-- YOUR ARMY NEEDS YOU AND YOUR RESILIENCE (DON’T ***@CK YOUR COUNTY WITH
#325 {5x5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} - DETRUDE)
(c) 2019 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 6 January, 2019
For our next update to the GRAPPLE prototype we have to give some
consideration on how to resolve the perennial problem of SOCIAL MEDIA
conquest defined as the:
PRO DOMO {ie. FOR THEIR OWN CAUSE OF IDENTITY}
SUI JURIS AS #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL {eg: IGNORANCE}
MEMBRUM VIRILE AS #120 / #360 - TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPE
YOUTUBE: "Your Army Needs You, and Your Resilience"
http://youtu.be/YFGHEZMSek4
Dynamic within the context of the #72 - ANTHROPIC PROTOTYPE quest {#312
- ATTRIBUTE DIFFERENTIALS / #288 - IDEALISATIONS} for sexual opportunism:
#231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL (ANKH BINOMIAL HETEROS / TORAH PROTOTYPES
OF THE PERENNIALIST ECONOMY)@{
@1: Sup: 81 (#81); Ego: 81 (#81),
@2: Sup: 78 (#159); Ego: 78 (#159 - SEE KANT'S IDEA B159),
@3: Sup: 72 (#231 - *AT* *THE* *GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN*
*AND* *IN* *THE* *MORNING*); Ego: 75 (#234 - SEE KANT'S IDEA B234),
@4: Sup: 71 (#302); Ego: 80 (#314),
@5: Sup: 67 (#369 - #9 X #41); Ego: 77 (#391 - *ANTAGONISM* *WITH*
#902 - RULE OF LAW (EGALITÉ {9 JULY 1900}: #22 x #41 AS *ONTIC*
NECESSITY COMPRISING A SUBSET OF 21 CONSONANTS WITH #VOWELS OF SEMITIC
ORIGINS), #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900}: #12 X
#41), and #391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ {29 OCTOBER 1900})
OF QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT TO THE FEDERATION OF THE AUSTRALIAN
COMMONWEALTH 1901),
@6: Sup: 60 (#429); Ego: 74 (#465),
@7: Sup: 58 (#487); Ego: 79 (#544),
@8: Sup: 53 (#540); Ego: 76 (#620),
@9: Sup: 45 (#585); Ego: 73 (#693),
Male: #585; Feme: #693
}
#360 - TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPE (ANKH BINOMIAL HETEROS PROTOTYPES OF THE
PERENNIALIST ECONOMY)@{
@1: Sup: 8 (#8); Ego: 8 (#8),
@2: Sup: 24 (#32); Ego: 16 (#24),
@3: Sup: 48 (#80); Ego: 24 (#48),
@4: Sup: 80 (#160); Ego: 32 (#80),
@5: Sup: 39 (#199); Ego: 40 (#120),
@6: Sup: 6 (#205); Ego: 48 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO
ANY {%26}),
@7: Sup: 62 (#267); Ego: 56 (#224),
@8: Sup: 45 (#312 - CONTRADICTION BY *WITHERED* *STATE* *WREATHS*);
Ego: 64 (#288 - *MEMORIAL*, *REMINDER*, *REMEMBRANCE* COMMON WITH ADOLF
HITLER'S USAGE),
@9: Sup: 36 (#348); Ego: 72 (#360),
Male: #348; Feme: #360
}
I've just watched the latest SBS TV episode of "Pope: The Most Powerful
Man In History" and I have to say with respects to COMMUNISM as being
entirely a semantical political construct by dialectics of #312 -
CONTRADICTION that is distinct from the repulsive machinations of
FASCISM / CATHOLICISM {ie. as competatively #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL
/ #360 - TRANSFORMATIVE PROTOTYPE AGAINST THE BIOLOGICAL ORDER} whereby
they are facilitators within the process of REASON:
#364
#312
#273
As no less than the FRENCH by their societal revolution of 1789.
So how are we going to achieve this?
That the PRO DOMO, SUI JURIS, MEMBRUM VIRILE might be considered in
terms of a LEGAL LOGICAL SYLLOGISM:
THE MAJOR PREMISE {YANG/FATHER/HEAVEN/MALE/FORM - Formula of Universal
Law}, which contains the law of that will:
In the consideration of a #72 - ANTHROPOLOGICAL PROTOTYPE this might be
thought of as the default birth DAEMON or any IMPETUS as CATEGORY OF
UNDERSTANDING (ie. #205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE* *PERSISTENCE* *OF*
*SUBSTANCE*):
The #1 - seraphim, #2 - cherubim, #3 - thrones, #4 - dominions, #5 -
virtues, #6 - powers,#7 - principalities, #8 - arch-angel, #9 - angel
prime directive which is the default disposition
THE MINOR PREMISE {YIN/MOTHER/EARTH/FEMALE/MATTER - Formula of
Humanity}, which contains the command to behave in accordance with the
law, that is, the principle of subsumption under the law:
This might be a consideration of the #231 - JUXTAPOSITION prototype
directive from #73 to #81 as CONTROL (ie. #164 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF*
*MATERIALITY*)
THE CONCLUSION {ZHUN/SON/SEA/ENUMERATE/OFFSPRING - Formula of Autonomy},
which contains the verdict (sentence), what is laid down as right in the
case at hand:
This might be a consideration of the ONTIC syncretism {ie. #205 / #164:
#364 ... #312 ... #273 dialectics} process which in metaphysical terms
is the cohesion that occurs before there is a streaming of consciousness
within the instantiation of temporality.
So we may need to define a totally new grappleIDEA which is capable as
perhaps a composite of the GIZMO array populated with relevant ONTIC and
TEMPORAL DIALECTIC CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING:
{nous: #nn, z: n, x: n, y: n, directive: #nnn, category: #nnn, type: (m
| f)}
which will then act as WATCHERS / RECEIVERS in conveying such a
composite notion so that we can explore by analytic judgements such a
notion as GNOSIS EX MACHINA.
We shall not be able to address this issue in any material manner of
javascript prototyping until we have *COMPLETED* our court submission by
26 JANUARY 2019 that is titled:
"SPECIFICITIES OF NON-FACTUALITY BEING THEN GROUNDS FOR COUNTY COURT
APPEAL AS CASE NUMBER: AP-18-0609 AGAINST A PUBLIC AUTHORITY'S
INFIDELITY TO WAR #288 - MEMORIAL COMMEMORATIONS DUE TO ALIGNMENT WITH A
FOREIGN POWER"
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/SPECIFICITIES%20OF%20NON-FACTUALITY%20AP-18-0609%20%28Censored%29.pdf>
Yet egotistically, SOCIAL MEDIA often ALSO claims as its integral view,
the resorting to a process as disenfranchising of the essence and soul
of the human dignity itself as the value of the person being the other
by its habituated pervasive carelessness as a culture of disrespect
which is always a quantification as:
#1 - A DEGREE OF AVARICIOUS WANT;
#2 - THE POTENTIAL OF LIMITATIONS UPON REALITY;
#3 - A CAPABILITY TO BEGUILE AND STUPEFY WITH WORDS, THE QUARRY SOUGHT
AS THE OBJECT OF VIRILE NECESSITY;
#4 - VARIANCE OF ACCEPTABILITY AS THE CAUSE FOR IMPROBABILITY;
#5 - THE PERMISSIBILITY OF IDEALISATIONS;
#6 - THE ORGANISATIONAL READINESS TO ELIMINATE ANY INHIBITORS TO THE
PHYSICAL DYNAMICS OF OPPORTUNITY;
#7 - TO FACILITATE A SPORTING PROWESS OF A PROUD ACCOMPLISHMENT IN A
MUTUALLY SATISFYING PURPOSED DELIVERY; AND
#8 - A JOB WELL DONE, ALWAYS WANTS MORE.
I have in the past, even given such cursory universal observations which
are independent of gender and sexual identity as summarily proclaimed as
long ago as 12 FEBRUARY 2017 but not exhaustively made of the sexual
act. Been accused of over intellectualising how people engage their
wants within this physical act.
Although some have more succinctly surmised as nothing more than a ***@ck
you and then onto the next, until you run out of opportunities.
Now that SAME SEX MARRIAGE has been adopted within LEGISLATION, how
effectively and strategically the GLBTQI COMMUNITY engages within this
process can do more to effectively control and eliminate neo-nazism and
religious extremism than 17 years of the Afghanistan or Iraqi Wars could
ever do.
With the continuing rise of neo-nazism, terrorism and religious bigotry
this nation especially needs you to be mindful of the effect that the
sexual opportunities you make can win that war.
In chaos theory, the butterfly effect is the sensitive dependence on
initial conditions in which a small change in one state of a
deterministic nonlinear system can result in large differences in a
later state.
YOUTUBE: "The Butterfly Effect | This Video Will Change Your Life |
Documentary"
http://youtu.be/G2xFJUSLEv8
Sadly such ignorance of individual #391 - HOMOGENEOUS accountability in
safe guarding any PRO DOMO entitlement without diminishing another
party's SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM VIRILE human rights / constitutional
protections within sexual opportunism amongst GRINDR users is especially
deprecated to the extent that its culpability and deprivation within the
community is worse than any socially communicable disease of living memory.
So within the coming weeks we're going to give some consideration to
expanding the GRAPPLE prototype with PRO DOMO / SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM
VIRILE notions as methodology functions.
Thus in terms of any cognitive processes (ie. as then the foundational
basis for probability theory as determinism of occurrence} what I desire
to observe is the process of intuition as the osmosis intersections
which occur within the neurological predisposition as nuanced syllogism
(ie. we need to still develop adequate semantics of nomenclature which
agreeably convey this).
So for example if I wanted to determine the reality of the notion: “this
is a test” as a criteria of existentiality, this would then require a
resolution of the criteria of enquiry being the hierarchy pairing as:
#61 / #122 against the default neurological and personalistic disposition:
[this, {@1: Sup: 49 (#49); Ego: 74 (#74)},
is, {@2: Sup: 5 (#54); Ego: 28 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4})},
a, {@3: Sup: 6 (#60); Ego: 1 (#103)},
test] {@4: Sup: 1 (#61); Ego: 19 (#122)}
#49 + #54 + #60 + #61 = #224 - *TO* *BRING* *FORTH* *TO* *VIEW*, *TO* *SHOW*
#74 + #102 + #103 + #122 = #401 - *RESTRAINT* *OR* *CONTROL*;
G1925@{
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 4 (#9); Ego: 80 (#85),
@3: Sup: 9 (#18); Ego: 5 (#90),
@4: Sup: 13 (#31); Ego: 4 (#94),
@5: Sup: 18 (#49); Ego: 5 (#99),
@6: Sup: 28 (#77); Ego: 10 (#109),
@7: Sup: 7 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 60 (#169 -
I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS {%18}),
@8: Sup: 12 (#96); Ego: 5 (#174),
@9: Sup: 62 (#158 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}); Ego: 50 (#224),
Male: #158; Feme: #224
} // #224
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #224 % #41 = #19 - Argument for Ethical Anarchism, Returning to
Simplicity; I-Ching: H57 - Compliance, Gentle Penetration/Wind, Ground,
Calculations; Tetra: 58 - Gathering In;
THOTH MEASURE: #19 - Oh Uammetu, who makest thine appearance at the
Block; I commit not adultery with another's wife.
#VIRTUE: Following (no. #19) means dispersing, but
#TOOLS: Massing (no. #59) means assembling.
#POSITION: With Ease (no. #23), the level and smooth, but
#TIME: With Difficulties (no. #79), the going up and down.
#CANON: #180
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_180@{
@1: Sup: 19 (#19); Ego: 19 (#19),
@2: Sup: 78 (#97); Ego: 59 (#78),
@3: Sup: 20 (#117); Ego: 23 (#101),
@4: Sup: 18 (#135); Ego: 79 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH
ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19}),
Male: #135; Feme: #180
} // #180
#224 as [#5, #80, #5, #4, #5, #10, #60, #5, #50] = epideiknumi (G1925):
{UMBRA: #57 as #224 % #41 = #19} 1) to exhibit, show; 1a) *TO* *BRING*
*FORTH* *TO* *VIEW*, *TO* *SHOW*; 1a1) furnish to be looked at, produce
what may looked at; 1a2) to display something belonging to one's self;
1b) to prove, demonstrate, set forth to be known and acknowledged;
#401 as #1, #400 = Self; #1, #400 = At; by; with; toward; the particle
of directed emphasis: THIS! (first and last Hebrew letters, like Alpha
and Omega); #40, #70, #90, #200 = *RESTRAINT* *OR* *CONTROL*;
So in order to do so we might need an interim pulse() function by which
we can then approximate thinking as the actuation of any dialectic set
{eg: #364, #312, #273, #237 - STUBBORN WILL} process and its enquiry
before arriving at any final disposition of intersections being then the
composition of knowing and its presentation.
G991@{
@1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2),
@2: Sup: 32 (#34); Ego: 30 (#32),
@3: Sup: 37 (#71); Ego: 5 (#37),
@4: Sup: 36 (#107); Ego: 80 (#117),
@5: Sup: 41 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}); Ego: 5 (#122),
Male: #148; Feme: #122
} // #122
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #122 % #41 = #40 - Reversal, Avoiding Activity; I-Ching: H36 -
Suppression of the Light, Sinking/Darkening Light, Brilliance injured,
Intelligence hidden; Tetra: 68 - Dimming;
THOTH MEASURE: #40 - Oh Neheb-kau, who makest thy appearance at thy
cavern; I have no unjust preferences.
#VIRTUE: Law (no. #40) means to facilitate union with All-under-Heaven.
#TOOLS: Labouring (no. #80) means to lack achievement despite strenuous
efforts.
#POSITION: With Duties (no. #27), to exhaust oneself.
#TIME: With Fostering (no. #81), to increase oneself.
#CANON: #228
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_228@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 39 (#79); Ego: 80 (#120),
@3: Sup: 66 (#145); Ego: 27 (#147),
@4: Sup: 66 (#211); Ego: 81 (#228 - I HAVE NO UNJUST PREFERENCES {%40}),
Male: #211; Feme: #228
} // #228
@memeBrain SYNCRETISM:
test] {@4: Sup: 1 (#61); Ego: 19 (#122)},
Thus within this instance of “this is a test” the condition of criteria:
#40, #80, #27, #81 is met within the #205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE*
*PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE*
#122 as [#2, #30, #5, #80, #5] = blepo (G991): {UMBRA: #93 as #122 % #41
= #40} 1) to see, discern, of the bodily eye; 2) metaphor: to see with
the mind's eye; 3) in a geographical sense of places, mountains,
buildings, etc. turning towards any quarter, as it were, facing it; 1a)
with the bodily eye: to be possessed of sight, have the power of seeing;
1b) perceive by the use of the eyes: to see, look descry; 1c) to turn
the eyes to anything: to look at, look upon, gaze at; 1d) to perceive by
the senses, to feel; 1e) to discover by use, to know by experience; 2a)
to have (the power of) understanding; 2b) to discern mentally, observe,
perceive,
discover, understand; 2c) to turn the thoughts or direct the mind to a
thing, to consider, contemplate, to look at, to weigh carefully, examine;
THIS COGNITIVE FUNCTION HAS NEVER BEFORE BEEN CONCEIVED IN TERMS OF AN
INTUITIVE COMPUTING FUNCTION() but we want to explore it none the less
so as to determine whether it is a viable means in describing the human
sapient paradigm of existence and reality—we may be wrong but it is not
improper to advance a proposition as then an avenue of self discovery.
IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783 AS APRIORITY TO FRENCH REVOLUTION)
IDEA: @B159 THIRD SECTION: OF THE SYSTEM OF PRINCIPLES OF THE PURE
UNDERSTANDING
SYSTEMATIC PRESENTATION OF ALL SYNTHETIC PRINCIPLES OF THE PURE
UNDERSTANDING
That principles occur anywhere at all is due solely to the pure
understanding, which is not only the faculty of rules with respect to
that which [IDEA: @B198] happens, but is itself the source of the
principles in accordance with which [IDEA: @A159] everything (that can
come forward to us only as object) necessarily falls under rules, since
without such rules the appearances could never amount to cognition of an
object corresponding to them. Even the #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*:
SECTION VIII: "REQUIRE AND COMMAND ALL OUR OFFICERS AND MINISTERS, CIVIL
AND MILITARY, AND ALL OTHER THE INHABITANTS OF OUR SAID COMMONWEALTH TO
BE #364 - OBEDIENT {#273 - REMEMBRANCE}, #312 - AIDING {#273 -
SEPULCHRE}, AND #273 - ASSISTING {#273 - WEAK} UNTO OUR SAID GOVERNOR
GENERAL {#2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE* AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL COSMOLOGICAL
PRINCIPLE / 12 = #182 AS DATE(1996,3,20) + 5 x #364 + #182 = 11
SEPTEMBER 2001}, OR, IN THE EVENT OF HIS DEATH, #273 - INCAPACITY, OR
ABSENCE, TO SUCH PERSON OR PERSONS AS MAY, FROM TIME TO TIME, UNDER THE
PROVISIONS OF THESE OUR LETTERS PATENT, ADMINISTER {#2184 - LAWS OF
NATURE AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE / 13 = #168 - I AM NOT
THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26 - *YHWH*}} THE GOVERNMENT OF OUR SAID
COMMONWEALTH."
IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) IDEA: @319: "There are many *LAWS*
*OF* *NATURE* {ie. #2184 ipso facto 6 x #364 - OBEDIENT(H7522) {#273 as
[#6, #7, #20, #200, #40] = zeker (H2143): 1) *REMEMBRANCE*}, 7 x #312 -
AIDING(H5826) {#273 as [#40, #50, #8, #40, #5, #10, #70, #50] = mnemeion
(G3419): 1) *SEPULCHRE*}, 7 x #273 - ASSISTING / DEVOTE ONESELF(H5144)
{#273 as [#1, #200, #9, #5, #50, #8] = asthenes (G0772 ): 1) *WEAK*;
*INCAPACITY*} UNTO THE GOVERNOR GENERAL IS A REQUIREMENT OF ALL CITIZENS
UNDER SECTION VIII OF QUEEN VICTORIA’S LETTERS PATENT} that we can know
only through experience, but lawfulness in the connection of
appearances, i.e., nature in general, we cannot come to know through any
experience, because experience itself has need of such laws, which lie a
priori at the basis of its possibility.
OBEDIENT(H7522)@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 8 (#14); Ego: 2 (#8),
@3: Sup: 46 (#60); Ego: 38 (#46),
@4: Sup: 55 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}); Ego: 9 (#55),
@5: Sup: 61 (#176); Ego: 6 (#61),
@6: Sup: 30 (#206); Ego: 50 (#111),
@7: Sup: 40 (#246); Ego: 10 (#121),
Male: #246; Feme: #121
}
H7522@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 68 (#98); Ego: 38 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE
GOD OF MY DOMAIN {%42}),
@3: Sup: 77 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}); Ego: 9 (#77),
@4: Sup: 46 (#221); Ego: 50 (#127),
@5: Sup: 66 (#287); Ego: 20 (#147),
@6: Sup: 25 (#312); Ego: 40 (#187),
Male: #312; Feme: #187
} // #430
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #346 % #41 = #18 - Origin of Ethical Concepts, Palliation of
Vulgarity; I-Ching: H33 - Withdrawal, Retiring, Retreat, Yielding;
Tetra: 49 - Flight;
THOTH MEASURE: #18 - Oh Tutuf, who makest thine appearance in Ati; *I*
*TROUBLE* *MYSELF* *ONLY* *WITH* *MY* *OWN* *AFFAIRS*.
#VIRTUE: As to Waiting (no. #18), it exits.
#TOOLS: As to Closing in (no. #58), it enters.
#POSITION: As to Release (no. #21), it is softness, but
#TIME: As to Hardness (no. #72), it is leathery toughness.
#CANON: #169
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_169@{
@1: Sup: 18 (#18); Ego: 18 (#18),
@2: Sup: 76 (#94); Ego: 58 (#76),
@3: Sup: 16 (#110); Ego: 21 (#97),
@4: Sup: 7 (#117); Ego: 72 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN
AFFAIRS {%18}),
Male: #117; Feme: #169
} // #169 {#273 as [#6, #7, #20, #200, #40] = zeker (H2143): 1)
*REMEMBRANCE*}
#364 as [#6, #2, #200, #90, #6, #50, #10] / #430 as [#30, #200, #90,
#50, #20, #40] = ratsown (H7522): {UMBRA: #14 as #346 % #41 = #18} 1)
pleasure, delight, favour, goodwill, acceptance, will; 1a) goodwill,
favour; 1b) acceptance; 1c) will, desire, pleasure, self-will;
AIDING(H5826)@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 35 (#65); Ego: 5 (#35),
@3: Sup: 24 (#89); Ego: 70 (#105),
@4: Sup: 31 (#120); Ego: 7 (#112),
@5: Sup: 69 (#189); Ego: 38 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
Male: #189; Feme: #150
}
H5826@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 29 (#69); Ego: 70 (#110),
@3: Sup: 36 (#105); Ego: 7 (#117),
@4: Sup: 74 (#179); Ego: 38 (#155),
@5: Sup: 3 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN {%6});
Ego: 10 (#165),
@6: Sup: 43 (#225); Ego: 40 (#205),
Male: #225; Feme: #205
} // #367
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #277 % #41 = #31 - Military Stratagem, Quelling War; I-Ching: H32
- Perseverance, Endurance, Duration, Constancy; Tetra: 51 - Constancy;
THOTH MEASURE: #31 - Oh thou who hast different faces, and makest thine
appearance in Net'efit; *I* *AM* *NOT* *ONE* *OF* *INCONSTANT* *MIND*.
#VIRTUE: With Packing (no. #31), a move home, but
#TOOLS: With Stoppage (no. #71), a failure to proceed.
#POSITION: With Stove (no. #44), love of profit.
#TIME: With Law (no. #40), abhorrence of the cruel.
#CANON: #186
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_186@{
@1: Sup: 31 (#31); Ego: 31 (#31),
@2: Sup: 21 (#52); Ego: 71 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}),
@3: Sup: 65 (#117); Ego: 44 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
@4: Sup: 24 (#141); Ego: 40 (#186 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND
{%31}),
Male: #141; Feme: #186
} // #186 {#273 as [#40, #50, #8, #40, #5, #10, #70, #50] = mnemeion
(G3419): 1) *SEPULCHRE*}
#312 as [#30, #5, #70, #7, #200] / #367 as [#40, #70, #7, #200, #10,
#40] = âzar (H5826): {UMBRA: #4 as #277 % #41 = #31} 1) *TO* *HELP*,
*SUCCOUR*, *SUPPORT*; 1a) (Qal) to help; 1b) (Niphal) to be helped; 1c)
(Hiphil) to help;
DEVOTE ONESELF(H5144)@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 16 (#22); Ego: 10 (#16),
@3: Sup: 66 (#88); Ego: 50 (#66),
@4: Sup: 73 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 7 (#73),
@5: Sup: 30 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS
{%32}); Ego: 38 (#111),
Male: #191; Feme: #111
}
H5144@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 16 (#22); Ego: 10 (#16),
@3: Sup: 66 (#88); Ego: 50 (#66),
@4: Sup: 73 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 7 (#73),
@5: Sup: 30 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS
{%32}); Ego: 38 (#111),
@6: Sup: 36 (#227); Ego: 6 (#117),
Male: #227; Feme: #117
} // #279
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #257 % #41 = #11 - Value and Function of Non-Existence; I-Ching:
H8 - Closeness, Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together, Alliance;
Tetra: 33 - Closeness;
THOTH MEASURE: #11 - Oh thou of the Two Caverns, who makest thine
appearance in Amenta; *I* *AM* *NOT* *SLUGGISH*.
#VIRTUE: Divergence (no. #11) means mistakes, but
#TOOLS: Constancy (no. #51) is good.
#POSITION: With Joy (no. #24), calm and composure.
#TIME: With Labouring (no. #80), hustle and bustle.
#CANON: #166
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_166@{
@1: Sup: 11 (#11); Ego: 11 (#11),
@2: Sup: 62 (#73); Ego: 51 (#62),
@3: Sup: 5 (#78); Ego: 24 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
@4: Sup: 4 (#82); Ego: 80 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}),
Male: #82; Feme: #166
} // #166 {#273 as [#1, #200, #9, #5, #50, #8] = asthenes (G0772 ): 1)
*WEAK*; *INCAPACITY*}
#273 as [#6, #10, #50, #7, #200] / #279 as [#6, #10, #50, #7, #200, #6]
= nazar (H5144): {UMBRA: #4 as #257 % #41 = #11} 1) to dedicate,
consecrate, separate; 2) (Hiphil) to be a Nazarite, live as a Nazarite;
1a) (Niphal) to dedicate oneself, devote oneself; 1b) (Hiphil) to keep
sacredly separate; 2) *SOVEREIGN*; *ONE* *CHOSEN* *OR* *SET* *APART*;
*SEPARATED*; *CROWNED*; SANCTIFIED;
THEREFORE THE INTERDICTION: “GOD SAVE THE QUEEN FROM YOU FASCISTS” given
the impunity against the DIGNITY ROYAL as an OAK TREE PLANTING upon 27
OCTOBER 1934 BY HIS ROYAL HIGHNESS PRINCE HENRY DUKE OF GLOUCESTER
expressed as *CARPE* *DIEM* upon the SATURDAY of 28 OCTOBER 2017 at a
distance of some 40 to 60 metres within the street to passing persons
whom paused and laughed with absolute conviction as derision by means of
#325 {#5x#5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} - DETRUDE MORE PROPERLY DEFINED AS A
CONTEMPT BY MALFEASANCE AS UNLAWFUL CONDUCT BY A PUBLIC AUTHORITY.
G3622@{
@1: Sup: 70 (#70); Ego: 70 (#70),
@2: Sup: 80 (#150); Ego: 10 (#80),
@3: Sup: 19 (#169); Ego: 20 (#100),
@4: Sup: 8 (#177); Ego: 70 (#170),
@5: Sup: 58 (#235 - ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE TALK IDEA @235 ON 7 JUNE
1942 AS SHOOTING ONE HUNDRED AND THIRTY OF THESE SELF-STYLED BIBLE
STUDENTS (BIBELFORSCHER}); Ego: 50 (#220),
@6: Sup: 47 (#282); Ego: 70 (#290),
@7: Sup: 6 (#288 - UMBRA / 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 (HETEROS) / BEERSHEBA
/ ANTI-SEMITISM); Ego: 40 (#330), <-- *MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* /
*ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPES* #EIGHT: #120 / #360
@8: Sup: 16 (#304); Ego: 10 (#340),
@9: Sup: 17 (#321 as *PRO* *DOMO* (G156): BEING (LOGICAL) REASON
(MOTIVE, MATTER), (LEGAL) CRIME (ALLEGED OR PROVED)); Ego: 1 (#341 -
*TO* *PUT* *A* *NAME* *UPON*, *NAME* AS #444 - *SPORT* / *31ST*
*DECEMBER* *AS* *END**OF* *TROPICAL* *YEAR*),
@10: Sup: 67 (#388); Ego: 50 (#391),
Male: #388; Feme: #391
} // #391
REGARDING PRINCIPLE OF #312 - *CONTRADICTION* {#364 x 4 + #371 = #1827 -
ROMAN CATHOLIC LITURGICAL BLASPHEMY}
V'S
PRINCIPLE OF #391 - HOMOGENEOUS STEWARDSHIP {#2184 - (#390 + #312 +
#390) = #1092 as ‘OTH CYCLE of 3 x #364 / 4 = #273 - *MOMENT*}
#371 as [#30, #40, #100, #200, #1] = miqra' (H4744): {UMBRA: #4 as #341
% #41 = #13 *AS* *DATA* *MANIPULATION* *BEING* *EVIDENCE* *OF* *AN*
*INTENTION* *TO* *HIJACK* *WORLD* *WAR* *ONE* *CENTENNIAL* #288 -
*MEMORIAL* COMMEMORATIONS AS SAINT ANDREWS 30 NOVEMBER CAUSE CÉLÈBRE BY
INCESSANT LIEUTENANTS OF ROMAN CATHOLIC / FREEMASONRY KNIGHTS TEMPLAR
INTERNATIONAL BEING A NEO-FASCIST FOREIGN POWER BY IMPOST OF AN
ABHORRENT RELIGIOUS PRACTICE THAT IS PROHIBITED UNDER SECTION 116 OF THE
AUSTRALIAN CONSTITUTION} 1) convocation, convoking, reading, a calling
together; 1a) convocation, *SACRED* *ASSEMBLY*; 1b) convoking; 1c) reading;
#371 as [#6, #70, #90, #200, #5] = `atsarah (H6116): {UMBRA: #5 as #365
% #41 = #37 *AS* *DATA* MANIPULATION TO THE SOLAR YEAR CYCLE ENDING 31
DECEMBER: #341 / #444} 1) assembly, solemn assembly; 1a) *ASSEMBLY*
(*SACRED* *OR* *FESTIVE* *MEETING*); 1b) *ASSEMBLAGE*, #123 - *COMPANY*,
#369 - *GROUP*.
#391 as [#70, #10, #20, #70, #50, #70, #40, #10, #1, #50] = oikonomia
(G3622): {UMBRA: #11 as #341 % #41 = #13 AS DATA MANIPULATION TO *31ST*
*DECEMBER* *AS* *END**OF* *TROPICAL* *YEAR*} 1) *THE* *MANAGEMENT* *OF*
*A* *HOUSEHOLD* *OR* *OF* *HOUSEHOLD* *AFFAIRS*; 1a) specifically, the
management, oversight, administration, of other's property; 1b) the
office of a manager or overseer, stewardship; 1c) administration,
dispensation;
#391 as [#70, #40, #70, #10, #1, #200] = homoios (G3664): {UMBRA: #12 as
#460 % #41 = #9} 1) like, similar, resembling; 1a) like: ie. resembling;
1b) like: ie. corresponding to a thing;
#541 as [#70, #10, #20, #70, #50, #70, #40, #10, #1, #200] = oikonomia
(G3622): {UMBRA: #56 as #541 % #41 = #8} 1) *THE* *MANAGEMENT* *OF* *A*
*HOUSEHOLD* *OR* *OF* *HOUSEHOLD* *AFFAIRS*; 1a) specifically, the
management, oversight, administration, of other's property; 1b) the
office of a manager or overseer, stewardship; 1c) administration,
dispensation;
#541 as [#5, #70, #2, #4, #400, #50, #10] = `abad (H5647): {UMBRA: #42
as #541 % #41 = #8} 1) to work, serve; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to labour, work,
do work; 1a2) to work for another, serve another by labour; 1a3) to
serve as subjects; 1a4) to serve (God); 1a5) to serve (with Levitical
service); 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be worked, be tilled (of land); 1b2) to
make oneself a servant; 1c) (Pual) to be worked; 1d) (Hiphil); 1d1) to
compel to labour or work, cause to labour, cause to serve; 1d2) to cause
to serve as subjects; 1e) (Hophal) to be led or enticed to serve;
#541 as [#50, #1, #90, #400] = na'ats (H5006): {UMBRA: #31 as #541 % #41
= #8} 1) to spurn, contemn, despise, abhor; 1a) (Qal) to spurn, contemn;
1b) (Piel); 1b1) to spurn; 1b2) to cause to contemn; 1c) (Hiphil) to
spurn; 1d) (Hithpolel) to be contemned;
#541 as [#1, #80, #70, #20, #300, #5, #50, #5, #10] = apokteino (G615):
{UMBRA: #60 as #541 % #41 = #8} 1) to kill in any way whatever; 2)
metaph. to extinguish, abolish; 1a) to destroy, to allow to perish; 2a)
to inflict mortal death; 2b) to deprive of spiritual life and procure
eternal misery in hell;
It also provides understanding of the underlying methodology as the
precedent PRO DOMO IDEA (12 MAY 1942) @215 / @235 (7 JUNE 1942) assigned
to ADOLF HITLER’S (1941 - 1944) TABLE TALK depiction as the shooting of
one hundred and thirty bible students whom were indicted by the highest
military court of the Wehrmacht charged with demoralization of the armed
forces.
THE #41 - ONTIC_OBLIGANS NECESSITY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE IDEA @215 - I
AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER OF MISCHIEF {%34}
#325 (PYTHAGOREAN ESOTERIC VALUE FOR #65 - *SOLDIER* AND KNIGHTS TEMPLAR
INTERNATIONAL AS UNLAWFUL FOREIGN POWER) as [#5, #50, #70, #200] = heis
(G1520): {UMBRA: #12 as #215 % #41 = #10} 1) *ONE*
#235 as [#20, #7, #200, #8] = zarach (H2224): {UMBRA: #1 as #215 % #41 =
#10} 1) *TO* *RISE*, *COME* *FORTH*, *BREAK* *OUT*, *ARISE*, *RISE*
*UP*, *SHINE*; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to rise; 1a2) to come out, appear;
#175 {MARRIAGE} (@4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE: #369 - Autonomous
Nature [#205 - DO NOT STEAL]) ...
210: [30 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND]
215: [34 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER OF MISCHIEF]
220: [38 - I CURSE NOT A GOD]
228: [40 - I HAVE NO UNJUST PREFERENCES]
TOTAL: @210 + @215 + @220 + @228 = #873 - PRINCIPLE OF THE PERSISTENCE
OF SUBSTANCE as [#80, #5, #100, #10, #70, #600, #8] = perioche (G4042):
{UMBRA: #873 % #41 = #12} 1) an encompassing, compass, circuit; 2) that
which is contained; 2a) the contents of any writing SUCH AS QUEEN
VICTORIAS LETTERS PATENT OF 29 OCTOBER 1900 AS DICTUM OF #2184 - FREEDOM
from #1827 - OPPRESSION is:
#902 - RULE OF LAW (EGALITÉ {9 JULY 1900}: #22 x #41 as *ONTIC*
necessity comprising a subset of 21 consonants with #VOWELS of Semitic
origins),
#492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900}: #12 X #41), and
#391 - HOMOGENIOUS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ {29 OCTOBER 1900}) OF CIVIL
SOCIETY
That inhumanity as a lack of sapience is then an endless conflict
against nature itself."
The possibility of experience in general is thus at the same time the
universal law of nature, and the principles of the former are themselves
the laws of the latter. For we are not acquainted with nature except as
the sum total of appearances, i.e., of the representations in us, and so
we cannot get the laws of their connection from anywhere else except the
*PRINCIPLES* {ie. #390 + #312 + #390 = #1092 or #364 + #312 + #728 +
#390 + #390 = @2184} *OF* *THEIR* *CONNECTION* *IN* *US*, i.e., *FROM*
*THE* *CONDITIONS* *OF* *NECESSARY* *UNIFICATION* *IN* *ONE*
*CONSCIOUSNESS*, *WHICH* *UNIFICATION* *CONSTITUTES* *THE* *POSSIBILITY*
*OF* *EXPERIENCE*." [page 70]
SECTION VI: "And whereas by 'The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution
Act 1900,' {#902 - RULE OF LAW (EGALITÉ {9 JULY 1900}} it is amongst
other things enacted, that we may authorise the GOVERNOR GENERAL to
APPOINT any person or persons, jointly or severally, to be his DEPUTY OR
DEPUTIES: {#2184 - LAWS OF NATURE AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL COSMOLOGICAL
PRINCIPLE / 14 = #156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}} within any part of
Our Commonwealth, and in that capacity to exercise, during the pleasure
of the GOVERNOR GENERAL such POWERS, and FUNCTIONS of the said GOVERNOR
GENERAL as he thinks fit to assign to such DEPUTY OR DEPUTIES, subject
to any #168 - *LIMITATIONS* and directions as aforesaid, to APPOINT any
person or persons, jointly or severally. To be his DEPUTY OR DEPUTIES
within any part of Our said Commonwealth of Australia, and in that
capacity to exercise, during his pleasure, such of his POWERS and
FUNCTIONS, as he may deem it necessary or expedient to assign to him or
them: Provided always, that the APPOINTMENT of such a DEPUTY OR DEPUTIES
shall not affect the exercise by the GOVERNOR GENERAL himself of any
POWER or FUNCTION."
SECTION VII: "And We do hereby declare Our pleasure to be that, in the
event of death, #273 - INCAPACITY, removal, or absence of Our said
GOVERNOR GENERAL out of Our said Commonwealth, and all and EVERY THE
POWERS AND AUTHORITIES herein granted to him shall until Our further
pleasure is signified therein, be vested in such person as may be
APPOINTED by Us under Our Sign Manual and Signet to be Our LIEUTENANT
GOVERNOR of Our said Commonwealth: or if there shall be no such
LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR in Our said Commonwealth, then in such person or
persons as may be APPOINTED by Us under Our Sign Manual and Signet to
administer the Government of the same. No SUCH POWERS OR AUTHORITIES
SHALL VEST in such LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR, or such other person or persons,
UNTIL HE OR THEY SHALL HAVE TAKEN THE #108 - *OATHS* *APPOINTED* {
"They clave to their brethren, their nobles, and entered into a curse,
and into an oath, to walk in God's law, which was given by Moses the
servant of God, and to observe and do all the commandments of the LORD
our Lord, and his judgments and his statutes {#108 as [#8, #100] = choq
(H2706): statute};" [Nehemiah 10:29 (KJV)]
} to be taken by the GOVERNOR GENERAL of Our said Commonwealth, and in
the manner provided by the Instructions accompanying these Our Letters
Patent."
ASSOCIATED TO THE DIGNITY ROYAL AS SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM VIRILE #390 -
SOVEREIGN ENTITLEMENT {#2184 - LAWS OF NATURE AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL
COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE / 21 = #104 - COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}}:
H5157@{
@1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
@2: Sup: 60 (#70); Ego: 50 (#60),
@3: Sup: 68 (#138); Ego: 8 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE
GOD OF MY DOMAIN {%42}),
@4: Sup: 17 (#155); Ego: 30 (#98),
@5: Sup: 23 (#178); Ego: 6 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
Male: #178; Feme: #104
} // #104
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #104 % #41 = #22 - Point to Reversal?, Humility's Increase;
I-Ching: H8 - Closeness, Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together,
Alliance; Tetra: 34 - Kinship;
THOTH MEASURE: #22 - Oh Chemiu, who makest thine appearance in Kauu; I
am not a transgressor.
#VIRTUE: What Resistance (no. #22) approves is right while
#TOOLS: What Doubt (no. #62) abhors is wrong.
#POSITION: With Advance (no. #20), the desire to proceed.
#TIME: With Stoppage (no. #71), the desire for constraints.
#CANON: #175
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_175@{
@1: Sup: 22 (#22); Ego: 22 (#22),
@2: Sup: 3 (#25); Ego: 62 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
@3: Sup: 23 (#48); Ego: 20 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
@4: Sup: 13 (#61); Ego: 71 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
Male: #61; Feme: #175
} // #175
#104 as [#10, #50, #8, #30, #6] = nachal (H5157): {UMBRA: #16 as #104 %
#41 = #22} 1) to get as a possession, acquire, inherit, possess; 1a)
(Qal); 1a1) to take possession, inherit; 1a2) to have or get as a
possession or property (fig.); 1a3) to divide the land for a possession;
1a4) to acquire (testimonies) (fig.); 1b) (Piel) to divide for a
possession; 1c) (Hithpael) to possess oneself of; 1d) (Hiphil); 1d1) to
give as a possession; 1d2) to cause to inherit, give as an inheritance;
1e) (Hophal) to be allotted, be made to possess;
SECTION IX: “And We do hereby reserve to Ourselves Our #104 - HEIRS AND
SUCCESSORS, FULL POWER AND AUTHORITY FROM TIME TO TIME TO REVOKE, ALTER,
OR AMEND these Our Letters Patent, as to Us or THEM SHALL SEEM MEET.”
If they are considered as fundamental laws of the empirical use of the
understanding, at the same time carry with them an expression of
necessity, hence at least the presumption of being determined from
grounds that are valid a priori and before all experience. But all #2184
- *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*, without distinction, fall under higher
principles of the understanding, since they merely apply such principles
to particular cases of appearance.
... The table of categories provides us with completely natural
instructions [IDEA: @A161 / @B200] for the table of principles, since
these principles are indeed nothing other than rules for the objective
use of the categories." [pages 180 - 181]
IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783 AS APRIORITY TO FRENCH REVOLUTION)
IDEA: @B252 SECOND ANALOGY: PRINCIPLE OF TIME-SUCCESSION ACCORDING TO
THE LAW OF CAUSALITY
ALL ALTERATIONS TAKE PLACE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW OF THE CONNECTION
OF CAUSE AND EFFECT.
PROOF: I perceive that appearances succeed one another, that is, that
[IDEA: @B233] one state of a thing exists at one time, the opposite of
which existed in the previous state. I am therefore actually connecting
two perceptions in time. Now connection is no act of mere sense and
intuition, but is here the product of a synthetic faculty of the
imagination that determines the inner sense with respect to relation in
time. The imagination can however conjoin the aforementioned two states
in two different ways, so that either one or the other would precede in
time; for time cannot be perceived in itself and what precedes and what
follows in objects determined, as it were empirically, in relation to
it. I am therefore conscious only that my imagination places one state
before, the other after, not that in the object [IDEA: @B234] one
precedes the other; or, in other words, the objective relation of the
appearances that succeed one another remains undetermined through mere
perception. In order then for this relation to be cognized as
determined, the relation between the two states must be so thought that
it is thereby determined with necessity which of them must be placed
before, which after, and not the reverse. However, the concept that
carries with it a necessity of synthetic unity can only be a pure
concept of the understanding, which does not lie in perception – and
here it is the concept of the relation of cause and effect, in which the
former determines the latter in time as consequence, and not merely as
something that could precede it in the imagination (or not be perceived
at all). It is, then, only because we subject the succession of
appearances, hence all alterations, to the law of causality that
experience itself – i.e., empirical cognition of the appearances – is
possible; hence the appearances themselves as objects of experience are
possible only in accordance with this very law.
The apprehension of the manifold of appearances is always successive.
[IDEA: @A189] The representations of the parts succeed one another.
Whether they also succeed one another in the object is a further point
for reflection, which is not included in the first point. Now one can in
fact call everything, and even every representation insofar as one is
conscious of it, an object; but it is a matter for deeper investigation
what this word is to signify regarding [IDEA: @B235] appearances, not
insofar as they (as representations) [A: @190] are objects, but only in
so far as they designate an object. In as much as they, merely as
representations, are at the same time objects of consciousness, they are
not at all to be distinguished from apprehension, i.e., reception into
the synthesis of the imagination, and one must then say: that the
manifold of appearances is always generated successively in the mind.
Were appearances things in themselves, then no human being would be able
to conclude from the succession of representations how the manifold of
those appearances might be conjoined in the object. For in the end we
have to do only with our own representations; how things in themselves
may be (without regard to representations through which they affect us)
is completely beyond our sphere of cognition. Now although the
appearances are not things in themselves, and nevertheless are the only
thing that can be given to us for cognition, I still have to show what
in the appearances themselves may suit the manifold for a conjoining in
time, notwithstanding that its representation in apprehension is always
successive. Thus, for example, the apprehension of the manifold in the
appearances of a house that stands before me is successive. Now the
question is: whether the manifold of this house itself also is
successive in itself, which of course no one will grant. However, as
soon as I raise my concept of an object up to transcendental
significance, the house is now indeed no thing in itself, but [IDEA:
@B236] only an appearance, i.e., a representation, whose transcendental
object is [IDEA: @A191] unknown; what, then, shall I understand by the
question: how might the manifold be conjoined in the appearance itself
(which is still nothing in itself )? That which lies in the successive
apprehension is here viewed as representation, while the appearance that
is given to me, notwithstanding that it is nothing more than a sum of
such representations, is viewed as their object – with which my concept,
which I extract from the representations of apprehension, has to agree.
Since truth is the agreement of cognition with object, it can easily be
seen that here one can ask only about the formal conditions of empirical
truth, and that appearance, in counter-relation with the representations
of apprehension, can only be represented as their object that is
distinct from them if it falls under a rule that distinguishes it from
every other apprehension and makes one way of conjoining the manifold
necessary. That in the appearance which contains the condition of this
necessary rule of apprehension is the object.
Let us now proceed to our problem. That something happens – i.e., that
something, or some state, comes to be that wasn’t there before – [IDEA:
@B237] cannot be perceived empirically unless preceded by an appearance
that [IDEA: @A192] does not contain this state in itself; for a reality
following upon an empty time, hence, a coming to be that no state of
things precedes, can be apprehended just as little as empty time itself.
Every apprehension of an event is therefore a perception that follows
upon another perception. Since this is, though, the case with every
synthesis of apprehension, as I have shown above in the appearance of a
house, it does not in this way yet distinguish itself from the others.
But I also note: that if, in an appearance containing a happening, I
call the preceding state of perception A and the succeeding one B, then
B can only follow A in the apprehension, while the perception a cannot
follow but only precede B. I see for example a ship drifting downstream.
My perception of its location further down succeeds the perception of
its location further up the course of the river, and it is impossible
that in the apprehension of this appearance the ship should first be
perceived further downstream but afterwards further upstream. Here,
then, the order in the succession of perceptions in the apprehension is
determined, and the apprehension is bound by that order. In the previous
example of a house, in the apprehension my perceptions could start at
[IDEA: @B238] the top of the house and end with the ground, or else
start from below and end above, just as they could apprehend the
manifold of empirical intuition from the right or the left. In the
series of these perceptions there [IDEA: @A193] was, then, no determined
order making it necessary when in the apprehension I had to begin in
order to conjoin the manifold empirically. This rule is, however, always
to be met with in the perception of something that happens, and it makes
the order of the perceptions succeeding one another (in the apprehension
of this appearance) necessary.
In our case, therefore, I will have to derive the subjective sequence of
the apprehension from the objective sequence of the appearances, because
otherwise the former is completely undetermined and does not distinguish
any one appearance from the rest. By itself the former proves nothing
about the connection of the manifold in the object, because it is
completely arbitrary. This connection will therefore consist in the
order of the manifold of the appearance according to which the
apprehension of the one (what happens) follows upon that of the other
(which precedes) according to a rule. Only in this way can I gain the
right to say of the appearance itself, and not merely of my
apprehension: that in it a sequence is to be found – which is as much as
to say that I cannot institute the apprehension otherwise than exactly
in this sequence. [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's
Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, SECOND ANALOGY of ANALYTIC OF
PRINCIPLES, pp 184-187]
YOUR COUNTRY NEEDS YOU TO PLAY YOUR PART AND DON'T LET neo-nazism,
terrorism and religious bigotry BECOME AN UNSTOPPABLE PLAQUE
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/uncle-sam-wants-you.png>
WHAT HAVE YOU FORGOTTEN?
YOUTUBE: “In the Navy (Village People)”
http://youtu.be/InBXu-iY7cw
GOVERNMENT SHILL #2 (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0924 HOURS ON 6 JANUARY
2019: "You will write a couple of hundred lines of gobbledygook, as usual."
DOLF @ 1117 HOURS ON 6 JANUARY 2019: "NO I'M ACTUALLY GIVING A VALID
EXPLANATION WHICH CONVEYS PRINCIPLES OF Existential phenomenology that
exceeds Martin Heidegger's brand of phenomenology:
Wanting to determine the reality of the notion: 'this is a test' as a
criteria of existentiality, this would then require a resolution of the
criteria of enquiry being the hierarchy pairing as: #61 / #122 against
the default neurological and personalistic disposition:
THUS I CONVEY THE EPISTEMOLOGICAL PREMISE as an INTUITION of the
ONTOLOGICAL EXPERIENCE in being DEPENDENT upon ONTIC necessity expressed by:
#205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE* *PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE*
#164 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY*
And its CRITERIA of either #277 - RIGHT TO PLACE A TEST / #237 -
IMMUTABLE WILL is itself an outcome of a DIALECTIC SYNCRETIC
META-PHYSICAL PROCESS:
#364 - PRINCIPLE OF ENQUIRY
#312 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTRADICTION
#273 - PRINCIPLE OF SYNCRETISM
Which although outside time or preceding instantiation within TIME as an
IDEA:
[I, {@1: Sup: 9 (#9); Ego: 9 (#9)},
D, {@2: Sup: 13 (#22); Ego: 4 (#13)},
E, {@3: Sup: 18 (#40); Ego: 5 (#18)},
A] {@4: Sup: 19 (#59); Ego: 1 (#19)},
Nevertheless conforms {#9 + #22 + #40 + #59 = #130 - I AM NOT EVIL
MINDED {%3}} to the ANTHROPOCENTRIC characteristic of TIME.
H3117@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 40 (#70); Ego: 10 (#40),
@3: Sup: 80 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}); Ego: 40 (#80),
@4: Sup: 9 (#159); Ego: 10 (#90),
@5: Sup: 42 (#201); Ego: 33 (#123),
Male: #201; Feme: #123
} // #130
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #130 % #41 = #7 - Intentional Reversal, Dimming Radiance;
I-Ching: H12 - Obstruction, Stagnation, Selfish persons; Tetra: 56 -
Closed Mouth;
THOTH MEASURE: #7 - Oh thou whose eyes pierce like swords, who makest
thine appearance in Sechem; I commit no fraud.
#VIRTUE: With Ascent (no. #7), coming up against plainness?
#TOOLS: With Pattern (no. #47), increasing artifice.
#POSITION: With Youthfulness (no. #12), having no knowledge, but
#TIME: With Fullness (no. #38), having a surplus.
#CANON: #104
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_104@{
@1: Sup: 7 (#7); Ego: 7 (#7),
@2: Sup: 54 (#61); Ego: 47 (#54),
@3: Sup: 66 (#127); Ego: 12 (#66),
@4: Sup: 23 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}); Ego: 38 (#104 - I
COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
Male: #150; Feme: #104
} // #104
#130 as [#30, #10, #40, #10, #600] = yowm (H3117): {UMBRA: #2 as #130 %
#41 = #7} 1) day, time, year; 1a) day (as opposed to night); 1b) day (24
hour period); 1b1) as defined by evening and morning in Genesis 1; 1b2)
as a division of time; 1b2a) a working day, a day's journey; 1c) days,
lifetime (pl.); 1d) time, period (general); 1e) year; 1f) temporal
references; 1f1) today; 1f2) yesterday; 1f3) tomorrow;
"And God called the light Day {#130 as [#30, #10, #40, #10, #600] = yowm
(H3117): day}, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the
morning were the first day {#130 as [#30, #10, #40, #10, #600] = yowm
(H3117): day}." [Genesis 1:5 (KJV)]
"And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning
were the second day {#130 as [#30, #10, #40, #10, #600] = yowm (H3117):
day}." [Genesis 1:8 (KJV)]
"And the evening and the morning were the third day {#130 as [#30, #10,
#40, #10, #600] = yowm (H3117): day}." [Genesis 1:13 (KJV)]
"And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to
divide the day {#130 as [#30, #10, #40, #10, #600] = yowm (H3117): day}
from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days
{#130 as [#30, #10, #40, #10, #600] = yowm (H3117): day}, and years:"
[Genesis 1:14 (KJV)]
"And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day {#130
as [#30, #10, #40, #10, #600] = yowm (H3117): day}, and the lesser light
to rule the night: he made the stars also." [Genesis 1:16 (KJV)]
"And to rule over the day {#130 as [#30, #10, #40, #10, #600] = yowm
(H3117): day} and over the night, and to divide the light from the
darkness: and God saw that it was good." [Genesis 1:18 (KJV)]
"And the evening and the morning were the fourth day {#130 as [#30, #10,
#40, #10, #600] = yowm (H3117): day}." [Genesis 1:19 (KJV)]
"And the evening and the morning were the fifth day {#130 as [#30, #10,
#40, #10, #600] = yowm (H3117): day}." [Genesis 1:23 (KJV)]
In contrast with his former mentor Edmund Husserl, Heidegger (in his
Being and Time) put ontology before epistemology and thought that
phenomenology would have to be based on an observation and analysis of
Dasein ("being-there"), human being, investigating the fundamental
ontology of the Lebenswelt (lifeworld, Husserl's term) underlying all
so-called regional ontologies of the special sciences. In Heidegger's
philosophy, people are thrown into the world in a given situation, but
they are also a project towards the future, possibility, freedom, wait,
hope, anguish. In contrast with the philosopher Kierkegaard, Heidegger
wanted to explore the problem of Dasein existentially (existenzial),
rather than existentielly (existenziell) because Heidegger argued
Kierkegaard had already described the latter with "penetrating fashion".
[<https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Existential_phenomenology>]
GOVERNMENT SHILL #2 (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1349 HOURS ON 6 JANUARY
2019: "And... you wrote gobbledygook instead."
DOLF @ 1413 HOURS ON 6 JANUARY 2019: "You are such an imbecile that you
cannot even recognise technical brilliance in explaining why the
biblical narrative of Genesis (1550 BCE) similarly utilises temporal
designations before time itself existed."
GOVERNMENT SHILL #2 (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1537 HOURS ON 6 JANUARY
2019: "I recognise that there is no evidence that the bible is, in any
useful way, true."
DOLF @ 1615 HOURS ON 6 JANUARY 2019: "There is no #492 - REASONING {ie.
RATIONAL PI - 22 HEBREW LETTERS / 7 DAYS} with you is there as your #41
- INNATE prejudice and lack of education is just #451 - ABYSMAL
51 25 74
73 50 27
26 75 49 (NATURAL PROGRESSION {#1 / #73 SUBSTITUTION}) / #450 {#PSEUDO
NINE (*YESOD*: *PROCREATIONAL* *FOUNDATION*) *OF* *JEWISH* *TORAH*
*KABBALAH* *VASSAL* *GOVERNANCE*: #YOD (#10) + #MEM (#40) + #TAU (#400)
[+ #ALEPH (#1) = #451]}
49 9 65 - *SOLDIER*
57 41 25
17 73 33 = #123 / #369 {#PSEUDO NINE *OF* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* *OF* *ROMAN*
*EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*} AS IT'S NATURAL PROGRESSION {#1 / #73 SUBSTITUTION}
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Circle.jpeg>
[IMAGE: The MOBIUS ‘8’ LOOP OF PYTHAGOREAN SOPHISTRY AS WISDOM SO CALLED
is not homoiotic as anthropocentric but rather “homeomorphic to a circle”]
#YOD (#10) {10 SEPTEMBER 2001 - THE HONOURABLE JOHN HOWARD (THEN
AUSTRALIAN PRIME MINISTER) IN NEW YORK}
#MEM (#40) {#41 - #CENTRE: #6000 %22 = 13 - DELIMITED: 13 SEPTEMBER 2001}
#TAU (#400) {CIRCUMSCRIBING : 22 SEPTEMBER 2001}
#ALEPH (#1) {23 CHROMOSOMES: 23 SEPTEMBER 2001} = #451
#451 - *ABYSS* / *PRE-TEMPORAL* *VOID* + #41 x n - ONTIC FACULTY = #492
- VOLUNTARY FREE WILL {ie. 12 x #41 as CIRCULARITY of BEING} and through
inclusion of #41 x n - ONTIC FACULTY as a cognitive conceptualisation
then allows for stages of development.
THERE CAN BE NO DOUBT ABOUT THE FACT THAT THE GENESIS {ie. DAO-ziran /
COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis: #1, #21, #41, #61, #81 / BIRTHDAY
CELEBRATION-genesia} BIBLICAL TEXT RELATES TO AN #451 - COSMOGONIC
PREMISE FOR NATURE AND #41 - ONTIC NECESSITY BASIS OF HOMOGENEOUS #492 -
VOLUNTARY FREE WILL, TRINOMIAL MORALITY AND JURISPRUDENCE:
#8 - Transforming Nature: {DOUBLE: #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature {#7
- Engendering Nature}}
#11 x #41 = #451 - COSMOGONY {#KAF {#20} / #M {#40}} as TERRA-FORMING is
the conveyance of discovery as natural secrets which influences the
spread of Light and industry by Government and Non-Government
Organisations as conducive for sustainable #9 - Autonomous Nature
That what MOSES is here cognitive of is clearly a relativity between the
‘OTH CYCLE and #41 - ONTIC necessity which expresses an equivalence by:
#2184 % #41 = #11
Colin Jones a lecturer in Aboriginal History, talking about 'What do
circles represent in Aboriginal art?" his culture, his history and his
art within a similar manner.
YOUTUBE: "What do circles represent in Aboriginal art?"
http://youtu.be/qyUxxgwHK8Q
ANTHROPOCENTRIC (adjective):
- regarding the human being as the central fact of the universe.
- assuming human beings to be the final aim and end of the universe.
- viewing and interpreting everything in terms of human experience and
values.
In modern Israeli orthography, vowel and consonant pointing is seldom
used, except in specialised texts such as dictionaries, poetry, or texts
for children or for new immigrants. *LIKE* *ENGLISH* Israeli Hebrew has
five vowel phonemes—/i/, /e/, /a/, /o/ and /u/—but many more written
symbols for them.
What are you doing for AUSTRALIA DAY?"
- dolf
Initial Post: 4 January 2019
Post by unknown"Do not forget prayer-it is the life of the soul."
St. Nikon of Optina, Living Without Hypocrisy: Spiritual Counsels of the
Holy Elders of Optina.
"But the wisdom that is from above is first pure, then peaceable, gentle,
willing to yield, full of mercy and good fruits, without partiality and
without hypocrisy." James 3:17
Draw nigh unto God and He will draw nigh unto you.
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"
http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ
SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*
Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit
<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>
SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]
Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.
It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.
<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>
The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."
That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)
After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
