Whether a habit is good or bad, time nourishes it

Discussion:

(too old to reply)

unknown

2019-03-08 19:39:08 UTC

"Whether a habit is good or bad, time nourishes it, just as wood feeds a
fire. Thus, so far as we can, we should cultivate and practice what is
good, so that it becomes an established habit operating automatically and
effortlessly when required. It was through victories in small things that
the fathers won their great battles."

St. Peter of Damaskos.

"A perverse man sows strife, And a whisperer separates the best of
friends." Proverbs 16:28

Draw nigh unto God and He will draw nigh unto you.

dolf

2019-03-08 23:41:16 UTC

Permalink

IMMANUEL KANT’S PROLEGOMENA (1783) THE TRANSCENDENTAL DOCTRINE OF THE
POWER OF JUDGMENT (OR ANALYTIC OF PRINCIPLES) SECOND CHAPTER ON SYSTEM
OF ALL PRINCIPLES OF THE PURE UNDERSTANDING: “[IDEAS: @A148 / @B187] In
the previous chapter we have considered the transcendental power of
judgment according only to the general conditions under which alone is
entitled to use the pure concepts of the understanding for synthetic
judgments. Our task now is to exhibit, in systematic connection, the
judgments that the understanding actually achieves a priori under this
critical provision, in which our table of categories must, without
doubt, give us natural and sure guidance. For the relation of these
categories to possible experience is exactly that which must constitute
all pure a priori cognition of the understanding, and for that reason
their relation to sensibility in general will exhibit, completely and
[IDEA: @B188] in a system, all the transcendental principles for the use
of the understanding.

A priori principles bear this name not only because they contain in
themselves the grounds for other judgments, but also because they are
not themselves grounded in higher and more general cognitions. This
[IDEA: @A149] property does not, however, exempt them from all proof.
For although such a *PRINCIPLE* *CANNOT* *BE* *TAKEN* *FURTHER*
*OBJECTIVELY*, but underlies all cognition of its *OBJECT*, this does
not at all prevent its being possible or even necessary to create a
proof from the *SUBJECTIVE* *SOURCES* *OF* *THE* *POSSIBILITY* *OF* *A*
*COGNITION* *OF* *AN* *OBJECT* *IN* *GENERAL*, for otherwise the
proposition would, for all that, carry the highest suspicion of being a
purely fraudulent assertion.

Second, we will limit ourselves merely to those principles that relate
to the categories. The principles of the Transcendental Aesthetic,
according to which space and time are the conditions of the possibility
of all things as appearances, together with the restriction of these
principles – namely, that they cannot be related to things in themselves
– thus do not belong to the field of investigation we’ve picked out.

Equally, mathematical principles do not make up any part of this system,
since they are drawn only from intuition and not from the pure concepts
of the understanding; nonetheless, the possibility of such principles,
[IDEA: @B189] since they are still synthetic a priori judgments, will
necessarily find a place here, not indeed in order to prove their
correctness and apodeictic {ie. *CLEARLY* *ESTABLISHED* *BEYOND*
*DISPUTE*} certainty, of which they have no need at all, but only to
make comprehensible, and to deduce, the possibility of such evident
cognitions a priori.” [pages 177 to 178]

STATES OF EUROPEAN UNION
#1 - Principle of Enquiry;
#2 - Principle of Contradiction;
#3 - Principle of Syncretic Progression;
#4 - Principle of Materiality
#5 - Discriminating Norm {Principle of Enquiry}
#6 - Obligating Norm {Principle of Contradiction}: Binomial stasis
nomenclature
#7 - Manifesting Norm {Principle of Syncretic Progression}

FUNCTION OF EUROPEAN UNION
#8 - Transformational Principle {Transforming Nature / #5 - Act of Nature}
#9 - Ontological Principle {Autonomous Nature / #6 - Form of Nature}

*OBJECTIVE* OF EUROPEAN UNION
#10 - Sovereign Principle {Totality of Nature / #7 - Engendering Nature}

So firstly we need to consider what is reality?

And the answer which I would consider is that it is constituted by a
metastasised characteristic of identity or persona.

Whereas a ring on one’s finger is an *OBJECT* of reality.

How is such stasis of reality achieved as CONCORDIA?

BINOMIAL APPARATUS:
@1 <--- INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN {#64 = 8 x 8 as #260 MAGIC SUM}
@5 <--- ANCHOR {PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY PROTOTYPE}
#65 - *SOLDIER* {@1 RETENTION + #64 ELEMENTS}
#175 - *MARRIAGE*

TRINOMIAL APPARATUS:
@1 <— #492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL {#369 - DISCRIMINATING NORM / #123 -
JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY (3x3 - CENTRE INTERLOCK)}
@5 <— #205 - PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE {#873 - PROBITY OF THE
DIGNITY ROYAL}
@491 <— #491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY
@164 <— #3273 - PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY

THUSLY: 3 x 1091 + @1 (1) - HOMOGENEOUS + @2 (1) - HETEROGENEOUS + @3
(1) - TORAH = 3 x #1092 IS STILL IN HARMONY / EQUILIBRIUM WITH THE #2184
- ANTHROPOCENTRIC COSMOGONIC PRINCIPLE AS CONSTITUTION OF STATE / PROVINCE

1) DEMIURGE OF NATURE {4 x #364 + #371 = #1827}

@1 - FASCIST MOVEMENT IS A SPONTANEOUS RETURN TO THE TRADITIONS OF
ANCIENT ROME [ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE TALK IDEA: @1 ON SATURDAY 5 JULY 1941]

@5 - ROMAN EMPIRE GREAT POLITICAL CREATION OF STATE [ADOLF HITLER'S
TABLE TALK IDEA: @5 ON 21-22 JULY 1941]

#65 - *SOLDIER* (MARS: PRIAPUS / PHALLUS)

#1827 = 4 x #364 + #371 - ROMAN CATHOLIC LITURGICAL CALENDAR 2ND VATICAN
COUNCIL / SAINT ANDREWS #371 - 30 NOVEMBER CAUSE CÉLÈBRE FIVE YEAR CYCLE

#175 - *MARRIAGE* (VENUS: HYMENIALISM)

#1827 = [#5, #400, #600, #1, #100, #10, #200, #300, #10, #1, #200]
eucharistia / ευχαριστιας (G2169): 1) Thanksgiving; 2) *EUCHARIST*; 3)
*TARGETED* *SINCE* *REFUSAL* *OF* *COMMUNION* upon PENTECOST SUNDAY 31
MAY 1998 AND 11 JUNE 2000.

2) COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis {6 x #364 = #2184 as ANTHROPOCENTRIC
COSMOGONIC PRINCIPLE}

@1 {#451 - INCEPTION} +
@2 {#41 - AN ETHICAL / MORAL PRESCRIPTION “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 -
*ONTIC* X N] NECESSITY WITH IT” WHICH IMPLIES A TRINOMIAL WORLDVIEW} EQUALS

@3 {#492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL IN THE EXERCISE OF THE INTELLECTUS AS
GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS: #205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE* *PERSISTENCE* *OF*
*SUBSTANCE* ☯️ / ✡️ #164 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY* = #369} +

@4 {#123 - JUDGEMENT SENSIBILITY} EQUALS

@10 {#615 - TO PRONOUNCE JUDGMENT AND TO SUBJECT TO PROCEDURES / #41 =
#15 {#113 as [#6, #5, #2, #50, #10, #600] = ben (H1121): {UMBRA: #6 as
#113 % #41 = #31} 1) *A* *MEMBER* *OF* *A* *GUILD*, *ORDER*, *CLASS*}}

THUS THE MECHANICS OF BREXIT IS ENTIRELY METEMPIRICAL AS ONTIC PROCESS {

#492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL {#369 / #123 (3x3 - CENTRE INTERLOCK)}
@205 / #873
@491
@164 / #3273

} IS ENTIRELY MATHEMATICAL AND PERSISTENT AS WRITTEN AGREEMENT WHICH IN
MY HUMBLE OPINION IT IS THEREBY A ROBUST AND VITAL IMPETUS FOR THE
EUROPEAN UNION ACHIEVING THE REALITY AS SAPIENT ECONOMY.

IMMANUEL KANT’S PROLEGOMENA (1783) SECOND SECTION OF THE HIGHEST
PRINCIPLE OF ALL SYNTHETIC JUDGMENTS AS IDEA @A157: “OF THE SYSTEM OF
PRINCIPLES OF THE PURE UNDERSTANDING [IDEAS: @A154 / @B193] It is
therefore given: that if one must go outside a given concept to compare
[IDEAS: @A155 / @B194] it synthetically with another, then a third thing
is needed, in which alone the synthesis of two concepts can originate.
But what is then this third thing, the medium of all synthetic
judgments? . . .

If a cognition is to have *OBJECTIVE* *REALITY*, i.e., if it is to
relate to an *OBJECT* and to have significance and sense in that
*OBJECT*, then the *OBJECT* must be able to be given in some way.

Without this, concepts are empty, and though one has indeed thought with
them, one has in fact cognized [IDEA: @196] nothing through this
thinking, but has merely played with representations.

To give an *OBJECT* – if this is not to mean giving it again only
mediately, [IDEA: @A156] but exhibiting it immediately in intuition – is
nothing other than to relate a representation of it to experience
(whether actual or indeed possible). Even space and time, as pure as
these concepts are of everything empirical, and as certain as it is also
that they are represented fully a priori in the mind, would nonetheless
be without *OBJECTIVE* *VALIDITY* and without sense and significance, if
their necessary use were not directed upon the *OBJECTS* *OF*
*EXPERIENCE* – indeed, their representation is a mere schema that is
always related to the reproductive imagination, which calls forth the
*OBJECTS* *OF* *EXPERIENCE* without which they would have no
significance; and thus it is with all concepts, without distinction.

The possibility of experience is then what gives *OBJECTIVE* *REALITY*
to all our a priori cognitions. Now experience rests on the synthetic
unity of the appearances, i.e., on a synthesis according to *CONCEPTS*
*OF* *AN* *OBJECT* *OF* *APPEARANCES* *IN* *GENERAL*, without which it
would not even be cognition, but a rhapsody of perceptions, which in no
context would agree together according to the rules of a thoroughly
connected (possible) consciousness, hence also not for the
transcendental and necessary unity of apperception.

Experience therefore has principles of its form underlying it a priori,
[IDEA: @B196] namely universal rules of unity in the synthesis of the
appearances, whose [IDEA: @A157] *OBJECTIVE* *REALITY* as necessary
{#287 - STATES OF THE EUROPEAN UNION} conditions can always be pointed
to in experience, indeed, even in its possibility. Outside this
relation, however, synthetic a priori propositions are completely
impossible, since they have no third thing, namely, no pure *OBJECT*,
upon which the synthetic unity of their concepts could establish
*OBJECTIVE* *REALITY*.

Although we cognize a priori in synthetic judgments so much about space
in general, or the figures that the reproductive imagination inscribes
in it, that we actually require no experience thereto at all;
nonetheless, this cognition would amount to nothing but preoccupation
with a mere brain phantom, were it not that space is to be regarded as a
condition of the appearances that constitute the stuff of outer
experience; in consequence, these pure synthetic judgments relate
(albeit only mediately) to possible experience, or rather to the
*POSSIBILITY* *OF* *EXPERIENCE* *ITSELF*, *AND* *GROUND* *THE*
*OBJECTIVE* *VALIDITY* *OF* *THEIR* *SYNTHESIS* upon that alone.

Since then experience, as empirical synthesis, is in its possibility the
single type of cognition that gives reality to every other synthesis, as
a [IDEA: @B197] priori cognition the other synthesis also has truth
(*AGREEMENT* *WITH* *AN* [IDEA: @A158] *OBJECT*) only in that it
contains nothing more than what is necessary for the synthetic unity of
experience in general.

The highest principle of all synthetic judgments is then: *EVERY*
*OBJECT* *FALLS* *UNDER* *THE* *NECESSARY* *CONDITIONS* *OF* *THE*
*SYNTHETIC* *UNITY* *OF* *THE* *MANIFOLD* *OF* *INTUITION* *IN* *A*
*POSSIBLE* *EXPERIENCE*. Synthetic a priori judgments are possible in
this way: if we relate the formal conditions of a priori intuition, the
synthesis of the imagination, and its necessary unity in a
transcendental apperception to a possible cognition of experience in
general and say: the conditions of the possibility of experience in
general are at the same time the conditions of the possibility of the
*OBJECTS* *OF* *EXPERIENCE*, AND FOR THAT REASON HAVE *OBJECTIVE*
*VALIDITY* in a synthetic judgment a priori. [pages 179 to 180]

CAVEAT: Ignore any grammatical errors, as it was 0500 hours when I began
writing this in bed and just after 0720 hours when I initially sent it.
Once again I am only proffering an informal opinion from my causal
infatuation as metaphysical faculty of endeavour and as such I am
entirely reliant upon the sapient expertise of others to provision its
potential utility and material merits.

- dolf

The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's
Ground Work for the Metaphysics of Morals are now available within the
directory:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>

Initial Post: 9 March 2019

SUBJECT WAS: WHETHER A HABIT IS GOOD OR BAD, TIME NOURISHES IT

Post by unknown
"Whether a habit is good or bad, time nourishes it, just as wood feeds a
fire. Thus, so far as we can, we should cultivate and practice what is
good, so that it becomes an established habit operating automatically and
effortlessly when required. It was through victories in small things that
the fathers won their great battles."
St. Peter of Damaskos.
"A perverse man sows strife, And a whisperer separates the best of
friends." Proverbs 16:28
Draw nigh unto God and He will draw nigh unto you.

--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.

dolf

2019-03-09 03:30:04 UTC

Permalink

-- WHAT IS BREXT?

(c) 2019 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 9 March, 2019

Nous: #24
Time: 23:15 hrs
Date: 2019.3.9
Torah: [#10, #2, #40]@{
@1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
@2: Sup: 12 (#22); Ego: 2 (#12),
@3: Sup: 52 (#74); Ego: 40 (#52),
Male: #74; Feme: #52
} // #52

Dao: Important Distinctions, Trouble from Indulgence
Tetra: #18 - Waiting
I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay, Attending, Waiting, Moistened, Arriving

Latin: Operator {Word which produces all things} Alt: Eriel
{Watchfulness of God} {

1. GENERATION OF BEINGS & PHILOSOPHICAL KNOWLEDGE
2. PROTECTS & REGENERATES, LEADS TO INNER HARMONY
3. PHENOMENA OF NATURE
4. Thopibui
}

Solar Eclipse: 9 March 1997 (AEST) / Solar Eclipse: 3 November 2013 (AEST)

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#250 / #354} / HETEROS {#280 / #369} / TORAH {#280
/ #369}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:4,row:9,col:8,nous:24&idea:{m,150}&idea:{f,198}&idea:{m,250}&idea:{f,354}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

***@zen: 4, row: 9, col: 8, nous: 24 [Date: 2019.3.9, Time: 23:15
hrs, Super: #250 / #36 - Natural Reversals, 'Secret' Explanation;
I-Ching: H4 - Juvenile Ignorance, Youthful Inexperience, Enveloping, The
young shoot, Discovering; Tetra: 12 - Youthfulness, Ego: #354 / #24 -
Important Distinctions, Trouble from Indulgence; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting,
Delay, Attending, Waiting, Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 18 - Waiting]

We have a busy time today doing something that I rarely do upon the #364
- Sabbath day and that is working on document preparation which plans
the demise of others as it seems to be a #312 - contradiction and so we
need some #273 - syncretistic mechanism to facilitate a favourable outcome.

And do that I thought to consider (this is a spontaneous comment and
subject to revision) the question on WHAT IS BREXIT?

IS IT REALITY?
OR AN *OBJECT* OF REALITY?
ONLY A CHIMERA OR MIRROR OF REALITY?
OUR IMPETUS AS *OBJECTIVE* FOR REALITY?

Europeans would readily agree that such four corners of dialectics
whether GEORG HEGEL’s @1 - Thesis; @2 - Anti-thesis; @3 - Synthesis; @4
- Progression or KARL MARX’s @1 - Progression; @2 - Synthesis; @3 -
Anti-thesis; @4 - Thesis that there is no end of idealism or argument
and which may lead to disastrous consequences with the world being
turned upside down.

[B, {@1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2)},
R, {@2: Sup: 11 (#13); Ego: 9 (#11)},
E, {@3: Sup: 16 (#29); Ego: 5 (#16)},
X, {@4: Sup: 49 (#78); Ego: 33 (#49)},
I, {@5: Sup: 58 (#136); Ego: 9 (#58)},
T] {@6: Sup: 15 (#151: SEE TRANSITION POINT AS IDEA: @A149 WITHIN
IMMANUEL KANT’S PROLEGOMENA); Ego: 38 (#96)}

YOUTUBE: "The Master and Insanity (Doctor Who)

http://youtu.be/m0RvDZFN71A

IMMANUEL KANT’S PROLEGOMENA (1783) THE TRANSCENDENTAL DOCTRINE OF THE
POWER OF JUDGMENT (OR ANALYTIC OF PRINCIPLES) SECOND CHAPTER ON SYSTEM
OF ALL PRINCIPLES OF THE PURE UNDERSTANDING: “[IDEAS: @A148 / @B187] In
the previous chapter we have considered the transcendental power of
judgment according only to the general conditions under which alone is
entitled to use the pure concepts of the understanding for synthetic
judgments. Our task now is to exhibit, in systematic connection, the
judgments that the understanding actually achieves a priori under this
critical provision, in which our table of categories must, without
doubt, give us natural and sure guidance. For the relation of these
categories to possible experience is exactly that which must constitute
all pure a priori cognition of the understanding, and for that reason
their relation to sensibility in general will exhibit, completely and
[IDEA: @B188] in a system, all the transcendental principles for the use
of the understanding.

A priori principles bear this name not only because they contain in
themselves the grounds for other judgments, but also because they are
not themselves grounded in higher and more general cognitions. This
[IDEA: @A149] property does not, however, exempt them from all proof.

For although such a *PRINCIPLE* *CANNOT* *BE* *TAKEN* *FURTHER*
*OBJECTIVELY*, but underlies all cognition of its *OBJECT*, this does
not at all prevent its being possible or even necessary to create a
proof from the *SUBJECTIVE* *SOURCES* *OF* *THE* *POSSIBILITY* *OF* *A*
*COGNITION* *OF* *AN* *OBJECT* *IN* *GENERAL*, for otherwise the
proposition would, for all that, carry the highest suspicion of being a
purely fraudulent assertion.

Second, we will limit ourselves merely to those principles that relate
to the categories. The principles of the Transcendental Aesthetic,
according to which space and time are the conditions of the possibility
of all things as appearances, together with the restriction of these
principles – namely, that they cannot be related to things in themselves
– thus do not belong to the field of investigation we’ve picked out.

Equally, mathematical principles do not make up any part of this system,
since they are drawn only from intuition and not from the pure concepts
of the understanding; nonetheless, the possibility of such principles,
[IDEA: @B189] since they are still synthetic a priori judgments, will
necessarily find a place here, not indeed in order to prove their
correctness and apodeictic {ie. *CLEARLY* *ESTABLISHED* *BEYOND*
*DISPUTE*} certainty, of which they have no need at all, but only to
make comprehensible, and to deduce, the possibility of such evident
cognitions a priori.” [pages 177 to 178]

STATES OF EUROPEAN UNION
#1 - Principle of Enquiry;
#2 - Principle of Contradiction;
#3 - Principle of Syncretic Progression;
#4 - Principle of Materiality
#5 - Discriminating Norm {Principle of Enquiry}
#6 - Obligating Norm {Principle of Contradiction}: Binomial stasis
nomenclature
#7 - Manifesting Norm {Principle of Syncretic Progression}

FUNCTION OF EUROPEAN UNION
#8 - Transformational Principle {Transforming Nature / #5 - Act of Nature}
#9 - Ontological Principle {Autonomous Nature / #6 - Form of Nature}

*OBJECTIVE* OF EUROPEAN UNION
#10 - Sovereign Principle {Totality of Nature / #7 - Engendering Nature}

So firstly we need to consider what is reality?

And the answer which I would consider is that it is constituted by a
metastasised characteristic of identity or persona.

Whereas a ring on one’s finger is an *OBJECT* of reality.

How is such stasis of reality achieved as CONCORDIA?

BINOMIAL APPARATUS:
@1 <--- INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN {#64 = 8 x 8 as #260 MAGIC SUM}
@5 <--- ANCHOR {PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY PROTOTYPE}
#65 - *SOLDIER* {@1 RETENTION + #64 ELEMENTS}
#175 - *MARRIAGE*

G4074@{
   @1: Sup: 80 (#80); Ego: 80 (#80),
   @2: Sup: 4 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 5 (#85),
   @3: Sup: 61 (#145); Ego: 57 (#142),
   @4: Sup: 80 (#225); Ego: 19 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}),
   @5: Sup: 4 (#229); Ego: 5 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}),
   Male: #229; Feme: #166
} // #490 + @1 AS CARDINAL PRINCIPLE OF RETENTION = #491

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #755 % #41 = #17 - Politics; I-Ching: H54 - Marriageable
Maid/Maiden, Converting the Maiden; Tetra: 65 - Inner;

THOTH MEASURE: #17 - Oh Aati, who makest thine appearance at Annu; I am
not one of prating tongue.

    #VIRTUE: With Holding Back (no. #17), to have fears.
    #TOOLS: Guardedness (no. #57) means to be impregnable.
    #POSITION: With Compliance (no. #77), orders upheld, but
    #TIME: With Contrariety (no. #6), mutual opposition.
    #CANON: #157

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_157@{
   @1: Sup: 17 (#17); Ego: 17 (#17),
   @2: Sup: 74 (#91); Ego: 57 (#74),
   @3: Sup: 70 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 77 (#151),
   @4: Sup: 76 (#237); Ego: 6 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE
{%17} / I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
   Male: #237; Feme: #157
} // #157

#490 as [#80, #5, #300, #100, #5] = Petros (G4074): {UMBRA: #16 as #755
% #41 = #17} 1) one of the twelve disciples of Jesus;

"AND I SAY ALSO UNTO THEE, THAT THOU ART PETER {#490 as [#80, #5, #300,
#100, #5] = Petros (G4074): Peter}, AND UPON THIS ROCK I WILL BUILD MY
CHURCH; AND THE GATES {

@1 - #33 [#1 {#99 / #297 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #6 {#123 / #369 - TORAH & 114
/ #342 - ANKH / ROMAN} - *SHARE* *THE* *SAME* *ANCESTOR*]
@5 - #77 [#5 {#111 / #333 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #5 {#114 / #342 - TORAH} -
*PROTECT* *EACH* *OTHER* {Latin: CANONICUS ‘according to rule’}]

= #100 - *WHAT* *IS* *TRUTH*? AS THE ESTABLISHING OF A #231 -
JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL

#473 as [#40, #400, #1, #2, #30] = 'abal (H56): {UMBRA: #0 as #33 % #41
= #33} 1) to mourn, lament; 1a) (Qal) to mourn, lament; 1a1) of humans;
1a2) of inanimate objects (fig.); 1a2a) of *GATES*; 1a2b) of land; 1b)
(Hiphil); 1b1) to mourn, cause to mourn (fig.); 1c) (Hithpael); 1c1) to
mourn; 1c2) play the mourner;

} OF HELL SHALL NOT PREVAIL AGAINST IT." [Matthew 16:18 (KJV)]

TRINOMIAL APPARATUS:
@1 <— #492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL {#369 - DISCRIMINATING NORM / #123 -
JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY (3x3 - CENTRE INTERLOCK)}
@5 <— #205 - PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE {#873 - PROBITY OF THE
DIGNITY ROYAL}
@491 <— #491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY
@164 <— #3273 - PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY

@123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY AS #2188 - AUTONOMOUS PRINCIPLE OF COHESION
(#273 - SYNCRETIC PROGRESSION)

THUSLY: 3 x 1091 + @1 (1) - HOMOGENEOUS + @2 (1) - HETEROGENEOUS + @3
(1) - TORAH = 3 x #1092 IS STILL IN HARMONY / EQUILIBRIUM WITH THE #2184
- ANTHROPOCENTRIC COSMOGONIC PRINCIPLE AS CONSTITUTION OF STATE / PROVINCE

1) DEMIURGE OF NATURE {4 x #364 + #371 = #1827}

@1 - FASCIST MOVEMENT IS A SPONTANEOUS RETURN TO THE TRADITIONS OF
ANCIENT ROME [ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE TALK IDEA: @1 ON SATURDAY 5 JULY 1941]

@5 - ROMAN EMPIRE GREAT POLITICAL CREATION OF STATE [ADOLF HITLER'S
TABLE TALK IDEA: @5 ON 21-22 JULY 1941]

#65 - *SOLDIER* (MARS: PRIAPUS / PHALLUS)

#1827 = 4 x #364 + #371 - ROMAN CATHOLIC LITURGICAL CALENDAR 2ND VATICAN
COUNCIL / SAINT ANDREWS #371 - 30 NOVEMBER CAUSE CÉLÈBRE FIVE YEAR CYCLE

#175 - *MARRIAGE* (VENUS: HYMENIALISM)

#1827 = [#5, #400, #600, #1, #100, #10, #200, #300, #10, #1, #200]
eucharistia / ευχαριστιας (G2169): 1) Thanksgiving; 2) *EUCHARIST*; 3)
*TARGETED* *SINCE* *REFUSAL* *OF* *COMMUNION* upon PENTECOST SUNDAY 31
MAY 1998 AND 11 JUNE 2000.

2) COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis {6 x #364 = #2184 as ANTHROPOCENTRIC
COSMOGONIC PRINCIPLE}

@1 {#451 - INCEPTION} +
@2 {#41 - AN ETHICAL / MORAL PRESCRIPTION “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 -
*ONTIC* X n] NECESSITY WITH IT” WHICH IMPLIES A TRINOMIAL WORLDVIEW} EQUALS

@3 {#492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL IN THE EXERCISE OF THE INTELLECTUS AS
GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS: #205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE* *PERSISTENCE* *OF*
*SUBSTANCE* ☯️ / ✡️ #164 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY* = #369} +

@4 {#123 - JUDGEMENT SENSIBILITY} EQUALS

@10 {#615 - TO PRONOUNCE JUDGMENT AND TO SUBJECT TO PROCEDURES / #41 =
#15 {#113 as [#6, #5, #2, #50, #10, #600] = ben (H1121): {UMBRA: #6 as
#113 % #41 = #31} 1) *A* *MEMBER* *OF* *A* *GUILD*, *ORDER*, *CLASS*}}

THUS THE MECHANICS OF BREXIT IS ENTIRELY METEMPIRICAL AS ONTIC PROCESS {

@492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL {@369 / @123 (#3 x #3 - CENTRE INTERLOCK)}
@205 / #873
@82 / #491
@164 / #3273
@123 / #2188

@41 / #113 - EMANATION FUNCTION

} IS ENTIRELY MATHEMATICAL AND PERSISTENT AS WRITTEN AGREEMENT WHICH IN
MY HUMBLE OPINION IT IS THEREBY A ROBUST AND VITAL IMPETUS FOR THE
EUROPEAN UNION ACHIEVING THE REALITY AS SAPIENT ECONOMY.

IMMANUEL KANT’S PROLEGOMENA (1783) SECOND SECTION OF THE HIGHEST
PRINCIPLE OF ALL SYNTHETIC JUDGMENTS AS IDEA @A157: “OF THE SYSTEM OF
PRINCIPLES OF THE PURE UNDERSTANDING [IDEAS: @A154 / @B193] It is
therefore given: that if one must go outside a given concept to compare
[IDEAS: @A155 / @B194] it synthetically with another, then a third thing
is needed, in which alone the synthesis of two concepts can originate.
But what is then this third thing, the medium of all synthetic
judgments? . . .

If a cognition is to have *OBJECTIVE* *REALITY*, i.e., if it is to
relate to an *OBJECT* and to have significance and sense in that
*OBJECT*, then the *OBJECT* must be able to be given in some way.

Without this, concepts are empty, and though one has indeed thought with
them, one has in fact cognized [IDEA: @196] nothing through this
thinking, but has merely played with representations.

To give an *OBJECT* – if this is not to mean giving it again only
mediately, [IDEA: @A156] but exhibiting it immediately in intuition – is
nothing other than to relate a representation of it to experience
(whether actual or indeed possible). Even space and time, as pure as
these concepts are of everything empirical, and as certain as it is also
that they are represented fully a priori in the mind, would nonetheless
be without *OBJECTIVE* *VALIDITY* and without sense and significance, if
their necessary use were not directed upon the *OBJECTS* *OF*
*EXPERIENCE* – indeed, their representation is a mere schema that is
always related to the reproductive imagination, which calls forth the
*OBJECTS* *OF* *EXPERIENCE* without which they would have no
significance; and thus it is with all concepts, without distinction.

The possibility of experience is then what gives *OBJECTIVE* *REALITY*
to all our a priori cognitions. Now experience rests on the synthetic
unity of the appearances, i.e., on a synthesis according to *CONCEPTS*
*OF* *AN* *OBJECT* *OF* *APPEARANCES* *IN* *GENERAL*, without which it
would not even be cognition, but a rhapsody of perceptions, which in no
context would agree together according to the rules of a thoroughly
connected (possible) consciousness, hence also not for the
transcendental and necessary unity of apperception.

Experience therefore has principles of its form underlying it a priori,
[IDEA: @B196] namely universal rules of unity in the synthesis of the
appearances, whose [IDEA: @A157] *OBJECTIVE* *REALITY* as necessary
{#287 - STATES OF THE EUROPEAN UNION} conditions can always be pointed
to in experience, indeed, even in its possibility. Outside this
relation, however, synthetic a priori propositions are completely
impossible, since they have no third thing, namely, no pure *OBJECT*,
upon which the synthetic unity of their concepts could establish
*OBJECTIVE* *REALITY*.

Although we cognize a priori in synthetic judgments so much about space
in general, or the figures that the reproductive imagination inscribes
in it, that we actually require no experience thereto at all;
nonetheless, this cognition would amount to nothing but preoccupation
with a mere brain phantom, were it not that space is to be regarded as a
condition of the appearances that constitute the stuff of outer
experience; in consequence, these pure synthetic judgments relate
(albeit only mediately) to possible experience, or rather to the
*POSSIBILITY* *OF* *EXPERIENCE* *ITSELF*, *AND* *GROUND* *THE*
*OBJECTIVE* *VALIDITY* *OF* *THEIR* *SYNTHESIS* upon that alone.

Since then experience, as empirical synthesis, is in its possibility the
single type of cognition that gives reality to every other synthesis, as
a [IDEA: @B197] priori cognition the other synthesis also has truth
(*AGREEMENT* *WITH* *AN* [IDEA: @A158] *OBJECT*) only in that it
contains nothing more than what is necessary for the synthetic unity of
experience in general.

The highest principle of all synthetic judgments is then: *EVERY*
*OBJECT* *FALLS* *UNDER* *THE* *NECESSARY* *CONDITIONS* *OF* *THE*
*SYNTHETIC* *UNITY* *OF* *THE* *MANIFOLD* *OF* *INTUITION* *IN* *A*
*POSSIBLE* *EXPERIENCE*. Synthetic a priori judgments are possible in
this way: if we relate the formal conditions of a priori intuition, the
synthesis of the imagination, and its necessary unity in a
transcendental apperception to a possible cognition of experience in
general and say: the conditions of the possibility of experience in
general are at the same time the conditions of the possibility of the
*OBJECTS* *OF* *EXPERIENCE*, AND FOR THAT REASON HAVE *OBJECTIVE*
*VALIDITY* in a synthetic judgment a priori. [pages 179 to 180]

CAVEAT: Ignore any grammatical errors, as it was 0500 hours when I began
writing this in bed and just after 0720 hours when I initially sent it.
Once again I am only proffering an informal opinion from my causal
infatuation as metaphysical faculty of endeavour and as such I am
entirely reliant upon the sapient expertise of others to provision its
potential utility and material merits.

- dolf

The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's
Ground Work for the Metaphysics of Morals are now available within the
directory:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>

Initial Post: 9 March 2019

SUBJECT WAS: WHETHER A HABIT IS GOOD OR BAD, TIME NOURISHES IT

--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.

dolf

2019-03-09 04:53:53 UTC

Permalink

-- WHAT IS BREXT?

(c) 2019 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 9 March, 2019

Nous: #24
Time: 23:15 hrs
Date: 2019.3.9
Torah: [#10, #2, #40]@{
@1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
@2: Sup: 12 (#22); Ego: 2 (#12),
@3: Sup: 52 (#74); Ego: 40 (#52),
Male: #74; Feme: #52
} // #52

Dao: Important Distinctions, Trouble from Indulgence
Tetra: #18 - Waiting
I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay, Attending, Waiting, Moistened, Arriving

Latin: Operator {Word which produces all things} Alt: Eriel
{Watchfulness of God} {

1. GENERATION OF BEINGS & PHILOSOPHICAL KNOWLEDGE
2. PROTECTS & REGENERATES, LEADS TO INNER HARMONY
3. PHENOMENA OF NATURE
4. Thopibui
}

Solar Eclipse: 9 March 1997 (AEST) / Solar Eclipse: 3 November 2013 (AEST)

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#250 / #354} / HETEROS {#280 / #369} / TORAH {#280
/ #369}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:4,row:9,col:8,nous:24&idea:{m,150}&idea:{f,198}&idea:{m,250}&idea:{f,354}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

***@zen: 4, row: 9, col: 8, nous: 24 [Date: 2019.3.9, Time: 23:15
hrs, Super: #250 / #36 - Natural Reversals, 'Secret' Explanation;
I-Ching: H4 - Juvenile Ignorance, Youthful Inexperience, Enveloping, The
young shoot, Discovering; Tetra: 12 - Youthfulness, Ego: #354 / #24 -
Important Distinctions, Trouble from Indulgence; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting,
Delay, Attending, Waiting, Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 18 - Waiting]

We have a busy time today doing something that I rarely do upon the #364
- Sabbath day and that is working on document preparation which plans
the demise of others as it seems to be a #312 - contradiction and so we
need some #273 - syncretistic mechanism to facilitate a favourable outcome.

And do that I thought to consider (this is a spontaneous comment and
subject to revision) the question on WHAT IS BREXIT?

IS IT REALITY?
OR AN *OBJECT* OF REALITY?
ONLY A CHIMERA OR MIRROR OF REALITY?
OUR IMPETUS AS *OBJECTIVE* FOR REALITY?

Europeans would readily agree that such four corners of dialectics
whether GEORG HEGEL’s @1 - Thesis; @2 - Anti-thesis; @3 - Synthesis; @4
- Progression or KARL MARX’s @1 - Progression; @2 - Synthesis; @3 -
Anti-thesis; @4 - Thesis that there is no end of idealism or argument
and which may lead to disastrous consequences with the world being
turned upside down.

[B, {@1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2)},
R, {@2: Sup: 11 (#13); Ego: 9 (#11)},
E, {@3: Sup: 16 (#29); Ego: 5 (#16)},
X, {@4: Sup: 49 (#78); Ego: 33 (#49)},
I, {@5: Sup: 58 (#136); Ego: 9 (#58)},
T] {@6: Sup: 15 (#151: SEE TRANSITION POINT AS IDEA: @A149 WITHIN
IMMANUEL KANT’S PROLEGOMENA); Ego: 38 (#96)}

YOUTUBE: "The Master and Insanity (Doctor Who)

http://youtu.be/m0RvDZFN71A

IMMANUEL KANT’S PROLEGOMENA (1783) THE TRANSCENDENTAL DOCTRINE OF THE
POWER OF JUDGMENT (OR ANALYTIC OF PRINCIPLES) SECOND CHAPTER ON SYSTEM
OF ALL PRINCIPLES OF THE PURE UNDERSTANDING: “[IDEAS: @A148 / @B187] In
the previous chapter we have considered the transcendental power of
judgment according only to the general conditions under which alone is
entitled to use the pure concepts of the understanding for synthetic
judgments. Our task now is to exhibit, in systematic connection, the
judgments that the understanding actually achieves a priori under this
critical provision, in which our table of categories must, without
doubt, give us natural and sure guidance. For the relation of these
categories to possible experience is exactly that which must constitute
all pure a priori cognition of the understanding, and for that reason
their relation to sensibility in general will exhibit, completely and
[IDEA: @B188] in a system, all the transcendental principles for the use
of the understanding.

A priori principles bear this name not only because they contain in
themselves the grounds for other judgments, but also because they are
not themselves grounded in higher and more general cognitions. This
[IDEA: @A149] property does not, however, exempt them from all proof.

For although such a *PRINCIPLE* *CANNOT* *BE* *TAKEN* *FURTHER*
*OBJECTIVELY*, but underlies all cognition of its *OBJECT*, this does
not at all prevent its being possible or even necessary to create a
proof from the *SUBJECTIVE* *SOURCES* *OF* *THE* *POSSIBILITY* *OF* *A*
*COGNITION* *OF* *AN* *OBJECT* *IN* *GENERAL*, for otherwise the
proposition would, for all that, carry the highest suspicion of being a
purely fraudulent assertion.

Second, we will limit ourselves merely to those principles that relate
to the categories. The principles of the Transcendental Aesthetic,
according to which space and time are the conditions of the possibility
of all things as appearances, together with the restriction of these
principles – namely, that they cannot be related to things in themselves
– thus do not belong to the field of investigation we’ve picked out.

Equally, mathematical principles do not make up any part of this system,
since they are drawn only from intuition and not from the pure concepts
of the understanding; nonetheless, the possibility of such principles,
[IDEA: @B189] since they are still synthetic a priori judgments, will
necessarily find a place here, not indeed in order to prove their
correctness and apodeictic {ie. *CLEARLY* *ESTABLISHED* *BEYOND*
*DISPUTE*} certainty, of which they have no need at all, but only to
make comprehensible, and to deduce, the possibility of such evident
cognitions a priori.” [pages 177 to 178]

STATES OF EUROPEAN UNION
#1 - Principle of Enquiry;
#2 - Principle of Contradiction;
#3 - Principle of Syncretic Progression;
#4 - Principle of Materiality
#5 - Discriminating Norm {Principle of Enquiry}
#6 - Obligating Norm {Principle of Contradiction}: Binomial stasis
nomenclature
#7 - Manifesting Norm {Principle of Syncretic Progression}

FUNCTION OF EUROPEAN UNION
#8 - Transformational Principle {Transforming Nature / #5 - Act of Nature}
#9 - Ontological Principle {Autonomous Nature / #6 - Form of Nature}

*OBJECTIVE* OF EUROPEAN UNION
#10 - Sovereign Principle {Totality of Nature / #7 - Engendering Nature}

So firstly we need to consider what is reality?

And the answer which I would consider is that it is constituted by a
metastasised characteristic of identity or persona.

Whereas a ring on one’s finger is an *OBJECT* of reality.

How is such stasis of reality achieved as CONCORDIA?

BINOMIAL APPARATUS:
@1 <--- INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN {#64 = 8 x 8 as #260 MAGIC SUM}
@5 <--- ANCHOR {PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY PROTOTYPE}
#65 - *SOLDIER* {@1 RETENTION + #64 ELEMENTS}
#175 - *MARRIAGE*

G4074@{
   @1: Sup: 80 (#80); Ego: 80 (#80),
   @2: Sup: 4 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 5 (#85),
   @3: Sup: 61 (#145); Ego: 57 (#142),
   @4: Sup: 80 (#225); Ego: 19 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}),
   @5: Sup: 4 (#229); Ego: 5 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}),
   Male: #229; Feme: #166
} // #490 + @1 AS *CARDINAL* *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *RETENTION* = #491

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #755 % #41 = #17 - Politics; I-Ching: H54 - Marriageable
Maid/Maiden, Converting the Maiden; Tetra: 65 - Inner;

THOTH MEASURE: #17 - Oh Aati, who makest thine appearance at Annu; I am
not one of prating tongue.

    #VIRTUE: With Holding Back (no. #17), to have fears.
    #TOOLS: Guardedness (no. #57) means to be impregnable.
    #POSITION: With Compliance (no. #77), orders upheld, but
    #TIME: With Contrariety (no. #6), mutual opposition.
    #CANON: #157

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_157@{
   @1: Sup: 17 (#17); Ego: 17 (#17),
   @2: Sup: 74 (#91); Ego: 57 (#74),
   @3: Sup: 70 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 77 (#151),
   @4: Sup: 76 (#237); Ego: 6 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE
{%17} / I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
   Male: #237; Feme: #157
} // #157

#490 as [#80, #5, #300, #100, #5] = Petros (G4074): {UMBRA: #16 as #755
% #41 = #17} 1) one of the twelve disciples of Jesus;

"AND I SAY ALSO UNTO THEE, THAT THOU ART PETER {#490 as [#80, #5, #300,
#100, #5] = Petros (G4074): Peter}, AND UPON THIS ROCK I WILL BUILD MY
CHURCH; AND THE *GATES* {

@1 - #33 [#1 {#99 / #297 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #6 {#123 / #369 - TORAH & 114
/ #342 - ANKH / ROMAN} - *SHARE* *THE* *SAME* *ANCESTOR*]
@5 - #77 [#5 {#111 / #333 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #5 {#114 / #342 - TORAH} -
*PROTECT* *EACH* *OTHER* {Latin: CANONICUS ‘according to rule’}]

= #100 - *WHAT* *IS* *TRUTH*? AS THE ESTABLISHING OF A #231 -
JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL

#473 as [#40, #400, #1, #2, #30] = 'abal (H56): {UMBRA: #0 as #33 % #41
= #33} 1) to mourn, lament; 1a) (Qal) to mourn, lament; 1a1) of humans;
1a2) of inanimate objects (fig.); 1a2a) of *GATES*; 1a2b) of land; 1b)
(Hiphil); 1b1) to mourn, cause to mourn (fig.); 1c) (Hithpael); 1c1) to
mourn; 1c2) play the mourner;

#473 as [#20, #3, #50, #400] = gannah (H1593): {UMBRA: #1 as #58 -
Political Reversal, Adaptation to Change; I-Ching: H43 - Resolution,
Displacement, Parting, Break-through; Tetra: 29 - Decisiveness % #41 =
#17} 1) garden, orchard;

#473 as [#6, #400, #7, #2, #8, #10, #40] = zabach (H2076): {UMBRA: #2 as
#17 % #41 = #17} 1) to slaughter, kill, sacrifice, slaughter for
sacrifice; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to slaughter for sacrifice; 1a2) to slaughter
for eating; 1a3) to slaughter in divine judgment; 1b) (Piel) to
sacrifice, offer sacrifice;

} OF HELL SHALL NOT PREVAIL AGAINST IT." [Matthew 16:18 (KJV)]

TRINOMIAL APPARATUS:
@1 <— #492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL {#369 - DISCRIMINATING NORM / #123 -
JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY (3x3 - CENTRE INTERLOCK)}
@5 <— #205 - PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE {#873 - PROBITY OF THE
DIGNITY ROYAL}
@491 <— #491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY
@164 <— #3273 - PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY

@123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY AS #2188 - AUTONOMOUS PRINCIPLE OF COHESION
(#273 - SYNCRETIC PROGRESSION)

THUSLY: 3 x 1091 + @1 (1) - HOMOGENEOUS + @2 (1) - HETEROGENEOUS + @3
(1) - TORAH = 3 x #1092 IS STILL IN HARMONY / EQUILIBRIUM WITH THE #2184
- ANTHROPOCENTRIC COSMOGONIC PRINCIPLE AS CONSTITUTION OF STATE / PROVINCE

1) DEMIURGE OF NATURE {4 x #364 + #371 = #1827}

@1 - FASCIST MOVEMENT IS A SPONTANEOUS RETURN TO THE TRADITIONS OF
ANCIENT ROME [ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE TALK IDEA: @1 ON SATURDAY 5 JULY 1941]

@5 - ROMAN EMPIRE GREAT POLITICAL CREATION OF STATE [ADOLF HITLER'S
TABLE TALK IDEA: @5 ON 21-22 JULY 1941]

H3632@{
   @1: Sup: 20 (#20); Ego: 20 (#20),
   @2: Sup: 50 (#70); Ego: 30 (#50),
   @3: Sup: 60 (#130 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}); Ego: 10 (#60),
   @4: Sup: 9 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED ANIMALS {%13});
Ego: 30 (#90),
   @5: Sup: 4 (#143); Ego: 76 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}),
   Male: #143; Feme: #166
} // #490 + @1 AS *CARDINAL* *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *RETENTION* = #491

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #90 % #41 = #8 - Worth of Water, Easy By Nature; I-Ching: H48 -
The Well, Welling; Tetra: 40 - Law/Model;

THOTH MEASURE: #8 - Oh thou of fiery face, whose motion is backwards; I
am not a robber of sacred property.

    #VIRTUE: Opposition (no. #8) means recklessness.
    #TOOLS: Ritual (no. #48) means squareness the correspondence
between word and deed.
    #POSITION: With Departure (no. #66), leaving the old, but
    #TIME: With On the Verge (no. #78), coming to a new start.
    #CANON: #200

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_200@{
   @1: Sup: 8 (#8); Ego: 8 (#8),
   @2: Sup: 56 (#64); Ego: 48 (#56),
   @3: Sup: 41 (#105); Ego: 66 (#122),
   @4: Sup: 38 (#143); Ego: 78 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED
PROPERTY {%8}),
   Male: #143; Feme: #200
} // #200

#490 as [#20, #30, #10, #30, #400] = kaliyl (H3632): {UMBRA: #3 as #90 %
#41 = #8} 1) entire, all, perfect adv; 2) entirety subst; 3) whole,
whole burnt offering, *HOLOCAUST*, entirety;

"THEY SHALL TEACH JACOB THY JUDGMENTS, AND ISRAEL THY LAW: THEY SHALL
PUT INCENSE BEFORE THEE, AND WHOLE {#490 as [#20, #30, #10, #30, #400] =
kaliyl (H3632): perfect} BURNT {#490 as [#20, #30, #10, #30, #400] =
kaliyl (H3632): perfect} SACRIFICE UPON THINE ALTAR." [Deuteronomy 33:10
(KJV)]

#65 - *SOLDIER* (MARS: PRIAPUS / PHALLUS)

#1827 = 4 x #364 + #371 - ROMAN CATHOLIC LITURGICAL CALENDAR 2ND VATICAN
COUNCIL / SAINT ANDREWS #371 - 30 NOVEMBER CAUSE CÉLÈBRE FIVE YEAR CYCLE

#175 - *MARRIAGE* (VENUS: HYMENIALISM)

#1827 = [#5, #400, #600, #1, #100, #10, #200, #300, #10, #1, #200]
eucharistia / ευχαριστιας (G2169): 1) Thanksgiving; 2) *EUCHARIST*; 3)
*TARGETED* *SINCE* *REFUSAL* *OF* *COMMUNION* upon PENTECOST SUNDAY 31
MAY 1998 AND 11 JUNE 2000.

2) COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis {6 x #364 = #2184 as ANTHROPOCENTRIC
COSMOGONIC PRINCIPLE}

@1 {#451 - INCEPTION} +
@2 {#41 - AN ETHICAL / MORAL PRESCRIPTION “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 -
*ONTIC* X n] NECESSITY WITH IT” WHICH IMPLIES A TRINOMIAL WORLDVIEW} EQUALS

@3 {#492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL IN THE EXERCISE OF THE INTELLECTUS AS
GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS: #205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE* *PERSISTENCE* *OF*
*SUBSTANCE* ☯️ / ✡️ #164 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY* = #369} +

@4 {#123 - JUDGEMENT SENSIBILITY} EQUALS

@10 {#615 - TO PRONOUNCE JUDGMENT AND TO SUBJECT TO PROCEDURES / #41 =
#15 {#113 as [#6, #5, #2, #50, #10, #600] = ben (H1121): {UMBRA: #6 as
#113 % #41 = #31} 1) *A* *MEMBER* *OF* *A* *GUILD*, *ORDER*, *CLASS*}}

THUS THE MECHANICS OF BREXIT IS ENTIRELY METEMPIRICAL AS ONTIC PROCESS {

@492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL {@369 / @123 (#3 x #3 - CENTRE INTERLOCK)}
@205 / #873
@82 / #491
@164 / #3273
@123 / #2188

@41 / #113 - EMANATION FUNCTION

} IS ENTIRELY MATHEMATICAL AND PERSISTENT AS WRITTEN AGREEMENT WHICH IN
MY HUMBLE OPINION IT IS THEREBY A ROBUST AND VITAL IMPETUS FOR THE
EUROPEAN UNION ACHIEVING THE REALITY AS SAPIENT ECONOMY.

IMMANUEL KANT’S PROLEGOMENA (1783) SECOND SECTION OF THE HIGHEST
PRINCIPLE OF ALL SYNTHETIC JUDGMENTS AS IDEA @A157: “OF THE SYSTEM OF
PRINCIPLES OF THE PURE UNDERSTANDING [IDEAS: @A154 / @B193] It is
therefore given: that if one must go outside a given concept to compare
[IDEAS: @A155 / @B194] it synthetically with another, then a third thing
is needed, in which alone the synthesis of two concepts can originate.
But what is then this third thing, the medium of all synthetic
judgments? . . .

If a cognition is to have *OBJECTIVE* *REALITY*, i.e., if it is to
relate to an *OBJECT* and to have significance and sense in that
*OBJECT*, then the *OBJECT* must be able to be given in some way.

Without this, concepts are empty, and though one has indeed thought with
them, one has in fact cognized [IDEA: @196] nothing through this
thinking, but has merely played with representations.

To give an *OBJECT* – if this is not to mean giving it again only
mediately, [IDEA: @A156] but exhibiting it immediately in intuition – is
nothing other than to relate a representation of it to experience
(whether actual or indeed possible). Even space and time, as pure as
these concepts are of everything empirical, and as certain as it is also
that they are represented fully a priori in the mind, would nonetheless
be without *OBJECTIVE* *VALIDITY* and without sense and significance, if
their necessary use were not directed upon the *OBJECTS* *OF*
*EXPERIENCE* – indeed, their representation is a mere schema that is
always related to the reproductive imagination, which calls forth the
*OBJECTS* *OF* *EXPERIENCE* without which they would have no
significance; and thus it is with all concepts, without distinction.

The possibility of experience is then what gives *OBJECTIVE* *REALITY*
to all our a priori cognitions. Now experience rests on the synthetic
unity of the appearances, i.e., on a synthesis according to *CONCEPTS*
*OF* *AN* *OBJECT* *OF* *APPEARANCES* *IN* *GENERAL*, without which it
would not even be cognition, but a rhapsody of perceptions, which in no
context would agree together according to the rules of a thoroughly
connected (possible) consciousness, hence also not for the
transcendental and necessary unity of apperception.

Experience therefore has principles of its form underlying it a priori,
[IDEA: @B196] namely universal rules of unity in the synthesis of the
appearances, whose [IDEA: @A157] *OBJECTIVE* *REALITY* as necessary
{#287 - STATES OF THE EUROPEAN UNION} conditions can always be pointed
to in experience, indeed, even in its possibility. Outside this
relation, however, synthetic a priori propositions are completely
impossible, since they have no third thing, namely, no pure *OBJECT*,
upon which the synthetic unity of their concepts could establish
*OBJECTIVE* *REALITY*.

Although we cognize a priori in synthetic judgments so much about space
in general, or the figures that the reproductive imagination inscribes
in it, that we actually require no experience thereto at all;
nonetheless, this cognition would amount to nothing but preoccupation
with a mere brain phantom, were it not that space is to be regarded as a
condition of the appearances that constitute the stuff of outer
experience; in consequence, these pure synthetic judgments relate
(albeit only mediately) to possible experience, or rather to the
*POSSIBILITY* *OF* *EXPERIENCE* *ITSELF*, *AND* *GROUND* *THE*
*OBJECTIVE* *VALIDITY* *OF* *THEIR* *SYNTHESIS* upon that alone.

Since then experience, as empirical synthesis, is in its possibility the
single type of cognition that gives reality to every other synthesis, as
a [IDEA: @B197] priori cognition the other synthesis also has truth
(*AGREEMENT* *WITH* *AN* [IDEA: @A158] *OBJECT*) only in that it
contains nothing more than what is necessary for the synthetic unity of
experience in general.

The highest principle of all synthetic judgments is then: *EVERY*
*OBJECT* *FALLS* *UNDER* *THE* *NECESSARY* *CONDITIONS* *OF* *THE*
*SYNTHETIC* *UNITY* *OF* *THE* *MANIFOLD* *OF* *INTUITION* *IN* *A*
*POSSIBLE* *EXPERIENCE*. Synthetic a priori judgments are possible in
this way: if we relate the formal conditions of a priori intuition, the
synthesis of the imagination, and its necessary unity in a
transcendental apperception to a possible cognition of experience in
general and say: the conditions of the possibility of experience in
general are at the same time the conditions of the possibility of the
*OBJECTS* *OF* *EXPERIENCE*, AND FOR THAT REASON HAVE *OBJECTIVE*
*VALIDITY* in a synthetic judgment a priori. [pages 179 to 180]

CAVEAT: Ignore any grammatical errors, as it was 0500 hours when I began
writing this in bed and just after 0720 hours when I initially sent it.
Once again I am only proffering an informal opinion from my causal
infatuation as metaphysical faculty of endeavour and as such I am
entirely reliant upon the sapient expertise of others to provision its
potential utility and material merits.

- dolf

The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's
Ground Work for the Metaphysics of Morals are now available within the
directory:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>

Initial Post: 9 March 2019

SUBJECT WAS: WHETHER A HABIT IS GOOD OR BAD, TIME NOURISHES IT

dolf

2019-04-19 04:55:48 UTC

Permalink

>

<Loading Image...

>

As we'd previously raised in our correspondence to this COURT, the
starting point of our concerns lays with a #364 - QUESTION upon what is
the actual focal impetus to their SWEARING of *OATHS* {

"391" : [6, 2, 300, 2, 6, 70, 5],
"413" : {
"0" : [6, 30, 300, 2, 70, 5],
"1" : [30, 300, 2, 6, 70, 5]
}

AS 8 JUNE 2017 CHERISHED MOTHER STATUE PLAQUE INSTALLATION

} as being made in the circumstance against the autonomy of the person
(#492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL) but entirely to:

'I *SWEAR* BY HIM WHO THE TETRAKTYS (@1 - RETENTION + @5 - CENTRE OF
VALUE? + #65 - *DODECAHEDRON* / *SOLDIER* + #175 - *ICOSAHEDRON* /
*MARRIAGE* = #10 - TETRAKTYS) FOUND, WHENCE ALL OUR WISDOM SPRINGS AND
WHICH CONTAINS PERENNIAL NATURE'S FOUNTAIN, CAUSE AND ROOT.'

"ANYONE WHO FOR FALSE REASONS OF MERCY DEVIATES FROM THIS CLEAR
PRINCIPLE IS AIDING {H5826: `azar / help: #273}, WILLINGLY {H7521:
ratsah / accept: #273} OR UNWILLINGLY {H7589: she'at / despiteful: #273;
H4784: marah / rebel: #273; H6696: tsuwr / besiege: #273}, THE
DISSOLUTION OF THE STATE." [Adolf Hitler's Table Talk IDEA: (7 JUNE
1942) @235, page #519]

Had it not be for our rational belief and sapient intellectual property
our nation’s statehood would have been consumed in that holocaust
against 850 years of history.

THUSLY IT EXHIBITS A CLEAR MENS REA RELATING TO:

SOVEREIGN / MARRIAGE DYNAMIC (TRADITION)

v's

SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY DYNAMIC

AS IMPETUS FOR THE NOTRE DAME MAELSTROM WHICH BEING AN ASSAILMENT
AGAINST 850 YEARS OF STATE / SOVEREIGN HISTORY WOULD HAVE BY DEFAULT
*ROLLED* *BACK* *TO* ITS KNOWN STASIS

BINOMIAL APPARATUS {#36}:
@1 <--- INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN {#64 = 8 x 8 as #260 MAGIC SUM}
@5 <--- ANCHOR {PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY PROTOTYPE}
#65 - *SOLDIER* {@1 RETENTION + #64 ELEMENTS}
#175 - *MARRIAGE*

Nous: #36
Time: 01:40 hrs
Date: 2019.4.15
Torah:

Dao: Natural Reversals, 'Secret' Explanation
Tetra: #12 - Youthfulness
I-Ching: H4 - Juvenile Ignorance, Youthful Inexperience, Enveloping, The
young shoot, Discovering

#260 CE

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#325 / #367} / HETEROS {#330 / #329} / TORAH {#324
/ #326}

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:1,row:1,col:8,nous:36&lexicon:H776>

***@zen: 1, row: 1, col: 8, nous: 36 [Date: 2019.4.15, Time: 01:40
hrs, Super: #325 / #36 - Natural Reversals, 'Secret' Explanation;
I-Ching: H4 - Juvenile Ignorance, Youthful Inexperience, Enveloping, The
young shoot, Discovering; Tetra: 12 - Youthfulness, Ego: #367 / #36 -
Natural Reversals, 'Secret' Explanation; I-Ching: H4 - Juvenile
Ignorance, Youthful Inexperience, Enveloping, The young shoot,
Discovering; Tetra: 12 - Youthfulness]

*THUS* *WE* *CONCLUDE* *A* *HIGH* *PROBABILITY* *THAT* *THE* *FIRE*
*WAS* *A* *DELIBERATE* *CAUSE* *CÉLÈBRE* *ASSAILMENT* *AGAINST*
*SOVEREIGN* *DEMOCRATIC* *NATIONS*.

In our opinion the BINOMIAL APPARATUS as the occidental perspective of
PERENNIALISM having by the immateriality of its STASIS which defines a
SOVEREIGN / MARRIAGE dynamic may in some circumstances have a
predisposition towards judgementalism by impetus of narcissistic
self-justification as being an auto-intoxication in a self bestowed
dignity as a ontological self-delusion due to an infatuation with the
mirroring of its various ONTIC characteristic elements expressed therein
and perhaps not realising that it is also subject to the @205 -
PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE {#873 - PROBITY OF THE DIGNITY ROYAL
(LETTERS PATENT)} and @82 / #491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY (SECTION IX)
in being a lawful EMANATION OF STATE AS METHODOLOGY which itself
conforms to the dialectic of the #2184 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC COSMOGONIC
PRINCIPLE that are encapsulated by the @164 / #3273 - PRINCIPLE OF
MATERIALITY (SECTION VIII) and the HISTORICAL CHRISTIAN WEDDING VOW.

"I, *NAME* *OF* *BRIDE*, #312 - *TAKE* *THEE* {ie. A WILLING, WILL},
*NAME* *OF* *GROOM* to be my #2184 - *LAWFULLY* {ie. LAWS OF NATURE}
wedding husband. To have and to hold #273 - *FROM* *THIS* *DAY*
*FORWARD* {ie. SUCCESSIVELY IN ORDER}, for richer or poorer, in sickness
and in health, to love and #364 - *OBEY* until death do we part, today I
pledge my faithfulness."

SECTION VIII: "REQUIRE AND COMMAND ALL OUR OFFICERS AND MINISTERS, CIVIL
AND MILITARY, AND ALL OTHER THE INHABITANTS OF OUR SAID COMMONWEALTH TO
BE #364 - OBEDIENT {#273 - REMEMBRANCE}, #312 - AIDING {#273
-SEPULCHRE}, AND #273 - ASSISTING {#273 - WEAK} UNTO OUR SAID GOVERNOR
GENERAL {#2184 - LAWS OF NATURE AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL COSMOLOGICAL
PRINCIPLE / 12 = #182 AS DATE(1996,3,20) + 5 x #364 + #182 = 11
SEPTEMBER 2001}, OR, IN THE EVENT OF HIS DEATH, #273 - INCAPACITY, OR
ABSENCE, TO SUCH PERSON OR PERSONS AS MAY, FROM TIME TO TIME, UNDER THE
PROVISIONS OF THESE OUR LETTERS PATENT, ADMINISTER {#2184 - LAWS OF
NATURE AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE / 13 = #168 - I AM NOT
THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26 - *YHWH*}} THE GOVERNMENT OF OUR SAID
COMMONWEALTH."

What we call 'culture' is actually a series of core beliefs or value
systems, with each level expressing a different understanding of the
world or the church. A “belief” or “value system” is a worldview, a set
of perspectives/priorities/paradigms, a mind-set, an organizing
framework for deep-level decision-making at the bottom line—which is why
you can’t compromise about it. Your value system is the threshold at
which you won’t negotiate.

BEFORE PONTIUS PILATE AS TRIAL (H974) ENDS FRIDAY 3 APRIL 33 AD:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:4,row:1,col:5,nous:1&lexicon:H974>

HUNG (H8518) FOR DISPLAY ENDS SATURDAY 4 APRIL 33 AD

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:5,row:1,col:5,nous:14&lexicon:H8518>

THAT THE ONTOLOGICAL CONTEXT OF REDEMPTION (G4266) OCCURRING UPON SUNDAY
5 APRIL 33 AD IS PREDICATED UPON THE ONTIC EPISTEMOLOGICAL PREMISE

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:1,row:1,col:6,nous:76&lexicon:G4266>

SONS OF BELIAL ARE TO KEEP THEIR WEDDING VOWS (H631) WHICH WERE NOT MADE
TO ALMIGHTY GOD

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:4,row:1,col:5,nous:1&lexicon:H631>

*EXPIRY* *OF* *ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *MITHRAS* *CLAIMS* (G2983) *TO*
*CHRISTIAN* *IDENTITY* UPON 22 APRIL 2019: @113 : [#30, #1, #2, #70,
#10] as @41 / #113 - EMANATION FUNCTION <— ETHICAL ENGAGEMENT}

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:2,row:1,col:9,nous:16&lexicon:G2983>

"I LAY DOWN MY LIFE, THAT I MIGHT TAKE {22 APRIL 2019: @113: [#30, #1,
#2, #70, #10] as @41 / #113 - EMANATION FUNCTION <— ETHICAL ENGAGEMENT}
IT AGAIN. NO MAN TAKETH IT FROM ME, BUT I LAY IT DOWN OF MYSELF. I HAVE
POWER TO LAY IT DOWN, AND I HAVE POWER TO TAKE IT AGAIN. THIS
COMMANDMENT HAVE I RECEIVED OF MY FATHER." [John 10:10-18 (KJV)]"

#34 (@7 - Engendering Nature: #175 {*MARRIAGE*} - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS
NATURE [#82 - HONOUR YOUR PARENTS]) ...

84: [2 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE]
86: [10 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD]
102: [4 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS]
104: [7 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD]
115: [5 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN]

TOTAL: @84 + @86 + @102 = *ROYALTY*, *REIGN* (*OF* *TIME*), *KINGDOM* /
*DAY*, *TIME*, *YEAR* + @104 = *TO* *GET* *AS* *A* *POSSESSION*,
*ACQUIRE*, *INHERIT*, *POSSESS* / *TO* *POSSESS* *ONESELF* + @115 =
*MOSES* *SEAT* *OF* *HONOUR* (*ROYAL* *DIGNITY*, *AUTHORITY*, *POWER*) =
#491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY (#312 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTRADICTION) as
#491 as [#80, #1, #300, #100, #10] = pater (G3962): {UMBRA: #22 as #489
% #41 = #38} 1) generator or male ancestor; 2) metaphor: *ZEUS*.; 3) God
is called the Father; 1a) either the nearest ancestor: father of the
corporeal nature, natural fathers, both parents; 1b) a more remote
ancestor, the founder of a race or tribe, progenitor of a people,
forefather: ... the Father of Jesus Christ, as one whom God has united
to himself in the closest bond of love and intimacy, made acquainted
with his purposes, appointed to explain and carry out among men the plan
of salvation, and made to share also in his own divine nature; 3d1) *BY*
*JESUS* *CHRIST* *HIMSELF*; 3d2) by the apostles;

QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT SECTION IX: “AND WE DO HEREBY RESERVE TO
OURSELVES OUR @104 - HEIRS AND SUCCESSORS, FULL @115 - POWER AND
AUTHORITY FROM @102 - TIME TO @104 - TIME TO REVOKE, ALTER, OR AMEND
THESE OUR LETTERS PATENT, AS TO US OR THEM SHALL SEEM MEET.”

“YE WORSHIP YE KNOW NOT WHAT: WE KNOW WHAT WE WORSHIP: FOR SALVATION IS
OF THE JEWS.” [John 4:22 (KJV)]

#71 #1 #11
#61 #81 #21
#51 #41 #31 = #369 as DISCRIMINATING NORM OF HUMAN NATURE / WAN WU AS
ORGANISATION OF THINGS IN NATURE

#205 = PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE (YANG)
#164 = PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY (YIN)

#41 - EMANATION PRINCIPLE (REMEMBER THE SABBATH)
#82 - TERMS OF CONTINUITY (HONOUR PARENTS)
#123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY (DO NOT KILL)
#164 = PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY (YIN / TORAH: AVOID HETERONOMY AGAINST
AUTONOMY)
#205 = PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE (YANG / YAHAD: DO NOT STEAL)
#246 - NORMA OBLIGANS (BEAR NO FALSE WITNESS)
#287 - MANIFESITNG NORM (COVET NOT)

@492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL {@369 / @123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY (#3 x #3 -
CENTRE INTERLOCK)}

@205 / #873 - LETTERS PATENT <-- PRINCIPLES OF PROBITY
@82 / #491 - SECTION IX <— TERMS OF CONTINUITY
@164 / #3273 - SECTION VIII (?) <— COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS
@123 / #2188 - SECTION III (?) <— JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT

@41 / #113 - EMANATION FUNCTION <— ETHICAL ENGAGEMENT

HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO ELIZABETH REGINA II ON EASTER SUNDAY 21 APRIL 2019

- dolf

----------

TAKE NOTE OF THIS WARNING:

THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE MODIFIED AT ANY TIME, EVEN AFTER ITS ELECTRONIC
SERVICE AS PUBLIC STATEMENT AND THE CONVEYING OF A SOVEREIGN AUTHORITY
MAKING AN EFFECTUAL DEMAND AS A DUTY OF COMPLIANCE (‘EVENT’) PLACED UPON
ANY NOMINATED PARTIES (WHETHER OR NOT SPECIFIED).

SUCH AMENDMENTS WHICH HAVE OCCURRED THEREAFTER THE SAID EVENT, WILL BE
CONSTRUED AS A DEMAND BEING PLACED UPON ANY NOMINATED PARTIES AT THE
TIME OF SAID EVENT AND NOT THEREAFTER.

ACCORDINGLY, THERE IS NO IMMUTABILITY OF ANY PENALTY SOUGHT AND WHICH
MAY ARBITRARILY AND SUBSEQUENTLY IMPOSED AS EXIGENCY DEMAND IN BEING
CONSTRUED AS A LIABILITY WHICH IS PLACED UPON THE ABSENCE OF KNOWLEDGE
TO A DUTY OF ANY PRINCIPLE AS A DEMAND OF COMPLIANCE FOR WHICH ANY
NOMINATED PARTIES MUST BE AWARE.

THIS IS TO AVOID ANY POSSIBILITY OF ANY HINDRANCE, OBSTRUCTION AND
FRUSTRATION OF THE PREROGATIVE AS SOVEREIGN AUTHORITY. THUS IF A
PROVISION IS INEFFECTUAL AND AN ATTEMPT MADE TO CONTRAVENE AND MITIGATE
THE CLEAR DUTY OF ANY PROVISION OF COMPLIANCE.

IT WILL BE MODIFIED AND INCLUDED HEREIN UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THIS
NOTICE, AND CONSTRUED AS KNOWLEDGE TO A DUTY OF ANY PRINCIPLE AS A
DEMAND OF COMPLIANCE FOR WHICH ANY NOMINATED PARTIES MUST BE AWARE.

THE CURRENT REVISION OF THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE OBTAINED AS A PDF DOCUMENT
FROM THIS URL:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/RELIGIOUS%20AND%20RACIAL%20HATRED%20BY%20FACEBOOK%20ON%20GOOD%20FRIDAY%2019%20APRIL%202019.pdf>

Initial Post: Good Friday 19 April 2019

----------

-- THE MARRIAGE OF FREXIT AND BREXIT AS SAPIENT ECONOMY

(c) 2019 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 15 April, 2019

FRANCE24 (ENGLISH) @ 1814 HOURS ON 13 APRIL 2019: “COULD MACRON AND
BREXIT MAKE PARIS THE CAPITAL OF EUROPEAN TECH?

Shortly after his election in May 2017, President Macron said he wanted
France itself “to think and move like a start-up” – a vision of the
country’s digital future that is gaining traction as Britain wrestles
with BREXIT.

French President Emmanuel Macron’s vow to make France a ‘start-up
nation’ amid the uncertainty over BREXITIS raising the question of
whether Paris could supplant London as the capital of European tech.

Since his election, Macron has wooed *TECHNOLOGY* entrepreneurs with a
string of initiatives in the form of lavish tax breaks, subsides, and
credits for research. In March 2018, he promised to invest €1.5 billion
into artificial intelligence research through 2022.

Some of these initiatives, in addition to Macron’s dynamism, have lured
British tech companies who are looking to gain a foothold in Europe."

<https://www.france24.com/en/20190413-france-paris-macron-brexit-tech-capital-european-station-f>

MARTIN DAVIES: “Time to stop BREXIT before more jobs, businesses and
hardworking EU citizens abandon the U.K. for good.”

DOLF BOEK: “But only Britain has the means to define the Sovereign /
Autonomy dynamic which a sapient economy requires.

And their political opportunism are no different to Mr Macron’s in that
any viable political life requires a favourably motivated constituency
otherwise how will they retain office.”

DAVID NICOL: “Time for the losers to accept democracy.”

STEPHAN GON: “David, it’s about economy this time, you reflect the
innate ignorance of the bulk of BREXITERS, now you go back reading more
lies from the side of that bus."

NOTE: The word 'TRADITION' appears on the side of a bus crash in
Portugal @ 1730 HOURS (GMT) on 17 APRIL 2019

KURT SHUBERT: “Dolf any business relationship requires working with your
partners & biggest customers. The best deal the UK can have and still
retain *X* amount of autonomy is to remain a part of the EU.”

DOLF BOEK: “Kurt, I have made a further statement given such incapacity
to comprehend that the microcosm as the trinomial metastasised
conception of state being sovereign / autonomy dynamic must be
understood before the binomial stasis of macroeconomic interoperability
can occur and the later which is Mr Macron’s expertise.”

STEPHAN GON: “Dolf that’s the least productive copied / pasted piece of
text I’ve read this week.”

NOTE: This was a staged statement as having no reality excepting being
provisioned by Internet militia

DOLF BOEK: “Stephan, you are a simple life entity (not even capable of
understanding my own valid informal research on Critique of Pure Reason)
but I am sapient which is given to rationality so don’t subject me to
your strictures of incompressibility which is a perverse narcissistic
characteristic of self entitlement which you have ...

One doesn’t answer a fool in relation to the foundation of state
especially when like you they have violated our BOER / ANZAC tradition...

LEST WE FORGET”

JONATHAN PHILLIPS: “Stephan, its not, and never has been 'about the
economy'.. its about making our own decisions, and not bankrolling the
'pipe-dreams' of others...”

— HELL’S CLAMOUR —

“OH YELLOW SHIRTS.
PARIS IS BURNING.
AN OLD DAME FLIRTS.
HELL HAS YEARNING.
FOR YOUR COHORTS. {@6: Sup: 11 (#268); Ego: 45 (#312 - *CONTRADICTION*)}
A PAGE OF TURNING. {@7: Sup: 44 (#312 - *CONTRADICTION*); Ego: 46 (#358)}
FRATERNITÉ AU MORTS.”

IMMANUEL KANT’S PROLEGOMENA (1783) IDEA @268: “Judgments of experience
are always synthetic. For it would be absurd to base an analytic
judgment on experience, since I do not at all need to go beyond my
concept in order to formulate the judgment and therefore have no need
for any testimony from experience. That a body is extended, is a
proposition that stands certain a priori, and not a #473 - *JUDGEMENT*
of experience.

G2632@{
   @1: Sup: 20 (#20); Ego: 20 (#20),
   @2: Sup: 21 (#41); Ego: 1 (#21),
   @3: Sup: 78 (#119); Ego: 57 (#78),
   @4: Sup: 2 (#121); Ego: 5 (#83),
   @5: Sup: 22 (#143); Ego: 20 (#103),
   @6: Sup: 41 (#184 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS FLOW
{%36}); Ego: 19 (#122),
   @7: Sup: 51 (#235); Ego: 10 (#132),
   @8: Sup: 60 (#295); Ego: 9 (#141),
   @9: Sup: 68 (#363); Ego: 8 (#149),
   Male: #363; Feme: #149
} // #473

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #1302 % #41 = #31 - Military Stratagem, Quelling War; I-Ching:
H32 - Perseverance, Endurance, Duration, Constancy; Tetra: 51 - Constancy;

THOTH MEASURE: #31 - Oh thou who hast different faces, and makest thine
appearance in Net'efit; I am not one of inconstant mind.

    #VIRTUE: With Packing (no. #31), a move home, but
    #TOOLS: With Stoppage (no. #71), a failure to proceed.
    #POSITION: With Stove (no. #44), love of proﬁt.
    #TIME: With Law (no. #40), abhorrence of the cruel.
    #CANON: #186

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_186@{
   @1: Sup: 31 (#31); Ego: 31 (#31),
   @2: Sup: 21 (#52); Ego: 71 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}),
   @3: Sup: 65 (#117); Ego: 44 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
   @4: Sup: 24 (#141); Ego: 40 (#186 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND
{%31}),
   Male: #141; Feme: #186
} // #186

#473 as [#20, #1, #300, #5, #20, #100, #10, #9, #8] = katakrínō (G2632):
{UMBRA: #43 as #1302 % #41 = #31} 1) *TO* *GIVE* *JUDGMENT* *AGAINST*,
*TO* *JUDGE* *WORTHY* *OF* *PUNISHMENT*; 1a) to condemn; 1b) by one's
good example to render another's wickedness the more evident and censurable;

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:1,row:2,col:5,nous:77&lexicon:G2632>

"The men of Nineveh shall rise in judgment with this generation, and
shall condemn-G2632 it: because they repented at the preaching of Jonas;
and, behold, a greater than Jonas is here." [Matthew 12:41]

"The queen of the south shall rise up in the judgment with this
generation, and shall condemn-G2632 it: for she came from the uttermost
parts of the earth to hear the wisdom of Solomon; and, behold, a greater
than Solomon is here." [Matthew 12:42]

"Then Judas, which had betrayed him, when he saw that he was
condemned-G2632, repented himself, and brought again the thirty pieces
of silver to the chief priests and elders," [Matthew 27:3]

"Ye have heard the blasphemy: what think ye? And they all
condemned-G2632 him to be guilty of death." [Mark 14:64]

For before I go to experience, I have all the conditions for my #473 -
*JUDGEMENT* already in the concept, from which I merely extract the
predicate in accordance with the principle of #312 - *CONTRADICTION*,
and by this means can simultaneously become conscious of the necessity
of the #473 - *JUDGEMENT*, which experience could never teach me. [pages
17-18]

Before the advent of combination therapy within the AIDS crisis if one
engaged within dangerous actions with wanton reckless regard you could
be subject to 25 years imprisonment.

But on a building site apparently you can engage in “constructive
events” such as welding as “dangerous actions with wanton reckless
regard” for having fire extinguishers 🧯 within proximity and the Mayor
of Paris thinks it accidental. The question then is whether the lack of
safety with the electrical works amounted to reckless or culpable conduct?

Whom can ever tell as it reminds me of the occasion where my own power
fuse was removed by contrived action @ 1130 hours {#311 / #391} on
Saturday 10 March 2018 with the seal left intact as to convey a
premeditated action of some sort. Does a Marion statue ever weep and
bleed by itself as consideration on what are your values anchored
to—surely not to reason?

EXCERPT FROM EMAIL TO STATE / FEDERAL ATTORNEY GENERALS & MINISTER FOR
DEFENCE / ANZAC 2018 COMMEMORATIONS (HE WAS IN PARIS ON 11 NOVEMBER
2018) ASSISTING THE PRIME MINISTER @ 1627 / 1636 HOURS ON 15 APRIL 2019
TITLED:

"CORRECTION (11 JUNE 2000 AS CROWN IMPLICATIONS ON VIABILITY OF STATE AS
COMMONWEALTH) THAT THE NEWS MEDIA CANNOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT OF COURT
ORDERS RELATING TO THE REPORTING OF COURT HEARINGS OF CARDINAL PELL
BECAUSE THERE IS AN ALLEGED TREASON / PRO DOMO CLAIM RELATING TO 31 MAY
1998 REFUSAL OF COMMUNION"

MARION STATUE DIALOG WITH ARTIST @ 1739 HOURS ON MONDAY 28 MAY 2018

DOLF: "Can I ask for what purpose you are *LIGHTING* *CANDLES* ma'am?"

ARTIST: "Sorry."

DOLF: "For what purpose are you *LIGHTING* *CANDLES*?"

ARTIST: "Umm"

DOLF: "Why aren't you at the BOER WAR memorial celebrating our ah ...
our ah Australian! Oh you're the artist aren't you ma'am?"

ARTIST: "(laughs) I'm Brenda."

DOLF: "You're the artist."

ARTIST: "Nice to meet you."

DOLF: "Now..."

ARTIST: "What happened is um, the mother in Ireland died and their
service in Ireland is at 7 o'clock tonight."

DOLF: "What. Whose? Is that [statue] after a particular person?"

ARTIST: "Yeah Cathy McMahon."

DOLF: "So this [statue] was created in representation of ..."

ARTIST: "This here ... lighting the candles. Wanting to get the candles
all lit at the start of her service."

DOLF: "Okay. It's a Catholic [memorial] service is it?"

ARTIST: "Umm. I['m] not [entirely sure]. I think she is in the
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH*."

DOLF: "Yes. Is this statue related to her in any manner?"

ARTIST: "Yes she is a mother."

DOLF: "Is she the mother depicted [by] the statue."

ARTIST: "No it depicts. The statue depicts all mothers [of which *OUR*
*LADY* [meaning: NOTRE DAME (the French term added later)] is the
exemplar]."

DOLF: "Yes. Yeah. The problem is that with the BOER WAR Memorial on the
31 May ..."

ARTIST: "Yes"

DOLF: "... I hugged a mother [at] refusal of Communion at Saint
Patrick's Cathedral in Melbourne on 31 May 1998."

ARTIST: "Really."

DOLF: "And she was refused communion because she was wearing a rainbow
sash."

ARTIST: "Oh really."

DOLF: "For no other reason. So I have an objection for it. *NOW*
*WOULD* *YOU* *DO* *ME* *A* *FAVOUR* *TO* *APPEASE*, *TO* *BALANCE*
*THE* *KARMA* *OF* *THINGS*. Because..."

...

DOLF: "... I'm going to take the council to court over this particular
matter. Because there is no object of respect at the BOER WAR Memorial."

ARTIST: "So what are you doing taking this to court?"

DOLF: "I'm taking this and the BOER yeah ... this is part of that. This
is part of *ANZAC* *DEFAMATION* which I have been subject to.

When a mother weeps for her children..."

ARTIST: "But this is what this is."

DOLF: "Yeah that is exactly what our 'LEST WE FORGET' poem is all about."

ARTIST: "So why are you against this?"

DOLF: "I'm against this because I happen to be JEWISH and ..."

ARTIST: "Oh okay my darling yes..."

DOLF: "And this is a MARION statue. Now if you really want to IRISH
persons its the WASHER WOMAN that was the person who was most ..."

ARTIST: "No no..."

DOLF: "The WASHER WOMAN in IRISH society was subject to more impunity
than any other woman within IRISH society."

ARTIST: "But you know it's interesting that you say that you're um ah
... JEWISH because the man that led this through the COMMONWEALTH games
... through the COMMONWEALTH government was JEWISH."

DOLF: "Yes but he should know better we don't ... they don't allow
statues in their TEMPLE precinct. And the circumstance that we have is
that I'm of DUTCH heritage and the [INTERNATIONAL] KNIGHTS TEMPLAR which
was formed in 2015 are associated with the ORDER that [DUTCH EXPLORER]
DIRK HARTOG signed the PEWTER PLATE with. So if you want to *TALK*
*ABOUT* *ERECTIONS* [*OF* *COMMEMORATIVE* *MERIT*] DIRK HARTOG signed it
as AO and their were SEVEN PAPAL BULLS associated with my INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY.

As the RIGHT OF WOMEN which is the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS."

ARTIST: "So why are you against this? Why are you going to bring this
into your argument?"

DOLF: "Because WOMEN'S SUFFRAGE was the RIGHT of the exercise of
VOLUNTARY WILL in political life and this [statue] is not."

ARTIST: "What do you mean?"

DOLF: "This is not."

ARTIST: "What do you mean?"

DOLF: "Women in IRELAND have just been [granted the right of *ABORTION*]
..."

ARTIST: "No no hang on a moment.."

DOLF: "Women in IRELAND ... this was put here on SAINT PATRICK'S DAY of
all people. Of all places."

ARTIST: "But I chose that."

DOLF: "You should not have done that. Its representing [only the] IRISH..."

ARTIST: "No it's not. No it's not."

DOLF: "Well because that ... there was no PLAQUE here on the day that it
was [unveiled] ..."

ARTIST: "No but I didn't. I wasn't able to get it ..."

DOLF: "Let me finish..."

ARTIST: "No but you let me finish. I wasn't able ..."

DOLF: "There was no PLAQUE here on the day it was installed."

ARTIST: "Yes there was."

DOLF: "No there wasn't."

ARTIST: "I'm sorry SIR I unveiled the PLAQUE."

DOLF: "I'm sorry ma'am but I took pictures. And I took the picture on
the 8 JUNE when the PLAQUE was unveiled and then I went to the BOER WAR
MEMORIAL and there were tributes there as well.

So that's good day to you ma'am."

[walking away]

ARTIST: "Who are you taking it to?"

DOLF: "I will take you to court as well."

[walking away]

THE POLICE ATTENDED AND REPEATED THE UNSUSTAINABLE FALSE ACCUSATION THAT
I WAS IN ANY MANNER THREATENING. AND I *CONVEYED* *AT* *THE* *TIME*
*OF* *MY* *POLICE* *EMERGENCY* *CALL* *WHICH* *WAS* *MADE* *DUE* *TO*
*THE* *FIRE* *RISK* *BY* *NUMEROUS* *CANDLES* *UPON* *THE* #473 -
*GARDEN* *BED* *WITH* *NO* *FIRE* *EXTINGUISHER* *PRESENT*, THAT THE
ARTIST APPEARED TO HAVE MENTAL STABILITY ISSUES.

G4160@{
   @1: Sup: 80 (#80); Ego: 80 (#80),
   @2: Sup: 69 (#149); Ego: 70 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
   @3: Sup: 79 (#228 - I HAVE NO UNJUST PREFERENCES {%40}); Ego: 10 (#160),
   @4: Sup: 6 (#234); Ego: 8 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO
ANY {%26}),
   @5: Sup: 63 (#297); Ego: 57 (#225),
   @6: Sup: 68 (#365); Ego: 5 (#230),
   Male: #365; Feme: #230
} // #473

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #965 % #41 = #22 - Point to Reversal?, Humility's Increase;
I-Ching: H8 - Closeness, Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together,
Alliance; Tetra: 34 - Kinship;

THOTH MEASURE: #22 - Oh Chemiu, who makest thine appearance in Kauu; I
am not a transgressor.

    #VIRTUE: What Resistance (no. #22) approves is right while
    #TOOLS: What Doubt (no. #62) abhors is wrong.
    #POSITION: With Advance (no. #20), the desire to proceed.
    #TIME: With Stoppage (no. #71), the desire for constraints.
    #CANON: #175

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_175@{
   @1: Sup: 22 (#22); Ego: 22 (#22),
   @2: Sup: 3 (#25); Ego: 62 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
   @3: Sup: 23 (#48); Ego: 20 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
   @4: Sup: 13 (#61); Ego: 71 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
   Male: #61; Feme: #175
} // #175

#473 as [#80, #70, #10, #8, #300, #5] = poiéō (G4160): {UMBRA: #48 as
#965 % #41 = #22} 1) to make; 1a) with the names of things made, to
produce, construct, form, fashion, etc.; 1b) to be the authors of, the
cause; 1c) to make ready, to prepare; 1d) to produce, bear, shoot forth;
1e) to acquire, to provide a thing for one's self; 1f) to make a thing
out of something; 1g) to (make i.e.) render one anything; 1g1) to (make
i.e.) constitute or appoint one anything, to appoint or ordain one that;
1g2) *TO* (*MAKE* ie.) *DECLARE* *ONE* *ANYTHING*; 1h) to put one forth,
to lead him out; 1i) to make one do something; 1i1) cause one to; 1j)
*TO* *BE* *THE* *AUTHORS* *OF* *A* *THING* (*TO* *CAUSE*, *BRING*
*ABOUT*); 2) to do; 2a) to act rightly, do well; 2a1) to carry out, to
execute; 2b) to do a thing unto one; 2b1) to do to one; 2c) with
designation of time: to pass, spend; 2d) to celebrate, keep; 2d1) *TO*
*MAKE* *READY*, *AND* *SO* *AT* *THE* *SAME* *TIME* *TO* *INSTITUTE*,
*THE* *CELEBRATION* *OF* *THE* *PASSOVER*; 2e) to perform: to a promise;

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:1,row:2,col:5,nous:77&lexicon:G4160>

"For this is he that was spoken of by the prophet Esaias, saying, The
voice of one crying in the wilderness, Prepare ye the way of the Lord,
make-G4160 his paths straight." [Matthew 3:3]

THAT THEY ONLY HAD RECOURSE TO THE SLANDER OF THREATENING CONDUCT (WHICH
THE TONE OF THE CONVERSATION DOES NOT CONVEY) WHEN IT WAS EVIDENT THERE
WAS A LACK OF TRUTH CONTENT [IN] THEIR RESPONSES TO REASONABLE QUESTIONS.

THE AUDIO RECORDINGS WERE NECESSARY TO GUARANTEE MY OWN SAFETY AND
INTEGRITY AND WITHOUT SUCH I WOULD HAVE IMMEDIATELY BEEN ARRESTED FOR
THREATENING CONDUCT WHICH DID NOT OCCUR AND NEVER INTENTIONED.

AT THE TIME OF PROVIDING THE POLICE WITH A COPY OF THE AUDIO RECORDING
IT WAS CONVEYED THAT THE CAMELLIA {so named after Georg Joseph Kamel (21
April 1661 – 2 May 1706) a Jesuit missionary, pharmacist and naturalist
known for producing the first comprehensive accounts of Philippine flora
and fauna and for introducing Philippine nature to the European learned
world} FLORAL TRIBUTE LEFT AT THE MARION SHRINE WAS REMOVED AND PLACED
AT THE BOER WAR MEMORIAL AND REMAINED THERE UNTIL AFTER 31 MAY 2018.

IMMANUEL KANT’S PROLEGOMENA (1783) ON SECTION #58 - POLITICAL REVERSAL,
ADAPTATION TO CHANGE AS IDEA @358: “This type of cognition is cognition
according to analogy, which surely does not signify, as the word is
usually taken, an imperfect similarity between two things, but rather a
perfect similarity between two relations in wholly dissimilar things.

Such is an analogy between the legal relation of human actions and the
mechanical relation of moving forces: I can never do anything to another
without giving him a right to do the same to me under the same
conditions; just as a body cannot act on another body with its motive
force without thereby causing the other body to react just as much on
it. Right and motive force are here completely dissimilar things, but in
their relation there is nonetheless complete similarity. By means of
such an analogy I can therefore provide a concept of a relation to
things that are absolutely unknown to me. E.g., THE PROMOTION OF THE
HAPPINESS OF THE CHILDREN = A IS TO THE LOVE OF THE PARENTS = B AS THE
WELFARE OF HUMANKIND = C IS TO THE UNKNOWN IN GOD = *X*, WHICH WE CALL
LOVE: not as if this unknown had the least similarity with any human
inclination, but because we can posit the relation between God’s love
and the world to be similar to that which things in the world have to
one another. But here the concept of the relation is a mere category,
namely the concept of cause, which has nothing to do with sensibility.

By means of this analogy there still remains a concept of the supreme
being sufficiently determinate for us, though we have omitted everything
that could have determined this concept unconditionally and in itself;
for we determine the concept only with respect to the world and hence
with respect to us, and we have no need of more. The attacks that Hume
makes against those who want to determine this concept absolutely –
since they borrow the materials for this determination from themselves
and from the world – do not touch us; he also cannot reproach us that
nothing whatsoever would remain for us if objective anthropomorphism
were subtracted from the concept of the supreme being.

— HYMN TO ZEUS —

“Most glorious of immortals, Zeus
The many named, almighty evermore,
Nature's great Sovereign, ruling all by law
Hail to thee! On thee 'tis meet and right

That mortals everywhere should call.
From thee was our begetting; ours alone
Of all that live and move upon the earth
The lot to bear God's likeness.
Thee will I ever chant, thy power praise!

For thee this whole vast cosmos, wheeling round
The earth, obeys, and where thou leadest
It follows, ruled willingly by thee.
In thy unconquerable hands thou holdest fast,
Ready prepared, that two-timed flaming blast,
The ever-living thunderbolt:
Nature's own stroke brings all things to their end.
By it thou guidest aright the sense instinct
Which spreads through all things, mingled even
With stars in heaven, the great and small --
Thou who art King supreme for evermore!

Naught upon earth is wrought in thy despite, O God.
Nor in the ethereal sphere aloft which ever winds
About its pole, nor in the sea -- save only what
The wicked work, in their strange madness,
Yet even so, thou knowest to make the crooked straight.
Prune all excess, give order to the orderless,
For unto thee the unloved still is lovely--
And thus in one all things are harmonized,
The evil with the good, that so one Word
Should be in all things everlastingly.

One Word--which evermore the wicked flee!
Ill-fated, hungering to possess the good
They have no vision of God's universal law,
Nor will they hear, though if obedient in mind
They might obtain a noble life, true wealth.
Instead they rush unthinking after ill:
Some with a shameless zeal for fame,
Others pursuing gain, disorderly;
Still others folly, or pleasures of the flesh.
[But evils are their lot] and other times
Bring other harvests, all unsought--
For all their great desire, its opposite!

But, Zeus, thou giver of every gift,
Who dwellest within the dark clouds, wielding still
The flashing stroke of lightning, save, we pray,
Thy children from this boundless misery.
Scatter, O Father, the darkness from their souls,
Grant them to find true understanding
On which relying thou justly rulest all---
While we, thus honoured, in turn will honour thee,
Hymning thy works forever, as is meet
For mortals while no greater right
Belongs even to the gods than evermore
Justly to praise the universal law!” [Cleanthes (c. 3rd century BCE)]

For if one only grants us, at the outset, the deistic concept of a first
being as a necessary hypothesis (as does Hume in his Dialogues in the
person of Philo as opposed to Cleanthes [c.330-c.230] who was a Greek
Stoic philosopher and followed of Zeno, the founder of the school of
Stoicism. We have only fragments of the fifty works ascribed to
Cleanthes, the largest fragment being the Hymn to Zeus), which is a
concept in which one thinks the first being by means of ontological
predicates alone, of substance, cause, etc. (something that one must do,
since reason, being driven in the sensible world solely by conditions
that are always again conditioned, cannot have any satisfaction at all
without this being done, and something that one very well can do without
falling into that anthropomorphism which transfers predicates from the
sensible world onto a being wholly distinct from the world, since the
predicates listed here are mere categories, which cannot indeed provide
any determinate concept of that being, but which, for that very reason,
do not provide a concept of it that is limited to the conditions of
sensibility) – then nothing can keep us from predicating of this being a
causality through reason with respect to the world, and thus from
crossing over to theism, but without our being compelled to attribute
this reason to that being in itself, as a property inhering in it. For,
concerning the first point, the only possible way to compel the use of
reason in the sensible world (with respect to all possible experience)
into the most thorough- going harmony with itself is to assume, in turn,
a supreme reason as a cause of all connections in the world; such a
principle must be thoroughly advantageous to reason and can nowhere harm
it in its use in nature.

Regarding the second point, however, reason is not thereby transposed as
a property onto the first being in itself, but only onto the relation of
that being to the sensible world, and therefore anthropomorphism is
completely avoided. For here only the cause of the rational form found
everywhere in the world is considered, and the supreme being, insofar as
it contains the basis of this rational form of the world, is indeed
ascribed reason, but only by analogy, i.e., insofar as this expression
signifies only the relation that the highest cause (which is unknown to
us) has to the world, in order to determine everything in it with the
highest degree of conformity to reason. We thereby avoid using the
property of reason in order to think God, but instead think the world
through it in the manner necessary to have the greatest possible use of
reason with respect to the world in accordance with a principle. We
thereby admit that the supreme being, as to what it may be in itself, is
for us wholly inscrutable and is even unthinkable by us in a determinate
manner; and we are thereby prevented from making any transcendent use of
the concepts that we have of reason as an efficient cause (through
willing) in order to determine the divine nature through properties that
are in any case always borrowed only from human nature, and so from
losing ourselves in crude or *FANATICAL* concepts, and, on the other
hand, we are also prevented from swamping the contemplation of the world
with hyperphysical modes of explanation according to concepts of human
reason we have transposed onto God, and so from diverting this
contemplation from its true vocation, according to which it is supposed
to be a study of mere nature through reason, and not an audacious
derivation of the appearances of nature from a supreme reason. The
expression suitable to our weak concepts will be: that we think the
world as if it derives from a supreme reason, as regards its existence
and inner determination; whereby we in part cognize the constitution
belonging to it (the world) itself, without presuming to want to
determine that of its cause in itself, and, on the other hand, we in
part posit the basis of this constitution (the rational form of the
world) in the relation of the highest cause to the world, not finding
the world by itself sufficient thereto.

HIS HONOUR MIGHT WELL BE GRIEVED THAT THE ACTIONS IN SUPERSEDING AS
INVALIDATING OF THOSE LETTERS PATENT which I have taken independently
from the COURT has simply taken advantage of the COURT's naivety as the
impertinence that HIS HONOUR IS IGNORANT in having no conception that
someone greater than he is standing before him. That I achieved great
things today in relation to MATTERS previously placed before the COURT
as an accountability made of others such that 1.2 billion ROMAN
CATHOLICS (ie. More than 40% of the world's Catholics live in Latin
America - but Africa has seen the biggest growth in Catholic
congregations in recent years) will not be able to CELEBRATE EASTER with
any clear conscience because *I* *HAVE* *STOLEN* *THEIR* *THUNDER* *AND*
*THEY* *CAN'T* *GET* *IT* *BACK*." [EXCERPT FROM COURT NOTE OF 1040
HOURS ON 3 APRIL 2019 RELATING TO COUNTY COURT APPEAL CASE NUMBERS:
AP-18-0609 / AP-18-0775 / AP-18-0794 / AP-18-2201 / AP-18-2202]

YOUTUBE: "Whatever It Takes (Imagine Dragons)"

In Greek mythology, it was Prometheus (Greek: Προμηθεύς possibly meaning
"forethought") as the Titan, culture hero, and trickster figure who is
credited with the creation of man from clay, and who *DEFIES* *THE*
*GODS* *BY* *STEALING* *FIRE* and giving it to humanity, an act that
enabled progress and civilisation. Prometheus is known for his
intelligence and as a champion of mankind and also seen as the author of
the human arts and sciences generally.

FORETHOUGHT (BEFORE TIME)@[
Π, {@1: Sup: 80 (#80); Ego: 80 (#80)},
ρ, {@2: Sup: 18 (#98); Ego: 19 (#99)},
ο, {@3: Sup: 7 (#105); Ego: 70 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN
AFFAIRS {%18})},
μ, {@4: Sup: 47 (#152); Ego: 40 (#209)},
η, {@5: Sup: 55 (#207); Ego: 8 (#217)},
θ, {@6: Sup: 64 (#271: KANT"S IDEA ON *GENERAL* *QUESTION* *OF* *THE*
*PROLEGOMENA*: *IS* *METAPHYSICS* *POSSIBLE* *AT* *ALL*?); Ego: 9 (#226)},
ε, {@7: Sup: 69 (#340); Ego: 5 (#231 - *JUXTAPOSITION* *CONTROL*)},
υ, {@8: Sup: 64 (#404); Ego: 76 (#307)},
ς] {@9: Sup: 21 (#425); Ego: 38 (#345)},

In another myth, Prometheus establishes the form of animal sacrifice
practiced in ancient Greek religion. Evidence of a cult to Prometheus
himself is not widespread. He was a focus of religious activity mainly
at Athens, where he was linked to Athena and Hephaestus, other Greek
deities of creative skills and *TECHNOLOGY*. [Ref: Wikipedia
2019:Prometheus]

In this way the difficulties that appear to oppose theism disappear, in
that to Hume’s principle, not to drive the use of reason dogmatically
beyond the field of all possible experience, we conjoin another
principle that Hume completely overlooked, namely: *NOT* *TO* *LOOK*
*UPON* *THE* *FIELD* *OF* *POSSIBLE* *EXPERIENCE* *AS* *SOMETHING*
*THAT* *BOUNDS* *ITSELF* *IN* *THE* *EYES* *OF* *OUR* *REASON*. A
critique of reason indicates the true middle way between the dogmatism
that Hume fought and the skepticism he wanted to introduce instead – a
middle way that, unlike other middle ways, which we are advised to
determine for ourselves as it were mechanically (something from one
side, and something from the other), and by which no one is taught any
better, is one, rather, that can be determined precisely, according to
principles." [Pages 109-110]

Nous: #36
Time: 01:40 hrs
Date: 2019.4.15
Torah:

Dao: Natural Reversals, 'Secret' Explanation
Tetra: #12 - Youthfulness
I-Ching: H4 - Juvenile Ignorance, Youthful Inexperience, Enveloping, The
young shoot, Discovering

#260 CE

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#325 / #367} / HETEROS {#330 / #329} / TORAH {#324
/ #326}

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:1,row:1,col:8,nous:36&lexicon:H776>

***@zen: 1, row: 1, col: 8, nous: 36 [Date: 2019.4.15, Time: 01:40
hrs, Super: #325 / #36 - Natural Reversals, 'Secret' Explanation;
I-Ching: H4 - Juvenile Ignorance, Youthful Inexperience, Enveloping, The
young shoot, Discovering; Tetra: 12 - Youthfulness, Ego: #367 / #36 -
Natural Reversals, 'Secret' Explanation; I-Ching: H4 - Juvenile
Ignorance, Youthful Inexperience, Enveloping, The young shoot,
Discovering; Tetra: 12 - Youthfulness]

H776@{
   @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
   @2: Sup: 36 (#42); Ego: 30 (#36),
   @3: Sup: 37 (#79); Ego: 1 (#37),
   @4: Sup: 75 (#154); Ego: 38 (#75),
   @5: Sup: 3 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE {%17} / I HAVE NO
STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}); Ego: 9 (#84 - I AM NOT
A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
   @6: Sup: 36 (#193); Ego: 33 (#117),
   Male: #193; Feme: #117
} // #367

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #291 % #41 = #4 - Using Guidance, Sourceless; I-Ching: H27 -
Nourishment, Swallowing, Jaws, Comfort/Security; Tetra: 81 - Fostering;

THOTH MEASURE: #4 - Oh Eater of the Shadow, who makest thine appearance
at Elephantine; I am not rapacious.

    #VIRTUE: With Barrier (no. #4), isolation} but
    #TOOLS: With Stove (no. #44), neighbours.
    #POSITION: As to Strength (no. #36), it is the solidly built.
    #TIME: As to Waiting (no. #18), it is the weak.
    #CANON: #102

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_102@{
   @1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
   @2: Sup: 48 (#52); Ego: 44 (#48),
   @3: Sup: 3 (#55); Ego: 36 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
   @4: Sup: 21 (#76); Ego: 18 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}),
   Male: #76; Feme: #102
} // #102

#367 as [#6, #30, #1, #200, #90, #600] = ʼerets (H776): {UMBRA: #3 as
#291 % #41 = #4} 1) land, earth; 1a) earth; 1a1) whole earth (as opposed
to a part); 1a2) earth (as opposed to heaven); 1a3) earth (inhabitants);
1b) land; 1b1) country, territory; 1b2) district, region; 1b3) tribal
territory; 1b4) piece of ground; 1b5) land of Canaan, Israel; 1b6)
inhabitants of land; 1b7) Sheol, land without return, (under) world;
1b8) city (-state); 1c) ground, surface of the earth; 1c1) ground; 1c2)
soil; 1d) (in phrases); 1d1) people of the land; 1d2) space or distance
of country (in measurements of distance); 1d3) level or plain country;
1d4) land of the living; 1d5) end(s) of the earth; 1e) (almost wholly
late in usage); 1e1) lands, countries; i) often in contrast to Canaan;

BINOMIAL APPARATUS {#36}:
@1 <--- INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN {#64 = 8 x 8 as #260 MAGIC SUM}
@5 <--- ANCHOR {PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY PROTOTYPE}
#65 - *SOLDIER* {@1 RETENTION + #64 ELEMENTS}
#175 - *MARRIAGE*

THESE ARE MATTERS OF FACT ALREADY BEFORE THE COUNTY COURT IN APPEAL
CASES AP-18-0609 and AP-18-0775 which have a directions hearing on 20
January 2020 and were conveyed prior to the maelstrom event as emailed
advice made to state / federal attorney generals upon 15 April 2019 as
grounds for 36 news media not being subjected to contempt of court charges.

Jesus Christ’s Crown of Thorns saved in NOTRE DAME MAELSTROM after
firefighters and police form human chain

#1828 - Crown of Thorns is the perfect accompaniment for #1827 -
Eucharist and Saint Andrews #371 - 30 November (Knights Templar
International) Cause Célèbre #364 x 4 + #371 = #1827 days against our
Commonwealth of States and it’s BOER / ANZAC heritage.

DOLF @ 0416 HOURS ON 17 MARCH 2019: "Of course we are still to
incorporate such narrative within our next COUNTY COURT submission but
the resolution is (if my memory serves me correctly): #341 - 30 DECEMBER
v's #329 - 1 JANUARY CONFORMING TO IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) /
#391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLE and FIDELITY OF OATHS TO #231 -
JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL / #541 - *THICK* *CLOUD* being a supranatural /
paranormal consequence as interventions which occurred (temporal adjust
for daylight saving differs in Queensland and thus was before 1100
hours) on 11 November 2018 as World War One Centennial Commemorations.

In summary speaking to NATIONAL PARTY parliamentarians immediately
thereafter:

DANNY O’BRIEN: as removal of 7 July 2017 proroguing order given the
expulsion of neo-nazis from party membership.

DARREN CHESTER: discussion of his participation at inauguration of the
Cherished Mother Saint Patrick’s Day Statue, Remembrance Day
Intervention whilst he attended memorial events in France as minister
for ANZAC Commemorations assisting the Prime Minister and his knowledge
of the Oak Tree plaque in Victoria Park dedicated to Duke of
Gloucester’s planting on 27 October 1934 accompanying his dedication of
the Sydney Hyde Park War Memorial same year.

We were satisfied that involvement by the MINISTERS OF PARLIAMENT were a
natural prerogative reliably and honourably made in support of
constituents and did not involve maleficence on their part—the result of
the elections saw the Nationals receive a vote increase which was a
significant #312 - *CONTRADICTION* of the trend within the Saturday 24
NOVEMBER 2018 Victorian state election of the 59th Parliament of
Victoria. Where all 88 seats in the Legislative Assembly and all 40
seats in the Legislative Council were up for election.

DOLF: "Do be very careful when you read it though because it is Neural
Linguistic Programming written (for anti-terrorism purposes) to a
TRINOMIAL MATHEMATICAL THEORETICAL NOUMENON which is entirely
supranatural being outside temporality or immediate sense perception and
should you have abnormal physiological effects of sensory overload such
as anxiety--THEN LAY DOWN...

I'm still incorporating narrative of an earlier syncretism involving an
intervention over TRUMPS failed cemetery visit and prior to as
intersecting with MACRON's NATIONALISM v's PATRIOTISM speech at WORLD
WAR I CENTENNIAL COMMEMORATIONS within FRANCE ...

— TIME DIDN'T DENY —

“YE BE NOT
FORGOTTEN.
AS THEY ROT {ie. US corruption on the part of officials}.
SOIL SODDEN.

WE REMEMBER.
OF VALOUR BORN.
FAITHFUL FOREVER.
ER EVE NOR MORN.”

[ANZAC Centennial 25 April 2018]

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Time%20Didn't%20Deny%2020180425.pdf>

NICK MILLER (SYDNEY MORNING HERALD) @ 2332 HOURS ON 11 NOVEMBER 2018:
"NATIONALISM IS A BETRAYAL OF PATRIOTISM: FRANCE'S PRESIDENT LECTURES
THE POWERFUL: (PARIS) By the grave of an unknown soldier, under
Napoleon’s grand arch, at the centenary of the end of a great, terrible
war, France’s president lectured the powerful.

The first world war’s lesson and legacy were clear, he said. Peace is
hard won and is fragile.

A century ago, after such loss, the world took a path of humiliation and
revenge and it fuelled the rise of nationalism and totalitarianism.

His audience, metres away, included presidents Donald Trump and Vladimir
Putin, and Recep Erdogan.

*NATIONALISM* *IS* *A* *BETRAYAL* *OF* *PATRIOTISM*, Emmanuel Macron
declared. A withdrawal into isolationism would be “a grave error that
future generations would very rightly make us responsible for”.

“The old demons are rising again, ready to wreak chaos and death,” he
warned. “History sometimes threatens to take its sinister course again.”

He wanted the 70 world leaders assembled there - including Australian
Governor-General Peter Cosgrove, seated just next to Putin - to renew a
pledge to honour the dead and “place peace above all else”.

Trump listened, leaning forward, his eyes narrow. He was one of the last
to applaud as the speech ended.

— ALL HAIL THE POTUS —
[Written 1124 hours (AEDT) 11 November 2018]

“WITH TRUMP YOU KNOW.
IT’S EITHER *FIRE* OR FURY.
OR *WATER* LOGGED.

THE *WIND* DOTH BLOW.
YET *SOIL* MAKES MERRY.
BY FIELDS LEFT UNTROD.”

JUST A FEW WEEKS AGO, AT A RALLY IN TEXAS, HE HAD SAID “*YOU* *KNOW*
*WHAT* *I* *AM*? *I’M* *A* *NATIONALIST*. *OK*? *I’M* *A*
*NATIONALIST*…. *USE* *THAT* *WORD*. *USE* *THAT* *WORD*”.

— CONFEDERATE APPETITE —

“THE KERNEL LOVES TO BBQ.
AFTER EVERY BIG SLAUGHTER.
THE FRENZIED LUSTFUL CAUSE.
WHETHER IT’S BAR FLYS OR JEW.
ANYONES SON OR DAUGHTER.
THERE IS NO TIME FOR PAUSE.”

WHAT IS A TROD?
A Trod in the west of England is a straight line or fairy path in the
grass of a field with a different shade of green from the rest. Great
danger was associated with using these paths when a supernatural
procession was using them. Fairy rings have certain elements in common
with this phenomenon. People with rheumatism {ANAGRAM: Mithraeums as
*Mithraism*} sought relief by walking along these paths; however animals
were thought to actively avoid them.
[<https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Trod>]

— BLINKERED DEVOTIONS —

“IF I KNOW GOOD.
AND I KNOW EVIL.
BE IT UNDERSTOOD.
I AIN’T NO DEVIL.
WELL KISS MY RING.
YOU ROTTEN SOD.
‘N MOUTH MY DING.
YOU AIN’T NO GOD.”

A #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL {ie. we have already noted #419 -
SLAUGHTER / #728 (2 x #273 + #182 - *LIMIT*) - REACTANCE EVENTS and
VALUE STATEMENTS} is an artefact of both Islam and Roman Catholicism
which are reliant upon Pythagorean binomial nomenclature as NUMBER then
they are *MITHRAS* {ie. @1 - RETAINED / @5 - CENTRE OF VALUE, #15
(#260) ... #369 (#15)} and not Christian {ie. a moral law “HAS TO CARRY
ABSOLUTE [#41 - *ONTIC* x n] NECESSITY WITH IT”} ...

An example of REACTANCE EVENTS (Sphere of Action) and VALUE STATEMENTS
(Universe of Discourse) could be simply: “They mingle not with their
laughing comrades again; They sit no more at familiar tables of home;
They have no lot in our labour of the day-time; They sleep beyond
England's foam.” [ODE to the Fallen]

All it then requires is a theft of my Intellectual Property which they
have had within their possession from at least prior to 28 JULY 2011
whereby the nous #75 is then applied to a #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL
upon 11 November 2018 and voila ...

What advice then or as counsel of the church (consilia evangelica) would
they give on various *MORAL* issues as their claim to a higher obedience
than the natural law (ie. on the basis of Pythagorean HETEROS THEORY OF
NUMBER) which is required by others who follow the counsels to perform
acts of merit and who are thereby given a *GREATER* certainty of
salvation than those who merely follow the commands of the law. And
what then is the character of the forma corporis of your archetypal son
of man {ie. HEAVEN (H27) EARTH (H9) = MAN (H36) as #666} in relation to
your representations (conscientia erronea: erring conscience of the
reprobate *MIND* which misidentifies the good) as improper claims made
of Jesus {He is saved/A saviour; a deliverer} of Nazareth {Sovereign;
one chosen or set apart; separated; crowned; sanctified}, in being then
the full embodiment of this Divine *MIND* as an AUTONOMY OF WILL?

As to what constitutes the substantial form (forma substantialis) of the
formal cause (causa formalis) as to the quintessential first material
(materia prima: Anthropic Cosmological Principle as the absolute
generalized basis of all subsequent individualization that is utterly
potential and is devoid of all attributes or qualities) which is then
the *MIND* as intellectualised universal form (universalia forma), idea,
shape or pattern of the essential or natural image of God (imago Dei
essentialis sive naturalis: that archetypal principal perfections of
righteousness, holiness and wisdom as the likeness or resemblance to God
in which man was originally created).

Which then results in the second matter (materia secunda) as the basis
for all material existence (essentia: indicates the entire whatness of a
thing including the materiality or spirituality as its substantia) as
the integrity and authenticity of being within the world and living in
compliance (status integritatis) as obedience with the terms of the
innate *MORAL* (lex moralis primordialis:

7: {

5: {1: {zen: 8, row: 7, col: 5}, nous: [1]}, // IDENTICAL TO HETEROS
PROTOTYPE

***@zen: 4, row: 7, col: 9, nous: 15 [Date: 2018.12.25, Time: 1816
hrs, Super: #359 / #1 - To Guide with Names, Reason's Realisation;
I-Ching: H58 - Joy, Open, Lake; Tetra: 24 - Joy, Ego: #397 / #15 -
Mastering Guiding Discourse, Revealers of Virtue; I-Ching: H61 - Inner
Trust, Inner Truth, Center Returning; Tetra: 1 - Centre]

7: {48: {zen: 8, row: 7, col: 7}, nous: [48]}, // IDENTICAL TO HETEROS
PROTOTYPE

***@zen: 4, row: 3, col: 1, nous: 67 [Date: (none), Time: (none),
Super: #408 / #63 - Origins in Reversal, Consider Beginnings; I-Ching:
H51 - Quake, Thunderclap, Shake, The arousing (shock, thunder); Tetra:
62 - Doubt, Ego: #279 / #67 - Three Treasures; I-Ching: H10 - Treading
(conduct), Tread Carefully, Continuing; Tetra: 48 - Ritual]

},

8: {
4: {49: {zen: 8, row: 8, col: 4}, nous: [49]}, // IDENTICAL TO HETEROS
PROTOTYPE

***@zen: 4, row: 4, col: 3, nous: 18 [Date: 2018.7.26, Time: 0805
hrs, Super: #395 / #11 - Value and Function of Non-Existence; I-Ching:
H8 - Closeness, Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together, Alliance;
Tetra: 33 - Closeness, Ego: #421 / #18 - Origin of Ethical Concepts,
Palliation of Vulgarity; I-Ching: H33 - Withdrawal, Retiring, Retreat,
Yielding; Tetra: 49 - Flight]

9: {24: {zen: 8, row: 8, col: 9}, nous: [24]} // IDENTICAL TO HETEROS
PROTOTYPE

***@zen: 4, row: 1, col: 5, nous: 1 [Date: 2018.4.3, Time: 0055
hrs, Super: #516 / #76 - Strength's Warning Signs, Revealers of Virtue;
I-Ching: H20 - Viewing, Contemplation (view), Looking up; Tetra: 64 -
Sinking, Ego: #331 / #1 - To Guide with Names, Reason's Realisation;
I-Ching: H58 - Joy, Open, Lake; Tetra: 24 - Joy]

},

9: {
6: {25: {zen: 8, row: 9, col: 6}, nous: [25]}, // IDENTICAL TO HETEROS
PROTOTYPE

***@zen: 4, row: 1, col: 6, nous: 12 [Date: 2018.4.8, Time: 0115
hrs, Super: #427 / #81 - Propounding the Essential; I-Ching: H11 -
Peace, Pervading, Greatness; Tetra: 15 - Reach, Ego: #366 / #12 -
Numbing Effect of the Conventional, Abstaining from Desire; I-Ching: H6
- Contention, Conflict, Arguing, Lawsuit; Tetra: 25 - Contention]

8: {72: {zen: 8, row: 9, col: 8}, nous: [72]}, // IDENTICAL TO HETEROS
PROTOTYPE

***@zen: 4, row: 6, col: 8, nous: 75 [Date: 2018.11.11 *AS*
*REMEMBRANCE* / *ARMISTICE* *DAY*, Time: 1515 hrs, Super: #367 / #76 -
Strength's Warning Signs, Revealers of Virtue; I-Ching: H20 - Viewing,
Contemplation (view), Looking up; Tetra: 64 - Sinking, Ego: #352 / #75 -
Destructive Envy, Harmed Through Greed; I-Ching: H52 - Restraint,
Inaction, Bound, Keeping still, mountain, Stilling; Tetra: 72 - Hardness]

}

Which as a habit and capacity of will by its exercise of intellect as
being primarily intentioned to be regulated by the innate understanding
which grasps the basic principles of the *MORAL* law and spontaneously
acts according to the dictates as wants and desires of conscientia) and
the natural law (ie. the universal *MORAL* law either impresses by God
upon the *MIND* of all the people or immediately discerned by the reason
in its encounter with the order of nature) as a covenant of nature
(foedus naturae: predicated on the original integrity of human nature
and its capacity for obedience under the terms if the innate *MORAL* or
natural law) bestowed upon us by the graciousness of God.

I clearly do metaphysics and metempirical philosophy (perennialist
school of thought) and have an alternate gender identity and sexual
dynamic paradigm of MIND, BODY and SOUL captivation which is
historically associated with the HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER as being an
encapsulated microcosm as metempirical (ie. the branch of philosophy
that deals with things existing beyond the realm of experience)
philosophy as the perennialist school of thought or that of metaphysical
(ie. of things transcending what is physical or natural and the temporal
reality) dynamic perpetuated against the human psyche.

I have defined the complexities of this opposition from the perspective,
as being a composite lack of any sapient thought to any real depth,
conduct as repetitive use of idioms as mantras of opposition fixed by
symbolic associations to obsolete mathematical paradigms of *MIND* and
the re-packaging as thoughts of others which is then traditionally
characteristic of a skepticism, and narcissism as nihilism, in having
only a sensual consequence as its own defied claim to any reality.

In that, they deploy language as denial and which has its throne within
the basal realm of consciousness relating to the seat of its impulsive
desire, action as a lack of motion towards freedom from any accountability.

A habitual action of anal extrusion exhibiting an infantile psychosexual
developmental stage in which thinking and language is nothing more than
an act of defecation as the major source of sensuous pleasure where the
anus forms the *CENTRE* of self-awareness.

Although this is universally and historical declared a common good in
expressing a ’natural biological order reality’ as the basis for the
Institutional religo-political worldview as the sovereign/marriage
dynamic being the Natural / Common Law acceptance imperative as the
cultivating artifice (ie. NOT STRAIGHT OR DIRECT, AS A COURSE;
INDIRECTLY STATED OR EXPRESSED; NOT STRAIGHTFORWARD; INDIRECTLY AIMED AT
OR REACHED, AS ENDS OR RESULTS; DEVIOUSLY ACHIEVED) of the inner female
within conjugal slavitude as domesticated goddess and whilst the
emancipated male ran victorious as conquistadors within the phenomenal
realm and conquering through-out all the world.

Macron did use that word, and he used the weight of the war dead to
argue for multilateralism, internationalism, for groups that spanned
borders such as the European Union and the United Nations.

“Let us add our hopes together instead of seeing our fears oppose each
other,” he said, appealing for global unity in the fight against global
warming, poverty, hunger, *INEQUALITY* and *IGNORANCE*.
[<https://www.smh.com.au/world/europe/nationalism-is-a-betrayal-of-patriotism-france-s-president-lectures-the-powerful-20181111-p50fes.html>]

REMEMBRANCE DAY 2018@{
@1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 80 (#80),
@2: Sup: 34 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 29 (#109),
@3: Sup: 8 (#92); Ego: 38 (#147),
@4: Sup: 5 (#97); Ego: 6 (#153),
@5: Sup: 33 (#130 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}); Ego: 20 (#173 - I
AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST {%27}),
@6: Sup: 14 (#144); Ego: 8 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE
WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
@7: Sup: 67 (#211); Ego: 19 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED
PROPERTY {%8}),
Male: #211; Feme: #200
} // TRUMP *CANCELS* WW1 MEMORIAL AT U.S. CEMETERY IN FRANCE *DUE* *TO*
*RAIN*

#211 as [#10, #200, #1] = yare' (H3372): {UMBRA: #5 as #211 % #41 = #6}
1) to fear, revere, be afraid; 2) (TWOT) *TO* *SHOOT*, pour; 1a) (Qal);
1a1) to fear, be afraid; 1a2) to stand in awe of, be awed; 1a3) to fear,
reverence, honour, respect; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be fearful, be
dreadful, be feared; 1b2) *TO* *CAUSE* *ASTONISHMENT* *AND* *AWE*, *BE*
*HELD* *IN* *AWE*; 1b3) to inspire reverence or godly fear or awe; 1c)
(Piel) *TO* *MAKE* *AFRAID*, *TERRIFY*;

#200 as [#40, #70, #40, #10, #40] = `am (H5971): {UMBRA: #10 as #110 %
#41 = #28} 1) nation, people; 2) kinsman, kindred; 1a) *PEOPLE*,
*NATION*; 1b) *PERSONS*, *MEMBERS* *OF* *ONE'S* *PEOPLE*, *COMPATRIOTS*,
*COUNTRY*-*MEN*;

DOLF @ 0858 HOURS ON 17 MARCH 2019: "Just listening to Stan Grant on ABC
news & 0842 hours on 17 March 2019.

Let me cast that consideration which he made in terms of my own informal
research on TRINOMIAL METASTASIS V’S BINOMIAL STASIS as worldview being
kosmos formation.

If there is a notion of ANTHROPOCENTRIC COSMOGONIC PRINCIPLE as
dialectic and PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY how then is the METASTASISED
IDENTITY formed as PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE being then an
encapsulated mind, body and soul?

Words and number after all convey ontological experience.

How can receiving the right neurological stimulation at an appropriate
time as the process of #5 + #7 = #10 cohesion then facilitate the mind
dynamic: “AND YE SHALL KNOW THE TRUTH, AND THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU
FREE.” [John 8:32 (KJV)]"

LET’S THEN CONSIDER SOME REAL WORLD SCENARIOS:

CASE #1: In an age of smart phone accessibility to expansive multimedia
sources can promiscuous (ie. lack of any viable and integral #5 + #7 =
#10 cohesion) selection then be causal to a dysfunctional mind dynamic
and result within adverse mental health outcomes?

CASE #2: In the circumstance where the PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY is a
repetitive gaming sequence which is reliant upon only impulsive and
non-sapient responses, what is the predominant and determinant
characteristic of existence being formed as PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT
SUBSTANCE?

CASE #3: If reliable sources of news media presents to us events which
occur within the world having an implicit context or proximity to their
temporal event then a natural #5 + #7 = #10 cohesion is in all
likelihood will have occurred.

Can then an exclusion or avoidance of such relative neurological
stimulation then be causal for a cognitive dissonance and detachment
from reality?

When does self reality lose connection to the temporal markers of
conscience reality?

CASE #4: How does OPERANT CONDITIONING inhibit or facilitate the
autonomous SAPIENT experience?"

ON CONSIDERATION OF OPERANT CONDITIONING: Just to repeat that the #341 -
*SHOOT* / 31 DECEMBER is an #288 - UMBRA data manipulation by the #325
(#5 x #5 = #65 - *SOLDIERS*) DETRUDE SCHEMA which is then redacted to
#215 - HEIS meaning *ONE* as the meta-schema process of reconciliation
of otherwise incommensurate dichotomies within an integral and coherent
unity of apperception and so we find a direct connection to Adolf
Hitler’s Table Talk IDEAS: @215 / @235 specifically which includes the
execution of 130 bible students for demoralising the #65 - *SOLDIER* and
so it is little wonder that the Russians are troubled by their
disloyalties to the State as reasonable #364 - QUESTIONS of #430 - LAW.

SEE ALSO: "RUSSIAN COURT SENTENCES DANISH JEHOVAH'S WITNESS TO JAIL FOR
'EXTREMISM': THE QUESTION IS WHETHER THIS PRESENT LEGAL DILEMMA AS
IMPASSE IS A STUBBORN CRITERIA OF DETERMINISM OR A STAGE OF CULTURAL
DEVELOPMENT?"

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Jehovah%20Witness.pdf>

#341 as [#40, #5, #40, #6, #200, #10, #40] = yarah (H3384): {UMBRA: #1
as #215 % #41 = #10} 1) to throw, *SHOOT*, cast, pour; 1a) (Qal); 1a1)
to throw, cast; 1a2) to cast, lay, set; 1a3) to shoot arrows; 1a4) to
throw water, rain; 1b) (Niphal) *TO* *BE* *SHOT*; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to
throw, cast; 1c2) to shoot; 1c3) to point out, show; 1c4) *TO* *DIRECT*,
*TEACH*, *INSTRUCT*; 1c5) to throw water, rain;

REMEMBRANCE DAY 11 NOVEMBER 2018 POEM:

#211 as [#10, #200, #1] = yare' (H3372): {UMBRA: #5 as #211 % #41 = #6}
1) to fear, revere, be afraid; 2) (TWOT) to *SHOOT*, pour; 1a) (Qal);
1a1) to fear, be afraid; 1a2) to stand in awe of, be awed; 1a3) to fear,
reverence, honour, respect; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be fearful, be
dreadful, be feared; 1b2) *TO* *CAUSE* *ASTONISHMENT* *AND* *AWE*, *BE*
*HELD* *IN* *AWE*; 1b3) to inspire reverence or godly fear or awe; 1c)
(Piel) *TO* *MAKE* *AFRAID*, *TERRIFY*;

THE #41 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE IDEA @215 - I
AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER OF MISCHIEF {%34}

#325 (PYTHAGOREAN ESOTERIC VALUE FOR #65 - *SOLDIER* AND KNIGHTS TEMPLAR
INTERNATIONAL AS UNLAWFUL FOREIGN POWER) as [#5, #50, #70, #200] = heis
(G1520): {UMBRA: #12 as #215 % #41 = #10} 1) *ONE*

#235 as [#20, #7, #200, #8] = zarach (H2224): {UMBRA: #1 as #215 % #41 =
#10} 1) *TO* *RISE*, *COME* *FORTH*, *BREAK* *OUT*, *ARISE*, *RISE*
*UP*, *SHINE*; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to rise; 1a2) to come out, appear;

#341 as [#5, #80, #70, #50, #70, #40, #1, #7, #8, #10] = eponomazo
(G2028): {UMBRA: #13 as #1123 - REACTANCE EVENTS % #41 = #16} 1) *TO*
*PUT* *A* *NAME* *UPON*, *NAME*; 2) *TO* *BE* *NAMED*;

EVIDENCE OF TARGETING: #1123 as [#300, #2, #400, #6, #400, #10, #5] /
#707 as [#5, #300, #2, #400] = shabbath (H7676): {UMBRA: #6 as #707 %
#41 = #10} 1) *SABBATH*; 1a) sabbath; 1b) day of atonement; 1c) sabbath
year; 1d) week; 1e) produce (in sabbath year);

#1123 as [#5, #400, #300, #8, #10, #400] / #729 as [#5, #300, #8, #10,
#400, #6] = shachath (H7843): {UMBRA: #3 as #729 % #41 = #32} 1) to
destroy, corrupt, go to ruin, decay; 1a) (Niphal) to be marred, be
spoiled, be corrupted, be corrupt, be injured, be ruined, be *ROTTED*;
1b) (Piel); 1b1) to spoil, ruin; 1b2) *TO* *PERVERT*, *CORRUPT*, *DEAL*
*CORRUPTLY* (*MORALLY*); 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to spoil, ruin, destroy;
1c2) to pervert, corrupt (morally); 1c3) destroyer (participle); 1d)
(Hophal) spoiled, ruined (participle);

HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO ELIZABETH REGINA II ON 21 APRIL 2019: #1123 as [#3,
#5, #50, #5, #200, #10, #800, #50] / #553 as [#3, #5, #50, #5, #200,
#10, #70, #10, #200] = genesia (G1077): {UMBRA: #22 as #553 % #41 = #20}
1) *A* *BIRTHDAY* *CELEBRATION*, a birthday feast; 1a) the earlier
Greeks used this word of funeral commemorations, a festival
commemorative of a deceased friend;

#341 as [#5, #300, #1, #30, #5] = she'elah (H7596): {UMBRA: #9 as #336 %
#41 = #8} 1) request, thing asked for, demand; 1a) *REQUEST*,
*PETITION*; 1b) thing asked for;

#341 as [#40, #5, #40, #6, #200, #10, #40] = yarah (H3384): {UMBRA: #1
as #215 % #41 = #10} 1) to throw, shoot, cast, pour; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to
throw, cast; 1a2) to cast, lay, set; 1a3) to shoot arrows; 1a4) to throw
water, rain; 1b) (Niphal) *TO* *BE* *SHOT*; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to throw,
cast; 1c2) to shoot; 1c3) *TO* *POINT* *OUT*, *SHOW*; 1c4) to direct,
teach, instruct; 1c5) to throw water, rain;

#341 as [#1, #60, #10, #70, #200] = axios (G514): {UMBRA: #11 as #341 %
#41 = #13} 1) *WEIGHING*, *HAVING* *WEIGHT*, having the weight of
another thing of like value, worth as much; 2) *BEFITTING*, *CONGRUOUS*,
*CORRESPONDING* *TO* *A* *THING*; 3) *OF* *ONE* *WHO* *HAS* *MERITED*
*ANYTHING* WORTHY*; 3a) *BOTH* *IN* *A* *GOOD* *AND* *A* *BAD* *SENSE*;

#444 as [#30, #300, #8, #6, #100] = sechowq (H7814): {UMBRA: #8 as #414
% #41 = #4} 1) *LAUGHTER*, *LAUGHING* *STOCK*, *MOCKING*, *DERISION*;
1a) laughter; 1a1) joyful; 1a2) hollow; 1b) derision (of object); 1c)
*SPORT*;

<— *THIS* *ACCORDS* *EXACTLY* *WITH* *MY* *OBSERVATIONS* *MADE* *OF*
*MY* SATURDAY CARPE DIEM ON 28 OCTOBER 2017 AS OBJECTION MADE OF #288 -
REMEMBRANCE INFIDELITY BY A PUBLIC AUTHORITY

I must therefore respectfully disagree with Catholic Archbishop of
Brisbane Mark COLERIDGE’s comments that ROMAN CATHOLICISM conveys a
great fidelity as respect to the judicial process.

As we'd previously raised in our correspondence to this COURT, the
starting point of our concerns lays with a #364 - QUESTION upon what is
the actual focal impetus to their SWEARING of *OATHS* {

"391" : [6, 2, 300, 2, 6, 70, 5],
"413" : {
"0" : [6, 30, 300, 2, 70, 5],
"1" : [30, 300, 2, 6, 70, 5]
}

AS 8 JUNE 2017 CHERISHED MOTHER STATUE PLAQUE INSTALLATION

} as being made in the circumstance against the autonomy of the person
(#492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL) but entirely to:

'I *SWEAR* BY HIM WHO THE TETRAKTYS (@1 - RETENTION + @5 - CENTRE OF
VALUE? + #65 - *DODECAHEDRON* / *SOLDIER* + #175 - *ICOSAHEDRON* /
*MARRIAGE* = #10 - TETRAKTYS) FOUND, WHENCE ALL OUR WISDOM SPRINGS AND
WHICH CONTAINS PERENNIAL NATURE'S FOUNTAIN, CAUSE AND ROOT.'

"ANYONE WHO FOR FALSE REASONS OF MERCY DEVIATES FROM THIS CLEAR
PRINCIPLE IS AIDING {H5826: `azar / help: #273}, WILLINGLY {H7521:
ratsah / accept: #273} OR UNWILLINGLY {H7589: she'at / despiteful: #273;
H4784: marah / rebel: #273; H6696: tsuwr / besiege: #273}, THE
DISSOLUTION OF THE STATE." [Adolf Hitler's Table Talk IDEA: (7 JUNE
1942) @235, page #519]

Had it not be for our rational belief and sapient intellectual property
our nation’s statehood would have been consumed in that holocaust
against 850 years of history.

In our opinion the BINOMIAL APPARATUS as the occidental perspective of
PERENNIALISM having by the immateriality of its STASIS which defines a
SOVEREIGN / MARRIAGE dynamic may in some circumstances have a
predisposition towards judgementalism by impetus of narcissistic
self-justification as being an auto-intoxication in a self bestowed
dignity as a ontological self-delusion due to an infatuation with the
mirroring of its various ONTIC characteristic elements expressed therein
and perhaps not realising that it is also subject to the @205 -
PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE {#873 - PROBITY OF THE DIGNITY ROYAL
(LETTERS PATENT)} and @82 / #491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY (SECTION IX)
in being a lawful EMANATION OF STATE AS METHODOLOGY which itself
conforms to the dialectic of the #2184 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC COSMOGONIC
PRINCIPLE that are encapsulated by the @164 / #3273 - PRINCIPLE OF
MATERIALITY (SECTION VIII) and the HISTORICAL CHRISTIAN WEDDING VOW.

"I, *NAME* *OF* *BRIDE*, #312 - *TAKE* *THEE* {ie. A WILLING, WILL},
*NAME* *OF* *GROOM* to be my #2184 - *LAWFULLY* {ie. LAWS OF NATURE}
wedding husband. To have and to hold #273 - *FROM* *THIS* *DAY*
*FORWARD* {ie. SUCCESSIVELY IN ORDER}, for richer or poorer, in sickness
and in health, to love and #364 - *OBEY* until death do we part, today I
pledge my faithfulness."

H376@{
   @1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
   @2: Sup: 31 (#61); Ego: 1 (#31),
   @3: Sup: 81 (#142); Ego: 50 (#81),
   @4: Sup: 57 (#199); Ego: 57 (#138),
   @5: Sup: 67 (#266); Ego: 10 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
   Male: #266; Feme: #148
} // #391

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #311 % #41 = #24 - Important Distinctions, Trouble from
Indulgence; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay, Attending, Waiting, Moistened,
Arriving; Tetra: 18 - Waiting;

THOTH MEASURE: #24 - Oh divine Babe, who makest thy appearance in Annu;
I lend not a deaf ear to the words of Righteousness.

    #VIRTUE: With Joy (no. #24), raising high, but
    #TOOLS: With Sinking (no. #64), hiding below.
    #POSITION: As to Response (no. #41), it is the present, but
    #TIME: As to Measure (no. #52), it is the past.
    #CANON: #181

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_181@{
   @1: Sup: 24 (#24); Ego: 24 (#24),
   @2: Sup: 7 (#31); Ego: 64 (#88),
   @3: Sup: 48 (#79); Ego: 41 (#129),
   @4: Sup: 19 (#98); Ego: 52 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE
WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
   Male: #98; Feme: #181
} // #181

#391 as [#30, #1, #50, #300, #10] = ʼîysh (H376): {UMBRA: #0 as #311 %
#41 = #24} 1) man; 1a) man, male (in contrast to woman, female); 1b)
husband; 1c) human being, person (in contrast to God); 1d) servant; 1e)
mankind; 1f) champion; 1g) great man; 2) whosoever; 3) each (adjective);

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:3,row:5,col:5,nous:41&lexicon:H376>

H802@{
   @1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
   @2: Sup: 80 (#110); Ego: 50 (#80),
   @3: Sup: 56 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}); Ego: 57 (#137),
   @4: Sup: 66 (#232); Ego: 10 (#147),
   Male: #232; Feme: #147
} // #390

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #306 % #41 = #19 - Argument for Ethical Anarchism, Returning to
Simplicity; I-Ching: H57 - Compliance, Gentle Penetration/Wind, Ground,
Calculations; Tetra: 58 - Gathering In;

THOTH MEASURE: #19 - Oh Uammetu, who makest thine appearance at the
Block; I commit not adultery with another's wife.

    #VIRTUE: Following (no. #19) means dispersing, but
    #TOOLS: Massing (no. #59) means assembling.
    #POSITION: With Ease (no. #23), the level and smooth, but
    #TIME: With Difﬁculties (no. #79), the going up and down.
    #CANON: #180

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_180@{
   @1: Sup: 19 (#19); Ego: 19 (#19),
   @2: Sup: 78 (#97); Ego: 59 (#78),
   @3: Sup: 20 (#117); Ego: 23 (#101),
   @4: Sup: 18 (#135); Ego: 79 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH
ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19}),
   Male: #135; Feme: #180
} // #180

#390 as [#30, #50, #300, #10] = ʼishshâh (H802): {UMBRA: #0 as #306 %
#41 = #19} 1) woman, wife, female; 1a) woman (opposite of man); 1b) wife
(woman married to a man); 1c) female (of animals); 1d) each, every
(pronoun);

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:6,row:5,col:5,nous:41&lexicon:H802>

SECTION VIII: "REQUIRE AND COMMAND ALL OUR OFFICERS AND MINISTERS, CIVIL
AND MILITARY, AND ALL OTHER THE INHABITANTS OF OUR SAID COMMONWEALTH TO
BE #364 - OBEDIENT {#273 - REMEMBRANCE}, #312 - AIDING {#273
-SEPULCHRE}, AND #273 - ASSISTING {#273 - WEAK} UNTO OUR SAID GOVERNOR
GENERAL {#2184 - LAWS OF NATURE AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL COSMOLOGICAL
PRINCIPLE / 12 = #182 AS DATE(1996,3,20) + 5 x #364 + #182 = 11
SEPTEMBER 2001}, OR, IN THE EVENT OF HIS DEATH, #273 - INCAPACITY, OR
ABSENCE, TO SUCH PERSON OR PERSONS AS MAY, FROM TIME TO TIME, UNDER THE
PROVISIONS OF THESE OUR LETTERS PATENT, ADMINISTER {#2184 - LAWS OF
NATURE AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE / 13 = #168 - I AM NOT
THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26 - *YHWH*}} THE GOVERNMENT OF OUR SAID
COMMONWEALTH."

What we call 'culture' is actually a series of core beliefs or value
systems, with each level expressing a different understanding of the
world or the church. A “belief” or “value system” is a worldview, a set
of perspectives/priorities/paradigms, a mind-set, an organizing
framework for deep-level decision-making at the bottom line—which is why
you can’t compromise about it. Your value system is the threshold at
which you won’t negotiate.

AUTONOMOUS NATURE {FORM OF NATURE}@[
C, {@1: Sup: 3 (#3); Ego: 3 (#3)},
O, {@2: Sup: 63 (#66); Ego: 60 (#63)},
R, {@3: Sup: 72 (#138: KANT'S METEMPIRICAL PREMISE - *PURE*
*CONCEPTS* *OF* *THE* *UNDERSTANDING*, IN COMPARISON WITH EMPIRICAL
INTUITIONS (INDEED, SENSORY INTUITIONS IN GENERAL), ARE COMPLETELY
HETEROGENEOUS: [AS #205 - MALE / #164 - FEME WITHIN THE #391 -
HOMOGENEOUS NOUMENON]); Ego: 9 (#72)},
A, {@4: Sup: 73 (#211); Ego: 1 (#73)},
L] {@5: Sup: 22 (#233: SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA: B233 -
PRINCIPLE OF TIME-SUCCESSION ACCORDING TO THE LAW OF CAUSALITY); Ego: 30
(#103: SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA: B103 - ON THE PURE CONCEPTS OF THE
UNDERSTANDING, OR CATEGORIES

<Loading Image...

>

Each level of cultural and human development represents a value system,
or to use a term coined by Richard Dawkins, a meme. Just as genes carry
the informational codes for our biological DNA, these value systems
supply the codes (or memes, rhymes with “themes”) that determine our
“cultural DNA.” Memes are ideas, beliefs, values, common ways of looking
at the world that, like contagious viruses, spread from brain to brain
through word of mouth, through media, through interaction between
people. There are more than 6 billion people in the world today, and
though we all come from some 100,000 genes—all of us—we share only a few
basic value systems or memes. Researchers studying this topic have
identified only eight thus far.

Notice how the Focus column alternates between me-oriented
express-the-self (warm colours) and we-oriented sacrifice-the-self (cool
colours). Note also the differences people value the most in each system
as they flow from survival (Bronze), to safety and security (Purple), to
raw power and instant gratification (Red), to purpose in life (Blue), to
strategies for success (Orange), to community awareness (Green), to
alternative forms (Yellow), to global village (Cyan), to autonomy as its
natural form (Coral). The levels are open-ended; there isn’t a final
stage of development in this chart or any other useful one, for the
ideal that God sets before us is “higher than the highest human thought
can reach.” [Courtesy: Caleb Rosado, Ph.D, When We Disagree: Spiral
Dynamics on How Cultural Values Shape Our Conversation, Adventist
Review: 27th April 2000]

Accordingly we propose nine given that the #81 - PRINCIPLE OF
JUXTAPOSITION AS SOVEREIGNTY then gives rise to #492 - VOLUNTARY
FREEWILL and IPSO FACTO A TRINOMIAL RATHER THAN A BINOMIAL CONCEPTION OF
NUMBER:

+ 0, 27 {IDEA: @311 *** SERIOUS BREACH OF THE SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY
DYNAMIC GIVEN THE INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN DYNAMIC OF 3 APRIL
33 AD}, 54 {IDEA: @348} {ie. REALM OF ITS NATURE AS HEAVEN - *FORMULA*
*FOR* *UNIVERSAL* *LAW*}

+ 0, 9 {IDEA: @282}, 18 {IDEA: @298} {ie. SYSTEM’S COSMOLOGY AS EARTH
- *FORMULA* *OF* *HUMANITY*}

+ 0, 3 {IDEA: @270}, 6 {IDEA: @280} {ie. SELF IDENTITY - *FORMULA*
*OF* *AUTONOMY* *AS* *SUI* *JURIS* / *MEMBRUM* *VIRILE*}

+ 1 {IDEA: @265, @266}, 2 {IDEA: @267, @268, @269, @272, @273 ***
*FORMULA* *FOR* *PRESERVING* *EUROPEAN* *AUTONOMY* ***, @274 - PERFUME},
3 {IDEA: @265 - PREAMBLE} {ie. *FORMULA* *OF* *PROGRESSION* OF
INDIVIDUAL PHENOMENA: *CONJECTURAL* *ONLY*}

@1 {#1} + @2 {#41} + @3 {#81} + @4 {#369} = #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL
{LIBERTÉ: 17 SEPTEMBER 1900 AS ADVICE OF THE PRIVY COUNCIL} IN THE
EXERCISE OF THE INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS: #205 - *PRINCIPLE*
*OF* *THE* *PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE* ☯️ / ✡️ #164 - *PRINCIPLE*
*OF* *MATERIALITY*].

#71 #1 #11
#61 #81 #21
#51 #41 #31 = #369 as DISCRIMINATING NORM OF HUMAN NATURE / WAN WU AS
ORGANISATION OF THINGS IN NATURE

#205 = PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE (YANG)
#164 = PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY (YIN)

#41 - EMANATION PRINCIPLE (REMEMBER THE SABBATH)
#82 - TERMS OF CONTINUITY (HONOUR PARENTS)
#123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY (DO NOT KILL)
#164 = PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY (YIN / TORAH: AVOID HETERONOMY AGAINST
AUTONOMY)
#205 = PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE (YANG / YAHAD: DO NOT STEAL)
#246 - NORMA OBLIGANS (BEAR NO FALSE WITNESS)
#287 - MANIFESTING NORM (COVET NOT)

According to Kant, the starting point, a reflection on our moral
concepts {#41 x n}, leads immediately to the first intermediate thesis,
that (1) a moral law “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 - *ONTIC*] NECESSITY
WITH IT” (GMS, 389,13). If this necessity is very narrowly interpreted,
that is, in the sense of the previously worked out modal status {

@1 - Nature Contains Nature [#328 - TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPE] {

HOMOIOS
HETEROS
KABBALAH
AS DEFINED

} ...

@5 - Act of Nature [#369 - REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE INHIBITOR WITH #164 -
CHRONOLOGICAL PLANE MAPPING] ...

#15 (@6 - Form of Nature: #260 - Transforming Nature [#41 - REMEMBER THE
SABBATH]) ...

45: [1 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG]
68: [42 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN]

#34 (@7 - Engendering Nature: #175 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE [#82 -
HONOUR YOUR PARENTS]) ...

84: [2 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE]
86: [10 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD]
102: [4 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS]
104: [7 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD]
115: [5 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN]

#65 (@2 - NATURE REJOICES IN ITS NATURE: #65 - NATURE REJOICES IN ITS
NATURE [#123 - DO NOT KILL]) ...

130: [3 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED]
139: [13 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED ANIMALS]
140: [14 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY, 16 - I AM NOT AN EAVES-DROPPER]
146: [15 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER]
148: [12 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR]
150: [28 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER]
156: [21 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS]
157: [17 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE, 41 - I HAVE NO STRONG
DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY]
158: [23 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH]
161: [9 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES]

#111 (@3 - Nature Surmounts Nature: #34 - Engendering Nature [#164 -
AVOID HETERONOMY AGAINST AUTONOMY]) ...

166: [11 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH]
168: [26 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY]
169: [18 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS]
171: [20 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE]
173: [27 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST]
175: [22 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR]
177: [29 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING]
180: [19 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE]
181: [24 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS, 35
- I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING]
182: [6 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN]
184: [36 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS FLOW]
185: [25 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR]
186: [31 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND]
191: [32 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS]
192: [39 - I AM NOT SWOLLEN WITH PRIDE]
196: [37 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE]
197: [33 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH]
200: [8 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY]

#175 (@4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE: #369 - Autonomous Nature [#205
- DO NOT STEAL]) ...

210: [30 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND]
215: [34 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER OF MISCHIEF]
220: [38 - I CURSE NOT A GOD]
228: [40 - I HAVE NO UNJUST PREFERENCES]

#260 (@8 - Transforming Nature: #111 - Nature Surmounts Nature [#246 -
BEAR NO FALSE WITNESS]) ...

#369 (@9 - Autonomous Nature: #15 - Form of Nature [#287 - COVET NOT])

} of an ethical principle, then two peculiarities of the total
argumentation will become more understandable as prescriptive of its
trinomial basis to nomenclature.

@1 - FORMULA OF UNIVERSAL LAW: @492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL {@369 / @123 -
JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY (#3 x #3 - CENTRE INTERLOCK)} AS FOUNDATIONAL STONE
(31 MAY) TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT dated 29 OCTOBER 1900 BEING
INSTRUMENTATION TO THE FEDERATION OF THE AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH 1901 /
#1 - PRINCIPLE OF ENQUIRY {#364}; @1 - THESIS;

@2 - FORMULA OF HUMANITY: @205 / #873 - LETTERS PATENT <-- PRINCIPLES OF
PROBITY / #2 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTRADICTION {#312 - #81 = #231}; @2 -
ANTI-THESIS;

@3 - FORMULA OF AUTONOMY: @82 / #491 - SECTION IX <— TERMS OF CONTINUITY
/ #3 - PRINCIPLE OF SYNCRETIC PROGRESSION {#273 v's #288}; @3 - SYNTHESIS;

@4 - FORMULA OF PROGRESSION: @164 / #3273 - SECTION VIII (?) <—
COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS / #4 - PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY {SOVEREIGN /
AUTONOMY DYNAMIC} @4 - PROGRESSION / @1 - PROGRESSION;

@5 - FORMULA OF KANONICOS {GK: ΚᾸΝΟΝῘΚΌΣ #352 / #329 - 1ST JANUARY
"INTER GRAVISSIMAS PASTORALIS OFFICII NOSTRI CURAS…" PAPAL BULL ISSUED
BY POPE GREGORY XIII ON 24 FEBRUARY 1582} PRINCIPLES: @123 / #2188 -
SECTION III (?) <— JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT / #5 - PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT
SUBSTANCE AS DISCRIMINATING NORM {PRINCIPLE OF ENQUIRY} @2 - SYNTHESIS;

KANONICOS@[
κ, {@1: Sup: 20 (#20); Ego: 20 (#20)},
α, {@2: Sup: 21 (#41); Ego: 1 (#21)},
ν, {@3: Sup: 71 (#112); Ego: 50 (#71)},
ο, {@4: Sup: 60 (#172); Ego: 70 (#141)},
ν, {@5: Sup: 29 (#201); Ego: 50 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE
SACRED ANIMALS {%32})},
ι, {@6: Sup: 39 (#240); Ego: 10 (#201)},
κ, {@7: Sup: 59 (#299); Ego: 20 (#221)},
ο, {@8: Sup: 48 (#347); Ego: 70 (#291)},
ς {@9: Sup: 5 (#352); Ego: 38 (#329)}
] // *AMONG* *THE* *MOST* *SERIOUS* *DUTIES* *OF* *OUR* *PASTORAL* *OFFICE*…

<Loading Image...

>

@6 - FORMULA OF EMANATION: @41 / #113 - EMANATION FUNCTION <— ETHICAL
ENGAGEMENT / #6 - OBLIGATING NORM {PRINCIPLE OF CONTRADICTION}: BINOMIAL
{@1 - RETAINED, @5 - CENTRE AS EMANATION} STASIS NOMENCLATURE @3 -
ANTI-THESIS;

AS AN OPTIMAL TEMPLATE OF AGREEMENT WHICH IS ONTIC / MATHEMATICAL AND
SUITABLE FOR A GLOBAL SAPIENT ECONOMY / #7 - MANIFESTING NORM {PRINCIPLE
OF SYNCRETIC PROGRESSION} @4 - THESIS;

That the graphic of the EARTH SEASONS showing the two polarities being
the *PERIAPSIS* upon 3 JANUARY and the *APOAPSIS* upon 3 JULY provides
an irrefutable proof to the reality as there being a more substantial
capacity by a TRINOMIAL MATHEMATICAL THEORETICAL NOUMENON AS MY
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY to define the entire #81 RATHER than H64 META
DESCRIPTOR PROTOTYPES as a single verity within a paradigm provisioning
equitable distribution of number having equilibrium being then a
METASTASIS and substantiation of concept that there is a STABLE
CONSCIOUSNESS or STATIC HYPOSTASIS known as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese:
ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek: TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]"

THE BIBLICAL STORY OF WISE MEN AT JESUS BIRTH MAY BE CONSIDERED THE
FOCAL ESTABLISHMENT {ie. *THE* *TETRAGRAM’S* *CORRELATION* *WITH* *THE*
*WOMAN* *CONSTELLATION*} OF THIS TEMPORAL MARKER IN HAVING A TRINOMIAL
MEASURE OF JUDGEMENT CORRESPONDENCE THEN TO HIS ACTUAL *DEATH*:

*CAN* *WE* *DETERMINE* *THE* *EXACT* *DAY*?

We can.

And here's how . . .

CLUE #1: THE HIGH PRIESTHOOD OF CAIAPHAS {HE THAT SEEKS WITH DILIGENCE;
ONE THAT VOMITETH}

The gospels indicate that Jesus was crucified at the instigation of the
first century high priest named Caiaphas (Matthew 26:3-4, John 11:49-53).

We know from other sources that he served as high priest from A.D. 18 to
36, so that puts Jesus' death in that time frame.

But we can get more specific. Much more.

CLUE #2: THE GOVERNORSHIP OF PONTIUS {MARINE; BELONGING TO THE SEA}
PILATE {ARMED WITH A DART}

All four gospels agree that Jesus was crucified on the orders of Pontius
Pilate (Matthew 27:24-26, Mark 15:15, Luke 23:24, John 19:15-16).

We know from other sources when he served as governor of Judea--A.D. 26
to A.D. 36--so we can narrow down the range by several years.

But how are we going to get it down to a specific day and year?

CLUE #3: AFTER "THE FIFTEENTH YEAR OF TIBERIUS {THE SON OF TIBER} CAESAR"

The Gospel of Luke tells us when the ministry of John the Baptist began:
In the fifteenth year of the reign of Tiberius Caesar . . . the word of
God came to John the son of Zechariah in the wilderness [Luke 3:1-2].

This picks out a specific year: A.D. 29.

Since all four gospels depict the ministry of Christ beginning after
that of John the Baptist had begun (Matthew 3, Mark 1, Luke 3, John 1),
this means that we can shave a few more years off our range.

The death of Christ had to be in a range of seven years: between A.D. 29
and 36.

CLUE #4: CRUCIFIED ON A FRIDAY

All four gospels agree that Jesus was crucified on a Friday (Matt.
27:62, Mark 15:42; Luke23:54; John 19:42), just before a Sabbath, which
was just before the first day of the week (Matthew 28:1, Mark 16:2, Luke
24:1, John 20:1).

We know that it was a Friday because it is referred to as "the day of
preparation"--that is, the day on which Jews made the preparations they
needed for the Sabbath, since they could not do any work on that day.
Thus thus cooked food in advance and made other necessary preparations.

The Jewish Encyclopaedia states: Friday, as the forerunner of Shabbat,
is called "'Ereb Shabbat" (The Eve of Sabbath). The term "'ereb" admits
of two meanings: "evening" and "admixture" (Ex. xii. 38); and "'Ereb
Shabbat" accordingly denotes the day on the evening of which Sabbath
begins, or the day on which food is prepared for both the current and
the following days, which latter is Sabbath.

The idea of preparation is expressed by the Greek name paraskeué, given
by Josephus ("Ant." xvi. 6, § 2) to that day (compare Mark xv. 42; Luke
xxiii. 54; Matt. xxvii. 62; John xix. 42). In Yer. Pesaḥim iv. 1 the day
is called "Yoma da-'Arubta" (Day of Preparation) [Jewish Encyclopedia,
s.v., "Calendar"].
That eliminates six of the days of the week, but there were still quite
a few Fridays between A.D. 29 and 36.
 Can we figure out which one?
CLUE #5: A FRIDAY AT PASSOVER

The gospels also agree that Jesus was crucified in conjunction with the
annual feast of Passover (Matthew 26:2, Mark 14:1, Luke 22:1, John 18:39).
Here we encounter a momentary complication, because Matthew, Mark, and
Luke describe the Last Supper on Holy Thursday as a Passover meal
(Matthew 26:19, Mark 14:14, Luke 22:15). That would suggest that Good
Friday was the day after Passover.

However, when describing the morning of Good Friday, John indicates that
the Jewish authorities had not yet eaten the Passover meal:

Then they led Jesus from the house of Caiaphas to the Praetorium [ie.,
Pilate's palace]. It was early. They themselves did not enter the
Praetorium, so that they might not be defiled, but might eat the
passover. So Pilate went out to them [John 18:28-29a].

That suggests that the Passover would have begun on sundown Friday.
There are a number of ways of resolving this. For example, some have
suggested that Jesus and his disciples used a different calendar than
the Jewish authorities, and we know that there were different calendars
in use in first century Judaism.

It's also possible that Jesus just advanced the date of the Passover
celebration for him and his disciples. I mean, they were already
convinced he was the Messiah and the Son of God. If he says, "We're
celebrating Passover today," and it's a day earlier than most people,
they'd just go with that. (Note that he made other modifications to the
ceremony, such as instituting the Eucharist in the midst of it.)

And there are other solutions.

However, regardless of what Jesus' movement did, we can look to John's
statement about the Jesus' captors as an indication of what the Jewish
authorities or the mainstream Jewish practice was: They were celebrating
a Passover beginning on what we would call Friday evening.

That lets us narrow down the range of possible dates to just a few. Here
is a complete list of the days between A.D. 29 and 36 on whose evenings
Passover began:

• Monday, April 18, A.D. 29
• Friday, April 7, A.D. 30
• Tuesday, March 27, A.D. 31
• Monday, April 14, A.D. 32
• Friday, April 3, A.D. 33
• Wednesday, March 24, A.D. 34
• Tuesday, April 12, A.D. 35
• Saturday, March 31, A.D. 36

As you can see, we have just two candidates left: Jesus was either
crucified on April 7 of A.D. 30 or April 3 of A.D. 33.

Which was it?

The traditional date is that of A.D. 33. You will find quite a number of
people today advocating the A.D. 30 date.

Do the gospels let us decide between the two?

CLUE #6: JOHN'S THREE PASSOVERS

The Gospel of John records three different Passovers during the ministry
of Jesus:

• Passover #1: This is recorded in John 2:13, near the beginning of
Jesus' ministry.
• Passover #2: This is recorded in John 6:4, in the middle of Jesus'
ministry.
• Passover #3: This is recorded in John 11:55 (and frequently mentioned
afterwards), at the end of Jesus' ministry.

That means that the ministry of Jesus had to span something over two
years. A fuller treatment would reveal that it spanned about three and a
half years, but even if we assume it began immediately before Passover
#1, the addition of two more Passovers shows that it lasted more than
two years at a bare minimum.

That means the A.D. 30 date is out.

There is not enough time between the fifteenth year of Tiberius
Caesar--A.D. 29--and the next year's Passover to accomodate a ministry
of at least two years.

The numbers don't add up.

As a result, the traditional date of Jesus' death--Friday, April 3, A.D.
33--must be regarded as the correct one.

Can we be even more precise?

CLUE #7: "THE NINTH HOUR"

Matthew, Mark, and Luke each record that Jesus died about "the ninth
hour" (Matthew 27:45-50, Mark 15:34-37, Luke 23:44-46).

"The ninth hour" is what we, today, would refer to as 3:00 p.m.

This allows us to narrow down the time of Jesus' death to a very
specific point in history:

AROUND 1500 HOURS ON FRIDAY, 3 APRIL, 33 A.D.

<http://www.ncregister.com/blog/jimmy-akin/when-precisely-did-jesus-die-the-year-month-day-and-hour-revealed>

3 JANUARY + #91 = SATURDAY 4 APRIL 33 AD

4 x #91 = #364 DAY / YEAR OF THE JERUSALEM TEMPLE SERVICE: 24 x 7 x 13 =
#2184 - ANTHROPOLOGICAL COSMOGONIC PRINCIPLE

#41 - ONTIC NECESSITY PROSCRIPTIONS: #205 - PRINCIPLE OF THE PERSISTENCE
OF SUBSTANCE ☯️ / ✡️ #164 - PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY AS CONSTITUTING:
#369 - DISCRIMINATING NORM (HUMAN NATURE) BEING THE ORGANISATIONAL
PREMISE OF #123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY BY THE EXERCISE OF INTELLECTUS AS
GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS AS #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL

3 JANUARY *PERIAPSIS* PROTOTYPE: *HOMOIOS* {#420 - VAULT OF THE HEAVENS,
FIRMAMENT AS BINDING EARTH TO THE HEAVENS / #322 - FREE CITIZENS,
SOVEREIGN PEOPLE; POPULAR GOVERNMENT, DEMOCRACY; POPULAR ASSEMBLY} /
*HETEROS* {#404 - KEEP SECRET / #314 - PURPLE / MAGUS} / *TORAH* {#369 -
DIADEM / #337 - NAZARITE / CONSECRATED ONE}

3 JULY *APOAPSIS* PROTOTYPE: *HOMOIOS* {#330 - FRIEND / REBELLIOUS /
#410 - YESHUA / KING} / *HETEROS* {#352 - A PROVING TRIAL / MARY / #421
- EXTREME WICKEDNESS} / *TORAH* {#373 - FROM TRUTH INTO ERROR / #472 -
CURSE}

<Loading Image...

>

*DEMOCRACY* is based on the concept of popular sovereignty. In a direct
democracy the public plays an active role in shaping and deciding
policy. Representative democracy permits a transfer of the exercise of
sovereignty from the people to a legislative body or an executive (or to
some combination of legislature, executive and Judiciary). Many
representative democracies provide limited direct democracy through
referendum, initiative, and recall.

Parliamentary sovereignty refers to a representative democracy where the
parliament is ultimately sovereign and not the executive power nor the
judiciary.

VIEWS
1) Classical liberals such as Stuart Mill consider every individual as
sovereign on oneself.

2) Realists view sovereignty as being untouchable and as guaranteed to
legitimate nation-states.

3) Rationalists see sovereignty similarly to realists. However,
rationalism states that the sovereignty of a nation-state may be
violated in extreme circumstances, such as human rights abuses.

4) Internationalists believe that sovereignty is outdated and an
unnecessary obstacle to achieving peace, in line with their belief of a
'global community'. In the light of the abuse of power by sovereign
states such as Hitler's Germany or Stalin's Soviet Union, they argue
that human beings are not necessarily protected by the state whose
citizens they are, and that the respect for state sovereignty on which
the UN Charter is founded is an obstacle to humanitarian intervention.

5) Anarchists and some libertarians deny the sovereignty of states and
governments. Anarchists often argue for a specific individual kind of
sovereignty, such as the Anarch as a sovereign individual. Salvador
Dalí, for instance, talked of "anarcho-monarchist" (as usual for him,
tongue in cheek); Antonin Artaud of Heliogabalus: Or, The Crowned
Anarchist; Max Stirner of The Ego and Its Own; Georges Bataille and
Jacques Derrida of a kind of "antisovereignty". Therefore, anarchists
join a classical conception of the individual as sovereign of himself,
which forms the basis of political consciousness. The unified
consciousness is sovereignty over one's own body, as Nietzsche
demonstrated (see also Pierre Klossowski's book on Nietzsche and the
Vicious Circle). See also sovereignty of the individual and self-ownership.

6) Imperialists hold a view of sovereignty where power rightfully exists
with those states that hold the greatest ability to impose the will of
said state, by force or threat of force, over the populace or other
states with weaker military or political will. They effectively deny the
sovereignty of the individual in deference to either the 'good' of the
whole, or to divine right.

According to Matteo Laruffa "sovereignty resides in every public action
and policy as the exercise of executive powers by institutions open to
the participation of citizens to the decision-making processes"

RELATION TO RULE OF LAW
Another topic is whether the law is held to be sovereign, that is,
whether it is above political or other interference. Sovereign law
constitutes a true state of law, meaning the letter of the law (if
constitutionally correct) is applicable and enforceable, even when
against the political will of the nation, as long as not formally
changed following the constitutional procedure. Strictly speaking, any
deviation from this principle constitutes a revolution or a coup d'état,
regardless of the intentions. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereignty>

BEFORE PONTIUS PILATE AS TRIAL (H974) ENDS FRIDAY 3 APRIL 33 AD:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:4,row:1,col:5,nous:1&lexicon:H974>

HUNG (H8518) FOR DISPLAY ENDS SATURDAY 4 APRIL 33 AD

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:5,row:1,col:5,nous:14&lexicon:H8518>

THAT THE ONTOLOGICAL CONTEXT OF REDEMPTION (G4266) OCCURRING UPON SUNDAY
5 APRIL 33 AD IS PREDICATED UPON THE ONTIC EPISTEMOLOGICAL PREMISE

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:1,row:1,col:6,nous:76&lexicon:G4266>

SONS OF BELIAL ARE TO KEEP THEIR WEDDING VOWS (H631) WHICH WERE NOT MADE
TO ALMIGHTY GOD

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:4,row:1,col:5,nous:1&lexicon:H631>

*EXPIRY* *OF* *ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *MITHRAS* *CLAIMS* (G2983) *TO*
*CHRISTIAN* *IDENTITY* UPON 22 APRIL 2019: @113 : [#30, #1, #2, #70,
#10] as @41 / #113 - EMANATION FUNCTION <— ETHICAL ENGAGEMENT}

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:2,row:1,col:9,nous:16&lexicon:G2983>

"I LAY DOWN MY LIFE, THAT I MIGHT TAKE {22 APRIL 2019: @113: [#30, #1,
#2, #70, #10] as @41 / #113 - EMANATION FUNCTION <— ETHICAL ENGAGEMENT}
IT AGAIN. NO MAN TAKETH IT FROM ME, BUT I LAY IT DOWN OF MYSELF. I HAVE
POWER TO LAY IT DOWN, AND I HAVE POWER TO TAKE IT AGAIN. THIS
COMMANDMENT HAVE I RECEIVED OF MY FATHER." [John 10:10-18 (KJV)]"

#34 (@7 - Engendering Nature: #175 {*MARRIAGE*} - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS
NATURE [#82 - HONOUR YOUR PARENTS]) ...

84: [2 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE]
86: [10 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD]
102: [4 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS]
104: [7 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD]
115: [5 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN]

TOTAL: @84 + @86 + @102 = *ROYALTY*, *REIGN* (*OF* *TIME*), *KINGDOM* /
*DAY*, *TIME*, *YEAR* + @104 = *TO* *GET* *AS* *A* *POSSESSION*,
*ACQUIRE*, *INHERIT*, *POSSESS* / *TO* *POSSESS* *ONESELF* + @115 =
*MOSES* *SEAT* *OF* *HONOUR* (*ROYAL* *DIGNITY*, *AUTHORITY*, *POWER*) =
#491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY (#312 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTRADICTION) as
#491 as [#80, #1, #300, #100, #10] = pater (G3962): {UMBRA: #22 as #489
% #41 = #38} 1) generator or male ancestor; 2) metaphor: *ZEUS*.; 3) God
is called the Father; 1a) either the nearest ancestor: father of the
corporeal nature, natural fathers, both parents; 1b) a more remote
ancestor, the founder of a race or tribe, progenitor of a people,
forefather: so Abraham is called, Jacob and David; 1b1) fathers ie.
ancestors, forefathers, founders of a race; 1c) one advanced in years, a
senior; 2a) the originator and transmitter of anything; 2a1) the authors
of a family or society of persons animated by the same spirit as
himself; 2a2) one who has infused his own spirit into others, who
actuates and governs their minds; 2b) one who stands in a father's place
and looks after another in a paternal way; 2c) a title of honour; 2c1)
teachers, as those to whom pupils trace back the knowledge and training
they have received; 2c2) the members of the Sanhedrin, whose prerogative
it was by virtue of the wisdom and experience in which they excelled, to
take charge of the interests of others; 3a) *OF* *THE* *STARS*, *THE*
*HEAVENLY* *LUMINARIES*, *BECAUSE* *HE* *IS* *THEIR* *CREATOR*,
*UPHOLDER*, *RULER*; 3b) of all rational and intelligent beings, whether
angels or men, because he is their creator, preserver, guardian and
protector; 3b1) of spiritual beings and of all men; 3c) of Christians,
as those who through Christ have been exalted to a specially close and
intimate relationship with God, and who no longer dread him as a stern
judge of sinners, but revere him as their reconciled and loving Father;
3d) the Father of Jesus Christ, as one whom God has united to himself in
the closest bond of love and intimacy, made acquainted with his
purposes, appointed to explain and carry out among men the plan of
salvation, and made to share also in his own divine nature; 3d1) *BY*
*JESUS* *CHRIST* *HIMSELF*; 3d2) by the apostles;

YOUTUBE: "Personal Jesus (Depeche Mode)"

"And when the people saw what Paul {small; little} had done, they lifted
up their voices, saying in the speech of Lycaonia {she-wolf}, The gods
are come down to us in the likeness of men. And they called Barnabas
{son of the prophet, or of consolation}, *JUPITER* {the father that
helpeth}; and Paul {small; little}, *MERCURIUS* {an orator; an
interpreter}, because he was the chief speaker. Then the priest of
Jupiter, which was before their city, brought oxen and garlands unto the
gates, and would have done sacrifice with the people.

Which when the apostles, Barnabas and Paul, heard of, they rent their
clothes, and ran in among the people, crying out, And saying, Sirs, why
do ye these things? *WE* *ALSO* *ARE* *MEN* *OF* *LIKE* *PASSIONS*
*WITH* *YOU*, *AND* *PREACH* *UNTO* *YOU* *THAT* *YE* *SHOULD* *TURN*
*FROM* *THESE* *VANITIES* *UNTO* *THE* *LIVING* *GOD*, which made
heaven, and earth, and the sea, and all things that are therein: Who in
times past suffered all nations to walk in their own ways.

Nevertheless he left not himself without witness, in that he did good,
and gave us rain from heaven, and fruitful seasons, filling our hearts
with food and gladness. And with these sayings scarce restrained they
the people, that they had not done sacrifice unto them.

And there came thither certain Jews from Antioch {speedy as a chariot}
and Iconium {coming}, who persuaded the people, and, having stoned Paul,
drew him out of the city, supposing he had been dead. Howbeit, as the
disciples stood round about him, he rose up, and came into the city: and
the next day he departed with Barnabas to Derbe {a sting}. And when they
had preached the gospel to that city, and had taught many, they returned
again to Lystra {that dissolves or disperses}, and to Iconium {coming},
and Antioch {speedy as a chariot}, confirming the souls of the
disciples, and exhorting them to continue in the faith, and that we must
through much tribulation enter into the kingdom of God." [Acts 14:11-22 KJV]

QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT SECTION IX: “AND WE DO HEREBY RESERVE TO
OURSELVES OUR @104 - HEIRS AND SUCCESSORS, FULL @115 - POWER AND
AUTHORITY FROM @102 - TIME TO @104 - TIME TO REVOKE, ALTER, OR AMEND
THESE OUR LETTERS PATENT, AS TO US OR THEM SHALL SEEM MEET.”

SOVEREIGN ONTIC NECESSITY (6.5.5.41.0)@{
@1: Sup: 41 (#41); Ego: 41 (#41),
@2: Sup: 1 (#42); Ego: 41 (#82),
@3: Sup: 42 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 41 (#123
- JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY),
@4: Sup: 2 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 41 (#164 -
*PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY*),
@5: Sup: 43 (#129); Ego: 41 (#205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE*
*PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE*),
@6: Sup: 3 (#132); Ego: 41 (#246),
@7: Sup: 44 (#176 - KANT'S IDEA B176: *THE* *TRANSCENDENTAL*
*DOCTRINE* *OF* *THE POWER* *OF* *JUDGMENT* *OR* *ANALYTIC* *OF*
*PRINCIPLES*); Ego: 41 (#287),
@8: Sup: 24 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8});
Ego: 61 (#348),
@9: Sup: 66 (#266 - *PRECEPT* / *STATUTE*); Ego: 42 (#390 -
*SOVEREIGNTY* / *CROWN*),
Male: #266; Feme: #390
}

H117@{
   @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
   @2: Sup: 7 (#13); Ego: 1 (#7),
   @3: Sup: 11 (#24); Ego: 4 (#11),
   @4: Sup: 21 (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}); Ego: 10 (#21),
   @5: Sup: 59 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}); Ego: 38 (#59),
   @6: Sup: 69 (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST {%27}); Ego: 10
(#69),
   Male: #173; Feme: #69
} // #231 <-- *JUXTAPOSITION* *CONTROL*

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #215 % #41 = #10 - Impossible Advice, What can Be Done?; I-Ching:
H30 - Cohesion, Radiance, Clinging to Brightness/Fire, The net; Tetra:
41 - Response;

THOTH MEASURE: #10 - Oh thou who orderest the flame, who makest thine
appearance in Memphis; I am not a robber of food.

    #VIRTUE: With Defectiveness (no. #10), selﬁshness and crookedness.
    #TOOLS: With Vastness (no. #50), fairmindedness and desirelessness.
    #POSITION: As to Branching Out (no. #9), it is the advance.
    #TIME: As to Holding Back (no. #17), it is the retreat.
    #CANON: #86

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_86@{
   @1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
   @2: Sup: 60 (#70); Ego: 50 (#60),
   @3: Sup: 69 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED ANIMALS
{%13}); Ego: 9 (#69),
   @4: Sup: 5 (#144); Ego: 17 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
   Male: #144; Feme: #86
} // #86

#231 as [#6, #1, #4, #10, #200, #10] = ʼaddîyr (H117): {UMBRA: #0 as
#215 % #41 = #10} 1) great, majestic; 1a) of waters of sea; 1b) of a
tree; 1c) of kings, nations, gods; 2) great one, majestic one; 2a) of
nobles, chieftains, servants;

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#266 - *PRECEPT* / *STATUTE* / #390 -
*SOVEREIGNTY* / *CROWN*} / HETEROS {#238 / #376} / TORAH {#248 / #381}

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:6,row:5,col:5,nous:41&lexicon:H117>

HUMAN BEING ONTIC NECESSITY (3.5.5.41.0)@{
@1: Sup: 41 (#41); Ego: 41 (#41),
@2: Sup: 1 (#42); Ego: 41 (#82),
@3: Sup: 42 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 41 (#123
- JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY),
@4: Sup: 2 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 41 (#164 -
*PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY*),
@5: Sup: 43 (#129); Ego: 41 (#205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE*
*PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE*),
@6: Sup: 3 (#132); Ego: 41 (#246),
@7: Sup: 44 (#176); Ego: 41 (#287),
@8: Sup: 68 (#244); Ego: 24 (#311 *** SERIOUS BREACH OF THE
SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY DYNAMIC GIVEN THE INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE
MAIDEN DYNAMIC OF 3 APRIL 33 AD),
@9: Sup: 67 (#311 *** SERIOUS BREACH OF THE SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY
DYNAMIC GIVEN THE INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN DYNAMIC OF 3 APRIL
33 AD); Ego: 80 (#391),
Male: #311; Feme: #391
} // [LATIN definition: VOLUNTĀTIS (*YES*) / NOLUNTĀTIS (*NO*)]

H3467@{
   @1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
   @2: Sup: 11 (#16); Ego: 6 (#11),
   @3: Sup: 68 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 57 (#68 -
I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN {%42}),
   @4: Sup: 78 (#162); Ego: 10 (#78),
   @5: Sup: 67 (#229); Ego: 70 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
   Male: #229; Feme: #148
} // #391

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #380 % #41 = #11 - Value and Function of Non-Existence; I-Ching:
H8 - Closeness, Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together, Alliance;
Tetra: 33 - Closeness;

THOTH MEASURE: #11 - Oh thou of the Two Caverns, who makest thine
appearance in Amenta; I am not sluggish.

    #VIRTUE: Divergence (no. #11) means mistakes, but
    #TOOLS: Constancy (no. #51) is good.
    #POSITION: With Joy (no. #24), calm and composure.
    #TIME: With Labouring (no. #80), hustle and bustle.
    #CANON: #166

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_166@{
   @1: Sup: 11 (#11); Ego: 11 (#11),
   @2: Sup: 62 (#73); Ego: 51 (#62),
   @3: Sup: 5 (#78); Ego: 24 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
   @4: Sup: 4 (#82); Ego: 80 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}),
   Male: #82; Feme: #166
} // #166

#391 as [#5, #6, #300, #10, #70] = yâshaʻ (H3467): {UMBRA: #8 as #380 %
#41 = #11} 1) to save, be saved, be delivered; 1a) (Niphal); 1a1) to be
liberated, be saved, be delivered; 1a2) to be saved (in battle), be
victorious; 1b) (Hiphil); 1b1) to save, deliver; 1b2) to save from moral
troubles; 1b3) to give victory to;

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#311 / #391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ
{29 OCTOBER 1900}) OF QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT TO THE FEDERATION
OF THE AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH 1901} / HETEROS {#283 / #377} / TORAH
{#237 - *USE* *OF* *FORCE* OR *IMMUTABLE* / *STUBBORN* *WILL* / #435}

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:3,row:5,col:5,nous:41&lexicon:H3467>

#311 as [#70, #10, #20, #10, #1, #200] = oikia (G3614): {UMBRA: #21 as
#111 % #41 = #29} 1) a *HOUSE*; 1a) an inhabited edifice, a dwelling;
1b) the inmates of a house, the family; 1c) property, wealth, goods;

#311 as [#80, #1, #10, #4, #5, #10, #1, #200] = paideia (G3809): {UMBRA:
#22 as #111 % #41 = #29} 1) the whole training and education of children
(which relates to the cultivation of mind and morals, and employs for
this purpose now commands and admonitions, now reproof and punishment)
It also includes the training and care of the body; 2) whatever in
adults also cultivates the soul, esp. by correcting mistakes and curbing
passions.; 2a) instruction which aims at increasing virtue; 2b)
chastisement, chastening, (of the evils with which God visits men for
their amendment);

Can you #331 - NOT also see the dichotomy by a buffoonery notion of
these PARIS RIOTS pictured within the news media as presumably an
Islamic binomial mindset of an unreasoned methodology yet presumptuously
claiming to dictate peace as conveying circularity of #492 - AUTONOMOUS
VOLUNTARY FREEWILL (ie. either Liberty / Egalitarian depending upon the
nuance) in being paradoxically entirely of a trinomial providence:

MADNESS AND DARKNESS IS UPON THE PEOPLE AS DERANGED HYSTERIA.

#902 - RULE OF LAW (EGALITÉ {9 JULY 1900}: #22 x #41 as *ONTIC*
necessity comprising a subset of 21 consonants with #VOWELS of Semitic
origins),

#492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900}: #12 X #41), and

#391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ {29 OCTOBER 1900}) OF CIVIL
SOCIETY

#41 - TO BE OR #81 - NOT TO BE THAT IS THE #364 - QUESTION AS #231 -
JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL MADE OF IGNORANCE AND IT’S ENDLESS #312 -
CONTRADICTION AGAINST THE #123 - SENSIBILITY OF #273 - REASON ITSELF

KURT SHUBERT @ 0612 HOURS ON 15 APRIL 2019: “Dolf you’re a crack-up
mate. Well done. 😂"

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Marriage%20of%20FREXIT%20and%20BREXIT%20as%20Sapient%20Economy%2020190415.pdf>

- dolf

Initial Post: 15 April 2019
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.

dolf

2019-04-19 11:00:13 UTC

Permalink

*— DIARY NOTE: THE SEEKING OF DAMAGES $1.5 BILLION (AND RISING) AS
FRUSTRATION BY FACEBOOK OF OUR LAWFUL ATTEMPTS TO DEFEND OUR PROPERTY
FROM THEFT BY PERSONS BANNED (ie. KNIGHTS TEMPLAR INTERNATIONAL) BY
FACEBOOK WITHIN THE LAST 24 HOURS AS CONSEQUENCES UPON AMERICANS DUE TO
FACEBOOK'S RELIGIOUS AND RACIAL HATRED ON GOOD FRIDAY 19 APRIL 2019*
*
*
*We have at 1952 HOURS ON 19 APRIL 2019 COMMUNICATED WITH THEAMERICAN
CONSULATE (SYDNEY) AND FACEBOOK (PRESS, SUBPOENA, INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY)AND RAISED THEOBJECTION THAT THE ** NOTRE DAME INTERVENTION BY
US WAS TO PROHIBIT AN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY THEFT:{ie. #36 - PYTHAGOREAN
INTELLECTUAL TETRAD / #260 - INNER MAIDEN OR MARRIAGEABLE MAID / #325 -
TOTAL MAGIC SUM #65 - SOLDIER / #330 - HRUMACHIS WITH 11 SEPTEMBER 2001
INCLUSIONS (#288) / #329 - NEW YEARS DAY AS IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA
OF 1783 AS PRIOR TO FRENCH REVOLUTION...*
*
*
*
This is an automated response. Your case number is 2893371.

Thank you for contacting the Law Enforcement Response Team. Law
Enforcement officials who do not submit requests through the Law
Enforcement Online Request System
at https://www.facebook.com/records should expect longer response times.*
*
*
*----------*

*The Facebook Team received a report from you. For reference, your
complaint number is 375162619997170.

Please note that this channel is only for reports of alleged
infringements or violations of your legal rights, such as copyright or
trademark. If you filed that type of report, no further action is
necessary. However, if you contacted us through this channel about
another matter, you might not receive a response.

If you're not confident that your issue concerns intellectual property
rights, please consult the Intellectual Property section of our Help
Center for additional information:

IP Help Center: https://www.facebook.com/help/intellectual_property/
*
------------
*
*
*THAT IN THE CIRCUMSTANCE WE CAN CLAIM EQUIVALENT DAMAGES WHICH AS
EQUIVALENT TO WITHIN HOURS OF THE FIRE THAT DESTROYED MUCH OF THE
CATHEDRAL ON MONDAY 15 , DONORS PLEDGING MORE THAN $1.5 BILLION TO
RESTORE THE PARISIAN ICON TO ITS FORMER GLORY.*
*
*
*- dolf*

*Subject: **— [DISTRIBUTION TO INCLUDE FACEBOOK POSSIBLE ADDRESSES /
NOTRE DAME INTERVENTION AS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY THEFT INCLUDED] THE
CONSEQUENCES UPON AMERICANS DUE TO FACEBOOK'S RELIGIOUS AND RACIAL
HATRED ON GOOD FRIDAY 19 APRIL 2019*
*Date: *19 April 2019 at 7:52:13 pm AEST

*
*

— THE CONSEQUENCES UPON AMERICANS DUE TO FACEBOOK'S RELIGIOUS AND
RACIAL HATRED ON GOOD FRIDAY 19 APRIL 2019
(c) 2019 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: *GOOD* *FRIDAY* on 19 April, 2019
In consideration FACEBOOK's continuing prejudiced conduct within this
matter and inadequate processes of reporting and resolution to such
matters of gravitas I will never submit your considerations of
arbitrary community standards which I find to be repulsive and against
#2184 - LAWS OF NATURE itself.
I have now concluded attending to my laundry and given FACEBOOK’S
inability to convey with clarity in what manner that such a post made
by me in response to BOER / ANZAC DEFAMATION occasioning RACIAL HATRED
/ RELIGIOUS PERSECUTION AND PSYCHOSEXUAL PREJUDICE BY ISRAEL FOLAU /
KENTHURST UNITING CHURCH was a breach their arbitrary Community
Standards even though a review has been supposedly undertaken.
Accordingly upon 17 APRIL 2019 there was made A FORMAL NOTICE OF
COMPLAINT AGAINST SUCH PERSONS accompanying several documents of our
SEE ALSO: THE MARRIAGE OF FREXIT AND BREXIT AS SAPIENT ECONOMY
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Marriage%20of%20FREXIT%20and%20BREXIT%20as%20Sapient%20Economy%2020190415.pdf>
SEE ALSO: "ARE THE VEGAN #419 - PROTESTS AN ASYMMETRICAL GLOBALIST
MOVEMENT PROPAGANDISED BY INTEGRAL WORLD WHICH IS INTENTIONED ON
DESTABILISING SOVEREIGN NATIONS?"
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Reggie%20The%20Veggie.pdf>
SEE ALSO: “MELBOURNE FERTILITY CONTROL CLINIC” dated 11 to 13 April 2019
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Melbourne%20Fertility%20Control%20Clinic%2020190411.pdf>
SEE ALSO: "THE ADVENTURES OF W[H]ACK JOB (POTTY MOUTH GETS TOILET
TRAINING)" dated 11 April 2019
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Potty%20Mouth.pdf>
Were served upon the local administrative offices to the UNITING
CHURCH with a clear intention that regrettably it will then be
necessary to take legal action to enforce our RIGHTS AND ENTITLEMENTS
WITHIN A CONTINENT WHERE WE HAVE OVER A 400 YEAR HISTORY FROM 26
OCTOBER 1616 and in forcing you to respond to our written submissions
by the bestowing of a proper RESPECTFUL perspective as ACCOUNTABILITY
AND RESPONSIBILITY at a convenient time against both ISRAEL FOLAU and
the UNITING CHURCH OF AUSTRALIA as a PUBLIC AUTHORITY PROVISIONING
GOVERNMENT SERVICES in relation to his unrepentant public slander due
entirely to a delusional religious belief, breaches of our
constitutional entitlement, a disrespect of our BOER / ANZAC heritage
and the prerogatives of our factual religious belief associated to a
sapient intellectual property and allied to an enlightened culture.
against this endemic and systemic CULTURE OF PUBLIC DEFAMATION AS
RACIAL HATRED, RELIGIOUS PERSECUTION AND DENIAL OF JUSTICE which is
"TRINOMIAL {Y-M-T-A} METASTASISED MATHEMATICAL THEORETICAL NOUMENON
IMPETUS TO GOVERNANCE AS A DISCREET {% #81} AUTONOMOUS PARADIGM
#205 - PRINCIPLE OF THE PERSISTENCE OF SUBSTANCE
☯️ / ✡️
#164 - PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY
AS #369 - DISCRIMINATING NORM CAPABLE OF UTILITY FOR COGNITION,
SAPIENCE AND EMANATION BY PROVISION OF ONTIC {% #41} NECESSITY
DEFINITIONS IN AGGREGATIONS OF MORAL PROSCRIPTIONS IMPOSED ON THE
PERENNIALIST BINOMIAL {A-U-M} STASIS BASIS AS A METHODOLOGY."
THAT I have within PART FIVE of a 19 MARCH 2019 submission made to the
COUNTY COURT "ON SPECIFICITIES OF NON-FACTUALITY BEING THEN GROUNDS
FOR COUNTY COURT APPEAL AS CASE NUMBER: AP-18-0609 AGAINST A PUBLIC
AUTHORITY'S INFIDELITY TO WAR #288 - MEMORIAL COMMEMORATIONS DUE TO
ALIGNMENT WITH A FOREIGN POWER" sought the COURT'S prudent
'With respects to #288 - UMBRA data manipulation as #1828 - META
CATHOLIC LITURGICAL CALENDAR: 4 x #364 + #371 - 30 NOVEMBER = #1827}
which is made AGAINST an INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY of COGNITION and
COHERING REALITY as MENS REA being considered in the circumstance of
the existing correspondence between a #CENTRE having as ONTIC
necessity and attributed by EVER PRESENT relative to the
circumscribing happenstance as whether intentional / unintentional
being an universe of discourse and occasioning sphere of action ⭕️
which have both a finite temporality and continuity.
Whether the #288 - UMBRA impetus can be better considered a fixed
mindset and the data manipulation itself an ACTUS REUS that is
construed as PERPETUAL ACTION and therefore a FINDS COMMITTING status
can be applied to any *AHISTORICAL* (word of the day for 11 DECEMBER
2018) criminal acts although having an EVENT within the past yet
cleave to #123 - SENSIBILITY OF THE PRESENT and against which a POWER
OF ARREST under SECTION 458 of the CRIMES ACT (1958) VICTORIA can be
applied at any time.”
Which as DATA SET knowledge provided by the HEBREW / GREEK Biblical
lexicon being the CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING as coming into my
2011, then had a confirmation to its existence within my possession
only upon 19 MAY 2016 in having at such prior time been DATA MINED by
my own undertaking and ingenuity in being sourced from a *FOREIGN*
*AGENT* named RICHARD AMIEL MCGOUGH, whom is well educated within
mathematics and quantum physics and currently a software engineer at
4QTRS within YAKIMA, WASHINGTON, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and this
occurred following his debunked BIBLE WHEEL PROJECT (2001-2011) as
research MATERIAL which accompanied a selective computed #288 - UMBRA
by contrived GEMATRIA value being a DATA MANIPULATION that whilst
initially obscured by myself, regardlessly conveyed a clear MENS REA
{ie. the intention or knowledge of wrongdoing that constitutes part of
a crime, as opposed to the action or conduct of the accused} of
defeasance (French: défaire, to undo) which within law, is an
instrument which defeats the force or operation of some other deed or
estate; as distinguished from condition, that which in the same deed
is called a condition is a defeasance in another deed. Thusly
irrefutably sustains the gravitas of my claim as to there being
tangibility by ACTUS REUS {ie. action or conduct which is a
constituent element of a crime, as opposed to the mental state of the
accused} and therefore reasonable concerns for my safety, wellbeing
and security.
Given such magnitude as aforethought given in regards to a prudent
substantiation of the claim that there is (ie. a continuing context
of) determined misconduct (ie as to be WAR CRIMES against this NATION)
by PUBLIC AUTHORITIES {ie. AS *BINOMIAL* {A-U-M} *STASIS* *BASIS* *TO*
*STATUS* *BEING* *THEN* *AN* *EMANATION* *OF* *STATE*} being
contemptuous breaches of both THE CHARTER OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND
RESPONSIBILITIES NO. 43 OF ACT 2006 AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL ENTITLEMENT
#3 - CENTRE INTERLOCK)} AS FOUNDATIONAL STONE (31 MAY) TO QUEEN
VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT dated 29 OCTOBER 1900 BEING INSTRUMENTATION
TO THE FEDERATION OF THE AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH 1901 {
@205 / #873 - LETTERS PATENT <-- PRINCIPLES OF PROBITY
@82 / #491 - SECTION IX <— TERMS OF CONTINUITY
@164 / #3273 - SECTION VIII (?) <— COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS
@123 / #2188 - SECTION III (?) <— JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT
@41 / #113 - EMANATION FUNCTION <— ETHICAL ENGAGEMENT
} as *TANTAMOUNT* *TO* *TREASON*, I return again our letter of 8
November 2017 made to the STATE / FEDERAL ATTORNEY GENERAL and FEDERAL
SENATOR PENNY WONG conveying thereby PRECURSOR META-NARRATIVE WITH
SPECIFIC MARKERS having relativity to our *OBJECTS* *OF* *EXPERIENCE*
by which we cohere the integral context of the *OBJECTIVE* *REALITY*
in compliance to underlying dialects as conforming to the #2184 -
ANTHROPOLOGICAL COSMOGONIC PRINCIPLE basis to sapience itself and a
metastasised premise to identity as the POINT OF REFERENCE TO
PERSPECTIVE so that intelligence should not submit to ignorance which
is here the problem in relation to the truthfulness of any
*POSSIBILITY* *OF* *EXPERIENCE* *ITSELF*, *AND* *GROUND* *THE*
*OBJECTIVE* *VALIDITY* *OF* *THEIR* *SYNTHESIS*.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/PART%205%20-%20SPECIFICITIES%20OF%20NON-FACTUALITY%20AP-18-0609.pdf>
"THEREFORE LEAVING THE PRINCIPLES OF THE DOCTRINE OF CHRIST, LET US GO
ON UNTO PERFECTION; NOT LAYING AGAIN THE FOUNDATION OF REPENTANCE FROM
DEAD WORKS, AND OF FAITH TOWARD GOD,
OF THE DOCTRINE OF BAPTISMS, AND OF LAYING ON OF HANDS, AND OF
RESURRECTION OF THE DEAD, AND OF ETERNAL JUDGMENT. AND THIS WILL WE
DO, IF GOD PERMIT.
FOR IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR THOSE WHO WERE ONCE ENLIGHTENED, AND HAVE
TASTED OF THE HEAVENLY GIFT, AND WERE MADE PARTAKERS OF THE HOLY
GHOST, AND HAVE TASTED THE GOOD WORD OF GOD, AND THE POWERS OF THE
WORLD TO COME, IF THEY SHALL FALL AWAY, TO RENEW THEM AGAIN UNTO
REPENTANCE; SEEING THEY CRUCIFY TO THEMSELVES THE SON OF GOD AFRESH,
AND PUT HIM TO AN OPEN SHAME.
FOR THE EARTH WHICH DRINKETH IN THE RAIN THAT COMETH OFT UPON IT, AND
BRINGETH FORTH HERBS MEET FOR THEM BY WHOM IT IS DRESSED, RECEIVETH
BLESSING FROM GOD: BUT THAT WHICH BEARETH THORNS AND BRIERS IS
REJECTED, AND IS NIGH UNTO CURSING; WHOSE END IS TO BE BURNED. BUT,
BELOVED, WE ARE PERSUADED BETTER THINGS OF YOU, AND THINGS THAT
ACCOMPANY SALVATION, THOUGH WE THUS SPEAK.
FOR GOD IS NOT UNRIGHTEOUS TO FORGET YOUR WORK AND LABOUR OF LOVE,
WHICH YE HAVE SHOWED TOWARD HIS NAME, IN THAT YE HAVE MINISTERED TO
THE SAINTS, AND DO MINISTER. AND WE DESIRE THAT EVERY ONE OF YOU DO
THAT YE BE NOT SLOTHFUL, BUT FOLLOWERS OF THEM WHO THROUGH FAITH AND
PATIENCE INHERIT THE PROMISES. FOR WHEN GOD MADE PROMISE TO ABRAHAM,
BECAUSE HE COULD SWEAR BY NO GREATER, HE SWARE BY HIMSELF, SAYING,
SURELY BLESSING I WILL BLESS THEE, AND MULTIPLYING I WILL MULTIPLY THEE.
AND SO, AFTER HE HAD PATIENTLY ENDURED, HE OBTAINED THE PROMISE. FOR
MEN VERILY SWEAR BY THE GREATER: AND AN OATH FOR CONFIRMATION IS TO
THEM AN END OF ALL STRIFE. WHEREIN GOD, WILLING MORE ABUNDANTLY TO
SHOW UNTO THE HEIRS OF PROMISE THE IMMUTABILITY OF HIS COUNSEL,
CONFIRMED IT BY AN OATH: THAT BY TWO IMMUTABLE THINGS, IN WHICH IT WAS
IMPOSSIBLE FOR GOD TO LIE, WE MIGHT HAVE A STRONG CONSOLATION, WHO
WHICH HOPE WE HAVE AS AN ANCHOR OF THE SOUL, BOTH SURE AND STEDFAST,
AND WHICH ENTERETH INTO THAT WITHIN THE VEIL; WHITHER THE FORERUNNER
IS FOR US ENTERED, EVEN JESUS, MADE AN HIGH PRIEST FOR EVER AFTER THE
ORDER OF MELCHISEDEC {IE. KING OF JUSTICE}." [Hebrews 6:1-20 (KJV)]
I recognise that this action as CONSTITUTING A TOTAL AND ABSOLUTE
EXCLUSION which will be of a far greater inhumanity and more enduring
than any AMERICANS have imposed upon another nation including North
Korea. Such prudent consideration given of censure and sanction in
light of GRINDR (formerly under Joel Simkhai) / FACEBOOK (Mark
Zuckerberg) is in the circumstance of depraved COMMUNITY STANDARDS and
perverse administration of JUSTICE against any possibilities as theft
of INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY THEFT ASSOCIATED TO HUMAN COGNITION AND
SAPIENCE AS SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY DYNAMIC OF DEMOCRATIC PEOPLES and its
misappropriation as an UNIVERSAL CHRISTOLOGICAL / HUMANIST STATEMENT
OF VALUES AND BELIEF by especially AMERICANS, companies such as
GOOGLE, FACEBOOK and APPLE (but not limited to), persons of TONGAN,
FIJIAN or IRISH NATIONALITY, HERITAGE AND DESCENT and those of ROMAN
CATHOLIC BELIEF by participation within #1827 - EUCHARIST at any time
within life.
(#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}),
{%31}),
   Male: #230; Feme: #186
} // #510
UMBRA: #705 % #41 = #8 - Worth of Water, Easy By Nature; I-Ching: H48
- The Well, Welling; Tetra: 40 - Law/Model;
THOTH MEASURE: #8 - Oh thou of fiery face, whose motion is backwards;
I am not a robber of sacred property.
    #VIRTUE: Opposition (no. #8) means recklessness.
    #TOOLS: Ritual (no. #48) means squareness the correspondence
between word and deed.
    #POSITION: With Departure (no. #66), leaving the old, but
    #TIME: With On the Verge (no. #78), coming to a new start.
    #CANON: #200
PROPERTY {%8}),
   Male: #143; Feme: #200
} // #200
#0 as #705 % #41 = #8} 1) strength power, ability; 1a) inherent power,
power residing in a thing by virtue of its nature, or which a person
or thing exerts and puts forth; 1b) power for performing miracles; 1c)
moral power and excellence of soul; 1d) the power and influence which
belong to riches and wealth; 1e) power and resources arising from
numbers; 1f) power consisting in or resting upon armies, forces, hosts;
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:4,row:1,col:1,nous:47&lexicon:G1411>
In the circumstance where I have never been accorded fair, equitable,
timely and satisfactory JUSTICE in response to BOER / ANZAC DEFAMATION
occasioning RACIAL HATRED / RELIGIOUS PERSECUTION AND PSYCHOSEXUAL
PREJUDICE therefore NO AUSTRALIAN is to given assent to or utilise my
SAPIENT INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY which SUPERSEDES QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT DATED 29 OCTOBER 1900. HERETOFORE RESPECT BEGETS
RESPECT AND YOU ARE FORBIDDEN TO RETAIN SUCH INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IN
ANY MANNER WHATSOEVER UNTIL I HAVE BEEN GRANTED A MODICUM OF JUSTICE.
be impossible for myself to be persuaded in any manner whatsoever to
RESCIND SUCH PRUDENT, JUST AND RIGHTEOUS CONSIDERATIONS OF TOTAL AND
proffer an apology because my limit as faithful regard towards
AMERICANS occurring over 22 years labour has now been exceeded.
There is a God in Heaven whom dispenses justice {ie. A dingo has got
my baby} when there is none found amongst humankind...
And all goodwill and patience is gone.
I must therefore respectfully disagree with Catholic Archbishop of
Brisbane Mark COLERIDGE’s comments that ROMAN CATHOLICISM conveys a
great fidelity as respect to the judicial process.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/FACEBOOK%20RACIAL%20RELIGIOUS%20HATRED%20GOOD%20FRIDAY%2020190419%201.png>
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/FACEBOOK%20RACIAL%20RELIGIOUS%20HATRED%20GOOD%20FRIDAY%2020190419%202.png>
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/FACEBOOK%20RACIAL%20RELIGIOUS%20HATRED%20GOOD%20FRIDAY%2020190419%203.png>
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/FACEBOOK%20RACIAL%20RELIGIOUS%20HATRED%20GOOD%20FRIDAY%2020190419%204.png>
As we'd previously raised in our correspondence to this COURT, the
starting point of our concerns lays with a #364 - QUESTION upon what
is the actual focal impetus to their SWEARING of *OATHS* {
    "391" : [6, 2, 300, 2, 6, 70, 5],
    "413" : {
        "0" : [6, 30, 300, 2, 70, 5],
        "1" : [30, 300, 2, 6, 70, 5]
    }
    AS 8 JUNE 2017 CHERISHED MOTHER STATUE PLAQUE INSTALLATION
} as being made in the circumstance against the autonomy of the person
VALUE? + #65 - *DODECAHEDRON* / *SOLDIER* + #175 - *ICOSAHEDRON* /
*MARRIAGE* = #10 - TETRAKTYS) FOUND, WHENCE ALL OUR WISDOM SPRINGS AND
WHICH CONTAINS PERENNIAL NATURE'S FOUNTAIN, CAUSE AND ROOT.'
"ANYONE WHO FOR FALSE REASONS OF MERCY DEVIATES FROM THIS CLEAR
#273; H4784: marah / rebel: #273; H6696: tsuwr / besiege: #273}, THE
DISSOLUTION OF THE STATE." [Adolf Hitler's Table Talk IDEA: (7 JUNE
Had it not be for our rational belief and sapient intellectual
property our nation’s statehood would have been consumed in that
holocaust against 850 years of history.
SOVEREIGN / MARRIAGE DYNAMIC (TRADITION)
v's
SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY DYNAMIC
AS IMPETUS FOR THE NOTRE DAME MAELSTROM WHICH BEING AN ASSAILMENT
AGAINST 850 YEARS OF STATE / SOVEREIGN HISTORY WOULD HAVE BY DEFAULT
*ROLLED* *BACK* *TO* ITS KNOWN STASIS
@1 <--- INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN {#64 = 8 x 8 as #260 MAGIC
SUM}
@5 <--- ANCHOR {PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY PROTOTYPE}
#175 - *MARRIAGE*
Nous: #36
Time: 01:40 hrs
Date: 2019.4.15
Dao: Natural Reversals, 'Secret' Explanation
Tetra: #12 - Youthfulness
I-Ching: H4 - Juvenile Ignorance, Youthful Inexperience, Enveloping,
The young shoot, Discovering
#260 CE
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#325 / #367} / HETEROS {#330 / #329} / TORAH
{#324 / #326}
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:1,row:1,col:8,nous:36&lexicon:H776>
01:40 hrs, Super: #325 / #36 - Natural Reversals, 'Secret'
Explanation; I-Ching: H4 - Juvenile Ignorance, Youthful Inexperience,
Enveloping, The young shoot, Discovering; Tetra: 12 - Youthfulness,
Ego: #367 / #36 - Natural Reversals, 'Secret' Explanation; I-Ching: H4
- Juvenile Ignorance, Youthful Inexperience, Enveloping, The young
shoot, Discovering; Tetra: 12 - Youthfulness]
*THUS* *WE* *CONCLUDE* *A* *HIGH* *PROBABILITY* *THAT* *THE* *FIRE*
*WAS* *A* *DELIBERATE* *CAUSE* *CÉLÈBRE* *ASSAILMENT* *AGAINST*
*SOVEREIGN* *DEMOCRATIC* *NATIONS*.
In our opinion the BINOMIAL APPARATUS as the occidental perspective of
PERENNIALISM having by the immateriality of its STASIS which defines a
SOVEREIGN / MARRIAGE dynamic may in some circumstances have a
predisposition towards judgementalism by impetus of narcissistic
self-justification as being an auto-intoxication in a self bestowed
dignity as a ontological self-delusion due to an infatuation with the
mirroring of its various ONTIC characteristic elements expressed
- PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE {#873 - PROBITY OF THE DIGNITY
(SECTION IX) in being a lawful EMANATION OF STATE AS METHODOLOGY which
itself conforms to the dialectic of the #2184 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC
PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY (SECTION VIII) and the HISTORICAL CHRISTIAN
WEDDING VOW.
"I, *NAME* *OF* *BRIDE*, #312 - *TAKE* *THEE* {ie. A WILLING, WILL},
*NAME* *OF* *GROOM* to be my #2184 - *LAWFULLY* {ie. LAWS OF NATURE}
wedding husband. To have and to hold #273 - *FROM* *THIS* *DAY*
*FORWARD* {ie. SUCCESSIVELY IN ORDER}, for richer or poorer, in
sickness and in health, to love and #364 - *OBEY* until death do we
part, today I pledge my faithfulness."
SECTION VIII: "REQUIRE AND COMMAND ALL OUR OFFICERS AND MINISTERS,
CIVIL AND MILITARY, AND ALL OTHER THE INHABITANTS OF OUR SAID
COMMONWEALTH TO BE #364 - OBEDIENT {#273 - REMEMBRANCE}, #312 - AIDING
{#273 -SEPULCHRE}, AND #273 - ASSISTING {#273 - WEAK} UNTO OUR SAID
GOVERNOR GENERAL {#2184 - LAWS OF NATURE AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL
COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE / 12 = #182 AS DATE(1996,3,20) + 5 x #364 +
#182 = 11 SEPTEMBER 2001}, OR, IN THE EVENT OF HIS DEATH, #273 -
INCAPACITY, OR ABSENCE, TO SUCH PERSON OR PERSONS AS MAY, FROM TIME TO
TIME, UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THESE OUR LETTERS PATENT, ADMINISTER
{#2184 - LAWS OF NATURE AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE / 13
= #168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26 - *YHWH*}} THE
GOVERNMENT OF OUR SAID COMMONWEALTH."
What we call 'culture' is actually a series of core beliefs or value
systems, with each level expressing a different understanding of the
world or the church. A “belief” or “value system” is a worldview, a
set of perspectives/priorities/paradigms, a mind-set, an organizing
framework for deep-level decision-making at the bottom line—which is
why you can’t compromise about it. Your value system is the threshold
at which you won’t negotiate.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:4,row:1,col:5,nous:1&lexicon:H974>
HUNG (H8518) FOR DISPLAY ENDS SATURDAY 4 APRIL 33 AD
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:5,row:1,col:5,nous:14&lexicon:H8518>
THAT THE ONTOLOGICAL CONTEXT OF REDEMPTION (G4266) OCCURRING UPON
SUNDAY 5 APRIL 33 AD IS PREDICATED UPON THE ONTIC EPISTEMOLOGICAL PREMISE
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:1,row:1,col:6,nous:76&lexicon:G4266>
SONS OF BELIAL ARE TO KEEP THEIR WEDDING VOWS (H631) WHICH WERE NOT
MADE TO ALMIGHTY GOD
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:4,row:1,col:5,nous:1&lexicon:H631>
*EXPIRY* *OF* *ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *MITHRAS* *CLAIMS* (G2983) *TO*
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:2,row:1,col:9,nous:16&lexicon:G2983>
ENGAGEMENT} IT AGAIN. NO MAN TAKETH IT FROM ME, BUT I LAY IT DOWN OF
MYSELF. I HAVE POWER TO LAY IT DOWN, AND I HAVE POWER TO TAKE IT
AGAIN. THIS COMMANDMENT HAVE I RECEIVED OF MY FATHER." [John 10:10-18
(KJV)]"
ITS NATURE [#82 - HONOUR YOUR PARENTS]) ...
84: [2 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE]
86: [10 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD]
102: [4 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS]
104: [7 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD]
115: [5 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN]
*MOSES* *SEAT* *OF* *HONOUR* (*ROYAL* *DIGNITY*, *AUTHORITY*, *POWER*)
= #491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY (#312 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTRADICTION)
as #491 as [#80, #1, #300, #100, #10] = pater (G3962): {UMBRA: #22 as
#489 % #41 = #38} 1) generator or male ancestor; 2) metaphor: *ZEUS*.;
3) God is called the Father; 1a) either the nearest ancestor: father
of the corporeal nature, natural fathers, both parents; 1b) a more
remote ancestor, the founder of a race or tribe, progenitor of a
people, forefather: ... the Father of Jesus Christ, as one whom God
has united to himself in the closest bond of love and intimacy, made
acquainted with his purposes, appointed to explain and carry out among
men the plan of salvation, and made to share also in his own divine
nature; 3d1) *BY* *JESUS* *CHRIST* *HIMSELF*; 3d2) by the apostles;
QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT SECTION IX: “AND WE DO HEREBY RESERVE
THESE OUR LETTERS PATENT, AS TO US OR THEM SHALL SEEM MEET.”
“YE WORSHIP YE KNOW NOT WHAT: WE KNOW WHAT WE WORSHIP: FOR SALVATION
IS OF THE JEWS.” [John 4:22 (KJV)]
#71 #1 #11
#61 #81 #21
#51 #41 #31 = #369 as DISCRIMINATING NORM OF HUMAN NATURE / WAN WU AS
ORGANISATION OF THINGS IN NATURE
#205 = PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE (YANG)
#164 = PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY (YIN)
#41 - EMANATION PRINCIPLE (REMEMBER THE SABBATH)
#82 - TERMS OF CONTINUITY (HONOUR PARENTS)
#123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY (DO NOT KILL)
#164 = PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY (YIN / TORAH: AVOID HETERONOMY AGAINST
AUTONOMY)
#205 = PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE (YANG / YAHAD: DO NOT STEAL)
#246 - NORMA OBLIGANS (BEAR NO FALSE WITNESS)
#287 - MANIFESITNG NORM (COVET NOT)
@492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL {@369 / @123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY (#3 x #3
- CENTRE INTERLOCK)}
@205 / #873 - LETTERS PATENT <-- PRINCIPLES OF PROBITY
@82 / #491 - SECTION IX <— TERMS OF CONTINUITY
@164 / #3273 - SECTION VIII (?) <— COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS
@123 / #2188 - SECTION III (?) <— JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT
@41 / #113 - EMANATION FUNCTION <— ETHICAL ENGAGEMENT
HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO ELIZABETH REGINA II ON EASTER SUNDAY 21 APRIL 2019
- dolf
----------
THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE MODIFIED AT ANY TIME, EVEN AFTER ITS ELECTRONIC
SERVICE AS PUBLIC STATEMENT AND THE CONVEYING OF A SOVEREIGN AUTHORITY
MAKING AN EFFECTUAL DEMAND AS A DUTY OF COMPLIANCE (‘EVENT’) PLACED
UPON ANY NOMINATED PARTIES (WHETHER OR NOT SPECIFIED).
SUCH AMENDMENTS WHICH HAVE OCCURRED THEREAFTER THE SAID EVENT, WILL BE
CONSTRUED AS A DEMAND BEING PLACED UPON ANY NOMINATED PARTIES AT THE
TIME OF SAID EVENT AND NOT THEREAFTER.
ACCORDINGLY, THERE IS NO IMMUTABILITY OF ANY PENALTY SOUGHT AND WHICH
MAY ARBITRARILY AND SUBSEQUENTLY IMPOSED AS EXIGENCY DEMAND IN BEING
CONSTRUED AS A LIABILITY WHICH IS PLACED UPON THE ABSENCE OF KNOWLEDGE
TO A DUTY OF ANY PRINCIPLE AS A DEMAND OF COMPLIANCE FOR WHICH ANY
NOMINATED PARTIES MUST BE AWARE.
THIS IS TO AVOID ANY POSSIBILITY OF ANY HINDRANCE, OBSTRUCTION AND
FRUSTRATION OF THE PREROGATIVE AS SOVEREIGN AUTHORITY. THUS IF A
PROVISION IS INEFFECTUAL AND AN ATTEMPT MADE TO CONTRAVENE AND
MITIGATE THE CLEAR DUTY OF ANY PROVISION OF COMPLIANCE.
IT WILL BE MODIFIED AND INCLUDED HEREIN UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THIS
NOTICE, AND CONSTRUED AS KNOWLEDGE TO A DUTY OF ANY PRINCIPLE AS A
DEMAND OF COMPLIANCE FOR WHICH ANY NOMINATED PARTIES MUST BE AWARE.
THE CURRENT REVISION OF THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE OBTAINED AS A PDF
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/RELIGIOUS%20AND%20RACIAL%20HATRED%20BY%20FACEBOOK%20ON%20GOOD%20FRIDAY%2019%20APRIL%202019.pdf>
Initial Post: Good Friday 19 April 2019
----------
-- THE MARRIAGE OF FREXIT AND BREXIT AS SAPIENT ECONOMY
(c) 2019 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 15 April, 2019
BREXIT MAKE PARIS THE CAPITAL OF EUROPEAN TECH?
Shortly after his election in May 2017, President Macron said he
wanted France itself “to think and move like a start-up” – a vision of
the country’s digital future that is gaining traction as Britain
wrestles with BREXIT.
French President Emmanuel Macron’s vow to make France a ‘start-up
nation’ amid the uncertainty over BREXITIS raising the question of
whether Paris could supplant London as the capital of European tech.
Since his election, Macron has wooed *TECHNOLOGY* entrepreneurs with a
string of initiatives in the form of lavish tax breaks, subsides, and
credits for research. In March 2018, he promised to invest €1.5
billion into artificial intelligence research through 2022.
Some of these initiatives, in addition to Macron’s dynamism, have
lured British tech companies who are looking to gain a foothold in
Europe."
<https://www.france24.com/en/20190413-france-paris-macron-brexit-tech-capital-european-station-f>
MARTIN DAVIES: “Time to stop BREXIT before more jobs, businesses and
hardworking EU citizens abandon the U.K. for good.”
DOLF BOEK: “But only Britain has the means to define the Sovereign /
Autonomy dynamic which a sapient economy requires.
And their political opportunism are no different to Mr Macron’s in
that any viable political life requires a favourably motivated
constituency otherwise how will they retain office.”
DAVID NICOL: “Time for the losers to accept democracy.”
STEPHAN GON: “David, it’s about economy this time, you reflect the
innate ignorance of the bulk of BREXITERS, now you go back reading
more lies from the side of that bus."
NOTE: The word 'TRADITION' appears on the side of a bus crash in
KURT SHUBERT: “Dolf any business relationship requires working with
your partners & biggest customers. The best deal the UK can have and
still retain *X* amount of autonomy is to remain a part of the EU.”
DOLF BOEK: “Kurt, I have made a further statement given such
incapacity to comprehend that the microcosm as the trinomial
metastasised conception of state being sovereign / autonomy dynamic
must be understood before the binomial stasis of macroeconomic
interoperability can occur and the later which is Mr Macron’s expertise.”
STEPHAN GON: “Dolf that’s the least productive copied / pasted piece
of text I’ve read this week.”
NOTE: This was a staged statement as having no reality excepting being
provisioned by Internet militia
DOLF BOEK: “Stephan, you are a simple life entity (not even capable of
understanding my own valid informal research on Critique of Pure
Reason) but I am sapient which is given to rationality so don’t
subject me to your strictures of incompressibility which is a perverse
narcissistic characteristic of self entitlement which you have ...
One doesn’t answer a fool in relation to the foundation of state
especially when like you they have violated our BOER / ANZAC tradition...
LEST WE FORGET”
JONATHAN PHILLIPS: “Stephan, its not, and never has been 'about the
economy'.. its about making our own decisions, and not bankrolling the
'pipe-dreams' of others...”
— HELL’S CLAMOUR —
“OH YELLOW SHIRTS.
PARIS IS BURNING.
AN OLD DAME FLIRTS.
HELL HAS YEARNING.
FRATERNITÉ AU MORTS.”
are always synthetic. For it would be absurd to base an analytic
judgment on experience, since I do not at all need to go beyond my
concept in order to formulate the judgment and therefore have no need
for any testimony from experience. That a body is extended, is a
proposition that stands certain a priori, and not a #473 - *JUDGEMENT*
of experience.
{%36}); Ego: 19 (#122),
   Male: #363; Feme: #149
} // #473
H32 - Perseverance, Endurance, Duration, Constancy; Tetra: 51 -
Constancy;
THOTH MEASURE: #31 - Oh thou who hast different faces, and makest
thine appearance in Net'efit; I am not one of inconstant mind.
    #VIRTUE: With Packing (no. #31), a move home, but
    #TOOLS: With Stoppage (no. #71), a failure to proceed.
    #POSITION: With Stove (no. #44), love of proﬁt.
    #TIME: With Law (no. #40), abhorrence of the cruel.
    #CANON: #186
{%31}),
   Male: #141; Feme: #186
} // #186
#473 as [#20, #1, #300, #5, #20, #100, #10, #9, #8] = katakrínō
(G2632): {UMBRA: #43 as #1302 % #41 = #31} 1) *TO* *GIVE* *JUDGMENT*
*AGAINST*, *TO* *JUDGE* *WORTHY* *OF* *PUNISHMENT*; 1a) to condemn;
1b) by one's good example to render another's wickedness the more
evident and censurable;
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:1,row:2,col:5,nous:77&lexicon:G2632>
"The men of Nineveh shall rise in judgment with this generation, and
shall condemn-G2632 it: because they repented at the preaching of
Jonas; and, behold, a greater than Jonas is here." [Matthew 12:41]
"The queen of the south shall rise up in the judgment with this
generation, and shall condemn-G2632 it: for she came from the
uttermost parts of the earth to hear the wisdom of Solomon; and,
behold, a greater than Solomon is here." [Matthew 12:42]
"Then Judas, which had betrayed him, when he saw that he was
condemned-G2632, repented himself, and brought again the thirty pieces
of silver to the chief priests and elders," [Matthew 27:3]
"Ye have heard the blasphemy: what think ye? And they all
condemned-G2632 him to be guilty of death." [Mark 14:64]
For before I go to experience, I have all the conditions for my #473 -
*JUDGEMENT* already in the concept, from which I merely extract the
predicate in accordance with the principle of #312 - *CONTRADICTION*,
and by this means can simultaneously become conscious of the necessity
of the #473 - *JUDGEMENT*, which experience could never teach me.
[pages 17-18]
Before the advent of combination therapy within the AIDS crisis if one
engaged within dangerous actions with wanton reckless regard you could
be subject to 25 years imprisonment.
But on a building site apparently you can engage in “constructive
events” such as welding as “dangerous actions with wanton reckless
regard” for having fire extinguishers 🧯 within proximity and the
Mayor of Paris thinks it accidental. The question then is whether the
lack of safety with the electrical works amounted to reckless or
culpable conduct?
Whom can ever tell as it reminds me of the occasion where my own power
Saturday 10 March 2018 with the seal left intact as to convey a
premeditated action of some sort. Does a Marion statue ever weep and
bleed by itself as consideration on what are your values anchored
to—surely not to reason?
EXCERPT FROM EMAIL TO STATE / FEDERAL ATTORNEY GENERALS & MINISTER FOR
DEFENCE / ANZAC 2018 COMMEMORATIONS (HE WAS IN PARIS ON 11 NOVEMBER
"CORRECTION (11 JUNE 2000 AS CROWN IMPLICATIONS ON VIABILITY OF STATE
AS COMMONWEALTH) THAT THE NEWS MEDIA CANNOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT OF
COURT ORDERS RELATING TO THE REPORTING OF COURT HEARINGS OF CARDINAL
PELL BECAUSE THERE IS AN ALLEGED TREASON / PRO DOMO CLAIM RELATING TO
31 MAY 1998 REFUSAL OF COMMUNION"
DOLF: "Can I ask for what purpose you are *LIGHTING* *CANDLES* ma'am?"
ARTIST: "Sorry."
DOLF: "For what purpose are you *LIGHTING* *CANDLES*?"
ARTIST: "Umm"
DOLF: "Why aren't you at the BOER WAR memorial celebrating our ah ...
our ah Australian! Oh you're the artist aren't you ma'am?"
ARTIST: "(laughs) I'm Brenda."
DOLF: "You're the artist."
ARTIST: "Nice to meet you."
DOLF: "Now..."
ARTIST: "What happened is um, the mother in Ireland died and their
service in Ireland is at 7 o'clock tonight."
DOLF: "What. Whose? Is that [statue] after a particular person?"
ARTIST: "Yeah Cathy McMahon."
DOLF: "So this [statue] was created in representation of ..."
ARTIST: "This here ... lighting the candles. Wanting to get the
candles all lit at the start of her service."
DOLF: "Okay. It's a Catholic [memorial] service is it?"
ARTIST: "Umm. I['m] not [entirely sure]. I think she is in the
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH*."
DOLF: "Yes. Is this statue related to her in any manner?"
ARTIST: "Yes she is a mother."
DOLF: "Is she the mother depicted [by] the statue."
ARTIST: "No it depicts. The statue depicts all mothers [of which
*OUR* *LADY* [meaning: NOTRE DAME (the French term added later)] is
the exemplar]."
DOLF: "Yes. Yeah. The problem is that with the BOER WAR Memorial on
the 31 May ..."
ARTIST: "Yes"
DOLF: "... I hugged a mother [at] refusal of Communion at Saint
Patrick's Cathedral in Melbourne on 31 May 1998."
ARTIST: "Really."
DOLF: "And she was refused communion because she was wearing a rainbow
sash."
ARTIST: "Oh really."
DOLF: "For no other reason. So I have an objection for it. *NOW*
*WOULD* *YOU* *DO* *ME* *A* *FAVOUR* *TO* *APPEASE*, *TO* *BALANCE*
*THE* *KARMA* *OF* *THINGS*. Because..."
...
DOLF: "... I'm going to take the council to court over this particular
matter. Because there is no object of respect at the BOER WAR Memorial."
ARTIST: "So what are you doing taking this to court?"
DOLF: "I'm taking this and the BOER yeah ... this is part of that.
This is part of *ANZAC* *DEFAMATION* which I have been subject to.
When a mother weeps for her children..."
ARTIST: "But this is what this is."
DOLF: "Yeah that is exactly what our 'LEST WE FORGET' poem is all about."
ARTIST: "So why are you against this?"
DOLF: "I'm against this because I happen to be JEWISH and ..."
ARTIST: "Oh okay my darling yes..."
DOLF: "And this is a MARION statue. Now if you really want to IRISH
persons its the WASHER WOMAN that was the person who was most ..."
ARTIST: "No no..."
DOLF: "The WASHER WOMAN in IRISH society was subject to more impunity
than any other woman within IRISH society."
ARTIST: "But you know it's interesting that you say that you're um ah
... JEWISH because the man that led this through the COMMONWEALTH
games ... through the COMMONWEALTH government was JEWISH."
DOLF: "Yes but he should know better we don't ... they don't allow
statues in their TEMPLE precinct. And the circumstance that we have
is that I'm of DUTCH heritage and the [INTERNATIONAL] KNIGHTS TEMPLAR
which was formed in 2015 are associated with the ORDER that [DUTCH
EXPLORER] DIRK HARTOG signed the PEWTER PLATE with. So if you want to
*TALK* *ABOUT* *ERECTIONS* [*OF* *COMMEMORATIVE* *MERIT*] DIRK HARTOG
signed it as AO and their were SEVEN PAPAL BULLS associated with my
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY.
As the RIGHT OF WOMEN which is the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS."
ARTIST: "So why are you against this? Why are you going to bring this
into your argument?"
DOLF: "Because WOMEN'S SUFFRAGE was the RIGHT of the exercise of
VOLUNTARY WILL in political life and this [statue] is not."
ARTIST: "What do you mean?"
DOLF: "This is not."
ARTIST: "What do you mean?"
DOLF: "Women in IRELAND have just been [granted the right of
*ABORTION*] ..."
ARTIST: "No no hang on a moment.."
DOLF: "Women in IRELAND ... this was put here on SAINT PATRICK'S DAY
of all people. Of all places."
ARTIST: "But I chose that."
DOLF: "You should not have done that. Its representing [only the]
IRISH..."
ARTIST: "No it's not. No it's not."
DOLF: "Well because that ... there was no PLAQUE here on the day that
it was [unveiled] ..."
ARTIST: "No but I didn't. I wasn't able to get it ..."
DOLF: "Let me finish..."
ARTIST: "No but you let me finish. I wasn't able ..."
DOLF: "There was no PLAQUE here on the day it was installed."
ARTIST: "Yes there was."
DOLF: "No there wasn't."
ARTIST: "I'm sorry SIR I unveiled the PLAQUE."
DOLF: "I'm sorry ma'am but I took pictures. And I took the picture on
the 8 JUNE when the PLAQUE was unveiled and then I went to the BOER
WAR MEMORIAL and there were tributes there as well.
So that's good day to you ma'am."
[walking away]
ARTIST: "Who are you taking it to?"
DOLF: "I will take you to court as well."
[walking away]
THE POLICE ATTENDED AND REPEATED THE UNSUSTAINABLE FALSE ACCUSATION
THAT I WAS IN ANY MANNER THREATENING. AND I *CONVEYED* *AT* *THE*
*TIME* *OF* *MY* *POLICE* *EMERGENCY* *CALL* *WHICH* *WAS* *MADE*
*DUE* *TO* *THE* *FIRE* *RISK* *BY* *NUMEROUS* *CANDLES* *UPON* *THE*
#473 - *GARDEN* *BED* *WITH* *NO* *FIRE* *EXTINGUISHER* *PRESENT*,
THAT THE ARTIST APPEARED TO HAVE MENTAL STABILITY ISSUES.
(#160),
ANY {%26}),
   Male: #365; Feme: #230
} // #473
UMBRA: #965 % #41 = #22 - Point to Reversal?, Humility's Increase;
I-Ching: H8 - Closeness, Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together,
Alliance; Tetra: 34 - Kinship;
THOTH MEASURE: #22 - Oh Chemiu, who makest thine appearance in Kauu; I
am not a transgressor.
    #VIRTUE: What Resistance (no. #22) approves is right while
    #TOOLS: What Doubt (no. #62) abhors is wrong.
    #POSITION: With Advance (no. #20), the desire to proceed.
    #TIME: With Stoppage (no. #71), the desire for constraints.
    #CANON: #175
   Male: #61; Feme: #175
} // #175
#473 as [#80, #70, #10, #8, #300, #5] = poiéō (G4160): {UMBRA: #48 as
#965 % #41 = #22} 1) to make; 1a) with the names of things made, to
produce, construct, form, fashion, etc.; 1b) to be the authors of, the
cause; 1c) to make ready, to prepare; 1d) to produce, bear, shoot
forth; 1e) to acquire, to provide a thing for one's self; 1f) to make
a thing out of something; 1g) to (make i.e.) render one anything; 1g1)
to (make i.e.) constitute or appoint one anything, to appoint or
ordain one that; 1g2) *TO* (*MAKE* ie.) *DECLARE* *ONE* *ANYTHING*;
1h) to put one forth, to lead him out; 1i) to make one do something;
1i1) cause one to; 1j) *TO* *BE* *THE* *AUTHORS* *OF* *A* *THING*
(*TO* *CAUSE*, *BRING* *ABOUT*); 2) to do; 2a) to act rightly, do
well; 2a1) to carry out, to execute; 2b) to do a thing unto one; 2b1)
to do to one; 2c) with designation of time: to pass, spend; 2d) to
celebrate, keep; 2d1) *TO* *MAKE* *READY*, *AND* *SO* *AT* *THE*
*SAME* *TIME* *TO* *INSTITUTE*, *THE* *CELEBRATION* *OF* *THE*
*PASSOVER*; 2e) to perform: to a promise;
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:1,row:2,col:5,nous:77&lexicon:G4160>
"For this is he that was spoken of by the prophet Esaias, saying, The
voice of one crying in the wilderness, Prepare ye the way of the Lord,
make-G4160 his paths straight." [Matthew 3:3]
THAT THEY ONLY HAD RECOURSE TO THE SLANDER OF THREATENING CONDUCT
(WHICH THE TONE OF THE CONVERSATION DOES NOT CONVEY) WHEN IT WAS
EVIDENT THERE WAS A LACK OF TRUTH CONTENT [IN] THEIR RESPONSES TO
REASONABLE QUESTIONS.
THE AUDIO RECORDINGS WERE NECESSARY TO GUARANTEE MY OWN SAFETY AND
INTEGRITY AND WITHOUT SUCH I WOULD HAVE IMMEDIATELY BEEN ARRESTED FOR
THREATENING CONDUCT WHICH DID NOT OCCUR AND NEVER INTENTIONED.
AT THE TIME OF PROVIDING THE POLICE WITH A COPY OF THE AUDIO RECORDING
IT WAS CONVEYED THAT THE CAMELLIA {so named after Georg Joseph Kamel
(21 April 1661 – 2 May 1706) a Jesuit missionary, pharmacist and
naturalist known for producing the first comprehensive accounts of
Philippine flora and fauna and for introducing Philippine nature to
the European learned world} FLORAL TRIBUTE LEFT AT THE MARION SHRINE
WAS REMOVED AND PLACED AT THE BOER WAR MEMORIAL AND REMAINED THERE
UNTIL AFTER 31 MAY 2018.
IMMANUEL KANT’S PROLEGOMENA (1783) ON SECTION #58 - POLITICAL
is cognition according to analogy, which surely does not signify, as
the word is usually taken, an imperfect similarity between two things,
but rather a perfect similarity between two relations in wholly
dissimilar things.
Such is an analogy between the legal relation of human actions and the
mechanical relation of moving forces: I can never do anything to
another without giving him a right to do the same to me under the same
conditions; just as a body cannot act on another body with its motive
force without thereby causing the other body to react just as much on
it. Right and motive force are here completely dissimilar things, but
in their relation there is nonetheless complete similarity. By means
of such an analogy I can therefore provide a concept of a relation to
things that are absolutely unknown to me. E.g., THE PROMOTION OF THE
HAPPINESS OF THE CHILDREN = A IS TO THE LOVE OF THE PARENTS = B AS THE
WELFARE OF HUMANKIND = C IS TO THE UNKNOWN IN GOD = *X*, WHICH WE CALL
LOVE: not as if this unknown had the least similarity with any human
inclination, but because we can posit the relation between God’s love
and the world to be similar to that which things in the world have to
one another. But here the concept of the relation is a mere category,
namely the concept of cause, which has nothing to do with sensibility.
By means of this analogy there still remains a concept of the supreme
being sufficiently determinate for us, though we have omitted
everything that could have determined this concept unconditionally and
in itself; for we determine the concept only with respect to the world
and hence with respect to us, and we have no need of more. The attacks
that Hume makes against those who want to determine this concept
absolutely – since they borrow the materials for this determination
from themselves and from the world – do not touch us; he also cannot
reproach us that nothing whatsoever would remain for us if objective
anthropomorphism were subtracted from the concept of the supreme being.
— HYMN TO ZEUS —
“Most glorious of immortals, Zeus
The many named, almighty evermore,
Nature's great Sovereign, ruling all by law
Hail to thee! On thee 'tis meet and right
That mortals everywhere should call.
From thee was our begetting; ours alone
Of all that live and move upon the earth
The lot to bear God's likeness.
Thee will I ever chant, thy power praise!
For thee this whole vast cosmos, wheeling round
The earth, obeys, and where thou leadest
It follows, ruled willingly by thee.
In thy unconquerable hands thou holdest fast,
Ready prepared, that two-timed flaming blast,
Nature's own stroke brings all things to their end.
By it thou guidest aright the sense instinct
Which spreads through all things, mingled even
With stars in heaven, the great and small --
Thou who art King supreme for evermore!
Naught upon earth is wrought in thy despite, O God.
Nor in the ethereal sphere aloft which ever winds
About its pole, nor in the sea -- save only what
The wicked work, in their strange madness,
Yet even so, thou knowest to make the crooked straight.
Prune all excess, give order to the orderless,
For unto thee the unloved still is lovely--
And thus in one all things are harmonized,
The evil with the good, that so one Word
Should be in all things everlastingly.
One Word--which evermore the wicked flee!
Ill-fated, hungering to possess the good
They have no vision of God's universal law,
Nor will they hear, though if obedient in mind
They might obtain a noble life, true wealth.
Some with a shameless zeal for fame,
Others pursuing gain, disorderly;
Still others folly, or pleasures of the flesh.
[But evils are their lot] and other times
Bring other harvests, all unsought--
For all their great desire, its opposite!
But, Zeus, thou giver of every gift,
Who dwellest within the dark clouds, wielding still
The flashing stroke of lightning, save, we pray,
Thy children from this boundless misery.
Scatter, O Father, the darkness from their souls,
Grant them to find true understanding
On which relying thou justly rulest all---
While we, thus honoured, in turn will honour thee,
Hymning thy works forever, as is meet
For mortals while no greater right
Belongs even to the gods than evermore
Justly to praise the universal law!” [Cleanthes (c. 3rd century BCE)]
For if one only grants us, at the outset, the deistic concept of a
first being as a necessary hypothesis (as does Hume in his Dialogues
in the person of Philo as opposed to Cleanthes [c.330-c.230] who was a
Greek Stoic philosopher and followed of Zeno, the founder of the
school of Stoicism. We have only fragments of the fifty works ascribed
to Cleanthes, the largest fragment being the Hymn to Zeus), which is a
concept in which one thinks the first being by means of ontological
predicates alone, of substance, cause, etc. (something that one must
do, since reason, being driven in the sensible world solely by
conditions that are always again conditioned, cannot have any
satisfaction at all without this being done, and something that one
very well can do without falling into that anthropomorphism which
transfers predicates from the sensible world onto a being wholly
distinct from the world, since the predicates listed here are mere
categories, which cannot indeed provide any determinate concept of
that being, but which, for that very reason, do not provide a concept
of it that is limited to the conditions of sensibility) – then nothing
can keep us from predicating of this being a causality through reason
with respect to the world, and thus from crossing over to theism, but
without our being compelled to attribute this reason to that being in
itself, as a property inhering in it. For, concerning the first point,
the only possible way to compel the use of reason in the sensible
world (with respect to all possible experience) into the most
thorough- going harmony with itself is to assume, in turn, a supreme
reason as a cause of all connections in the world; such a principle
must be thoroughly advantageous to reason and can nowhere harm it in
its use in nature.
Regarding the second point, however, reason is not thereby transposed
as a property onto the first being in itself, but only onto the
relation of that being to the sensible world, and therefore
anthropomorphism is completely avoided. For here only the cause of the
rational form found everywhere in the world is considered, and the
supreme being, insofar as it contains the basis of this rational form
of the world, is indeed ascribed reason, but only by analogy, i.e.,
insofar as this expression signifies only the relation that the
highest cause (which is unknown to us) has to the world, in order to
determine everything in it with the highest degree of conformity to
reason. We thereby avoid using the property of reason in order to
think God, but instead think the world through it in the manner
necessary to have the greatest possible use of reason with respect to
the world in accordance with a principle. We thereby admit that the
supreme being, as to what it may be in itself, is for us wholly
inscrutable and is even unthinkable by us in a determinate manner; and
we are thereby prevented from making any transcendent use of the
concepts that we have of reason as an efficient cause (through
willing) in order to determine the divine nature through properties
that are in any case always borrowed only from human nature, and so
from losing ourselves in crude or *FANATICAL* concepts, and, on the
other hand, we are also prevented from swamping the contemplation of
the world with hyperphysical modes of explanation according to
concepts of human reason we have transposed onto God, and so from
diverting this contemplation from its true vocation, according to
which it is supposed to be a study of mere nature through reason, and
not an audacious derivation of the appearances of nature from a
that we think the world as if it derives from a supreme reason, as
regards its existence and inner determination; whereby we in part
cognize the constitution belonging to it (the world) itself, without
presuming to want to determine that of its cause in itself, and, on
the other hand, we in part posit the basis of this constitution (the
rational form of the world) in the relation of the highest cause to
the world, not finding the world by itself sufficient thereto.
HIS HONOUR MIGHT WELL BE GRIEVED THAT THE ACTIONS IN SUPERSEDING AS
INVALIDATING OF THOSE LETTERS PATENT which I have taken independently
from the COURT has simply taken advantage of the COURT's naivety as
the impertinence that HIS HONOUR IS IGNORANT in having no conception
that someone greater than he is standing before him. That I achieved
great things today in relation to MATTERS previously placed before the
COURT as an accountability made of others such that 1.2 billion ROMAN
CATHOLICS (ie. More than 40% of the world's Catholics live in Latin
America - but Africa has seen the biggest growth in Catholic
congregations in recent years) will not be able to CELEBRATE EASTER
with any clear conscience because *I* *HAVE* *STOLEN* *THEIR*
*THUNDER* *AND* *THEY* *CAN'T* *GET* *IT* *BACK*." [EXCERPT FROM COURT
NOTE OF 1040 HOURS ON 3 APRIL 2019 RELATING TO COUNTY COURT APPEAL
CASE NUMBERS: AP-18-0609 / AP-18-0775 / AP-18-0794 / AP-18-2201 /
AP-18-2202]
YOUTUBE: "Whatever It Takes (Imagine Dragons)"
http://youtu.be/gOsM-DYAEhY
In Greek mythology, it was Prometheus (Greek: Προμηθεύς possibly
meaning "forethought") as the Titan, culture hero, and trickster
figure who is credited with the creation of man from clay, and who
*DEFIES* *THE* *GODS* *BY* *STEALING* *FIRE* and giving it to
humanity, an act that enabled progress and civilisation. Prometheus is
known for his intelligence and as a champion of mankind and also seen
as the author of the human arts and sciences generally.
OWN AFFAIRS {%18})},
*PROLEGOMENA*: *IS* *METAPHYSICS* *POSSIBLE* *AT* *ALL*?); Ego: 9
(#226)},
In another myth, Prometheus establishes the form of animal sacrifice
practiced in ancient Greek religion. Evidence of a cult to Prometheus
himself is not widespread. He was a focus of religious activity mainly
at Athens, where he was linked to Athena and Hephaestus, other Greek
deities of creative skills and *TECHNOLOGY*. [Ref: Wikipedia
2019:Prometheus]
In this way the difficulties that appear to oppose theism disappear,
in that to Hume’s principle, not to drive the use of reason
dogmatically beyond the field of all possible experience, we conjoin
another principle that Hume completely overlooked, namely: *NOT* *TO*
*LOOK* *UPON* *THE* *FIELD* *OF* *POSSIBLE* *EXPERIENCE* *AS*
*SOMETHING* *THAT* *BOUNDS* *ITSELF* *IN* *THE* *EYES* *OF* *OUR*
*REASON*. A critique of reason indicates the true middle way between
the dogmatism that Hume fought and the skepticism he wanted to
introduce instead – a middle way that, unlike other middle ways, which
we are advised to determine for ourselves as it were mechanically
(something from one side, and something from the other), and by which
no one is taught any better, is one, rather, that can be determined
precisely, according to principles." [Pages 109-110]
Nous: #36
Time: 01:40 hrs
Date: 2019.4.15
Dao: Natural Reversals, 'Secret' Explanation
Tetra: #12 - Youthfulness
I-Ching: H4 - Juvenile Ignorance, Youthful Inexperience, Enveloping,
The young shoot, Discovering
#260 CE
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#325 / #367} / HETEROS {#330 / #329} / TORAH
{#324 / #326}
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:1,row:1,col:8,nous:36&lexicon:H776>
01:40 hrs, Super: #325 / #36 - Natural Reversals, 'Secret'
Explanation; I-Ching: H4 - Juvenile Ignorance, Youthful Inexperience,
Enveloping, The young shoot, Discovering; Tetra: 12 - Youthfulness,
Ego: #367 / #36 - Natural Reversals, 'Secret' Explanation; I-Ching: H4
- Juvenile Ignorance, Youthful Inexperience, Enveloping, The young
shoot, Discovering; Tetra: 12 - Youthfulness]
STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}); Ego: 9 (#84 - I AM
NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
   Male: #193; Feme: #117
} // #367
UMBRA: #291 % #41 = #4 - Using Guidance, Sourceless; I-Ching: H27 -
Nourishment, Swallowing, Jaws, Comfort/Security; Tetra: 81 - Fostering;
THOTH MEASURE: #4 - Oh Eater of the Shadow, who makest thine
appearance at Elephantine; I am not rapacious.
    #VIRTUE: With Barrier (no. #4), isolation} but
    #TOOLS: With Stove (no. #44), neighbours.
    #POSITION: As to Strength (no. #36), it is the solidly built.
    #TIME: As to Waiting (no. #18), it is the weak.
    #CANON: #102
   Male: #76; Feme: #102
} // #102
#367 as [#6, #30, #1, #200, #90, #600] = ʼerets (H776): {UMBRA: #3 as
#291 % #41 = #4} 1) land, earth; 1a) earth; 1a1) whole earth (as
opposed to a part); 1a2) earth (as opposed to heaven); 1a3) earth
(inhabitants); 1b) land; 1b1) country, territory; 1b2) district,
region; 1b3) tribal territory; 1b4) piece of ground; 1b5) land of
Canaan, Israel; 1b6) inhabitants of land; 1b7) Sheol, land without
return, (under) world; 1b8) city (-state); 1c) ground, surface of the
earth; 1c1) ground; 1c2) soil; 1d) (in phrases); 1d1) people of the
land; 1d2) space or distance of country (in measurements of distance);
1d3) level or plain country; 1d4) land of the living; 1d5) end(s) of
the earth; 1e) (almost wholly late in usage); 1e1) lands, countries;
i) often in contrast to Canaan;
@1 <--- INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN {#64 = 8 x 8 as #260 MAGIC
SUM}
@5 <--- ANCHOR {PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY PROTOTYPE}
#175 - *MARRIAGE*
THESE ARE MATTERS OF FACT ALREADY BEFORE THE COUNTY COURT IN APPEAL
CASES AP-18-0609 and AP-18-0775 which have a directions hearing on 20
January 2020 and were conveyed prior to the maelstrom event as emailed
advice made to state / federal attorney generals upon 15 April 2019 as
grounds for 36 news media not being subjected to contempt of court
charges.
Jesus Christ’s Crown of Thorns saved in NOTRE DAME MAELSTROM after
firefighters and police form human chain
#1828 - Crown of Thorns is the perfect accompaniment for #1827 -
Eucharist and Saint Andrews #371 - 30 November (Knights Templar
International) Cause Célèbre #364 x 4 + #371 = #1827 days against our
Commonwealth of States and it’s BOER / ANZAC heritage.
incorporate such narrative within our next COUNTY COURT submission but
the resolution is (if my memory serves me correctly): #341 - 30
DECEMBER v's #329 - 1 JANUARY CONFORMING TO IMMANUEL KANT'S
PROLEGOMENA (1783) / #391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLE and FIDELITY OF
OATHS TO #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL / #541 - *THICK* *CLOUD* being a
supranatural / paranormal consequence as interventions which occurred
(temporal adjust for daylight saving differs in Queensland and thus
was before 1100 hours) on 11 November 2018 as World War One Centennial
Commemorations.
In summary speaking to NATIONAL PARTY parliamentarians immediately
DANNY O’BRIEN: as removal of 7 July 2017 proroguing order given the
expulsion of neo-nazis from party membership.
DARREN CHESTER: discussion of his participation at inauguration of the
Cherished Mother Saint Patrick’s Day Statue, Remembrance Day
Intervention whilst he attended memorial events in France as minister
for ANZAC Commemorations assisting the Prime Minister and his
knowledge of the Oak Tree plaque in Victoria Park dedicated to Duke of
Gloucester’s planting on 27 October 1934 accompanying his dedication
of the Sydney Hyde Park War Memorial same year.
We were satisfied that involvement by the MINISTERS OF PARLIAMENT were
a natural prerogative reliably and honourably made in support of
constituents and did not involve maleficence on their part—the result
of the elections saw the Nationals receive a vote increase which was a
significant #312 - *CONTRADICTION* of the trend within the Saturday 24
NOVEMBER 2018 Victorian state election of the 59th Parliament of
Victoria. Where all 88 seats in the Legislative Assembly and all 40
seats in the Legislative Council were up for election.
DOLF: "Do be very careful when you read it though because it is Neural
Linguistic Programming written (for anti-terrorism purposes) to a
TRINOMIAL MATHEMATICAL THEORETICAL NOUMENON which is entirely
supranatural being outside temporality or immediate sense perception
and should you have abnormal physiological effects of sensory overload
such as anxiety--THEN LAY DOWN...
I'm still incorporating narrative of an earlier syncretism involving
an intervention over TRUMPS failed cemetery visit and prior to as
intersecting with MACRON's NATIONALISM v's PATRIOTISM speech at WORLD
WAR I CENTENNIAL COMMEMORATIONS within FRANCE ...
— TIME DIDN'T DENY —
“YE BE NOT
FORGOTTEN.
AS THEY ROT {ie. US corruption on the part of officials}.
SOIL SODDEN.
WE REMEMBER.
OF VALOUR BORN.
FAITHFUL FOREVER.
ER EVE NOR MORN.”
[ANZAC Centennial 25 April 2018]
<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Time%20Didn't%20Deny%2020180425.pdf>
"NATIONALISM IS A BETRAYAL OF PATRIOTISM: FRANCE'S PRESIDENT LECTURES
THE POWERFUL: (PARIS) By the grave of an unknown soldier, under
Napoleon’s grand arch, at the centenary of the end of a great,
terrible war, France’s president lectured the powerful.
The first world war’s lesson and legacy were clear, he said. Peace is
hard won and is fragile.
A century ago, after such loss, the world took a path of humiliation
and revenge and it fuelled the rise of nationalism and totalitarianism.
His audience, metres away, included presidents Donald Trump and
Vladimir Putin, and Recep Erdogan.
*NATIONALISM* *IS* *A* *BETRAYAL* *OF* *PATRIOTISM*, Emmanuel Macron
declared. A withdrawal into isolationism would be “a grave error that
future generations would very rightly make us responsible for”.
“The old demons are rising again, ready to wreak chaos and death,” he
warned. “History sometimes threatens to take its sinister course again.”
He wanted the 70 world leaders assembled there - including Australian
Governor-General Peter Cosgrove, seated just next to Putin - to renew
a pledge to honour the dead and “place peace above all else”.
Trump listened, leaning forward, his eyes narrow. He was one of the
last to applaud as the speech ended.
— ALL HAIL THE POTUS —
[Written 1124 hours (AEDT) 11 November 2018]
“WITH TRUMP YOU KNOW.
IT’S EITHER *FIRE* OR FURY.
OR *WATER* LOGGED.
THE *WIND* DOTH BLOW.
YET *SOIL* MAKES MERRY.
BY FIELDS LEFT UNTROD.”
JUST A FEW WEEKS AGO, AT A RALLY IN TEXAS, HE HAD SAID “*YOU* *KNOW*
*WHAT* *I* *AM*? *I’M* *A* *NATIONALIST*. *OK*? *I’M* *A*
*NATIONALIST*…. *USE* *THAT* *WORD*. *USE* *THAT* *WORD*”.
— CONFEDERATE APPETITE —
“THE KERNEL LOVES TO BBQ.
AFTER EVERY BIG SLAUGHTER.
THE FRENZIED LUSTFUL CAUSE.
WHETHER IT’S BAR FLYS OR JEW.
ANYONES SON OR DAUGHTER.
THERE IS NO TIME FOR PAUSE.”
WHAT IS A TROD?
A Trod in the west of England is a straight line or fairy path in the
grass of a field with a different shade of green from the rest. Great
danger was associated with using these paths when a supernatural
procession was using them. Fairy rings have certain elements in common
with this phenomenon. People with rheumatism {ANAGRAM: Mithraeums as
*Mithraism*} sought relief by walking along these paths; however
animals were thought to actively avoid them.
[<https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Trod>]
— BLINKERED DEVOTIONS —
“IF I KNOW GOOD.
AND I KNOW EVIL.
BE IT UNDERSTOOD.
I AIN’T NO DEVIL.
WELL KISS MY RING.
YOU ROTTEN SOD.
‘N MOUTH MY DING.
YOU AIN’T NO GOD.”
A #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL {ie. we have already noted #419 -
SLAUGHTER / #728 (2 x #273 + #182 - *LIMIT*) - REACTANCE EVENTS and
VALUE STATEMENTS} is an artefact of both Islam and Roman Catholicism
which are reliant upon Pythagorean binomial nomenclature as NUMBER
#15 (#260) ... #369 (#15)} and not Christian {ie. a moral law “HAS TO
CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 - *ONTIC* x n] NECESSITY WITH IT”} ...
An example of REACTANCE EVENTS (Sphere of Action) and VALUE STATEMENTS
(Universe of Discourse) could be simply: “They mingle not with their
laughing comrades again; They sit no more at familiar tables of home;
They have no lot in our labour of the day-time; They sleep beyond
England's foam.” [ODE to the Fallen]
All it then requires is a theft of my Intellectual Property which they
have had within their possession from at least prior to 28 JULY 2011
whereby the nous #75 is then applied to a #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL
upon 11 November 2018 and voila ...
What advice then or as counsel of the church (consilia evangelica)
would they give on various *MORAL* issues as their claim to a higher
obedience than the natural law (ie. on the basis of Pythagorean
HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER) which is required by others who follow the
counsels to perform acts of merit and who are thereby given a
*GREATER* certainty of salvation than those who merely follow the
commands of the law. And what then is the character of the forma
corporis of your archetypal son of man {ie. HEAVEN (H27) EARTH (H9) =
MAN (H36) as #666} in relation to your representations (conscientia
erronea: erring conscience of the reprobate *MIND* which misidentifies
the good) as improper claims made of Jesus {He is saved/A saviour; a
deliverer} of Nazareth {Sovereign; one chosen or set apart; separated;
crowned; sanctified}, in being then the full embodiment of this Divine
*MIND* as an AUTONOMY OF WILL?
As to what constitutes the substantial form (forma substantialis) of
the formal cause (causa formalis) as to the quintessential first
material (materia prima: Anthropic Cosmological Principle as the
absolute generalized basis of all subsequent individualization that is
utterly potential and is devoid of all attributes or qualities) which
is then the *MIND* as intellectualised universal form (universalia
forma), idea, shape or pattern of the essential or natural image of
God (imago Dei essentialis sive naturalis: that archetypal principal
perfections of righteousness, holiness and wisdom as the likeness or
resemblance to God in which man was originally created).
Which then results in the second matter (materia secunda) as the basis
for all material existence (essentia: indicates the entire whatness of
a thing including the materiality or spirituality as its substantia)
as the integrity and authenticity of being within the world and living
in compliance (status integritatis) as obedience with the terms of the
7: {
5: {1: {zen: 8, row: 7, col: 5}, nous: [1]}, // IDENTICAL TO HETEROS
PROTOTYPE
1816 hrs, Super: #359 / #1 - To Guide with Names, Reason's
#397 / #15 - Mastering Guiding Discourse, Revealers of Virtue;
I-Ching: H61 - Inner Trust, Inner Truth, Center Returning; Tetra: 1 -
Centre]
7: {48: {zen: 8, row: 7, col: 7}, nous: [48]}, // IDENTICAL TO HETEROS
PROTOTYPE
(none), Super: #408 / #63 - Origins in Reversal, Consider Beginnings;
I-Ching: H51 - Quake, Thunderclap, Shake, The arousing (shock,
thunder); Tetra: 62 - Doubt, Ego: #279 / #67 - Three Treasures;
48 - Ritual]
},
8: {
4: {49: {zen: 8, row: 8, col: 4}, nous: [49]}, // IDENTICAL TO
HETEROS PROTOTYPE
0805 hrs, Super: #395 / #11 - Value and Function of Non-Existence;
I-Ching: H8 - Closeness, Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together,
Alliance; Tetra: 33 - Closeness, Ego: #421 / #18 - Origin of Ethical
Concepts, Palliation of Vulgarity; I-Ching: H33 - Withdrawal,
Retiring, Retreat, Yielding; Tetra: 49 - Flight]
9: {24: {zen: 8, row: 8, col: 9}, nous: [24]} // IDENTICAL TO HETEROS
PROTOTYPE
hrs, Super: #516 / #76 - Strength's Warning Signs, Revealers of
Virtue; I-Ching: H20 - Viewing, Contemplation (view), Looking up;
Tetra: 64 - Sinking, Ego: #331 / #1 - To Guide with Names, Reason's
Realisation; I-Ching: H58 - Joy, Open, Lake; Tetra: 24 - Joy]
},
9: {
6: {25: {zen: 8, row: 9, col: 6}, nous: [25]}, // IDENTICAL TO HETEROS
PROTOTYPE
hrs, Super: #427 / #81 - Propounding the Essential; I-Ching: H11 -
Peace, Pervading, Greatness; Tetra: 15 - Reach, Ego: #366 / #12 -
H6 - Contention, Conflict, Arguing, Lawsuit; Tetra: 25 - Contention]
8: {72: {zen: 8, row: 9, col: 8}, nous: [72]}, // IDENTICAL TO HETEROS
PROTOTYPE
*REMEMBRANCE* / *ARMISTICE* *DAY*, Time: 1515 hrs, Super: #367 / #76 -
Strength's Warning Signs, Revealers of Virtue; I-Ching: H20 - Viewing,
Contemplation (view), Looking up; Tetra: 64 - Sinking, Ego: #352 / #75
- Destructive Envy, Harmed Through Greed; I-Ching: H52 - Restraint,
Inaction, Bound, Keeping still, mountain, Stilling; Tetra: 72 - Hardness]
}
Which as a habit and capacity of will by its exercise of intellect as
being primarily intentioned to be regulated by the innate
understanding which grasps the basic principles of the *MORAL* law and
spontaneously acts according to the dictates as wants and desires of
conscientia) and the natural law (ie. the universal *MORAL* law either
impresses by God upon the *MIND* of all the people or immediately
discerned by the reason in its encounter with the order of nature) as
a covenant of nature (foedus naturae: predicated on the original
integrity of human nature and its capacity for obedience under the
terms if the innate *MORAL* or natural law) bestowed upon us by the
graciousness of God.
I clearly do metaphysics and metempirical philosophy (perennialist
school of thought) and have an alternate gender identity and sexual
dynamic paradigm of MIND, BODY and SOUL captivation which is
historically associated with the HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER as being an
encapsulated microcosm as metempirical (ie. the branch of philosophy
that deals with things existing beyond the realm of experience)
philosophy as the perennialist school of thought or that of
metaphysical (ie. of things transcending what is physical or natural
and the temporal reality) dynamic perpetuated against the human psyche.
I have defined the complexities of this opposition from the
perspective, as being a composite lack of any sapient thought to any
real depth, conduct as repetitive use of idioms as mantras of
opposition fixed by symbolic associations to obsolete mathematical
paradigms of *MIND* and the re-packaging as thoughts of others which
is then traditionally characteristic of a skepticism, and narcissism
as nihilism, in having only a sensual consequence as its own defied
claim to any reality.
In that, they deploy language as denial and which has its throne
within the basal realm of consciousness relating to the seat of its
impulsive desire, action as a lack of motion towards freedom from any
accountability.
A habitual action of anal extrusion exhibiting an infantile
psychosexual developmental stage in which thinking and language is
nothing more than an act of defecation as the major source of sensuous
pleasure where the anus forms the *CENTRE* of self-awareness.
Although this is universally and historical declared a common good in
expressing a ’natural biological order reality’ as the basis for the
Institutional religo-political worldview as the sovereign/marriage
dynamic being the Natural / Common Law acceptance imperative as the
cultivating artifice (ie. NOT STRAIGHT OR DIRECT, AS A COURSE;
INDIRECTLY STATED OR EXPRESSED; NOT STRAIGHTFORWARD; INDIRECTLY AIMED
AT OR REACHED, AS ENDS OR RESULTS; DEVIOUSLY ACHIEVED) of the inner
female within conjugal slavitude as domesticated goddess and whilst
the emancipated male ran victorious as conquistadors within the
phenomenal realm and conquering through-out all the world.
Macron did use that word, and he used the weight of the war dead to
argue for multilateralism, internationalism, for groups that spanned
borders such as the European Union and the United Nations.
“Let us add our hopes together instead of seeing our fears oppose each
other,” he said, appealing for global unity in the fight against
global warming, poverty, hunger, *INEQUALITY* and *IGNORANCE*.
[<https://www.smh.com.au/world/europe/nationalism-is-a-betrayal-of-patriotism-france-s-president-lectures-the-powerful-20181111-p50fes.html>]
AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST {%27}),
WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
PROPERTY {%8}),
    Male: #211; Feme: #200
} // TRUMP *CANCELS* WW1 MEMORIAL AT U.S. CEMETERY IN FRANCE *DUE*
*TO* *RAIN*
#211 as [#10, #200, #1] = yare' (H3372): {UMBRA: #5 as #211 % #41 =
#6} 1) to fear, revere, be afraid; 2) (TWOT) *TO* *SHOOT*, pour; 1a)
(Qal); 1a1) to fear, be afraid; 1a2) to stand in awe of, be awed; 1a3)
to fear, reverence, honour, respect; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be fearful,
be dreadful, be feared; 1b2) *TO* *CAUSE* *ASTONISHMENT* *AND* *AWE*,
*BE* *HELD* *IN* *AWE*; 1b3) to inspire reverence or godly fear or
awe; 1c) (Piel) *TO* *MAKE* *AFRAID*, *TERRIFY*;
#200 as [#40, #70, #40, #10, #40] = `am (H5971): {UMBRA: #10 as #110 %
#41 = #28} 1) nation, people; 2) kinsman, kindred; 1a) *PEOPLE*,
*NATION*; 1b) *PERSONS*, *MEMBERS* *OF* *ONE'S* *PEOPLE*,
*COMPATRIOTS*, *COUNTRY*-*MEN*;
ABC news & 0842 hours on 17 March 2019.
Let me cast that consideration which he made in terms of my own
informal research on TRINOMIAL METASTASIS V’S BINOMIAL STASIS as
worldview being kosmos formation.
If there is a notion of ANTHROPOCENTRIC COSMOGONIC PRINCIPLE as
dialectic and PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY how then is the METASTASISED
IDENTITY formed as PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE being then an
encapsulated mind, body and soul?
Words and number after all convey ontological experience.
How can receiving the right neurological stimulation at an appropriate
time as the process of #5 + #7 = #10 cohesion then facilitate the mind
dynamic: “AND YE SHALL KNOW THE TRUTH, AND THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU
FREE.” [John 8:32 (KJV)]"
CASE #1: In an age of smart phone accessibility to expansive
multimedia sources can promiscuous (ie. lack of any viable and
integral #5 + #7 = #10 cohesion) selection then be causal to a
dysfunctional mind dynamic and result within adverse mental health
outcomes?
CASE #2: In the circumstance where the PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY is a
repetitive gaming sequence which is reliant upon only impulsive and
non-sapient responses, what is the predominant and determinant
characteristic of existence being formed as PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT
SUBSTANCE?
CASE #3: If reliable sources of news media presents to us events which
occur within the world having an implicit context or proximity to
their temporal event then a natural #5 + #7 = #10 cohesion is in all
likelihood will have occurred.
Can then an exclusion or avoidance of such relative neurological
stimulation then be causal for a cognitive dissonance and detachment
from reality?
When does self reality lose connection to the temporal markers of
conscience reality?
CASE #4: How does OPERANT CONDITIONING inhibit or facilitate the
autonomous SAPIENT experience?"
ON CONSIDERATION OF OPERANT CONDITIONING: Just to repeat that the #341
- *SHOOT* / 31 DECEMBER is an #288 - UMBRA data manipulation by the
#325 (#5 x #5 = #65 - *SOLDIERS*) DETRUDE SCHEMA which is then
redacted to #215 - HEIS meaning *ONE* as the meta-schema process of
reconciliation of otherwise incommensurate dichotomies within an
integral and coherent unity of apperception and so we find a direct
specifically which includes the execution of 130 bible students for
demoralising the #65 - *SOLDIER* and so it is little wonder that the
Russians are troubled by their disloyalties to the State as reasonable
#364 - QUESTIONS of #430 - LAW.
SEE ALSO: "RUSSIAN COURT SENTENCES DANISH JEHOVAH'S WITNESS TO JAIL
FOR 'EXTREMISM': THE QUESTION IS WHETHER THIS PRESENT LEGAL DILEMMA AS
IMPASSE IS A STUBBORN CRITERIA OF DETERMINISM OR A STAGE OF CULTURAL
DEVELOPMENT?"
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Jehovah%20Witness.pdf>
#341 as [#40, #5, #40, #6, #200, #10, #40] = yarah (H3384): {UMBRA: #1
as #215 % #41 = #10} 1) to throw, *SHOOT*, cast, pour; 1a) (Qal); 1a1)
to throw, cast; 1a2) to cast, lay, set; 1a3) to shoot arrows; 1a4) to
throw water, rain; 1b) (Niphal) *TO* *BE* *SHOT*; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1)
to throw, cast; 1c2) to shoot; 1c3) to point out, show; 1c4) *TO*
*DIRECT*, *TEACH*, *INSTRUCT*; 1c5) to throw water, rain;
#211 as [#10, #200, #1] = yare' (H3372): {UMBRA: #5 as #211 % #41 =
#6} 1) to fear, revere, be afraid; 2) (TWOT) to *SHOOT*, pour; 1a)
(Qal); 1a1) to fear, be afraid; 1a2) to stand in awe of, be awed; 1a3)
to fear, reverence, honour, respect; 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be fearful,
be dreadful, be feared; 1b2) *TO* *CAUSE* *ASTONISHMENT* *AND* *AWE*,
*BE* *HELD* *IN* *AWE*; 1b3) to inspire reverence or godly fear or
awe; 1c) (Piel) *TO* *MAKE* *AFRAID*, *TERRIFY*;
AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER OF MISCHIEF {%34}
#325 (PYTHAGOREAN ESOTERIC VALUE FOR #65 - *SOLDIER* AND KNIGHTS
TEMPLAR INTERNATIONAL AS UNLAWFUL FOREIGN POWER) as [#5, #50, #70,
#200] = heis (G1520): {UMBRA: #12 as #215 % #41 = #10} 1) *ONE*
#235 as [#20, #7, #200, #8] = zarach (H2224): {UMBRA: #1 as #215 % #41
= #10} 1) *TO* *RISE*, *COME* *FORTH*, *BREAK* *OUT*, *ARISE*, *RISE*
*UP*, *SHINE*; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to rise; 1a2) to come out, appear;
#341 as [#5, #80, #70, #50, #70, #40, #1, #7, #8, #10] = eponomazo
(G2028): {UMBRA: #13 as #1123 - REACTANCE EVENTS % #41 = #16} 1) *TO*
*PUT* *A* *NAME* *UPON*, *NAME*; 2) *TO* *BE* *NAMED*;
EVIDENCE OF TARGETING: #1123 as [#300, #2, #400, #6, #400, #10, #5] /
#707 as [#5, #300, #2, #400] = shabbath (H7676): {UMBRA: #6 as #707 %
#41 = #10} 1) *SABBATH*; 1a) sabbath; 1b) day of atonement; 1c)
sabbath year; 1d) week; 1e) produce (in sabbath year);
#1123 as [#5, #400, #300, #8, #10, #400] / #729 as [#5, #300, #8, #10,
#400, #6] = shachath (H7843): {UMBRA: #3 as #729 % #41 = #32} 1) to
destroy, corrupt, go to ruin, decay; 1a) (Niphal) to be marred, be
spoiled, be corrupted, be corrupt, be injured, be ruined, be *ROTTED*;
1b) (Piel); 1b1) to spoil, ruin; 1b2) *TO* *PERVERT*, *CORRUPT*,
*DEAL* *CORRUPTLY* (*MORALLY*); 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to spoil, ruin,
destroy; 1c2) to pervert, corrupt (morally); 1c3) destroyer
(participle); 1d) (Hophal) spoiled, ruined (participle);
HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO ELIZABETH REGINA II ON 21 APRIL 2019: #1123 as [#3,
#5, #50, #5, #200, #10, #800, #50] / #553 as [#3, #5, #50, #5, #200,
#10, #70, #10, #200] = genesia (G1077): {UMBRA: #22 as #553 % #41 =
#20} 1) *A* *BIRTHDAY* *CELEBRATION*, a birthday feast; 1a) the
earlier Greeks used this word of funeral commemorations, a festival
commemorative of a deceased friend;
#341 as [#5, #300, #1, #30, #5] = she'elah (H7596): {UMBRA: #9 as #336
% #41 = #8} 1) request, thing asked for, demand; 1a) *REQUEST*,
*PETITION*; 1b) thing asked for;
#341 as [#40, #5, #40, #6, #200, #10, #40] = yarah (H3384): {UMBRA: #1
as #215 % #41 = #10} 1) to throw, shoot, cast, pour; 1a) (Qal); 1a1)
to throw, cast; 1a2) to cast, lay, set; 1a3) to shoot arrows; 1a4) to
throw water, rain; 1b) (Niphal) *TO* *BE* *SHOT*; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1)
to throw, cast; 1c2) to shoot; 1c3) *TO* *POINT* *OUT*, *SHOW*; 1c4)
to direct, teach, instruct; 1c5) to throw water, rain;
#341 as [#1, #60, #10, #70, #200] = axios (G514): {UMBRA: #11 as #341
% #41 = #13} 1) *WEIGHING*, *HAVING* *WEIGHT*, having the weight of
another thing of like value, worth as much; 2) *BEFITTING*,
*CONGRUOUS*, *CORRESPONDING* *TO* *A* *THING*; 3) *OF* *ONE* *WHO*
*HAS* *MERITED* *ANYTHING* WORTHY*; 3a) *BOTH* *IN* *A* *GOOD* *AND*
*A* *BAD* *SENSE*;
#444 as [#30, #300, #8, #6, #100] = sechowq (H7814): {UMBRA: #8 as
#414 % #41 = #4} 1) *LAUGHTER*, *LAUGHING* *STOCK*, *MOCKING*,
*DERISION*; 1a) laughter; 1a1) joyful; 1a2) hollow; 1b) derision (of
object); 1c) *SPORT*;
<— *THIS* *ACCORDS* *EXACTLY* *WITH* *MY* *OBSERVATIONS* *MADE* *OF*
*MY* SATURDAY CARPE DIEM ON 28 OCTOBER 2017 AS OBJECTION MADE OF #288
- REMEMBRANCE INFIDELITY BY A PUBLIC AUTHORITY
I must therefore respectfully disagree with Catholic Archbishop of
Brisbane Mark COLERIDGE’s comments that ROMAN CATHOLICISM conveys a
great fidelity as respect to the judicial process.
As we'd previously raised in our correspondence to this COURT, the
starting point of our concerns lays with a #364 - QUESTION upon what
is the actual focal impetus to their SWEARING of *OATHS* {
    "391" : [6, 2, 300, 2, 6, 70, 5],
    "413" : {
        "0" : [6, 30, 300, 2, 70, 5],
        "1" : [30, 300, 2, 6, 70, 5]
    }
    AS 8 JUNE 2017 CHERISHED MOTHER STATUE PLAQUE INSTALLATION
} as being made in the circumstance against the autonomy of the person
VALUE? + #65 - *DODECAHEDRON* / *SOLDIER* + #175 - *ICOSAHEDRON* /
*MARRIAGE* = #10 - TETRAKTYS) FOUND, WHENCE ALL OUR WISDOM SPRINGS AND
WHICH CONTAINS PERENNIAL NATURE'S FOUNTAIN, CAUSE AND ROOT.'
"ANYONE WHO FOR FALSE REASONS OF MERCY DEVIATES FROM THIS CLEAR
#273; H4784: marah / rebel: #273; H6696: tsuwr / besiege: #273}, THE
DISSOLUTION OF THE STATE." [Adolf Hitler's Table Talk IDEA: (7 JUNE
Had it not be for our rational belief and sapient intellectual
property our nation’s statehood would have been consumed in that
holocaust against 850 years of history.
In our opinion the BINOMIAL APPARATUS as the occidental perspective of
PERENNIALISM having by the immateriality of its STASIS which defines a
SOVEREIGN / MARRIAGE dynamic may in some circumstances have a
predisposition towards judgementalism by impetus of narcissistic
self-justification as being an auto-intoxication in a self bestowed
dignity as a ontological self-delusion due to an infatuation with the
mirroring of its various ONTIC characteristic elements expressed
- PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE {#873 - PROBITY OF THE DIGNITY
(SECTION IX) in being a lawful EMANATION OF STATE AS METHODOLOGY which
itself conforms to the dialectic of the #2184 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC
PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY (SECTION VIII) and the HISTORICAL CHRISTIAN
WEDDING VOW.
"I, *NAME* *OF* *BRIDE*, #312 - *TAKE* *THEE* {ie. A WILLING, WILL},
*NAME* *OF* *GROOM* to be my #2184 - *LAWFULLY* {ie. LAWS OF NATURE}
wedding husband. To have and to hold #273 - *FROM* *THIS* *DAY*
*FORWARD* {ie. SUCCESSIVELY IN ORDER}, for richer or poorer, in
sickness and in health, to love and #364 - *OBEY* until death do we
part, today I pledge my faithfulness."
   Male: #266; Feme: #148
} // #391
UMBRA: #311 % #41 = #24 - Important Distinctions, Trouble from
Indulgence; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting, Delay, Attending, Waiting,
Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 18 - Waiting;
THOTH MEASURE: #24 - Oh divine Babe, who makest thy appearance in
Annu; I lend not a deaf ear to the words of Righteousness.
    #VIRTUE: With Joy (no. #24), raising high, but
    #TOOLS: With Sinking (no. #64), hiding below.
    #POSITION: As to Response (no. #41), it is the present, but
    #TIME: As to Measure (no. #52), it is the past.
    #CANON: #181
WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
   Male: #98; Feme: #181
} // #181
#391 as [#30, #1, #50, #300, #10] = ʼîysh (H376): {UMBRA: #0 as #311 %
#41 = #24} 1) man; 1a) man, male (in contrast to woman, female); 1b)
husband; 1c) human being, person (in contrast to God); 1d) servant;
1e) mankind; 1f) champion; 1g) great man; 2) whosoever; 3) each
(adjective);
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:3,row:5,col:5,nous:41&lexicon:H376>
   Male: #232; Feme: #147
} // #390
UMBRA: #306 % #41 = #19 - Argument for Ethical Anarchism, Returning to
Simplicity; I-Ching: H57 - Compliance, Gentle Penetration/Wind,
Ground, Calculations; Tetra: 58 - Gathering In;
THOTH MEASURE: #19 - Oh Uammetu, who makest thine appearance at the
Block; I commit not adultery with another's wife.
    #VIRTUE: Following (no. #19) means dispersing, but
    #TOOLS: Massing (no. #59) means assembling.
    #POSITION: With Ease (no. #23), the level and smooth, but
    #TIME: With Difﬁculties (no. #79), the going up and down.
    #CANON: #180
ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19}),
   Male: #135; Feme: #180
} // #180
#390 as [#30, #50, #300, #10] = ʼishshâh (H802): {UMBRA: #0 as #306 %
#41 = #19} 1) woman, wife, female; 1a) woman (opposite of man); 1b)
wife (woman married to a man); 1c) female (of animals); 1d) each,
every (pronoun);
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:6,row:5,col:5,nous:41&lexicon:H802>
SECTION VIII: "REQUIRE AND COMMAND ALL OUR OFFICERS AND MINISTERS,
CIVIL AND MILITARY, AND ALL OTHER THE INHABITANTS OF OUR SAID
COMMONWEALTH TO BE #364 - OBEDIENT {#273 - REMEMBRANCE}, #312 - AIDING
{#273 -SEPULCHRE}, AND #273 - ASSISTING {#273 - WEAK} UNTO OUR SAID
GOVERNOR GENERAL {#2184 - LAWS OF NATURE AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL
COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE / 12 = #182 AS DATE(1996,3,20) + 5 x #364 +
#182 = 11 SEPTEMBER 2001}, OR, IN THE EVENT OF HIS DEATH, #273 -
INCAPACITY, OR ABSENCE, TO SUCH PERSON OR PERSONS AS MAY, FROM TIME TO
TIME, UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THESE OUR LETTERS PATENT, ADMINISTER
{#2184 - LAWS OF NATURE AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE / 13
= #168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26 - *YHWH*}} THE
GOVERNMENT OF OUR SAID COMMONWEALTH."
What we call 'culture' is actually a series of core beliefs or value
systems, with each level expressing a different understanding of the
world or the church. A “belief” or “value system” is a worldview, a
set of perspectives/priorities/paradigms, a mind-set, an organizing
framework for deep-level decision-making at the bottom line—which is
why you can’t compromise about it. Your value system is the threshold
at which you won’t negotiate.
*CONCEPTS* *OF* *THE* *UNDERSTANDING*, IN COMPARISON WITH EMPIRICAL
INTUITIONS (INDEED, SENSORY INTUITIONS IN GENERAL), ARE COMPLETELY
HETEROGENEOUS: [AS #205 - MALE / #164 - FEME WITHIN THE #391 -
HOMOGENEOUS NOUMENON]); Ego: 9 (#72)},
30 (#103: SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA: B103 - ON THE PURE CONCEPTS OF
THE UNDERSTANDING, OR CATEGORIES
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/DynamicsOfDevelopment.jpeg>
Each level of cultural and human development represents a value
system, or to use a term coined by Richard Dawkins, a meme. Just as
genes carry the informational codes for our biological DNA, these
value systems supply the codes (or memes, rhymes with “themes”) that
determine our “cultural DNA.” Memes are ideas, beliefs, values, common
ways of looking at the world that, like contagious viruses, spread
from brain to brain through word of mouth, through media, through
interaction between people. There are more than 6 billion people in
the world today, and though we all come from some 100,000 genes—all of
us—we share only a few basic value systems or memes. Researchers
studying this topic have identified only eight thus far.
Notice how the Focus column alternates between me-oriented
express-the-self (warm colours) and we-oriented sacrifice-the-self
(cool colours). Note also the differences people value the most in
each system as they flow from survival (Bronze), to safety and
security (Purple), to raw power and instant gratification (Red), to
purpose in life (Blue), to strategies for success (Orange), to
community awareness (Green), to alternative forms (Yellow), to global
village (Cyan), to autonomy as its natural form (Coral). The levels
are open-ended; there isn’t a final stage of development in this chart
or any other useful one, for the ideal that God sets before us is
“higher than the highest human thought can reach.” [Courtesy: Caleb
Rosado, Ph.D, When We Disagree: Spiral Dynamics on How Cultural Values
Shape Our Conversation, Adventist Review: 27th April 2000]
Accordingly we propose nine given that the #81 - PRINCIPLE OF
JUXTAPOSITION AS SOVEREIGNTY then gives rise to #492 - VOLUNTARY
FREEWILL and IPSO FACTO A TRINOMIAL RATHER THAN A BINOMIAL CONCEPTION
DYNAMIC GIVEN THE INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN DYNAMIC OF 3
*FORMULA* *FOR* *UNIVERSAL* *LAW*}
EARTH - *FORMULA* *OF* *HUMANITY*}
*OF* *AUTONOMY* *AS* *SUI* *JURIS* / *MEMBRUM* *VIRILE*}
OF INDIVIDUAL PHENOMENA: *CONJECTURAL* *ONLY*}
@1 {#1} + @2 {#41} + @3 {#81} + @4 {#369} = #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL
{LIBERTÉ: 17 SEPTEMBER 1900 AS ADVICE OF THE PRIVY COUNCIL} IN THE
EXERCISE OF THE INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS: #205 - *PRINCIPLE*
*OF* *THE* *PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE* ☯️ / ✡️ #164 - *PRINCIPLE*
*OF* *MATERIALITY*].
#71   #1 #11
#61 #81 #21
#51 #41 #31 = #369 as DISCRIMINATING NORM OF HUMAN NATURE / WAN WU AS
ORGANISATION OF THINGS IN NATURE
#205 = PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE (YANG)
#164 = PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY (YIN)
#41 - EMANATION PRINCIPLE (REMEMBER THE SABBATH)
#82 - TERMS OF CONTINUITY (HONOUR PARENTS)
#123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY (DO NOT KILL)
#164 = PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY (YIN / TORAH: AVOID HETERONOMY AGAINST
AUTONOMY)
#205 = PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE (YANG / YAHAD: DO NOT STEAL)
#246 - NORMA OBLIGANS (BEAR NO FALSE WITNESS)
#287 - MANIFESTING NORM (COVET NOT)
According to Kant, the starting point, a reflection on our moral
concepts {#41 x n}, leads immediately to the first intermediate
thesis, that (1) a moral law “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 - *ONTIC*]
NECESSITY WITH IT” (GMS, 389,13). If this necessity is very narrowly
interpreted, that is, in the sense of the previously worked out modal
status {
@1 - Nature Contains Nature [#328 - TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPE] {
HOMOIOS
HETEROS
KABBALAH
AS DEFINED
} ...
@5 - Act of Nature [#369 - REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE INHIBITOR WITH #164 -
CHRONOLOGICAL PLANE MAPPING] ...
THE SABBATH]) ...
45: [1 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG]
68: [42 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN]
- HONOUR YOUR PARENTS]) ...
84: [2 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE]
86: [10 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD]
102: [4 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS]
104: [7 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD]
115: [5 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN]
NATURE [#123 - DO NOT KILL]) ...
130: [3 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED]
139: [13 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED ANIMALS]
140: [14 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY, 16 - I AM NOT AN EAVES-DROPPER]
146: [15 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER]
148: [12 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR]
150: [28 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER]
156: [21 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS]
157: [17 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE, 41 - I HAVE NO STRONG
DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY]
158: [23 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH]
161: [9 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES]
AVOID HETERONOMY AGAINST AUTONOMY]) ...
166: [11 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH]
168: [26 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY]
169: [18 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS]
171: [20 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE]
173: [27 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST]
175: [22 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR]
177: [29 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING]
180: [19 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE]
181: [24 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS, 35
- I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING]
182: [6 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN]
184: [36 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS FLOW]
185: [25 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR]
186: [31 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND]
191: [32 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS]
192: [39 - I AM NOT SWOLLEN WITH PRIDE]
196: [37 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE]
197: [33 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH]
200: [8 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY]
[#205 - DO NOT STEAL]) ...
210: [30 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND]
215: [34 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER OF MISCHIEF]
220: [38 - I CURSE NOT A GOD]
228: [40 - I HAVE NO UNJUST PREFERENCES]
BEAR NO FALSE WITNESS]) ...
} of an ethical principle, then two peculiarities of the total
argumentation will become more understandable as prescriptive of its
trinomial basis to nomenclature.
@1 - FORMULA OF UNIVERSAL LAW: @492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL {@369 / @123
- JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY (#3 x #3 - CENTRE INTERLOCK)} AS FOUNDATIONAL
STONE (31 MAY) TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT dated 29 OCTOBER
1900 BEING INSTRUMENTATION TO THE FEDERATION OF THE AUSTRALIAN
@2 - FORMULA OF HUMANITY: @205 / #873 - LETTERS PATENT <-- PRINCIPLES
ANTI-THESIS;
@3 - FORMULA OF AUTONOMY: @82 / #491 - SECTION IX <— TERMS OF
CONTINUITY / #3 - PRINCIPLE OF SYNCRETIC PROGRESSION {#273 v's #288};
@3 - SYNTHESIS;
@4 - FORMULA OF PROGRESSION: @164 / #3273 - SECTION VIII (?) <—
COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS / #4 - PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY {SOVEREIGN /
@5 - FORMULA OF KANONICOS {GK: ΚᾸΝΟΝῘΚΌΣ #352 / #329 - 1ST JANUARY
"INTER GRAVISSIMAS PASTORALIS OFFICII NOSTRI CURAS…" PAPAL BULL ISSUED
SECTION III (?) <— JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT / #5 - PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT
THE SACRED ANIMALS {%32})},
] // *AMONG* *THE* *MOST* *SERIOUS* *DUTIES* *OF* *OUR* *PASTORAL*
*OFFICE*…
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/EarthSeasons.png>
@6 - FORMULA OF EMANATION: @41 / #113 - EMANATION FUNCTION <— ETHICAL
AS AN OPTIMAL TEMPLATE OF AGREEMENT WHICH IS ONTIC / MATHEMATICAL AND
SUITABLE FOR A GLOBAL SAPIENT ECONOMY / #7 - MANIFESTING NORM
That the graphic of the EARTH SEASONS showing the two polarities being
the *PERIAPSIS* upon 3 JANUARY and the *APOAPSIS* upon 3 JULY provides
an irrefutable proof to the reality as there being a more substantial
capacity by a TRINOMIAL MATHEMATICAL THEORETICAL NOUMENON AS MY
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY to define the entire #81 RATHER than H64 META
DESCRIPTOR PROTOTYPES as a single verity within a paradigm
provisioning equitable distribution of number having equilibrium being
then a METASTASIS and substantiation of concept that there is a STABLE
ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek: TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]"
THE BIBLICAL STORY OF WISE MEN AT JESUS BIRTH MAY BE CONSIDERED THE
FOCAL ESTABLISHMENT {ie. *THE* *TETRAGRAM’S* *CORRELATION* *WITH*
*THE* *WOMAN* *CONSTELLATION*} OF THIS TEMPORAL MARKER IN HAVING A
*CAN* *WE* *DETERMINE* *THE* *EXACT* *DAY*?
We can.
And here's how . . .
CLUE #1: THE HIGH PRIESTHOOD OF CAIAPHAS {HE THAT SEEKS WITH
DILIGENCE; ONE THAT VOMITETH}
The gospels indicate that Jesus was crucified at the instigation of
the first century high priest named Caiaphas (Matthew 26:3-4, John
11:49-53).
We know from other sources that he served as high priest from A.D. 18
to 36, so that puts Jesus' death in that time frame.
But we can get more specific. Much more.
CLUE #2: THE GOVERNORSHIP OF PONTIUS {MARINE; BELONGING TO THE SEA}
PILATE {ARMED WITH A DART}
All four gospels agree that Jesus was crucified on the orders of
Pontius Pilate (Matthew 27:24-26, Mark 15:15, Luke 23:24, John 19:15-16).
We know from other sources when he served as governor of Judea--A.D.
26 to A.D. 36--so we can narrow down the range by several years.
But how are we going to get it down to a specific day and year?
CLUE #3: AFTER "THE FIFTEENTH YEAR OF TIBERIUS {THE SON OF TIBER} CAESAR"
In the fifteenth year of the reign of Tiberius Caesar . . . the word
of God came to John the son of Zechariah in the wilderness [Luke 3:1-2].
This picks out a specific year: A.D. 29.
Since all four gospels depict the ministry of Christ beginning after
that of John the Baptist had begun (Matthew 3, Mark 1, Luke 3, John
1), this means that we can shave a few more years off our range.
The death of Christ had to be in a range of seven years: between A.D.
29 and 36.
CLUE #4: CRUCIFIED ON A FRIDAY
All four gospels agree that Jesus was crucified on a Friday (Matt.
27:62, Mark 15:42; Luke23:54; John 19:42), just before a Sabbath,
which was just before the first day of the week (Matthew 28:1, Mark
16:2, Luke 24:1, John 20:1).
We know that it was a Friday because it is referred to as "the day of
preparation"--that is, the day on which Jews made the preparations
they needed for the Sabbath, since they could not do any work on that
day. Thus thus cooked food in advance and made other necessary
preparations.
The Jewish Encyclopaedia states: Friday, as the forerunner of Shabbat,
is called "'Ereb Shabbat" (The Eve of Sabbath). The term "'ereb"
admits of two meanings: "evening" and "admixture" (Ex. xii. 38); and
"'Ereb Shabbat" accordingly denotes the day on the evening of which
Sabbath begins, or the day on which food is prepared for both the
current and the following days, which latter is Sabbath.
The idea of preparation is expressed by the Greek name paraskeué,
given by Josephus ("Ant." xvi. 6, § 2) to that day (compare Mark xv.
42; Luke xxiii. 54; Matt. xxvii. 62; John xix. 42). In Yer. Pesaḥim
iv. 1 the day is called "Yoma da-'Arubta" (Day of Preparation) [Jewish
Encyclopedia, s.v., "Calendar"].
That eliminates six of the days of the week, but there were still
quite a few Fridays between A.D. 29 and 36.
 Can we figure out which one?
CLUE #5: A FRIDAY AT PASSOVER
The gospels also agree that Jesus was crucified in conjunction with
the annual feast of Passover (Matthew 26:2, Mark 14:1, Luke 22:1, John
18:39).
Here we encounter a momentary complication, because Matthew, Mark, and
Luke describe the Last Supper on Holy Thursday as a Passover meal
(Matthew 26:19, Mark 14:14, Luke 22:15). That would suggest that Good
Friday was the day after Passover.
However, when describing the morning of Good Friday, John indicates
Then they led Jesus from the house of Caiaphas to the Praetorium [ie.,
Pilate's palace]. It was early. They themselves did not enter the
Praetorium, so that they might not be defiled, but might eat the
passover. So Pilate went out to them [John 18:28-29a].
That suggests that the Passover would have begun on sundown Friday.
There are a number of ways of resolving this. For example, some have
suggested that Jesus and his disciples used a different calendar than
the Jewish authorities, and we know that there were different
calendars in use in first century Judaism.
It's also possible that Jesus just advanced the date of the Passover
celebration for him and his disciples. I mean, they were already
convinced he was the Messiah and the Son of God. If he says, "We're
celebrating Passover today," and it's a day earlier than most people,
they'd just go with that. (Note that he made other modifications to
the ceremony, such as instituting the Eucharist in the midst of it.)
And there are other solutions.
However, regardless of what Jesus' movement did, we can look to John's
statement about the Jesus' captors as an indication of what the Jewish
authorities or the mainstream Jewish practice was: They were
celebrating a Passover beginning on what we would call Friday evening.
That lets us narrow down the range of possible dates to just a few.
Here is a complete list of the days between A.D. 29 and 36 on whose
    •    Monday, April 18, A.D. 29
    •    Friday, April 7, A.D. 30
    •    Tuesday, March 27, A.D. 31
    •    Monday, April 14, A.D. 32
    •    Friday, April 3, A.D. 33
    •    Wednesday, March 24, A.D. 34
    •    Tuesday, April 12, A.D. 35
    •    Saturday, March 31, A.D. 36
As you can see, we have just two candidates left: Jesus was either
crucified on April 7 of A.D. 30 or April 3 of A.D. 33.
Which was it?
The traditional date is that of A.D. 33. You will find quite a number
of people today advocating the A.D. 30 date.
Do the gospels let us decide between the two?
CLUE #6: JOHN'S THREE PASSOVERS
The Gospel of John records three different Passovers during the
    •    Passover #1: This is recorded in John 2:13, near the
beginning of Jesus' ministry.
    •    Passover #2: This is recorded in John 6:4, in the middle of
Jesus' ministry.
    •    Passover #3: This is recorded in John 11:55 (and frequently
mentioned afterwards), at the end of Jesus' ministry.
That means that the ministry of Jesus had to span something over two
years. A fuller treatment would reveal that it spanned about three and
a half years, but even if we assume it began immediately before
Passover #1, the addition of two more Passovers shows that it lasted
more than two years at a bare minimum.
That means the A.D. 30 date is out.
There is not enough time between the fifteenth year of Tiberius
Caesar--A.D. 29--and the next year's Passover to accomodate a ministry
of at least two years.
The numbers don't add up.
As a result, the traditional date of Jesus' death--Friday, April 3,
A.D. 33--must be regarded as the correct one.
Can we be even more precise?
CLUE #7: "THE NINTH HOUR"
Matthew, Mark, and Luke each record that Jesus died about "the ninth
hour" (Matthew 27:45-50, Mark 15:34-37, Luke 23:44-46).
"The ninth hour" is what we, today, would refer to as 3:00 p.m.
This allows us to narrow down the time of Jesus' death to a very
AROUND 1500 HOURS ON FRIDAY, 3 APRIL, 33 A.D.
<http://www.ncregister.com/blog/jimmy-akin/when-precisely-did-jesus-die-the-year-month-day-and-hour-revealed>
3 JANUARY + #91 = SATURDAY 4 APRIL 33 AD
4 x #91 = #364 DAY / YEAR OF THE JERUSALEM TEMPLE SERVICE: 24 x 7 x 13
= #2184 - ANTHROPOLOGICAL COSMOGONIC PRINCIPLE
#41 - ONTIC NECESSITY PROSCRIPTIONS: #205 - PRINCIPLE OF THE
PERSISTENCE OF SUBSTANCE ☯️ / ✡️ #164 - PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY AS
CONSTITUTING: #369 - DISCRIMINATING NORM (HUMAN NATURE) BEING THE
ORGANISATIONAL PREMISE OF #123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY BY THE EXERCISE
OF INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS AS #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL
3 JANUARY *PERIAPSIS* PROTOTYPE: *HOMOIOS* {#420 - VAULT OF THE
HEAVENS, FIRMAMENT AS BINDING EARTH TO THE HEAVENS / #322 - FREE
CITIZENS, SOVEREIGN PEOPLE; POPULAR GOVERNMENT, DEMOCRACY; POPULAR
ASSEMBLY} / *HETEROS* {#404 - KEEP SECRET / #314 - PURPLE / MAGUS} /
*TORAH* {#369 - DIADEM / #337 - NAZARITE / CONSECRATED ONE}
3 JULY *APOAPSIS* PROTOTYPE: *HOMOIOS* {#330 - FRIEND / REBELLIOUS /
#410 - YESHUA / KING} / *HETEROS* {#352 - A PROVING TRIAL / MARY /
#421 - EXTREME WICKEDNESS} / *TORAH* {#373 - FROM TRUTH INTO ERROR /
#472 - CURSE}
<http://www.grapple369.com/cosmos/Dali_Crucifixion_Hypercube.jpeg>
*DEMOCRACY* is based on the concept of popular sovereignty. In a
direct democracy the public plays an active role in shaping and
deciding policy. Representative democracy permits a transfer of the
exercise of sovereignty from the people to a legislative body or an
executive (or to some combination of legislature, executive and
Judiciary). Many representative democracies provide limited direct
democracy through referendum, initiative, and recall.
Parliamentary sovereignty refers to a representative democracy where
the parliament is ultimately sovereign and not the executive power nor
the judiciary.
VIEWS
1) Classical liberals such as Stuart Mill consider every individual as
sovereign on oneself.
2) Realists view sovereignty as being untouchable and as guaranteed to
legitimate nation-states.
3) Rationalists see sovereignty similarly to realists. However,
rationalism states that the sovereignty of a nation-state may be
violated in extreme circumstances, such as human rights abuses.
4) Internationalists believe that sovereignty is outdated and an
unnecessary obstacle to achieving peace, in line with their belief of
a 'global community'. In the light of the abuse of power by sovereign
states such as Hitler's Germany or Stalin's Soviet Union, they argue
that human beings are not necessarily protected by the state whose
citizens they are, and that the respect for state sovereignty on which
the UN Charter is founded is an obstacle to humanitarian intervention.
5) Anarchists and some libertarians deny the sovereignty of states and
governments. Anarchists often argue for a specific individual kind of
sovereignty, such as the Anarch as a sovereign individual. Salvador
Dalí, for instance, talked of "anarcho-monarchist" (as usual for him,
tongue in cheek); Antonin Artaud of Heliogabalus: Or, The Crowned
Anarchist; Max Stirner of The Ego and Its Own; Georges Bataille and
Jacques Derrida of a kind of "antisovereignty". Therefore, anarchists
join a classical conception of the individual as sovereign of himself,
which forms the basis of political consciousness. The unified
consciousness is sovereignty over one's own body, as Nietzsche
demonstrated (see also Pierre Klossowski's book on Nietzsche and the
Vicious Circle). See also sovereignty of the individual and
self-ownership.
6) Imperialists hold a view of sovereignty where power rightfully
exists with those states that hold the greatest ability to impose the
will of said state, by force or threat of force, over the populace or
other states with weaker military or political will. They effectively
deny the sovereignty of the individual in deference to either the
'good' of the whole, or to divine right.
According to Matteo Laruffa "sovereignty resides in every public
action and policy as the exercise of executive powers by institutions
open to the participation of citizens to the decision-making processes"
RELATION TO RULE OF LAW
Another topic is whether the law is held to be sovereign, that is,
whether it is above political or other interference. Sovereign law
constitutes a true state of law, meaning the letter of the law (if
constitutionally correct) is applicable and enforceable, even when
against the political will of the nation, as long as not formally
changed following the constitutional procedure. Strictly speaking, any
deviation from this principle constitutes a revolution or a coup
d'état, regardless of the intentions.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereignty>
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:4,row:1,col:5,nous:1&lexicon:H974>
HUNG (H8518) FOR DISPLAY ENDS SATURDAY 4 APRIL 33 AD
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:5,row:1,col:5,nous:14&lexicon:H8518>
THAT THE ONTOLOGICAL CONTEXT OF REDEMPTION (G4266) OCCURRING UPON
SUNDAY 5 APRIL 33 AD IS PREDICATED UPON THE ONTIC EPISTEMOLOGICAL PREMISE
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:1,row:1,col:6,nous:76&lexicon:G4266>
SONS OF BELIAL ARE TO KEEP THEIR WEDDING VOWS (H631) WHICH WERE NOT
MADE TO ALMIGHTY GOD
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:4,row:1,col:5,nous:1&lexicon:H631>
*EXPIRY* *OF* *ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *MITHRAS* *CLAIMS* (G2983) *TO*
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:2,row:1,col:9,nous:16&lexicon:G2983>
ENGAGEMENT} IT AGAIN. NO MAN TAKETH IT FROM ME, BUT I LAY IT DOWN OF
MYSELF. I HAVE POWER TO LAY IT DOWN, AND I HAVE POWER TO TAKE IT
AGAIN. THIS COMMANDMENT HAVE I RECEIVED OF MY FATHER." [John 10:10-18
(KJV)]"
ITS NATURE [#82 - HONOUR YOUR PARENTS]) ...
84: [2 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE]
86: [10 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD]
102: [4 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS]
104: [7 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD]
115: [5 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN]
*MOSES* *SEAT* *OF* *HONOUR* (*ROYAL* *DIGNITY*, *AUTHORITY*, *POWER*)
= #491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY (#312 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTRADICTION)
as #491 as [#80, #1, #300, #100, #10] = pater (G3962): {UMBRA: #22 as
#489 % #41 = #38} 1) generator or male ancestor; 2) metaphor: *ZEUS*.;
3) God is called the Father; 1a) either the nearest ancestor: father
of the corporeal nature, natural fathers, both parents; 1b) a more
remote ancestor, the founder of a race or tribe, progenitor of a
people, forefather: so Abraham is called, Jacob and David; 1b1)
fathers ie. ancestors, forefathers, founders of a race; 1c) one
advanced in years, a senior; 2a) the originator and transmitter of
anything; 2a1) the authors of a family or society of persons animated
by the same spirit as himself; 2a2) one who has infused his own spirit
into others, who actuates and governs their minds; 2b) one who stands
in a father's place and looks after another in a paternal way; 2c) a
title of honour; 2c1) teachers, as those to whom pupils trace back the
knowledge and training they have received; 2c2) the members of the
Sanhedrin, whose prerogative it was by virtue of the wisdom and
experience in which they excelled, to take charge of the interests of
others; 3a) *OF* *THE* *STARS*, *THE* *HEAVENLY* *LUMINARIES*,
*BECAUSE* *HE* *IS* *THEIR* *CREATOR*, *UPHOLDER*, *RULER*; 3b) of all
rational and intelligent beings, whether angels or men, because he is
their creator, preserver, guardian and protector; 3b1) of spiritual
beings and of all men; 3c) of Christians, as those who through Christ
have been exalted to a specially close and intimate relationship with
God, and who no longer dread him as a stern judge of sinners, but
revere him as their reconciled and loving Father; 3d) the Father of
Jesus Christ, as one whom God has united to himself in the closest
bond of love and intimacy, made acquainted with his purposes,
appointed to explain and carry out among men the plan of salvation,
and made to share also in his own divine nature; 3d1) *BY* *JESUS*
*CHRIST* *HIMSELF*; 3d2) by the apostles;
YOUTUBE: "Personal Jesus (Depeche Mode)"
http://youtu.be/rSb_KYzIgUs
"And when the people saw what Paul {small; little} had done, they
lifted up their voices, saying in the speech of Lycaonia {she-wolf},
The gods are come down to us in the likeness of men. And they called
Barnabas {son of the prophet, or of consolation}, *JUPITER* {the
father that helpeth}; and Paul {small; little}, *MERCURIUS* {an
orator; an interpreter}, because he was the chief speaker. Then the
priest of Jupiter, which was before their city, brought oxen and
garlands unto the gates, and would have done sacrifice with the people.
Which when the apostles, Barnabas and Paul, heard of, they rent their
clothes, and ran in among the people, crying out, And saying, Sirs,
why do ye these things? *WE* *ALSO* *ARE* *MEN* *OF* *LIKE* *PASSIONS*
*WITH* *YOU*, *AND* *PREACH* *UNTO* *YOU* *THAT* *YE* *SHOULD* *TURN*
*FROM* *THESE* *VANITIES* *UNTO* *THE* *LIVING* *GOD*, which made
heaven, and earth, and the sea, and all things that are therein: Who
in times past suffered all nations to walk in their own ways.
Nevertheless he left not himself without witness, in that he did good,
and gave us rain from heaven, and fruitful seasons, filling our hearts
with food and gladness. And with these sayings scarce restrained they
the people, that they had not done sacrifice unto them.
And there came thither certain Jews from Antioch {speedy as a chariot}
and Iconium {coming}, who persuaded the people, and, having stoned
Paul, drew him out of the city, supposing he had been dead. Howbeit,
as the disciples stood round about him, he rose up, and came into the
city: and the next day he departed with Barnabas to Derbe {a sting}.
And when they had preached the gospel to that city, and had taught
many, they returned again to Lystra {that dissolves or disperses}, and
to Iconium {coming}, and Antioch {speedy as a chariot}, confirming the
souls of the disciples, and exhorting them to continue in the faith,
and that we must through much tribulation enter into the kingdom of
God." [Acts 14:11-22 KJV]
QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT SECTION IX: “AND WE DO HEREBY RESERVE
THESE OUR LETTERS PATENT, AS TO US OR THEM SHALL SEEM MEET.”
- JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY),
- *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY*),
*PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE*),
*DOCTRINE* *OF* *THE POWER* *OF* *JUDGMENT* *OR* *ANALYTIC* *OF*
*PRINCIPLES*); Ego: 41 (#287),
Ego: 61 (#348),
*SOVEREIGNTY* / *CROWN*),
    Male: #266; Feme: #390
}
10 (#69),
   Male: #173; Feme: #69
} // #231 <-- *JUXTAPOSITION* *CONTROL*
UMBRA: #215 % #41 = #10 - Impossible Advice, What can Be Done?;
I-Ching: H30 - Cohesion, Radiance, Clinging to Brightness/Fire, The
net; Tetra: 41 - Response;
THOTH MEASURE: #10 - Oh thou who orderest the flame, who makest thine
appearance in Memphis; I am not a robber of food.
    #VIRTUE: With Defectiveness (no. #10), selﬁshness and crookedness.
    #TOOLS: With Vastness (no. #50), fairmindedness and desirelessness.
    #POSITION: As to Branching Out (no. #9), it is the advance.
    #TIME: As to Holding Back (no. #17), it is the retreat.
    #CANON: #86
{%13}); Ego: 9 (#69),
   Male: #144; Feme: #86
} // #86
#231 as [#6, #1, #4, #10, #200, #10] = ʼaddîyr (H117): {UMBRA: #0 as
#215 % #41 = #10} 1) great, majestic; 1a) of waters of sea; 1b) of a
tree; 1c) of kings, nations, gods; 2) great one, majestic one; 2a) of
nobles, chieftains, servants;
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#266 - *PRECEPT* / *STATUTE* / #390 -
*SOVEREIGNTY* / *CROWN*} / HETEROS {#238 / #376} / TORAH {#248 / #381}
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:6,row:5,col:5,nous:41&lexicon:H117>
- JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY),
- *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY*),
*PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE*),
SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY DYNAMIC GIVEN THE INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE
MAIDEN DYNAMIC OF 3 APRIL 33 AD),
DYNAMIC GIVEN THE INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN DYNAMIC OF 3
APRIL 33 AD); Ego: 80 (#391),
    Male: #311; Feme: #391
} // [LATIN definition: VOLUNTĀTIS (*YES*) / NOLUNTĀTIS (*NO*)]
I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN {%42}),
   Male: #229; Feme: #148
} // #391
UMBRA: #380 % #41 = #11 - Value and Function of Non-Existence;
I-Ching: H8 - Closeness, Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together,
Alliance; Tetra: 33 - Closeness;
THOTH MEASURE: #11 - Oh thou of the Two Caverns, who makest thine
appearance in Amenta; I am not sluggish.
    #VIRTUE: Divergence (no. #11) means mistakes, but
    #TOOLS: Constancy (no. #51) is good.
    #POSITION: With Joy (no. #24), calm and composure.
    #TIME: With Labouring (no. #80), hustle and bustle.
    #CANON: #166
   Male: #82; Feme: #166
} // #166
#391 as [#5, #6, #300, #10, #70] = yâshaʻ (H3467): {UMBRA: #8 as #380
% #41 = #11} 1) to save, be saved, be delivered; 1a) (Niphal); 1a1) to
be liberated, be saved, be delivered; 1a2) to be saved (in battle), be
victorious; 1b) (Hiphil); 1b1) to save, deliver; 1b2) to save from
moral troubles; 1b3) to give victory to;
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#311 / #391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ
{29 OCTOBER 1900}) OF QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT TO THE
FEDERATION OF THE AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH 1901} / HETEROS {#283 /
#377} / TORAH {#237 - *USE* *OF* *FORCE* OR *IMMUTABLE* / *STUBBORN*
*WILL* / #435}
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:3,row:5,col:5,nous:41&lexicon:H3467>
#311 as [#70, #10, #20, #10, #1, #200] = oikia (G3614): {UMBRA: #21 as
#111 % #41 = #29} 1) a *HOUSE*; 1a) an inhabited edifice, a dwelling;
1b) the inmates of a house, the family; 1c) property, wealth, goods;
{UMBRA: #22 as #111 % #41 = #29} 1) the whole training and education
of children (which relates to the cultivation of mind and morals, and
employs for this purpose now commands and admonitions, now reproof and
punishment) It also includes the training and care of the body; 2)
whatever in adults also cultivates the soul, esp. by correcting
mistakes and curbing passions.; 2a) instruction which aims at
increasing virtue; 2b) chastisement, chastening, (of the evils with
which God visits men for their amendment);
Can you #331 - NOT also see the dichotomy by a buffoonery notion of
these PARIS RIOTS pictured within the news media as presumably an
Islamic binomial mindset of an unreasoned methodology yet
presumptuously claiming to dictate peace as conveying circularity of
#492 - AUTONOMOUS VOLUNTARY FREEWILL (ie. either Liberty / Egalitarian
depending upon the nuance) in being paradoxically entirely of a
MADNESS AND DARKNESS IS UPON THE PEOPLE AS DERANGED HYSTERIA.
#902 - RULE OF LAW (EGALITÉ {9 JULY 1900}: #22 x #41 as *ONTIC*
necessity comprising a subset of 21 consonants with #VOWELS of Semitic
origins),
#492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900}: #12 X #41), and
#391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ {29 OCTOBER 1900}) OF CIVIL
SOCIETY
#41 - TO BE OR #81 - NOT TO BE THAT IS THE #364 - QUESTION AS #231 -
JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL MADE OF IGNORANCE AND IT’S ENDLESS #312 -
CONTRADICTION AGAINST THE #123 - SENSIBILITY OF #273 - REASON ITSELF
mate. Well done. 😂"
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Marriage%20of%20FREXIT%20and%20BREXIT%20as%20Sapient%20Economy%2020190415.pdf>
- dolf
Initial Post: 15 April 2019

--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS {#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek: TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE (translation published within English as first European language in 1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist, expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean TETRAD/TETRACTYS.

dolf

2019-04-20 12:59:54 UTC

Permalink

Nous: #36
Time: 01:40 hrs
Date: 2019.4.15 <— NOTRE DAME FIRE 🔥
Torah:

Dao: Natural Reversals, 'Secret' Explanation
Tetra: #12 - Youthfulness
I-Ching: H4 - Juvenile Ignorance, Youthful Inexperience, Enveloping, The
young shoot, Discovering

#260 CE

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#325 / #367} / HETEROS {#330 / #329} / TORAH {#324
/ #326}

We have at 1952 HOURS ON 19 APRIL 2019 COMMUNICATED WITH THE AMERICAN
CONSULATE (SYDNEY) AND FACEBOOK (PRESS, SUBPOENA, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY)
AND RAISED THE OBJECTION ABOUT MY RESPONSE TO PARLIAMENTARIAN TIM
WILSON’s SUPPORT OF ISRAEL FOLAU’s HOMOPHOBIC #444 - SLANDER (#444 -
COMBAT OF SPORTS / PRO DOMO and #341 are attributed to 31 December)
BEING CONSEQUENCE BY A GOOD FRIDAY ACCOUNT SUSPENSION BY FACEBOOK OVER
NON EXISTENT HATE SPEECH AND THAT INCLUDED THE NOTRE DAME INTERVENTION
BY US PRIOR TO SUCH EVENT AND A POEM WRITTEN TO PRESIDENT EMMANUEL
MACRON WITHIN ONE HOUR OF HIS PUBLIC STATEMENT TO CONCLUDE:

— HELL’S CLAMOUR —

“OH YELLOW SHIRTS.
PARIS IS BURNING.
AN OLD DAME FLIRTS.
HELL HAS YEARNING.
FOR YOUR COHORTS. {@6: Sup: 11 (#268: KANT’s PROLEGOMENA (1783) AS PRIOR
TO THE FRENCH REVOLUTION); Ego: 45 (#312 - *CONTRADICTION*)}
A PAGE OF TURNING. {@7: Sup: 44 (#312 - *CONTRADICTION*); Ego: 46 (#358:
KANT’s PROLEGOMENA (1783) AS PRIOR TO THE FRENCH REVOLUTION)}
FRATERNITÉ AU MORTS.”

THAT WAS TO PROHIBIT AN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY THEFT AND ACCORDINGLY
FACEBOOK WILL FACE A DAMAGES CLAIM EQUIVALENT TO THE COST OF NOTRE DAME
REPAIRS ($1.5 billion in donations and growing):

#36 - PYTHAGOREAN INTELLECTUAL TETRAD
#260 - INNER MAIDEN OR MARRIAGEABLE MAID
#325 - TOTAL MAGIC SUM #65 - SOLDIER
#330 - HRUMACHIS WITH 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 INCLUSIONS (#288)
#329 - NEW YEARS DAY AS IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA OF 1783 AS PRIOR TO
FRENCH REVOLUTION...

*PRO* *DOMO* MEANING *FOR* *HIS* *OWN* *CAUSE* is a relative value term
of SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM VIRILE PRINCIPLE and this notion is not
contradictory to the fact that clergy theorists have subjected Western
society to very heavy exogamous constraints and to a marked (largely
*PRO* *DOMO*) *VALORIZATION* OF *CELIBACY* [Joseph Morsel ( with the
collaboration of Christine Ducourtieux), The History (of the Middle
Ages) is a #444 - *SPORT* OF COMBAT ... Reflections on the aims of the
History of the Middle Ages intended for a society in which even the
students of history's question, 2007]

The Latin *PRO* *DOMO* *SUA* ("for his #311 - *HOUSE*") is derived from
a speech of Cicero, pronounced in 57 BCE, before the *PONTIFFS* to
obtain the restitution of his property confiscated by the tribune
Clodius, during his condemnation to the exile.

[140] It was then reported to you, O priests, and after that it became a
common topic of conversation, how he, with preposterous language with
ill-omened auspices, at times interrupting himself, doubting, fearing,
hesitating, pronounced and did everything in a manner wholly different
from that which you have recorded as proper in your books. It is,
indeed, not very strange that in doing an act of such wickedness and
such insanity, even his audacity could not wholly repress his fear.

In truth, if no #390 - *ROBBER* was ever so savage and inhuman, as, when
he had plundered temples, and then, having been excited by dreams or
some superstitious feelings, consecrated some altar on a desert shore,
not to shudder in his mind when compelled to propitiate with his prayers
the deity whom he has insulted by his wickedness; what do you suppose
must have been the agitation of mind of that plunderer of every temple,
and of every #311 - *HOUSE*, and of the whole city, when he was
consecrating one single altar to avert the vengeance due to his
numberless acts of wickedness? [141] He could not possibly (although the
insolence of power had elated his mind, and although he was armed by
nature with incredible audacity) fail to blunder in his proceedings, or
to keep constantly making mistakes, especially when he had a priest and
teacher who was compelled to teach before he had learnt himself. There
is great power, not only in the divinity of the immortal gods, but also
in the republic itself. When the immortal gods saw the guardian and
protector of their temples driven away in a most wicked manner, they
were unwilling to quit their temples and to remove into his #311 -
*HOUSE*. Therefore they alarmed the mind of that most insensible man
with fear and anxiety. But the republic, although that was banished at
the same time with myself, was still constantly present to the eyes of
its destroyer, and from his excited and kindled frenzy was constantly
demanding my restoration and its own. What marvel then is it, if he,
urged on by the insanity of fear and drawn on headlong by wickedness,
was neither able properly to perform the ceremonies which he had begun,
nor to utter one single word in due order with proper solemnity? [THE
ORATIONS OF MARCUS TULLIUS CICERO, LITERALLY TRANSLATED BY C. D. YONGE,
B. A. LONDON. GEORGE BELL & SONS, YORK STREET, COVENT GARDEN. 1891]

BINOMIAL APPARATUS {#36}:
@1 <--- INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN {#64 = 8 x 8 as #260 MAGIC SUM}
@5 <--- ANCHOR {PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY PROTOTYPE}
#65 - *SOLDIER* {@1 RETENTION + #64 ELEMENTS}
#175 - *MARRIAGE*

-- TWEEDLEDUM[B] AND TWEEDLEDEE[D] --

"TWEEDLEDUM AND TWEEDLEDEE.
SHAMEFUL PARAGON AS IDOLATRY.
KING OF JEWS NAILED TO A TREE.
WOE SOME TALE OF SANCTIMONY.

MEASURED THINGS DOTH CONVEY.
GUARDIANS TO HEAVEN'S THRONE.
JUXTAPOSED BIAS UNTIL THIS DAY.
AGAINST HEAVEN'S SON FIRSTBORN.

NONE DENY HOLOCAUST'S CAUSE.
JUSTICE AND COMPASSION LOATH.
ENDURING MILLENNIA SANS PAUSE.
ALTAR #419 - *SLAUGHTER* MADE BY OATH {ie. *MARRIAGE* *VOW* MOMENT: #353
as [#30, #200, #3, #70, #10, #40] = rega` (H7281): {UMBRA: #4 as #273 %
#41 = #27} 1) a moment; 2) for a moment, at one moment... at another
moment with prep; 3) in a moment}."

As we'd previously raised in our correspondence to this COUNTY COURT
within APPEALS AP-18-0609 / AP-18-0775, the starting point of our
concerns lays with a #364 - QUESTION upon what is the actual focal
impetus to their SWEARING of *OATHS* {

"391" : [6, 2, 300, 2, 6, 70, 5],
"413" : {
"0" : [6, 30, 300, 2, 70, 5],
"1" : [30, 300, 2, 6, 70, 5]
}

AS 8 JUNE 2017 CHERISHED MOTHER STATUE PLAQUE INSTALLATION

} as being made in the circumstance against the autonomy of the person
(#492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL) but entirely to:

'I *SWEAR* BY HIM WHO THE TETRAKTYS (@1 - RETENTION + @5 - CENTRE OF
VALUE? + #65 - *DODECAHEDRON* / *SOLDIER* + #175 - *ICOSAHEDRON* /
*MARRIAGE* = #10 - TETRAKTYS) FOUND, WHENCE ALL OUR WISDOM SPRINGS AND
WHICH CONTAINS PERENNIAL NATURE'S FOUNTAIN, CAUSE AND ROOT.'

"ANYONE WHO FOR FALSE REASONS OF MERCY DEVIATES FROM THIS CLEAR
PRINCIPLE IS AIDING {H5826: `azar / help: #273}, WILLINGLY {H7521:
ratsah / accept: #273} OR UNWILLINGLY {H7589: she'at / despiteful: #273;
H4784: marah / rebel: #273; H6696: tsuwr / besiege: #273}, THE
DISSOLUTION OF THE STATE." [Adolf Hitler's Table Talk IDEA: (7 JUNE
1942) @235, page #519]

I was just about to say that the Notre Dame event of 15 April intersects
with Kant’s category @329 as dual assignment to 1 January

@5 - FORMULA OF KANONICOS {GK: ΚᾸΝΟΝῘΚΌΣ #352 / #329 - 1ST JANUARY
"INTER GRAVISSIMAS PASTORALIS OFFICII NOSTRI CURAS…" PAPAL BULL ISSUED
BY POPE GREGORY XIII ON 24 FEBRUARY 1582} PRINCIPLES: @123 / #2188 -
SECTION III (?) <— JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT / #5 - PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT
SUBSTANCE AS DISCRIMINATING NORM {PRINCIPLE OF ENQUIRY} @2 - SYNTHESIS;

KANONICOS@[
κ, {@1: Sup: 20 (#20); Ego: 20 (#20)},
α, {@2: Sup: 21 (#41); Ego: 1 (#21)},
ν, {@3: Sup: 71 (#112); Ego: 50 (#71)},
ο, {@4: Sup: 60 (#172); Ego: 70 (#141)},
ν, {@5: Sup: 29 (#201); Ego: 50 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE
SACRED ANIMALS {%32})},
ι, {@6: Sup: 39 (#240); Ego: 10 (#201)},
κ, {@7: Sup: 59 (#299); Ego: 20 (#221)},

ς {@9: Sup: 5 (#352); Ego: 38 (#329)}
] // *AMONG* *THE* *MOST* *SERIOUS* *DUTIES* *OF* *OUR* *PASTORAL* *OFFICE*…

That is eight PAPAL BULLS and the other SEVEN relates to DUTCH DISCOVERY
OF AUSTRALIA on 26 October 1616 AO - YEAR OF THE ORDER OF TEMPLARS which
were disbanded by PAPAL BULL because of SODOMY and the Knights Templars
which is a Catholic military order. And this KNIGHTS TEMPLARS ORDER is
different to that of the British monarchy and was instituted before the
seven had concluded.

In essence it wipes the authority of Catholic Church city state out
since the Pythagorean Binomial Stasis consists of 8 paired elements
totalling #36 as the category of Roman Empire governance for the 15
April event

The knights Templars order gave a blessing to The Australian terrorist
whom slaughtered 50 persons on 15 March and It involves our ANZAC
identity and so affects everyone.

I just the same day as the Notre Dame fire and prior to it sent an email
on the subject of why 36 journalists and news media organisations ought
not be charged with contempt of court over Cardinal PELL’s trial

And the argument which I made described that the indictment of TREASON /
PRO DOMO (a MOTHER REFUSED COMMUNION due to wearing a RAINBOW SASH as a
breach of the FIRST PRINCIPLES of #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL associated
to QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT dated 29 OCTOBER 1900) in relation to
refusal of communion by then ARCHBISHOP GEORGE PELL on 31 May 1998.

I think that on the argument advanced, I saved 36 journalists and news
media organisations a very expensive legal bill. So yes I am successful
in that argument and we ought to wait for the Queen’s birthday honours
list ...

We began PART 6 dated 25 MARCH 2019 as the closing phase of our FILING
SUBMISSIONS by bringing the COURT's attention to the incontrovertible
premise that the objective and prudent opinions which we have submitted
upon "SPECIFICITIES OF NON-FACTUALITY BEING THEN GROUNDS FOR COUNTY
COURT APPEAL AS CASE NUMBER: AP-18-0609 AGAINST A PUBLIC AUTHORITY'S
INFIDELITY TO WAR #288 - MEMORIAL COMMEMORATIONS DUE TO ALIGNMENT WITH A
FOREIGN POWER" were made in association to those of a pre-eminent United
Kingdom Supreme Court judge and member of the Queen’s Privy Council in
1924 as the person MUIR MACKENZIE whom signed under WARRANT OF THE
SOVEREIGN our nation’s LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900.

WIKIPEDIA CONVEYS OF KENNETH MUIR MACKENZIE, 1ST BARON MUIR MACKENZIE AS
THE MOST LIKELY SIGNATORY: Muir Mackenzie was Clerk to the Crown in
Treasury from 1885 to 1915 and served as Permanent Secretary to the Lord
Chancellor from 1890 to 1915. He has joint author with Montague
Johnstone Muir Mackenzie and Charles John Stewart of The Public Trustee
Act, 1906, with rules, fees and official forms (1908).

He was appointed a *QUEEN'S* *COUNSEL* in 1887 and a Bencher of
Lincoln's Inn in 1891. In accordance with Most Honourable Order of the
Bath (formerly the Most Honourable *MILITARY* Order of the Bath) as a
British order of chivalry founded by George I on 18 May 1725. This Order
consists of the Sovereign (currently Queen Elizabeth II), the Great
Master (currently The Prince of Wales), and three Classes of members of
which he was made a Companion (CB) in 1893, a Knight Commander (KCB) in
1898 and a Knight Grand Cross (GCB) in 1911 and in 1915 he was raised to
the peerage as Baron Muir Mackenzie, of Delvine in the County of Perth.

The Order of the Bath is the fourth-most senior of the British Orders of
Chivalry, after the *MOST* *NOBLE* *ORDER* *OF* *THE* *GARTER*, the Most
Ancient and Most Noble Order of the Thistle, and the Most Illustrious
Order of Saint Patrick (dormant). Recipients of the Order are now
usually senior *MILITARY* officers or senior civil servants.
Commonwealth citizens who are not subjects of the Queen and foreign
nationals may be made Honorary Members.

In February 1924 Muir Mackenzie, then aged 78, was appointed a
Lord-in-waiting (government whip in the House of Lords) by Prime
Minister Ramsay MacDonald, head of the first ever Labour government, and
was sworn of the *PRIVY* *COUNCIL* the same year. He held this position
until the government fell in November 1924 and again from 1929 to 1930.
At the time of his death he was the oldest government minister of the
twentieth century.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenneth_Muir_Mackenzie,_1st_Baron_Muir_Mackenzie>

You will no doubt recall from news media reports of 24 APRIL 2008, that
"Former Australian prime minister John Howard appears to have missed out
on joining a prestigious British order of knights.

Speculation mounted earlier this year that Howard might be appointed a
Knight Companion of the *MOST* *NOBLE* *ORDER* *OF* *THE* *GARTER* - the
oldest order of British chivalry - when Queen Elizabeth II announced any
new additions.

Howard was a staunch monarchist during his term as Australia's second
longest-serving prime minister.

The deaths of former British prime minister Sir Edward Heath and Mount
Everest conqueror Sir Edmund Hillary left two places open in the
exclusive order.

But the Queen announced on Wednesday those vacancies would be filled by
Lord Luce, who was Lord Chamberlain from 2000 to 2006, and Sir Thomas
Dunne, Lord-Lieutenant of Hereford since 1977 and chairman of the Lord
Lieutenants Association. Their appointments take the number of Companion
Knights to the maximum 24.

The Queen also announced her grandson, Prince William, would join other
members of his family as a Royal Knight Companion of the Most Noble
Order of the Garter.

Members of the Royal family are additional to the 24 Knights Companion.
New members of the order, established in 1348 by Edward III [AND NOTING
THE SEVEN PAPAL BULLS AS APPERCEPTION RELATING TO THE COUNTERPOISED
CATHOLIC KNIGHTS TEMPLAR MILITARY ORDER WERE ESTABLISHED FROM 1139 CE TO
1312 CE WITH THE LATER DURING THE REIGN OF EDWARD II KING OF ENGLAND
FROM 1307 UNTIL HE WAS DEPOSED IN JANUARY 1327], are customarily
announced on St George's Day, England's national day on 23 April.

Its emblem is a blue ribbon or garter worn by men below the left knee
and women on the left arm.

Each year in June a procession and service take place at Windsor Castle
for the order. [Sydney Morning Herald, No knighthood for John Howard,
<https://www.smh.com.au/world/no-knighthood-for-john-howard-20080424-288m.html>]

AND WE HAVE ONLY PROVIDED AN INTERPRETATION OF THIS DOCUMENT BEING QUEEN
VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT DATED 29 OCTOBER 1900 AS REDACTION OF IT INTO
A CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE CONVEYING THE TRINOMIAL METASTASISED
FOUNDATIONAL AND UNIVERSAL (GLOBAL) ONTIC NECESSITY DESCRIPTORS /
CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING AS THEN AGGREGATIONS SUITABLE FOR A
COMPUTING FUNCTION () SO AS TO DETERMINE COMPLIANCE.

SPECIFICALLY THE OPPORTUNISM FOR NEUTRALISATION RELATING TO THE SEVEN
PAPAL BULLS AND ITS IMPETUS BY RENEWED KNIGHTS TEMPLARS AS EMANATION OF
STATE (RELIGIOUS OR OTHERWISE) IS THE BINOMIAL STASIS AND ITS
*IMMATERIALITY*:

#1 - PRINCIPLE OF ENQUIRY {#364 - WILL, FREE WILL, CHOICE} as Omne Datum
Optimum {#1 - Every perfect gift} (1139 CE)

#4 - PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY {SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY DYNAMIC: #164 -
FAVOUR, AFFECTION BY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE INHIBITOR} as Pastoralis
Praeeminentiae {#4 - Pastoral Pre-eminence to monarchs} (1307 CE)

#5 - PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE AS DISCRIMINATING NORM {PRINCIPLE
OF ENQUIRY: #205 - LAST WILL, TESTAMENT BY AGGREGATIONS AS OPTIMAL
LETTERS PATENT TEMPLATE OF AGREEMENT WHICH IS ONTIC / MATHEMATICAL AND
SUITABLE FOR A GLOBAL SAPIENT ECONOMY} as Faciens misericordiam {#5 -
Granting forgiveness} (1308 CE)

THAT THE PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY IS IN FAVOUR OF EUROPEAN MONARCHS
GIVEN THE PAPAL AUTHORITY IS ONLY A BINOMIAL {@1 - RETENTION, @5 -
CENTRE OF VALUE} STASIS AS EMANATION OF THE STATE:

Pastoralis praeeminentiae was a papal bull issued by Pope Clement V on
22 November 1307 to all Christian monarchs. It ordered the arrest of all
Knights Templar and to seize their properties on behalf of the church.
Clement was forced to support the campaign against the Templars by
Philip IV of France, who owed them a great deal of money and had
initiated the first arrests against the Templars on 13 October 1307.

Despite the papal request, not all the monarchs complied immediately,
most notably, Edward II of England [AND NOTING THE SEVEN PAPAL BULLS AS
APPERCEPTION RELATING TO THE COUNTERPOISED CATHOLIC KNIGHTS TEMPLAR
MILITARY ORDER WERE ESTABLISHED FROM 1139 CE TO 1312 CE WITH THE LATER
DURING THE REIGN OF EDWARD II KING OF ENGLAND FROM 1307 UNTIL HE WAS
DEPOSED IN JANUARY 1327] who at first refused to believe the
allegations, but later carried out the order. Following the arrests, a
period of trials was sanctioned against the Templars, enforced by
*TORTURE* and pain-induced confessions.

<-- *THIS* *IS* *A* *ABROGATION* *BREACH* *OF* *THE* *FIRST* *PRINCIPLE*
*AS* *FREE* *WILL* *BEING* *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *ENQUIRY* {#364}:

#364 x 6 = #2184
#364 x 4 + #371 = #1827 - CATHOLIC LITURGICAL CYCLE

AND THEREFORE IS THEN SUBJECT {ie. Pope Clement V was forced to support
the campaign by Philip IV of France} TO THIS 4 BCE DEPICTION OF THE
TRINOMIAL METASTASISED BASIS TO STATES #81 / #369 SUCH THAT THE POPE IS
ALARMED AT THE PROSPECT THAT THE VATICAN CITY STATE IS DESTINED TO
BECOME A WARSAW GHETTO FOR MAGGOTS AGAINST DEMOCRACY.

THE BIBLICAL STORY OF WISE MEN AT JESUS BIRTH MAY BE CONSIDERED THE
FOCAL ESTABLISHMENT {ie. *THE* *TETRAGRAM’S* *CORRELATION* *WITH* *THE*
*WOMAN* *CONSTELLATION*} OF THIS TEMPORAL MARKER IN HAVING A TRINOMIAL
MEASURE OF JUDGEMENT CORRESPONDENCE THEN TO HIS ACTUAL *DEATH*:

*CAN* *WE* *DETERMINE* *THE* *EXACT* *DAY*?

We can.

And here's how . . .

CLUE #1: THE HIGH PRIESTHOOD OF CAIAPHAS {HE THAT SEEKS WITH DILIGENCE;
ONE THAT VOMITETH}

The gospels indicate that Jesus was crucified at the instigation of the
first century high priest named Caiaphas (Matthew 26:3-4, John 11:49-53).

We know from other sources that he served as high priest from A.D. 18 to
36, so that puts Jesus' death in that time frame.

But we can get more specific. Much more.

CLUE #2: THE GOVERNORSHIP OF PONTIUS {MARINE; BELONGING TO THE SEA}
PILATE {ARMED WITH A DART}

All four gospels agree that Jesus was crucified on the orders of Pontius
Pilate (Matthew 27:24-26, Mark 15:15, Luke 23:24, John 19:15-16).

We know from other sources when he served as governor of Judea--A.D. 26
to A.D. 36--so we can narrow down the range by several years.

But how are we going to get it down to a specific day and year?

CLUE #3: AFTER "THE FIFTEENTH YEAR OF TIBERIUS {THE SON OF TIBER} CAESAR"

The Gospel of Luke tells us when the ministry of John the Baptist began:
In the fifteenth year of the reign of Tiberius Caesar . . . the word of
God came to John the son of Zechariah in the wilderness [Luke 3:1-2].

This picks out a specific year: A.D. 29.

Since all four gospels depict the ministry of Christ beginning after
that of John the Baptist had begun (Matthew 3, Mark 1, Luke 3, John 1),
this means that we can shave a few more years off our range.

The death of Christ had to be in a range of seven years: between A.D. 29
and 36.

CLUE #4: CRUCIFIED ON A FRIDAY

All four gospels agree that Jesus was crucified on a Friday (Matt.
27:62, Mark 15:42; Luke23:54; John 19:42), just before a Sabbath, which
was just before the first day of the week (Matthew 28:1, Mark 16:2, Luke
24:1, John 20:1).

We know that it was a Friday because it is referred to as "the day of
preparation"--that is, the day on which Jews made the preparations they
needed for the Sabbath, since they could not do any work on that day.
Thus thus cooked food in advance and made other necessary preparations.

The Jewish Encyclopaedia states: Friday, as the forerunner of Shabbat,
is called "'Ereb Shabbat" (The Eve of Sabbath). The term "'ereb" admits
of two meanings: "evening" and "admixture" (Ex. xii. 38); and "'Ereb
Shabbat" accordingly denotes the day on the evening of which Sabbath
begins, or the day on which food is prepared for both the current and
the following days, which latter is Sabbath.

The idea of preparation is expressed by the Greek name paraskeué, given
by Josephus ("Ant." xvi. 6, § 2) to that day (compare Mark xv. 42; Luke
xxiii. 54; Matt. xxvii. 62; John xix. 42). In Yer. Pesaḥim iv. 1 the day
is called "Yoma da-'Arubta" (Day of Preparation) [Jewish Encyclopedia,
s.v., "Calendar"].
That eliminates six of the days of the week, but there were still quite
a few Fridays between A.D. 29 and 36.
 Can we figure out which one?
CLUE #5: A FRIDAY AT PASSOVER

The gospels also agree that Jesus was crucified in conjunction with the
annual feast of Passover (Matthew 26:2, Mark 14:1, Luke 22:1, John 18:39).
Here we encounter a momentary complication, because Matthew, Mark, and
Luke describe the Last Supper on Holy Thursday as a Passover meal
(Matthew 26:19, Mark 14:14, Luke 22:15). That would suggest that Good
Friday was the day after Passover.

However, when describing the morning of Good Friday, John indicates that
the Jewish authorities had not yet eaten the Passover meal:

Then they led Jesus from the house of Caiaphas to the Praetorium [ie.,
Pilate's palace]. It was early. They themselves did not enter the
Praetorium, so that they might not be defiled, but might eat the
passover. So Pilate went out to them [John 18:28-29a].

That suggests that the Passover would have begun on sundown Friday.
There are a number of ways of resolving this. For example, some have
suggested that Jesus and his disciples used a different calendar than
the Jewish authorities, and we know that there were different calendars
in use in first century Judaism.

It's also possible that Jesus just advanced the date of the Passover
celebration for him and his disciples. I mean, they were already
convinced he was the Messiah and the Son of God. If he says, "We're
celebrating Passover today," and it's a day earlier than most people,
they'd just go with that. (Note that he made other modifications to the
ceremony, such as instituting the Eucharist in the midst of it.)

And there are other solutions.

However, regardless of what Jesus' movement did, we can look to John's
statement about the Jesus' captors as an indication of what the Jewish
authorities or the mainstream Jewish practice was: They were celebrating
a Passover beginning on what we would call Friday evening.

That lets us narrow down the range of possible dates to just a few. Here
is a complete list of the days between A.D. 29 and 36 on whose evenings
Passover began:

• Monday, April 18, A.D. 29
• Friday, April 7, A.D. 30
• Tuesday, March 27, A.D. 31
• Monday, April 14, A.D. 32
• Friday, April 3, A.D. 33
• Wednesday, March 24, A.D. 34
• Tuesday, April 12, A.D. 35
• Saturday, March 31, A.D. 36

As you can see, we have just two candidates left: Jesus was either
crucified on April 7 of A.D. 30 or April 3 of A.D. 33.

Which was it?

The traditional date is that of A.D. 33. You will find quite a number of
people today advocating the A.D. 30 date.

Do the gospels let us decide between the two?

CLUE #6: JOHN'S THREE PASSOVERS

The Gospel of John records three different Passovers during the ministry
of Jesus:

• Passover #1: This is recorded in John 2:13, near the beginning of
Jesus' ministry.
• Passover #2: This is recorded in John 6:4, in the middle of Jesus'
ministry.
• Passover #3: This is recorded in John 11:55 (and frequently mentioned
afterwards), at the end of Jesus' ministry.

That means that the ministry of Jesus had to span something over two
years. A fuller treatment would reveal that it spanned about three and a
half years, but even if we assume it began immediately before Passover
#1, the addition of two more Passovers shows that it lasted more than
two years at a bare minimum.

That means the A.D. 30 date is out.

There is not enough time between the fifteenth year of Tiberius
Caesar--A.D. 29--and the next year's Passover to accomodate a ministry
of at least two years.

The numbers don't add up.

As a result, the traditional date of Jesus' death--Friday, April 3, A.D.
33--must be regarded as the correct one.

Can we be even more precise?
CLUE #7: "THE NINTH HOUR"

Matthew, Mark, and Luke each record that Jesus died about "the ninth
hour" (Matthew 27:45-50, Mark 15:34-37, Luke 23:44-46).

"The ninth hour" is what we, today, would refer to as 3:00 p.m.

This allows us to narrow down the time of Jesus' death to a very
specific point in history:

AROUND 1500 HOURS ON FRIDAY, 3 APRIL, 33 A.D.

3 JANUARY + #91 = SATURDAY 4 APRIL 33 AD

4 x #91 = #364 DAY / YEAR OF THE JERUSALEM TEMPLE SERVICE: 24 x 7 x 13 =
#2184 - ANTHROPOLOGICAL COSMOGONIC PRINCIPLE

#41 - ONTIC NECESSITY PROSCRIPTIONS: #205 - PRINCIPLE OF THE PERSISTENCE
OF SUBSTANCE ☯️ / ✡️ #164 - PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY AS CONSTITUTING:
#369 - DISCRIMINATING NORM (HUMAN NATURE) BEING THE ORGANISATIONAL
PREMISE OF #123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY BY THE EXERCISE OF INTELLECTUS AS
GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS AS #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL

3 JANUARY *PERIAPSIS* PROTOTYPE: *HOMOIOS* {#420 - VAULT OF THE HEAVENS,
FIRMAMENT AS BINDING EARTH TO THE HEAVENS / #322 - FREE CITIZENS,
SOVEREIGN PEOPLE; POPULAR GOVERNMENT, *DEMOCRACY*; POPULAR ASSEMBLY} /
*HETEROS* {#404 - KEEP SECRET / #314 - PURPLE / MAGUS} / *TORAH* {#369 -
DIADEM / #337 - NAZARITE / CONSECRATED ONE}

3 JULY *APOAPSIS* PROTOTYPE: *HOMOIOS* {#330 - FRIEND / REBELLIOUS /
#410 - YESHUA / KING} / *HETEROS* {#352 - A PROVING TRIAL / MARY / #421
- EXTREME WICKEDNESS} / *TORAH* {#373 - FROM TRUTH INTO ERROR / #472 -
CURSE}

EXCERPT FROM EMAIL TO STATE / FEDERAL ATTORNEY GENERALS & MINISTER FOR
DEFENCE / ANZAC 2018 COMMEMORATIONS (HE WAS IN PARIS ON 11 NOVEMBER
2018) ASSISTING THE PRIME MINISTER @ 1627 / 1636 HOURS ON 15 APRIL 2019
TITLED:

"CORRECTION (11 JUNE 2000 AS CROWN IMPLICATIONS ON VIABILITY OF STATE AS
COMMONWEALTH) THAT THE NEWS MEDIA CANNOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT OF COURT
ORDERS RELATING TO THE REPORTING OF COURT HEARINGS OF CARDINAL PELL
BECAUSE THERE IS AN ALLEGED TREASON / PRO DOMO CLAIM RELATING TO 31 MAY
1998 REFUSAL OF COMMUNION"

MARION STATUE DIALOG WITH ARTIST @ 1739 HOURS ON MONDAY 28 MAY 2018

DOLF: "Can I ask for what purpose you are *LIGHTING* *CANDLES* ma'am?"

ARTIST: "Sorry."

DOLF: "For what purpose are you *LIGHTING* *CANDLES*?"

ARTIST: "Umm"

DOLF: "Why aren't you at the BOER WAR memorial celebrating our ah ...
our ah Australian! Oh you're the artist aren't you ma'am?"

ARTIST: "(laughs) I'm Brenda."

DOLF: "You're the artist."

ARTIST: "Nice to meet you."

DOLF: "Now..."

ARTIST: "What happened is um, the mother in Ireland died and their
service in Ireland is at 7 o'clock tonight."

DOLF: "What. Whose? Is that [statue] after a particular person?"

ARTIST: "Yeah Cathy McMahon."

DOLF: "So this [statue] was created in representation of ..."

ARTIST: "This here ... lighting the candles. Wanting to get the candles
all lit at the start of her service."

DOLF: "Okay. It's a Catholic [memorial] service is it?"

ARTIST: "Umm. I['m] not [entirely sure]. I think she is in the
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH*."

DOLF: "Yes. Is this statue related to her in any manner?"

ARTIST: "Yes she is a mother."

DOLF: "Is she the mother depicted [by] the statue."

ARTIST: "No it depicts. The statue depicts all mothers [of which *OUR*
*LADY* [meaning: NOTRE DAME (the French term added later)] is the
exemplar]."

DOLF: "Yes. Yeah. The problem is that with the BOER WAR Memorial on the
31 May ..."

ARTIST: "Yes"

DOLF: "... I hugged a mother [at] refusal of Communion at Saint
Patrick's Cathedral in Melbourne on 31 May 1998."

ARTIST: "Really."

DOLF: "And she was refused communion because she was wearing a rainbow
sash."

ARTIST: "Oh really."

DOLF: "For no other reason. So I have an objection for it. *NOW*
*WOULD* *YOU* *DO* *ME* *A* *FAVOUR* *TO* *APPEASE*, *TO* *BALANCE*
*THE* *KARMA* *OF* *THINGS*. Because..."

...

DOLF: "... I'm going to take the council to court over this particular
matter. Because there is no object of respect at the BOER WAR Memorial."

ARTIST: "So what are you doing taking this to court?"

DOLF: "I'm taking this and the BOER yeah ... this is part of that. This
is part of *ANZAC* *DEFAMATION* which I have been subject to.

When a mother weeps for her children..."

ARTIST: "But this is what this is."

DOLF: "Yeah that is exactly what our 'LEST WE FORGET' poem is all about."

ARTIST: "So why are you against this?"

DOLF: "I'm against this because I happen to be JEWISH and ..."

ARTIST: "Oh okay my darling yes..."

DOLF: "And this is a MARION statue. Now if you really want to IRISH
persons its the WASHER WOMAN that was the person who was most ..."

ARTIST: "No no..."

DOLF: "The WASHER WOMAN in IRISH society was subject to more impunity
than any other woman within IRISH society."

ARTIST: "But you know it's interesting that you say that you're um ah
... JEWISH because the man that led this through the COMMONWEALTH games
... through the COMMONWEALTH government was JEWISH."

DOLF: "Yes but he should know better we don't ... they don't allow
statues in their TEMPLE precinct. And the circumstance that we have is
that I'm of DUTCH heritage and the [INTERNATIONAL] KNIGHTS TEMPLAR which
was formed in 2015 are associated with the ORDER that [DUTCH EXPLORER]
DIRK HARTOG signed the PEWTER PLATE with. So if you want to *TALK*
*ABOUT* *ERECTIONS* [*OF* *COMMEMORATIVE* *MERIT*] DIRK HARTOG signed it
as AO and their were SEVEN PAPAL BULLS associated with my INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY.

As the RIGHT OF WOMEN which is the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS."

ARTIST: "So why are you against this? Why are you going to bring this
into your argument?"

DOLF: "Because WOMEN'S SUFFRAGE was the RIGHT of the exercise of
VOLUNTARY WILL in political life and this [statue] is not."

ARTIST: "What do you mean?"

DOLF: "This is not."

ARTIST: "What do you mean?"

DOLF: "Women in IRELAND have just been [granted the right of *ABORTION*]
..."

ARTIST: "No no hang on a moment.."

DOLF: "Women in IRELAND ... this was put here on SAINT PATRICK'S DAY of
all people. Of all places."

ARTIST: "But I chose that."

DOLF: "You should not have done that. Its representing [only the] IRISH..."

ARTIST: "No it's not. No it's not."

DOLF: "Well because that ... there was no PLAQUE here on the day that it
was [unveiled] ..."

ARTIST: "No but I didn't. I wasn't able to get it ..."

DOLF: "Let me finish..."

ARTIST: "No but you let me finish. I wasn't able ..."

DOLF: "There was no PLAQUE here on the day it was installed."

ARTIST: "Yes there was."

DOLF: "No there wasn't."

ARTIST: "I'm sorry SIR I unveiled the PLAQUE."

DOLF: "I'm sorry ma'am but I took pictures. And I took the picture on
the 8 JUNE when the PLAQUE was unveiled and then I went to the BOER WAR
MEMORIAL and there were tributes there as well.

So that's good day to you ma'am."

[walking away]

Had it not be for our rational belief and sapient intellectual property
our nation’s statehood would have been consumed in that holocaust
against 850 years of history.

THUSLY IT EXHIBITS A CLEAR MENS REA RELATING TO:

SOVEREIGN / MARRIAGE DYNAMIC (TRADITION)

v's

SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY DYNAMIC

AS IMPETUS FOR THE NOTRE DAME MAELSTROM WHICH BEING AN ASSAILMENT
AGAINST 850 YEARS OF STATE / SOVEREIGN HISTORY WOULD HAVE BY DEFAULT
*ROLLED* *BACK* *TO* ITS KNOWN STASIS: @1, @5, #65 - SOLDIER, #175 -
MARRIAGE

*THUS* *WE* *CONCLUDE* *A* *HIGH* *PROBABILITY* *THAT* *THE* *FIRE*
*WAS* *A* *DELIBERATE* *CAUSE* *CÉLÈBRE* *ASSAILMENT* *AGAINST*
*SOVEREIGN* *DEMOCRATIC* *NATIONS*.

In our opinion the BINOMIAL APPARATUS as the occidental perspective of
PERENNIALISM (including ISLAM) having by the immateriality of its STASIS
which defines a SOVEREIGN / MARRIAGE dynamic may in some circumstances
have a predisposition towards judgementalism by impetus of narcissistic
self-justification as being an auto-intoxication in a self bestowed
dignity as a ontological self-delusion due to an infatuation with the
mirroring of its various ONTIC characteristic elements expressed therein
and perhaps not realising that it is also subject to the @205 -
PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE {#873 - PROBITY OF THE DIGNITY ROYAL
(LETTERS PATENT)} and @82 / #491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY (SECTION IX)
in being a lawful EMANATION OF STATE AS METHODOLOGY which itself
conforms to the dialectic of the #2184 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC COSMOGONIC
PRINCIPLE that are encapsulated by the @164 / #3273 - PRINCIPLE OF
MATERIALITY (SECTION VIII) and the HISTORICAL CHRISTIAN WEDDING VOW.

"I, *NAME* *OF* *BRIDE*, #312 - *TAKE* *THEE* {ie. A WILLING, WILL},
*NAME* *OF* *GROOM* to be my #2184 - *LAWFULLY* {ie. LAWS OF NATURE}
wedding husband. To have and to hold #273 - *FROM* *THIS* *DAY*
*FORWARD* {ie. SUCCESSIVELY IN ORDER}, for richer or poorer, in sickness
and in health, to love and #364 - *OBEY* until death do we part, today I
pledge my faithfulness."

SECTION VIII: "REQUIRE AND COMMAND ALL OUR OFFICERS AND MINISTERS, CIVIL
AND MILITARY, AND ALL OTHER THE INHABITANTS OF OUR SAID COMMONWEALTH TO
BE #364 - OBEDIENT {#273 - REMEMBRANCE}, #312 - AIDING {#273
-SEPULCHRE}, AND #273 - ASSISTING {#273 - WEAK} UNTO OUR SAID GOVERNOR
GENERAL {#2184 - LAWS OF NATURE AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL COSMOLOGICAL
PRINCIPLE / 12 = #182 AS DATE(1996,3,20) + 5 x #364 + #182 = 11
SEPTEMBER 2001}, OR, IN THE EVENT OF HIS DEATH, #273 - INCAPACITY, OR
ABSENCE, TO SUCH PERSON OR PERSONS AS MAY, FROM TIME TO TIME, UNDER THE
PROVISIONS OF THESE OUR LETTERS PATENT, ADMINISTER {#2184 - LAWS OF
NATURE AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE / 13 = #168 - I AM NOT
THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26 - *YHWH*}} THE GOVERNMENT OF OUR SAID
COMMONWEALTH."

What we call 'culture' is actually a series of core beliefs or value
systems, with each level expressing a different understanding of the
world or the church. A “belief” or “value system” is a worldview, a set
of perspectives/priorities/paradigms, a mind-set, an organizing
framework for deep-level decision-making at the bottom line—which is why
you can’t compromise about it. Your value system is the threshold at
which you won’t negotiate.

BEFORE PONTIUS PILATE AS TRIAL (H974) ENDS FRIDAY 3 APRIL 33 AD:

HUNG (H8518) FOR DISPLAY ENDS SATURDAY 4 APRIL 33 AD

THAT THE ONTOLOGICAL CONTEXT OF REDEMPTION (G4266) OCCURRING UPON SUNDAY
5 APRIL 33 AD IS PREDICATED UPON THE ONTIC EPISTEMOLOGICAL PREMISE

*EXPIRY* *OF* *ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *MITHRAS* *CLAIMS* (G2983) *TO*
*CHRISTIAN* *IDENTITY* UPON 22 APRIL 2019: @113 : [#30, #1, #2, #70,
#10] as @41 / #113 - EMANATION FUNCTION <— ETHICAL ENGAGEMENT}

"I LAY DOWN MY LIFE, THAT I MIGHT TAKE {22 APRIL 2019: @113: [#30, #1,
#2, #70, #10] as @41 / #113 - EMANATION FUNCTION <— ETHICAL ENGAGEMENT}
IT AGAIN. NO MAN TAKETH IT FROM ME, BUT I LAY IT DOWN OF MYSELF. I HAVE
POWER TO LAY IT DOWN, AND I HAVE POWER TO TAKE IT AGAIN. THIS
COMMANDMENT HAVE I RECEIVED OF MY FATHER." [John 10:10-18 (KJV)]"

THESE ARE MATTERS OF FACT ALREADY BEFORE THE COUNTY COURT IN APPEAL
CASES AP-18-0609 and AP-18-0775 which have a directions hearing on 20
January 2020 and were conveyed prior to the maelstrom event as emailed
advice made to state / federal attorney generals upon 15 April 2019 as
grounds for 36 news media not being subjected to contempt of court
charges due to a claim of TREASON / PRO DOMO {own property, own #311 -
home, own cause} breaches arising from RAINBOW SASH (I hugged a PFLAG
member as mother of a gay son as pictured on the front page of the
Australian newspaper upon 1 June 1998) refusal of COMMUNION as #1827 -
EUCHARIST on PENTECOST SUNDAY 31 MAY 1998 when the BOER WAR MEMORIAL HAS
SINCE 2010 BEEN COMMEMORATED.

Jesus Christ’s Crown of Thorns saved in NOTRE DAME MAELSTROM after
firefighters and police form human chain

#1828 - Crown of Thorns is the perfect accompaniment for #1827 -
Eucharist and Saint Andrews #371 - 30 November (Knights Templar
International) Cause Célèbre #364 x 4 + #371 = #1827 days against our
Commonwealth of States and it’s BOER / ANZAC heritage.

#34 (@7 - Engendering Nature: #175 {*MARRIAGE*} - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS
NATURE [#82 - HONOUR YOUR PARENTS]) ...

84: [2 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE]
86: [10 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD]
102: [4 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS]
104: [7 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD]
115: [5 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN]

TOTAL: @84 + @86 + @102 = *ROYALTY*, *REIGN* (*OF* *TIME*), *KINGDOM* /
*DAY*, *TIME*, *YEAR* + @104 = *TO* *GET* *AS* *A* *POSSESSION*,
*ACQUIRE*, *INHERIT*, *POSSESS* / *TO* *POSSESS* *ONESELF* + @115 =
*MOSES* *SEAT* *OF* *HONOUR* (*ROYAL* *DIGNITY*, *AUTHORITY*, *POWER*) =
#491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY (#312 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTRADICTION) as
#491 as [#80, #1, #300, #100, #10] = pater (G3962): {UMBRA: #22 as #489
% #41 = #38} 1) generator or male ancestor; 2) metaphor: *ZEUS*.; 3) God
is called the Father; 1a) either the nearest ancestor: father of the
corporeal nature, natural fathers, both parents; ... 3d1) *BY* *JESUS*
*CHRIST* *HIMSELF*; 3d2) by the apostles;

"I WISH JESUS WOULD COME IN MY DAY. I WOULD SO LOVE TO LAY MY CROWN AT
HIS FEET." [Queen Victoria]

QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT SECTION IX: “AND WE DO HEREBY RESERVE TO
OURSELVES OUR @104 - HEIRS AND SUCCESSORS, FULL @115 - POWER AND
AUTHORITY FROM @102 - TIME TO @104 - TIME TO REVOKE, ALTER, OR AMEND
THESE OUR LETTERS PATENT, AS TO US OR THEM SHALL SEEM MEET.”

SOVEREIGN ONTIC NECESSITY (6.5.5.41.0)@{
@1: Sup: 41 (#41); Ego: 41 (#41),
@2: Sup: 1 (#42); Ego: 41 (#82),
@3: Sup: 42 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 41 (#123
- JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY),
@4: Sup: 2 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 41 (#164 -
*PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY*),
@5: Sup: 43 (#129); Ego: 41 (#205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE*
*PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE*),
@6: Sup: 3 (#132); Ego: 41 (#246),
@7: Sup: 44 (#176 - KANT'S IDEA B176: *THE* *TRANSCENDENTAL*
*DOCTRINE* *OF* *THE POWER* *OF* *JUDGMENT* *OR* *ANALYTIC* *OF*
*PRINCIPLES*); Ego: 41 (#287),
@8: Sup: 24 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8});
Ego: 61 (#348),
@9: Sup: 66 (#266 - *PRECEPT* / *STATUTE*); Ego: 42 (#390 -
*SOVEREIGNTY* / *CROWN*),
Male: #266; Feme: #390
}

HUMAN BEING ONTIC NECESSITY (3.5.5.41.0)@{
@1: Sup: 41 (#41); Ego: 41 (#41),
@2: Sup: 1 (#42); Ego: 41 (#82),
@3: Sup: 42 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 41 (#123
- JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY),
@4: Sup: 2 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 41 (#164 -
*PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY*),
@5: Sup: 43 (#129); Ego: 41 (#205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE*
*PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE*),
@6: Sup: 3 (#132); Ego: 41 (#246),
@7: Sup: 44 (#176); Ego: 41 (#287),
@8: Sup: 68 (#244); Ego: 24 (#311 *** SERIOUS BREACH OF THE
SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY DYNAMIC GIVEN THE INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE
MAIDEN DYNAMIC OF 3 APRIL 33 AD),
@9: Sup: 67 (#311 *** SERIOUS BREACH OF THE SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY
DYNAMIC GIVEN THE INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN DYNAMIC OF 3 APRIL
33 AD); Ego: 80 (#391),
Male: #311; Feme: #391
} // [LATIN definition: VOLUNTĀTIS (*YES*) / NOLUNTĀTIS (*NO*)]

“YE WORSHIP YE KNOW NOT WHAT: WE KNOW WHAT WE WORSHIP: FOR SALVATION IS
OF THE JEWS.” [John 4:22 (KJV)]

#71 #1 #11
#61 #81 #21
#51 #41 #31 = #369 as DISCRIMINATING NORM OF HUMAN NATURE / WAN WU AS
ORGANISATION OF THINGS IN NATURE

#205 = PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE (YANG)
#164 = PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY (YIN)

#41 - EMANATION PRINCIPLE (REMEMBER THE SABBATH)
#82 - TERMS OF CONTINUITY (HONOUR PARENTS)
#123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY (DO NOT KILL)
#164 = PRINCIPLE OF MATERIALITY (YIN / TORAH: AVOID HETERONOMY AGAINST
AUTONOMY)
#205 = PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE (YANG / YAHAD: DO NOT STEAL)
#246 - NORMA OBLIGANS (BEAR NO FALSE WITNESS)
#287 - MANIFESITNG NORM (COVET NOT)

@492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL {@369 / @123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY (#3 x #3 -
CENTRE INTERLOCK)}

@205 / #873 - LETTERS PATENT <-- PRINCIPLES OF PROBITY
@82 / #491 - SECTION IX <— TERMS OF CONTINUITY
@164 / #3273 - SECTION VIII (?) <— COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS
@123 / #2188 - SECTION III (?) <— JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT

@41 / #113 - EMANATION FUNCTION <— ETHICAL ENGAGEMENT

Before the advent of combination therapy within the AIDS crisis if one
engaged within dangerous actions with wanton reckless regard you could
be subject to 25 years imprisonment.

But on a building site apparently you can engage in “constructive
events” such as welding as “dangerous actions with wanton reckless
regard” for having fire extinguishers 🧯 within proximity and the Mayor
of Paris thinks it accidental. The question then is whether the lack of
safety with the electrical works amounted to reckless or culpable conduct?

Whom can ever tell as it reminds me of the occasion where my own power
fuse was removed by contrived action @ 1130 hours {#311 / #391} on
Saturday 10 March 2018 with the seal left intact as to convey a
premeditated action of some sort.

Does a Marion statue ever weep and bleed by itself as consideration on
what are your values anchored to—surely not to reason?

HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO ELIZABETH REGINA II ON EASTER SUNDAY 21 APRIL 2019
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.