THE CONNECTION OF CAUSE AND EFFECT); Ego: 66 (#437)}
YOUTUBE: "Vincent Van Gogh (d. 29 July 1890) - Starry starry night
(doctor who)"
“THEN THE LORD ANSWERED JOB OUT OF THE WHIRLWIND, AND SAID,
WHO IS THIS THAT DARKENETH COUNSEL BY WORDS WITHOUT KNOWLEDGE?
GIRD UP NOW THY LOINS LIKE A MAN; FOR I WILL DEMAND OF THEE, AND ANSWER
THOU ME.
WHERE WAST THOU WHEN I LAID THE FOUNDATIONS OF THE EARTH? DECLARE, IF
THOU HAST UNDERSTANDING.
WHO HATH LAID THE MEASURES THEREOF, IF THOU KNOWEST? OR WHO HATH
STRETCHED THE LINE UPON IT?
WHEREUPON ARE THE FOUNDATIONS THEREOF FASTENED? OR WHO LAID THE CORNER
STONE THEREOF;
WHEN THE MORNING STARS SANG TOGETHER, AND ALL THE SONS OF GOD SHOUTED
FOR JOY?
OR WHO SHUT UP THE SEA WITH DOORS, WHEN IT BRAKE FORTH, AS IF IT HAD
ISSUED OUT OF THE WOMB?
WHEN I MADE THE CLOUD THE GARMENT THEREOF, AND THICK DARKNESS A
SWADDLINGBAND FOR IT,
AND BRAKE UP FOR IT MY DECREED PLACE, AND SET BARS AND DOORS,
AND SAID, HITHERTO SHALT THOU COME, BUT NO FURTHER: AND HERE SHALL THY
PROUD WAVES BE STAYED?
HAST THOU COMMANDED THE MORNING SINCE THY DAYS; AND CAUSED THE DAYSPRING
TO KNOW HIS PLACE;
THAT IT MIGHT TAKE HOLD OF THE ENDS OF THE EARTH, THAT THE WICKED MIGHT
BE SHAKEN OUT OF IT?
IT IS TURNED AS CLAY TO THE SEAL; AND THEY STAND AS A GARMENT.
AND FROM THE WICKED THEIR LIGHT IS WITHHOLDEN, AND THE HIGH ARM SHALL BE
BROKEN.
HAST THOU ENTERED INTO THE SPRINGS OF THE SEA? OR HAST THOU WALKED IN
THE SEARCH OF THE DEPTH?
HAVE THE GATES OF DEATH BEEN OPENED UNTO THEE? OR HAST THOU SEEN THE
DOORS OF THE SHADOW OF DEATH?
HAST THOU PERCEIVED THE BREADTH OF THE EARTH? DECLARE IF THOU KNOWEST IT
ALL.
WHERE IS THE WAY WHERE LIGHT DWELLETH? AND AS FOR DARKNESS, WHERE IS THE
PLACE THEREOF,
THAT THOU SHOULDEST TAKE IT TO THE BOUND THEREOF, AND THAT THOU
SHOULDEST KNOW THE PATHS TO THE HOUSE THEREOF?
KNOWEST THOU IT, BECAUSE THOU WAST THEN BORN? OR BECAUSE THE NUMBER OF
THY DAYS IS GREAT?
HAST THOU ENTERED INTO THE TREASURES OF THE SNOW? OR HAST THOU SEEN THE
TREASURES OF THE HAIL,
WHICH I HAVE RESERVED AGAINST THE TIME OF TROUBLE, AGAINST THE DAY OF
BATTLE AND WAR?” [Job 36:1-41 (KJV)]
KANT'S PROLEGOMENA SECOND ANALOGY - PRINCIPLE OF TIME-SUCCESSION
ACCORDING TO THE LAW OF CAUSALITY [IDEA: B232]
ALL ALTERATIONS TAKE PLACE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW OF THE CONNECTION
OF CAUSE AND EFFECT.
PROOF: I perceive that *APPEARANCES* *SUCCEED* *ONE* *ANOTHER*, *THAT*
*IS*, *THAT* [IDEA: @B233] *ONE* *STATE* *OF* *A* *THING* *EXISTS* *AT*
*ONE* *TIME*, *THE* *OPPOSITE* *OF* *WHICH* *EXISTED* *IN* *THE*
*PREVIOUS* *STATE*. *I* *AM* *THEREFORE* *ACTUALLY* *CONNECTING* *TWO*
*PERCEPTIONS* *IN* *TIME*. Now connection is no act of mere sense and
intuition, but is here the product of a *SYNTHETIC* *FACULTY* *OF* *THE*
*IMAGINATION* *THAT* *DETERMINES* *THE* *INNER* *SENSE* *WITH* *RESPECT*
*TO* *RELATION* *IN* *TIME*. The imagination can however conjoin the
aforementioned two states in two different ways, so that either one or
the other would precede in time; for time cannot be perceived in itself
and what precedes and what follows in objects determined, as it were
empirically, in relation to it. *I* *AM* *THEREFORE* *CONSCIOUS* *ONLY*
*THAT* *MY* *IMAGINATION* *PLACES* *ONE* *STATE* *BEFORE*, *THE* *OTHER*
*AFTER*, not that in the object [IDEA: @B234] one precedes the other;
or, in other words, the objective relation of the appearances that
succeed one another remains undetermined through mere perception. In
order then for this relation to be cognized as determined, the relation
between the two states must be so thought that it is thereby determined
with necessity which of them must be placed before, which after, and not
the reverse. However, the concept that carries with it a necessity of
synthetic unity can only be a pure concept of the understanding, which
does not lie in perception – and here it is the concept of the relation
of cause and effect, in which the former determines the latter in time
as consequence, and not merely as something that could precede it in the
imagination (or not be perceived at all). It is, then, only because we
subject the succession of appearances, hence all alterations, to the law
of causality that experience itself – i.e., empirical cognition of the
appearances – is possible; hence the appearances themselves as objects
of experience are possible only in accordance with this very law.
The apprehension of the manifold of appearances is always successive.
[IDEA: @A189] The representations of the parts succeed one another.
Whether they also succeed one another in the object is a further point
for reflection, which is not included in the first point. Now one can in
fact call everything, and even every representation insofar as one is
conscious of it, an object; but it is a matter for deeper investigation
what this word is to signify regarding [IDEA: @B235] appearances, not
insofar as they (as representations) are objects, but only in so far as
they designate an object. In as much as they, merely as
representations, [IDEA: @A190] are at the same time objects of
consciousness, they are not at all to be distinguished from
apprehension, i.e., reception into the synthesis of the imagination, and
one must then say: that the manifold of appearances is always generated
successively in the mind. Were appearances things in themselves, then no
human being would be able to conclude from the succession of
representations how the manifold of those appearances might be conjoined
in the object. For in the end we have to do only with our own
representations; how things in themselves may be (without regard to
representations through which they affect us) is completely beyond our
sphere of cognition. Now although the appearances are not things in
themselves, and nevertheless are the only thing that can be given to us
for cognition, I still have to show what in the appearances themselves
may suit the manifold for a conjoining in time, notwithstanding that its
representation in apprehension is always successive. Thus, for example,
the apprehension of the manifold in the appearances of a house that
stands before me is successive. Now the question is: whether the
manifold of this house itself also is successive in itself, which of
course no one will grant. However, as soon as I raise my concept of an
object up to transcendental significance, the house is now indeed no
thing in itself, but [IDEA: @B236] only an appearance, i.e., a
representation, whose transcendental object is [IDEA: @A191] unknown;
what, then, shall I understand by the question: (ie. *EH*... *WHICH*
*POPULARITY* *DID* *YOU* *SAY*..?} how might the manifold be conjoined
in the appearance itself (*WHICH* *IS* *STILL* *NOTHING* *IN* *ITSELF*)?
That which lies in the successive apprehension is here viewed as
representation, while the appearance that is given to me,
notwithstanding that it is nothing more than a sum of such
representations, is viewed as their object – with which my concept,
which I extract from the representations of apprehension, has to agree.
Since truth is the agreement of cognition with object, it can easily be
seen that here one can ask only about the formal conditions of empirical
truth, and that appearance, in counter-relation with the representations
of apprehension, can only be represented as their object that is
distinct from them if it falls under a rule that distinguishes it from
every other apprehension and makes one way of conjoining the manifold
necessary. That in the appearance which contains the condition of this
necessary rule of apprehension is the object.
Let us now proceed to our problem. That something happens – i.e., that
something, or some state, comes to be that wasn’t there before – [IDEA:
@B237 - *USE* *OF* *FORCEFUL* *WILL*] cannot be perceived empirically
unless preceded by an appearance that [IDEA: @A192] does not contain
this state in itself; for a reality following upon an empty time, hence,
a coming to be that no state of things precedes, can be apprehended just
as little as empty time itself. Every apprehension of an event is
therefore a perception that follows upon another perception. Since this
is, though, the case with every synthesis of apprehension, as I have
shown above in the appearance of a house, it does not in this way yet
distinguish itself from the others. But I also note: that if, in an
appearance containing a happening, I call the preceding state of
perception A {ie. *POPALARITY* *AS* *PEDIGREE* *OF* *A* *PASHTUN*
*KING*} and the succeeding one B {ie. *MACRON’S* *POPULARITY*}, then B
can only follow A in the apprehension, while the perception A cannot
follow but only precede B. I see for example a ship drifting downstream.
My perception of its location further down succeeds the perception of
its location further up the course of the river, and it is impossible
that in the apprehension of this appearance the ship should first be
perceived further downstream but afterwards further upstream. Here,
then, the order in the succession of perceptions in the apprehension is
determined, and the apprehension is bound by that order. In the previous
example of a house, in the apprehension my perceptions could start at
the [IDEA: @B238] top of the house and end with the ground, or else
start from below and end above, just as they could apprehend the
manifold of empirical intuition from the right or the left. In the
series of these perceptions there [IDEA: @A193] was, then, no determined
order making it necessary when in the apprehension I had to begin in
order to conjoin the manifold empirically. This rule is, however, always
to be met with in the perception of something that happens, and it makes
the order of the perceptions succeeding one another (in the apprehension
of this appearance) necessary.
In our case, therefore, I will have to derive the subjective sequence of
the apprehension from the objective sequence of the appearances, because
otherwise the former is completely undetermined and does not distinguish
any one appearance from the rest. By itself the former proves nothing
about the connection of the manifold in the object, because it is
completely arbitrary. This connection will therefore consist in the
order of the manifold of the appearance according to which the
apprehension of the one (what happens) follows upon that of the other
(which precedes) according to a rule. Only in this way can I gain the
right to say of the appearance itself, and not merely of my
apprehension: that in it a sequence is to be found – which is as much as
to say that I cannot institute the apprehension otherwise than exactly
in this sequence. [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's
Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, IDEAS @B232 TO @B238 / @A189 TO
@A193]
- dolf
The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's
Ground Work for the Metaphysics of Morals are now available within the
directory:
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>
Initial Post: 28 November 2018
SUBJECT WAS: IF YOU CANNOT GO WITHOUT EATING ALL DAY BECAUSE OF AN AILMENT
Post by unknown"If you cannot go without eating all day because of an ailment of the body,
beloved one, no logical man will be able to criticize you for that.
Besides, we have a Lord who is meek and loving (philanthropic) and who does
not ask for anything beyond our power. Because he neither requires the
abstinence from foods, neither that the fast take place for the simple sake
of fasting, neither is its aim that we remain with empty stomachs, but that
we fast to offer our entire selves to the dedication of spiritual things,
having distanced ourselves from secular things."
Saint John Chrysostom, On Fasting.
"Know ye that the LORD he is God: it is he that hath made us, and not we
ourselves; we are his people, and the sheep of his pasture." Psalm 100:3
Draw nigh unto God and He will draw nigh unto you.
<http://www.grapple369.com?time:04.17&idea{115}&idea{435}&idea{202}&idea{307}>
***@zen: 4, row: 2, col: 7, nous: 33 [Super: #435 / #40 -
Reversal, Avoiding Activity; I-Ching: H36 - Suppression of the Light,
Sinking/Darkening Light, Brilliance injured, Intelligence hidden; Tetra:
68 - Dimming, Ego: #307 / #33 - Achievable Goals, Virtue of
Discrimination; I-Ching: H9 - Lesser Domestication, Minor Restraint,
Small Accumulating, The taming power of the small, Small harvest; Tetra:
35 - Gathering]
— MANTELPIECE DREAMS —
"GOD SAVE THE QUEEN,
LOOKING UPON IN DREAD.
I WONDER WHAT IT MIGHT MEAN,
COULD I LOSE MY SOUL INSTEAD?
ADOLF HITLER IS IN HELL.
JOIN HIM IF YOU MUST.
SADDAM HUSSEIN IS AS WELL.
AND ALL YOU WITH NO TRUST {#435 = #6, #400, #2, #9, #8, #10 as batach
(H982): {#0 as #19} 1) to trust; 2) (TWOT) to feel safe, be careless;
1a) (Qal); 1a1) to trust, trust in; 1a2) to have confidence, be
confident; 1a3) to be bold; 1a4) to be secure; 1b) (Hiphil); 1b1) to
cause to trust, make secure}."
THAT CONTEMPT OF DIGNITY ROYAL IS ENTIRELY WHAT QUEEN VICTORIA WITHIN
THIS STATUE IS HOLDING IN HER LEFT HAND AND BY #390 - SOVEREIGN EDICT as
PRESENTS {ie. HEAVENLY (EPOURANIOS) GIFT (DŌREA: a gratuity:—gift)
[Hebrews 6:4-12] as *GLOBUS* *CRUCIGER*} BESTOWED UPON THIS NATION BY
FEDERATION TO THE AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH 1901.
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Queen-Victoria-Statue-Outside-QV-Building.jpg>
[IMAGE: The Queen Victoria statue sculpted by John Hughes, located
outside the Queen Victoria building in downtown Sydney, Australia,
picture by Bjørn Christian Tørrissen on 3 January 2009]
The Statue of Queen Victoria, currently in Sydney, Australia, was made
by John Hughes in 1908 and was originally located in Dublin. Made of
bronze, it is situated on the corner of Druitt and George Street in
front of the Queen Victoria Building. It was the last royal statue to
have been erected in Ireland. An unveiling ceremony took place on
Sunday 20 December 1987 overseen by Eric Neal, Chief Commissioner of
Sydney, and Dermot Brangan, first secretary at the Irish embassy to
Australia. The irony of the British Queen being "transported" to
Australia by ship was not lost on the Irish media. In the days before
the unveiling the embassy and the Daily Telegraph newspaper received
anonymous threats of violence and protest about "the propriety of an
Irish government giving a statue of Victoria as a gift."
*THE* *STATUE* *PORTRAYED**HER* *AS* *THE SOVEREIGN* *HEAD* *OF* *THE*
*MOST* *ILLUSTRIOUS* *ORDER* *OF* *ST* *PATRICK*, *IRELAND'S* *ORDER*
*OF* *CHIVALRY* *DATING* *FROM* *1783* [AS COINCIDING WITH IMMANUEL
KANT'S PUBLISHING OF THE PROLEGOMENA TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS]. *THE*
*STAR* *ON* *HER* *LEFT* *BREAST*, *AND* *THE* *PENDANT* *BADGE*,
*FEATURE* *SHAMROCKS*, *CROWNED* *HARPS*, *AND* *ST* *PATRICK'S* *CROSS*.
DIARY NOTE @ 1252 HOURS ON 17 SEPTEMBER 2018: "I had to call the police
due to an instance of menacing and irrational conduct as alleged
breaches to an INTERVENTION ORDER which are subject to [this APPEAL CASE
NUMBER]: AP-18-0775 and there was a woman loitering some 80 metres away
within the park area who I couldn't readily distinguish and whom the
police later identified as the MARION STATUE ARTIST [with whom] I had
discoursed with @ 1739 / 1747 HOURS ON MONDAY 28 MAY 2018. I had in
point of fact not spoken to her at all today and yet it was being
improperly alleged that I had upon this day ambushed, harangued and
verbalised her over some absurd impetus of 'SAVING THE WORLD'.
MARION STATUE DIALOG WITH ARTIST @ 1739 HOURS ON MONDAY 28 MAY 2018
DOLF: "Can I ask for what purpose you are lighting candles ma'am?"
ARTIST: "Sorry."
DOLF: "For what purpose are you lighting candles?"
ARTIST: "Umm"
DOLF: "Why aren't you at the BOER WAR memorial celebrating our ah ...
our ah Australian! Oh you're the artist aren't you ma'am?"
ARTIST: "(laughs) I'm Brenda."
DOLF: "You're the artist."
ARTIST: "Nice to meet you."
DOLF: "Now..."
ARTIST: "What happened is um, the mother in Ireland died and their
service in Ireland is at 7 o'clock tonight."
DOLF: "What. Whose? Is that [statue] after a particular person?"
ARTIST: "Yeah Cathy McMahon."
DOLF: "So this [statue] was created in representation of ..."
ARTIST: "This here ... lighting the candles. Wanting to get the candles
all lit at the start of her service."
DOLF: "Okay. It's a Catholic [memorial] service is it?"
ARTIST: "Umm. I['m] not [entirely sure]. I think she is in the Catholic
Church."
DOLF: "Yes. Is this statue related to her in any manner?"
ARTIST: "Yes she is a mother."
DOLF: "Is she the mother depicted [by] the statue."
ARTIST: "No it depicts. The statue depicts all mothers [of which our
Lady is the exemplar]."
DOLF: "Yes. Yeah. The problem is that with the BOER WAR Memorial on the
31 May ..."
ARTIST: "Yes"
DOLF: "... I hugged a mother [at] refusal of Communion at Saint
Patrick's Cathedral in Melbourne on 31 May 1998."
ARTIST: "Really."
DOLF: "And she was refused communion because she was wearing a rainbow
sash."
ARTIST: "Oh really."
DOLF: "For no other reason. So I have an objection for it. Now would
you do me a favour to appease, to balance the karma of things. Because..."
ARTIST: "Yes (inaudible) ..."
It is noted that the THAT GOVERNOR GENERAL PETER COSGROVE WAS IN 2013
CONFERRED WITH THE KNIGHTHOOD OF THE GRAND CROSS OF THE ORDER OF ST
GREGORY THE GREAT BY CARDINAL PELL ON 7 FEBRUARY 2013 AND IS THEREFORE
COMPROMISED WITHIN HIS OFFICE AS GOVERNOR GENERAL AND THE SUBSTANTIAL
CAUSE FOR THE IMPEDIMENT TO ANY OBTAINMENT OF JUSTICE IN OUR PROVEN
ALLEGATION OF TREASON AGAINST THIS SAME ECCLESIASTIC as cause célebre
associated with unlawful foreign powers associated to eclipse cycles and
earlier refusal of the Eucharist Communion, which occurred at Saint
Patricks Cathedral, East Melbourne on the Pentecost Sunday Mass as the
dates of 31 May, 1998 (*THE* *PROXIMITY* *SUNDAY* *TO* *31ST* *MAY* *IS*
*WHEN* *THE* *BOER* *MEMORIAL* *OF* 1902 *OCCURS*) and 21 June, 2000.
Cardinal George Pell is guilty of Treason as per the photograph of
myself being evidence of our BOER WAR MEMORIAL DAY 31 May 1998 (refusal
of Communion on Pentecost Sunday) as crime by a substituted ethic
imposed upon our war dead and disloyalty towards our nation’s sovereignty.
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/BOERWARS19980531.jpg>
[IMAGE: Author consoling Catholic mother of a gay son & PFLAG President,
Nanette McGregor - The Rainbow Sash Protest (Refusal of Communion) on
'Pentecost Sunday' 31 May 1998, Saint Patrick's Cathedral, Melbourne
pictured by The Australian newspaper (front page) of 1 June 1998
(c) 1 June 1998 - James Croucher (photographer), News Ltd / Newspix,
Commercial Use, Internal Use For Company Or Organisation, Internal
Newsletter Or Document, Print And Digital, Up To 1,000]
DOLF: "... I'm going to take the council to court over this particular
matter. Because there is no object of respect at the BOER WAR Memorial."
ARTIST: "So what are you doing taking this to court?"
DOLF: "I'm taking this and the BOER yeah ... this is part of that. This
is part of ANZAC defamation which I have been subject to.
When a mother weeps for her children..."
ARTIST: "But this is what this is."
DOLF: "Yeah that is exactly what our 'LEST WE FORGET' poem is all about."
ARTIST: "So why are you against this?"
DOLF: "I'm against this because I happen to be JEWISH and ..."
ARTIST: "Oh okay my darling yes..."
DOLF: "And this is a MARION statue. Now if you really want to IRISH
persons its the WASHER WOMAN that was the person who was most ..."
ARTIST: "No no..."
DOLF: "The WASHER WOMAN in IRISH society was subject to more impunity
than any other woman within IRISH society."
ARTIST: "But you know it's interesting that you say that you're um ah
... JEWISH because the man that led this through the COMMONWEALTH games
... through the COMMONWEALTH government was JEWISH."
DOLF: "Yes but he should know better we don't ... they don't allow
statues in their TEMPLE precinct. And the circumstance that we have is
that I'm of DUTCH heritage and the [INTERNATIONAL] KNIGHTS TEMPLAR which
was formed in 2015 are associated with the ORDER that [DUTCH EXPLORER]
DIRK HARTOG signed the PEWTER PLATE with. So if you want to talk about
erections [of commemorative merit] DIRK HARTOG signed it as AO and their
were SEVEN PAPAL BULLS associated with my INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY.
As the RIGHT OF WOMEN which is the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS."
ARTIST: "So why are you against this? Why are you going to bring this
into your argument?"
DOLF: "Because WOMEN'S SUFFRAGE was the RIGHT of the exercise of
VOLUNTARY WILL in political life and this [statue] is not."
ARTIST: "What do you mean?"
DOLF: "This is not."
ARTIST: "What do you mean?"
DOLF: "Women in IRELAND have just been [granted the right of ABORTION] ..."
ARTIST: "No no hang on a moment.."
DOLF: "Women in IRELAND ... this was put here on SAINT PATRICK'S DAY of
all people. Of all places."
ARTIST: "But I chose that."
DOLF: "You should not have done that. Its representing [only the] IRISH..."
ARTIST: "No it's not. No it's not."
DOLF: "Well because that ... there was no PLAQUE here on the day that it
was [unveiled] ..."
ARTIST: "No but I didn't. I wasn't able to get it ..."
DOLF: "Let me finish..."
ARTIST: "No but you let me finish. I wasn't able ..."
DOLF: "There was no PLAQUE here on the day it was installed."
ARTIST: "Yes there was."
DOLF: "No there wasn't."
ARTIST: "I'm sorry SIR I unveiled the PLAQUE."
DOLF: "I'm sorry ma'am but I took pictures. And I took the picture on
the 8 JUNE when the PLAQUE was unveiled and then I went to the BOER WAR
MEMORIAL and there were tributes there as well.
So that's good day to you ma'am."
[walking away]
ARTIST: "Who are you taking it to?"
DOLF: "I will take you to court as well."
[walking away]
DOLF: "For vilification against my DUTCH heritage, my homosexuality and
my JEWISH belief."
[walking away]
DOLF: "When CAPTAIN COOK discovered AUSTRALIA he said the WEST COAST
belonged to the DUTCH [as] it was their discovery."
SUBSEQUENT MARION STATUE DIALOG WITH ARTIST @ 1747 HOURS ON MONDAY 28
MAY 2018
DOLF: "Just one more question if I may?
Did you get a planning permit for it?"
ARTIST: "Sorry my darling."
DOLF: "Did you get a planning permit for it?"
ARTIST: "Yes."
DOLF: "You did?"
ARTIST: "Yeah."
DOLF: "We were not notified about it."
ARTIST: "I'm sorry darling I don't know what you are on about because
I'm getting very scared."
DOLF: "Why should you be scared?"
ARTIST: "I'm scared of you..."
DOLF: "Why should you be ... I'm just asking you..."
ARTIST: "I'm just scared of you and I see you have been THREATENING."
DOLF: "I'm not being THREATENING at all ma'am."
ARTIST: "You are being THREATENING."
DOLF: "I'm not being THREATENING. I've got it on video tape so I don't
need to be THREATENING."
ARTIST: "Well you have just THREATENED me and I'm going to ring the police."
DOLF: "No I didn't thank-you."
THE POLICE ATTENDED AND REPEATED THE UNSUSTAINABLE FALSE ACCUSATION THAT
I WAS IN ANY MANNER THREATENING. AND I CONVEYED AT THE TIME OF MY
POLICE EMERGENCY CALL WHICH WAS MADE DUE TO THE FIRE RISK BY NUMEROUS
CANDLES UPON THE #473 - GARDEN BED WITH NO FIRE EXTINGUISHER PRESENT,
THAT THE ARTIST APPEARED TO HAVE MENTAL STABILITY ISSUES.
THAT THEY ONLY HAD RECOURSE TO THE SLANDER OF THREATENING CONDUCT (WHICH
THE TONE OF THE CONVERSATION DOES NOT CONVEY) WHEN IT WAS EVIDENT THERE
WAS A LACK OF TRUTH CONTENT OF THEIR RESPONSES TO REASONABLE QUESTIONS.
THE AUDIO RECORDINGS WHICH WERE NECESSARY TO GUARANTEE MY OWN SAFETY AND
INTEGRITY AND WITHOUT SUCH I WOULD HAVE IMMEDIATELY BEEN ARRESTED FOR
THREATENING CONDUCT WHICH DID NOT OCCUR AND NEVER INTENTIONED.
AT THE TIME OF PROVIDING THE POLICE WITH A COPY OF THE AUDIO RECORDING
IT WAS CONVEYED THAT THE CAMELLIA {so named after Georg Joseph Kamel (21
April 1661 – 2 May 1706) a Jesuit missionary, pharmacist and naturalist
known for producing the first comprehensive accounts of Philippine flora
and fauna and for introducing Philippine nature to the European learned
world} FLORAL TRIBUTE LEFT AT THE MARION SHRINE WAS REMOVED AND PLACED
AT THE BOER WAR MEMORIAL AND REMAINED THERE UNTIL AFTER 31 MAY 2018.
AS ITEM #3 OF MY SUBSTANTIAL GROUNDS FOR AN APPLICATION FOR AN
INTERVENTION AND PERSONAL SAFETY ORDER STATES: ON 31.7.2017 AT 10AM [THE
RESPONDENT] SHOWED ME A PHOTOGRAPH OF THE MARION STATUE WITH[IN] THE
PARK OPPOSITE WEARING A BALACLAVA AS TO CONVEY OUR MUTUAL
UNDERSTAND[ING] OF IT['S] PLACEMENT AS *AN* *ATTEMPT* [*TO*] *SUBVERT*
*OUR* *AUSTRALIAN* *HISTORY* *WHICH* *IS* *ABSENT* *OF* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *IMPOSITIONS* *UPON* *OUR* *BOER* / *ANZAC* *TRADITION* *BY*
*A* *SUBSTITUTED* *ETHIC*:
And this circumstance is given credence for action due to an equivalent
intrusion event occurring upon 21 JULY 2017 whilst attending to a
medical appointment, an unknown person was similarly fixated in a manner
of the MARION STATUE WEARING A BALACLAVA and had in my absence, dressed
my garden BUDDHA STATUE with a pair of WEDNESDAY underwear:
LET'S GO COMMANDO!
That I castigated the police for engaging within falsehoods as I hadn't
been in proximity to that person which the contiguous timestamp of my
photograph and time of telephone call convey.
With respects to the claim that it is likely the RESPONDENT is connected
with criminal networks as orbital to any sectarian [*BEING* *A*
*CONFEDERATE* *AS* *SECRET* *OR* *RELIGIOUS* *CONCOMITANT*] impetus
deploying a common source for its META SCHEMA OF ACQUIESCE {ie. TEMPORAL
COHESION OCCASIONING ACTION: #5 + #7 = #10 AS A SELF-PRESERVATION OF THE
EGO WITHIN CONTINUUM OF EXISTENCE} over which I still have further
informal research to undertake within the area of any determination made
as to a respective PROTOTYPE which is anticipated to exhibit #328 - BIAS
according to either: HOMOIOS / HETEROS / KABBALAH / ANY OTHER modality
as its innate propensity of mind encapsulation, then having viability as
feasibility by temporal cohesion occasioning action and whether such
generation of vital impetus can be thought of in terms of a toroidal
field being THE SOURCE where the poloidal quantum of action is directed
towards a central target as its focal universe of discourse and the
latitude is the permissibility within the sphere of action as the means
for attaining an intuition and sanctimony through the bestowal of self
entitlement.
However we would provisionally conclude from the publicly exhibited
allegiances conveyed by the various photographs:
#1) PHALLUS ON 7 JUNE 2018;
#2) LEST WE FORGET FLAG ON 28 JUNE 2018;
#3) EUREKA FLAG ON 10 JULY 2018;
#4) ISRAELI FLAG ON 17 JULY 2018;
#5) AUSTRALIAN FLAG (NOT SHOWN) ON 30 NOVEMBER 2018.
That there is conveyed by such a propensity towards distorted jingoistic
*BINOMIAL* perceptions of identity and its prerogatives which is
characteristically exhibited as pestilence amongst Irish Catholic
descents whom are delusional in the belief Australia is their Promised
Land where the KELLY motto is for example a mantra of opportunism:
'*TURRIS* *FORTIS* *MIHI* *DEUS*' as GOD IS A STRONG TOWER TO ME, which
is somehow a transcendent claim which casts a shadowy pall (ie. the
IRISH REPUBLICAN ARMY turned their lands into a WAR ZONE) upon the
sovereign motto itself: DIEU ET MON DROIT. Or acts wilfully against its
intrinsic principles of life: #462 - *A* *WRITTEN* *EDICT* *SUCH* *AS*
*PROROGUING* *ORDER* such as exhibited by TRINOMIAL MATHEMATICAL
THEORETICAL NOUMENON which is 'DEUS EX MACHINA'.
However, it would be a grave error to believe that the FIRST SUNDAY OF
ADVENT 2017 CELEBRATION as the 163RD ANNIVERSARY of the EUREKA REBELLION
on 3 DECEMBER 1854 resulting in the #419 - *SLAUGHTER* of at least 27
people, the majority of whom were unscrupulous rebels and had no notion
of moral principles of #41 - ONTIC NECESSITY such as #902 - RULE OF LAW
which implies a *TRINOMIAL* worldview. As defiantly 'WE ARE LIFE AND
YOU ARE #331 - NOT' the continuing struggle for a just, democratic and
sovereign Australia that paradoxically does not have any authentic right
to its own self-existence which is betrayed by ignorance through a
promiscuous and sycophantic association to the illusionary piety as
PRINCIPLE OF #312 - *CONTRADICTION* {#364 x 4 + #371 = #1827 - ROMAN
CATHOLIC LITURGICAL BLASPHEMY} with its encumbering implicit visceral
hatred as ANTI-SEMITISM.
[IMAGES: PHALLUS ON 7 JUNE 2018; LEST WE FORGET FLAG ON 28 JUNE 2018;
EUREKA FLAG ON 10 JULY 2018; ISRAELI FLAG ON 17 JULY 2018; AUSTRALIAN
FLAG (NOT SHOWN) ON 30 NOVEMBER 2018]
To that end, as we conveyed within our INSTRUCTIONS TO LEGAL COUNSEL
dated 18 NOVEMBER 2018, it does not seem surprising to me that the
APPLICATION for such COURT ORDERS which are now subject to COUNTY COURT
APPEALS: AP-18-2201 / AP-18-2202 ought to improperly use the expression
#419 - *CONTROLLING* being the same SIGNALLING {ie.
I HAVE FURNISHED THE POLICE WITH A DOCUMENT DETAILING THE GEMATRIA
SEMANTICAL CONSTRUCTS AS EXPRESSIONS WHICH COMPLY WITH THIS CATEGORY OF
UNDERSTANDING FOR SURVEILLANCE AND ANTI-TERRORIST PURPOSES AGAINST ANY
ORBITAL INSTITUTIONAL, ORGANISED CRIME OR BELIEF SYSTEMS THAT MIGHT
DEPLOY SUCH AGAINST THE *STATE*.
} later used to describe the subsequent disgusting amoral conduct which
is the SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM VIRILE character of AUSTRALIAN CRICKET as
unethical behaviour that was also exhibited by CHRIS MORRISON from
GIPPSLAND STRATA MANAGEMENT when he paradoxically sought to undertake
within his CRICKET REGALIA {ie. the emblems or insignia of royalty such
as the Australian Coat of Arms}, an urgent SATURDAY 10 MARCH 2018 duty
as #391 - STRATA MANAGEMENT by action of a FACILITATOR in the
establishing of a #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL, by recklessly and
improperly affixing a LOCK to the ELECTRICITY METER BOX due to the
APPLICANT'S ASSOCIATE being the AGENT PROVOCATEUR against whom there
existing ORDERS HAVE BEEN GRANTED in having committed (ie. AS BEING
WITHIN AN IMMEDIATE PROXIMITY WHICH CAN BE READILY DETERMINED FROM CCTV
FOOTAGE) a criminal act in unlawfully removing the ELECTRICAL FUSE (ie.
THAT INEXPLICABLY DIDN'T HAVE A BROKEN SEAL WHICH WAS IRREGULARLY
ELONGATED AS TO SUGGEST A SUBSEQUENT OR PLANNED RE-INSTALLATION SO AS TO
PROVIDE AN EXPEDIENT OPPORTUNITY FOR POWER DISRUPTION WHICH WAS ALSO
INFERRED BY THE ANIMUS AS MANNER OF UNDERTAKING WHERE HE PARKED WITHIN
ANOTHER UNIT'S DESIGNATED AREA, LEFT THE BOOT OPEN AND WITH CAUSAL
INTENTION {#391} WALKED TO THE METER BOX AND DISRUPTED THE POWER WITHOUT
BREAKING THE SEAL AS IF HE HAD FORE-KNOWLEDGE) as by such repeated
action with the APPLICANT'S KNOWLEDGE had also occurred upon 29 APRIL
2018 in addition to an unauthorised removal of the GATE (the later
action was admitted by the APPLICANT'S ASSOCIATE within the MAGISTRATES
COURT).
DIARY NOTE OF 12 MARCH 2018: "I HAVE PROVIDED THE DOCUMENT TO THE
VICTORIA POLICE IN RELATION TO A TARGETED POWER OUTAGE HIT EVENT @ 1130
HOURS ON SATURDAY 10 MARCH 2018:
<http://www.grapple369.com/?time:11.30>
That as previously advised the fuse holder to my electricity smart meter
was removed but the intact seal signifying an electrical tradesman
association.
These pictures were obtained showing the APPLICANT'S ASSOCIATE being the
AGENT PROVOCATEUR within proximity to the SP AUSNET tradesman [ref:
38805 as service call lodged @ 1204 HOURS ON SATURDAY 10 MARCH 2018] who
had his hand upon the relevant seal so that this fact cannot be denied.
BUT NEITHER THE SP AUSNET TECHNICIANS NOR THE STRATA TITLE MANAGEMENT
(WHOM HAVE AN ASSOCIATION AND ALLEGEDLY APARTMENT OWNERSHIP) WERE
PREPARED TO ACKNOWLEDGE THIS OBVIOUS FACT OF AN ELECTRICAL TRADESMAN
ASSOCIATION AND THIS ACCOUNTS FOR THE SUSTAINED VIEW THAT STRATA TITLE
MANAGEMENT WAS OBSTRUCTIONIST AND THEREFORE VICARIOUSLY LIABLE FOR THE
CRIME.
CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING FOR THE PLANNED EVENT WERE:
#391 as [#70, #40, #70, #10, #1, #200] = homoios (G3664): {#12 as #460 %
#41 = #9} 1) like, similar, resembling; 1a) like: ie. resembling; 1b)
like: ie. corresponding to a thing;
#391 as [#70, #10, #20, #70, #50, #70, #40, #10, #1, #50] = oikonomia
(G3622): {#11 as #341 % #41 = #13} 1) the management of a household or
of household affairs; 1a) specifically, the management, oversight,
administration, of other's property; 1b) the office of a manager or
overseer, stewardship; 1c) administration, dispensation;
That #391 - STRATA MANAGEMENT throughout this exigency was entirely
disrespectful towards my person by being hostile within his animus, as
to be like all sports people whom are entirely uncaring towards me as
anyone {ie. #391 - HOMOGENEOUS} not within their fan club such that they
have ONLY A CONCEPTION OF NUMBER (which the AUSTRALIAN FOOTBALL LEAGUE
corporally convey upon their backs) that is reliant upon the Pythagorean
binomial nomenclature as an artifice made of their reality.
TO BE CONTINUED ...
It ought to be noted that Mr. George W. Bush as the 43rd President of
the United States of America (Republican), did publicly make the claim
within the news media that this day: Wednesday 19 September, 2001 was
significantly recognized as the Creation Day of the World by some
religious communities of faith which conforms to my unfaltering
initiative that has been pursued every day since.
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"
http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ
SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*
Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit
<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>
SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]
Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.
It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.
<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>
The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."
That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)
After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
