— AMERICANS HAVE BEEN PERMANENTLY DENIED ACCESS TO SAPIENT PARADIGM DUE TO
FURTHER INFRACTIONS AGAINST OUR ENTITLEMENT TO #492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL
LACK OF GRATITUDE FROM AMERICANS AND BEING BOMBARDED WITH HETERODOX
RELIGIOUS SLOGANS WHICH IS INCOMPATIBLE WITH CONSTITUTION AND BELIEF
TO: host-***@andrew.cmu.edu (NO ACTION EXCEPT TO BLOCK REASONABLE
COMPLIANT)
YOUR BAN NOTICE IS ACCESSIBLE HERE:
<http://www.grapple369.com/SAPIENT%20INNOVATION%20BANS/AMERICAN%20CMU%20EDU%20HETRODOX%20BAN%20SABBATH%2020190209.pdf>
NO AMERICAN COMPANY WHETHER APPLE OR ANY OTHER IS TO UTILIZE these SAPIENT
OBJECTS <http://www.grapple369.com/objects/>
THIS ADVENTIST FORUM
alt.religion.christian.adventist
ADHERES TO NATURE’S #2184 - EVERLASTING COVENANT AND NOT THIS #1827 -
HETERODOX BLASPHEMY {#371, #390, #288, #312, #419} OF THE SECOND VATICAN
COUNCIL ECUMENICALISM AND OUR FREQUENT REQUESTS FOR THERE TO BE SHOWN #873
- PROBITY BY *CEASING* *THIS* *ENGAGEMENT* *WITHIN* *WICKED* *CONDUCT* *BY*
*SUCH* *POSTING* *TO* *THIS* *FORUM*
WE NOW HAVE BROUGHT ON SUCCESSIVE OCCASIONS (TO NO AVAIL AS THAT IS THE
NATURE OF THEIR WAR MONGERING CONTEMPT) TO *Carnegie* *Mellon* *University*
ATTENTION BOTH THE LACK OF GRATITUDE FROM AMERICANS OVER OUR IMMEDIATE
APRIORITY ASSISTANCE RENDERED WITH RESPECTS TO 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 AS THE
BASIS FOR A GENUINE RELIGIOUS BELIEF.
AND GIVEN THE QUIETUDE OF THE ADVENTIST FORUM IS CONTINUING BEING BOMBARDED
WITH HETERODOX RELIGIOUS SLOGANS ORIGINATING FROM YOUR GEOGRAPHIC REGION
WHICH IS INCOMPATIBLE WITH OUR CONSTITUTION AND BELIEF, WE WISH TO MAKE IT
PATENTLY CLEAR THAT WE DESIRE NOTHING FURTHER TO DO WITH YOURSELVES.
— WE #273 - REMEMBER YOUR FORGET —
“LEST WE FORGET.
TO FIRST #288 - REMEMBER.
THIS NATION’S TUNE.
AS SOVEREIGN BEGET.
ISN’T NAZI DISTEMPER.
BUT BY PRIVY TRIBUNE.
NO #364 - OBEY, #312 - AID, #273 - ASSIST REGRET.”
HISTORICAL CHRISTIAN WEDDING VOW: "I, *NAME* *OF* *BRIDE*, #312 - *TAKE*
*THEE* {ie. A WILLING, WILL}, *NAME* *OF* *GROOM* to be my #2184 -
*LAWFULLY* {ie. LAWS OF NATURE} wedding husband. To have and to hold #273 -
*FROM* *THIS* *DAY* *FORWARD* {ie. SUCCESSIVELY IN ORDER}, for richer or
poorer, in sickness and in health, to love and #364 - *OBEY* until death do
we part, today I pledge my faithfulness."
SECTION VIII: "REQUIRE AND COMMAND ALL OUR OFFICERS AND MINISTERS, CIVIL
AND MILITARY, AND ALL OTHER THE INHABITANTS OF OUR SAID COMMONWEALTH TO BE
#364 - OBEDIENT {#273 - REMEMBRANCE}, #312 - AIDING {#273 - SEPULCHRE}, AND
#273 - ASSISTING {#273 - WEAK} UNTO OUR SAID GOVERNOR GENERAL {
#2184 - LAWS OF NATURE AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE / 12 =
#182 AS DATE(1996,3,20) + 5 x #364 + #182 = SUNSET 11 SEPTEMBER 2001
<-- *IN* *CASE* *CARNEGIE* *MELLON* *UNIVERSITY* *MISSED* *THE* *REALITY*
}, OR, IN THE EVENT OF HIS DEATH, #273 - INCAPACITY, OR ABSENCE, TO SUCH
PERSON OR PERSONS AS MAY, FROM TIME TO TIME, UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THESE
OUR LETTERS PATENT, ADMINISTER {#2184 - LAWS OF NATURE AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL
COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE / 13 = #168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY
{%26 - *YHWH*}} THE GOVERNMENT OF OUR SAID COMMONWEALTH."
#34 (@7 - Engendering Nature: #175 {*MARRIAGE*} - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS
NATURE [#82 - HONOUR YOUR PARENTS]) ...
84: [2 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE]
86: [10 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD]
102: [4 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS]
104: [7 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD]
115: [5 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN]
TOTAL: @84 + @86 + @102 = *ROYALTY*, *REIGN* (*OF* *TIME*), *KINGDOM* /
*DAY*, *TIME*, *YEAR* + @104 = *TO* *GET* *AS* *A* *POSSESSION*, *ACQUIRE*,
*INHERIT*, *POSSESS* / *TO* *POSSESS* *ONESELF* + @115 = *MOSES* *SEAT*
*OF* *HONOUR* (*ROYAL* *DIGNITY*, *AUTHORITY*, *POWER*) = #491 - PRINCIPLE
OF CONTINUITY
SECTION IX: “AND WE DO HEREBY RESERVE TO OURSELVES OUR @104 - HEIRS AND
SUCCESSORS, FULL @115 - POWER AND AUTHORITY FROM @102 - TIME TO @104 - TIME
TO REVOKE, ALTER, OR AMEND THESE OUR LETTERS PATENT, AS TO US OR THEM SHALL
SEEM MEET.”
That there is by determined means a lack of #873 - *PROBITY* shown BY ONTIC
#205 - ABERRATION {@210 / @215 / @220 / @228} TO PRINCIPLES OF PARTICULAR
SECTIONS VIII / IX QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900 AS
CONVEYING THE PERSISTENCE OF SUBSTANCE MADE AGAINST ELIZABETH {THE OATH,
FULLNESS OF GOD} REGINA II and thereby as an impunity of the @115 - DIGNITY
ROYAL and in the circumstance of TREASON the ONUS of accountability is
placed upon OTHERS having no entitlement for any use of that INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY in such a manner whatsoever.
#175 {*MARRIAGE*} (@4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE: #369 - Autonomous
Nature [#205 - DO NOT STEAL]) ...
210: [30 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND]
215: [34 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER OF MISCHIEF]
220: [38 - I CURSE NOT A GOD]
228: [40 - I HAVE NO UNJUST PREFERENCES]
TOTAL: @210 + @215 + @220 + @228 = #873 - PRINCIPLE OF THE PERSISTENCE OF
SUBSTANCE as [#80, #5, #100, #10, #70, #600, #8] = perioche (G4042):
{UMBRA: #873 % #41 = #12} 1) an encompassing, compass, circuit; 2) that
which is contained; 2a) the contents of any writing SUCH AS QUEEN VICTORIAS
LETTERS PATENT OF 29 OCTOBER 1900 AS DICTUM OF #2184 - FREEDOM from #1827 -
OPPRESSION is:
#902 - RULE OF LAW (EGALITÉ {9 JULY 1900}: #22 x #41 as *ONTIC* necessity
comprising a subset of 21 consonants with #VOWELS of Semitic origins),
#492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900}: #12 X #41), and
#391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ {29 OCTOBER 1900}) OF CIVIL
SOCIETY
@1 {#451 - INCEPTION} +
@2 {#41 - AN ETHICAL / MORAL PRESCRIPTION “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 -
*ONTIC* X n] NECESSITY WITH IT” WHICH IMPLIES A TRINOMIAL WORLDVIEW} EQUALS
@3 {#492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL {LIBERTÉ: 17 SEPTEMBER 1900 AS ADVICE OF
THE PRIVY COUNCIL} IN THE EXERCISE OF THE INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE
VOLUNTĀTIS: #205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE* *PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE* ☯️
/ ✡️ #164 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY*} +
@4 {#123 - JUDGEMENT SENSIBILITY} EQUALS
@10 {#615 - TO PRONOUNCE JUDGMENT AND TO SUBJECT TO PROCEDURES / #41 = #15}
THUS IF THE SUBJECT IS SACRED, AND THE SUBJECT IS SOVEREIGN ACCORDINGLY IT
REQUIRES A THRESHOLD OF #873 - *PROBITY* AND #644 - *DECORUM* AS #123 -
*JUDGMENT* *SENSIBILITY* THAT IS SUBSTANTIALLY GREATER THAN THEIR EXHIBITED
#101 - *INDOLENT* TERRESTRIAL MANNER.”
SEE ALSO: "PART ONE ON SPECIFICITIES OF NON-FACTUALITY BEING THEN GROUNDS
FOR COUNTY COURT APPEAL AS CASE NUMBER: AP-18-0609 AGAINST A PUBLIC
AUTHORITY'S INFIDELITY TO WAR #288 - MEMORIAL COMMEMORATIONS DUE TO
ALIGNMENT WITH A FOREIGN POWER" comprising some #188 pages and dated 4
FEBRUARY 2019
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/SPECIFICITIES%20OF%20NON-FACTUALITY%20AP-18-0609%20%28Censored%29.pdf>
SEE ALSO: "PART TWO ON SPECIFICITIES OF NON-FACTUALITY BEING THEN GROUNDS
FOR COUNTY COURT APPEAL AS CASE NUMBER: AP-18-0609 AGAINST A PUBLIC
AUTHORITY'S INFIDELITY TO WAR #288 - MEMORIAL COMMEMORATIONS DUE TO
ALIGNMENT WITH A FOREIGN POWER" comprising some #58 pages and dated 5
FEBRUARY 2019
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/PART%202%20-%20SPECIFICITIES%20OF%20NON-FACTUALITY%20AP-18-0609.pdf>
- dolf
SUBJECT WAS: WHEN WE VIOLATED THE COMMANDMENTS OF HIM WHO IN BAPTISM
Post by unknown"When we violated the commandments of Him who in baptism regenerates us, we
separated ourselves from God and lost our conscious awareness of Him and
our union with Him. Sundered from that union and estranged from God, the
intellect is led captive everywhere; and it cannot regain its stability
unless it submits to God and is stilled by Him, joyfully uniting with Him
through unceasing and diligent prayer."
St. Gregory the Theologian.
"Brethren, I count not myself to have apprehended: but this one thing I do,
forgetting those things which are behind, and reaching forth unto those
things which are before, I press toward the mark for the prize of the high
calling of God in Christ Jesus." Philippians 3:13-14
Draw nigh unto God and He will draw nigh unto you.
— RUSSIAN COURT SENTENCES DANISH JEHOVAH'S WITNESS TO JAIL FOR 'EXTREMISM':
THE QUESTION IS WHETHER THIS PRESENT LEGAL DILEMMA AS IMPASSE IS A STUBBORN
CRITERIA OF DETERMINISM OR A STAGE OF CULTURAL DEVELOPMENT?
(c) 2019 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 9 February 2019
Due to Jehovah’s Witnesses intolerance within Australia, I recently
conveyed (before World War One 2018 Centennial #273 - REMEMBRANCE) a
rescinding to the good grace and assistance I had rendered them with
respects to their depiction within Adolf Hitler’s Table Talk IDEAS: @215
and @235 (from memory).
Their haughty self bestowal of entitlement and lack of appreciation (as if
they were the prerogative benefactors of the wise men from the East at an
infant’s birth) was an appalling #312 - CONTRADICTION of human dignity as
they sit like King Tutankhamen within our clock tower town square.
H7287@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 16 (#22); Ego: 10 (#16),
@3: Sup: 54 (#76); Ego: 38 (#54),
@4: Sup: 58 (#134); Ego: 4 (#58),
@5: Sup: 27 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 50 (#108),
@6: Sup: 32 (#193); Ego: 5 (#113),
Male: #193; Feme: #113
} // #275 < -- SEE IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA: @275 - *UNCONTESTED*
*SYNTHETIC* *COGNITION* *A* *PRIORI*
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #209 % #41 = #4 - Using Guidance, Sourceless; I-Ching: H27 -
Nourishment, Swallowing, Jaws, Comfort/Security; Tetra: 81 - Fostering;
THOTH MEASURE: #4 - Oh Eater of the Shadow, who makest thine appearance at
Elephantine; I am not rapacious.
#VIRTUE: With Barrier (no. #4), isolation} but
#TOOLS: With Stove (no. #44), neighbours.
#POSITION: As to Strength (no. #36), it is the solidly built.
#TIME: As to Waiting (no. #18), it is the weak.
#CANON: #102
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_102@{
@1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
@2: Sup: 48 (#52); Ego: 44 (#48),
@3: Sup: 3 (#55); Ego: 36 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
@4: Sup: 21 (#76); Ego: 18 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}),
Male: #76; Feme: #102
} // #102
#275 as [#6, #10, #200, #4, #50, #5] = radah (H7287): {UMBRA: #8 as #209 %
#41 = #4} 1) to rule, have dominion, dominate, tread down; 2) to scrape
out; 1a) (Qal) to have dominion, rule, subjugate; 1b) (Hiphil) to cause to
dominate; 2a) (Qal) to scrape, scrape out;
In doing so I specifically conveyed the references to the REDUCTIO AD
HITLERUM: "If you wish to wage war successfully or to lead a people
successfully through a difficult period of its history, you must have no
doubts whatever on one point—namely, any individual who in such times
tries, either actively or passively, to exclude himself from the activities
of the community, must be destroyed.
Anyone who for false reasons of mercy deviates from this clear principle is
aiding {H5826: `azar / help: #273}, willingly {H7521: ratsah / accept:
#273} or unwillingly {H7589: she'at / despiteful: #273; H4784: marah /
rebel: #273; H6696: tsuwr / besiege: #273}, the dissolution of the State."
[Adolf Hitler's Table Talk IDEA: @235, page #519]
<https://www.biblewheel.com/GR/GR_Database.php?SearchBy_Gematria=273>
IN EXPLAINING HITLER'S STATEMENT RELATIVE TO SECTION VIII OF QUEEN
VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT DATED 29 OCTOBER 1900 I HAVE ADDED WHAT IS
PERCEIVED TO BE THE COMMON #273 - CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING:
"AIDING {H5826: `azar / help: #273},
WILLINGLY {H7521: ratsah / accept: #273} or
UNWILLINGLY {H7589: she'at / despiteful: #273; H4784: marah / rebel: #273;
H6696: tsuwr / besiege: #273}, THE DISSOLUTION OF THE STATE."
— WE #273 - REMEMBER YOUR FORGET —
“LEST WE FORGET.
TO FIRST #288 - REMEMBER.
THIS NATION’S TUNE.
AS SOVEREIGN BEGET.
ISN’T NAZI DISTEMPER.
BUT BY PRIVY TRIBUNE.
NO #364 - OBEY, #312 - AID, #273 - ASSIST REGRET.”
HISTORICAL CHRISTIAN WEDDING VOW: "I, *NAME* *OF* *BRIDE*, #312 - *TAKE*
*THEE* {ie. A WILLING, WILL}, *NAME* *OF* *GROOM* to be my #2184 -
*LAWFULLY* {ie. LAWS OF NATURE} wedding husband. To have and to hold #273 -
*FROM* *THIS* *DAY* *FORWARD* {ie. SUCCESSIVELY IN ORDER}, for richer or
poorer, in sickness and in health, to love and #364 - *OBEY* until death do
we part, today I pledge my faithfulness."
SECTION VIII: "REQUIRE AND COMMAND ALL OUR OFFICERS AND MINISTERS, CIVIL
AND MILITARY, AND ALL OTHER THE INHABITANTS OF OUR SAID COMMONWEALTH TO BE
#364 - OBEDIENT {#273 - REMEMBRANCE}, #312 - AIDING {#273 - SEPULCHRE}, AND
#273 - ASSISTING {#273 - WEAK} UNTO OUR SAID GOVERNOR GENERAL {
#2184 - LAWS OF NATURE AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE / 12 =
#182 AS DATE(1996,3,20) + 5 x #364 + #182 = SUNSET 11 SEPTEMBER 2001
<-- *IN* *CASE* *YOU* *MISSED* *THE* *REALITY*
}, OR, IN THE EVENT OF HIS DEATH, #273 - INCAPACITY, OR ABSENCE, TO SUCH
PERSON OR PERSONS AS MAY, FROM TIME TO TIME, UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THESE
OUR LETTERS PATENT, ADMINISTER {#2184 - LAWS OF NATURE AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL
COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE / 13 = #168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY
{%26 - *YHWH*}} THE GOVERNMENT OF OUR SAID COMMONWEALTH."
SBS NEWS ON 7 FEBRUARY 2019: “Russia has banned the religion under
anti-extremism laws and a crackdown on believers has intensified, with
around 90 criminal trials now reportedly pending across Russia.”
<https://www.sbs.com.au/news/russian-court-sentences-danish-jehovah-s-witness-to-jail-for-extremism>
Those Bible students are a nasty piece of work as American espionage and so
it is little wonder that the Russians are troubled by their disloyalties to
the State as reasonable #364 - QUESTIONS of #430 - LAW.
EXCERPT FROM KANT'S PROLEGOMENA SECTION #4: IS METAPHYSICS POSSIBLE AT ALL?
AS IDEAS @275 - *UNCONTESTED* *SYNTHETIC* *COGNITION* *A* *PRIORI*: "For
long before we began to question nature methodically, we questioned just
our isolated reason, which already was practiced to a certain extent [IDEA:
@272] through common experience: for reason surely is present to us always,
but laws of nature must normally be sought out painstakingly; and so
metaphysics was floating at the top like foam, though in such a way that as
soon as what had been drawn off had dissolved, more showed itself on the
surface, which some *ALWAYS* *GATHERED* *UP* *EAGERLY*, *WHILE* *OTHERS*,
*INSTEAD* *OF* *SEEKING* *THE* *CAUSE* *OF* *THIS* *PHENOMENON* *IN* *THE*
*DEPTHS*, *THOUGHT* *THEMSELVES* *WISE* *IN* *MOCKING* *THE* *FRUITLESS*
*TOIL* *OF* *THE* *FORMER*.
WITH RESPECTS TO SUBSTANTIATING THE CLAIM OF IMPETUS OF *PRO* *DOMO* BY A
LOGICAL FALLACY OF DUPLICITOUS REDEFINITION BY #288 - UMBRA MANIPULATION
MADE TO CATEGORY OF UNDERSTANDING #311 AGAINST MY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND
THAT OF IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA PUBLISHED WITHIN 1783 WHICH DUE TO HIS
FORMER RELIGIOUS EDUCATION IS AS PREVIOUSLY SHOWN ALREADY COGNISANT OF THE
SPECTRUM AS HEBREW (22 / 7 as RATIONAL PI) and GREEK (24) IPSO FACTO: #2184
CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING THAT ARE EXHIBITED WITHIN ASSOCIATIONS MADE TO
TETRAGRAMMATON {ARCH KAI TELOS OIDA: #1 + #2 + #3 +#4 = #10} HIERARCHY
VALUE AS THE METAPHYSICAL CATEGORICAL APRIORITY IMPERATIVE TO THE HOMOIOS
THEORY OF *NUMBER*:
+ 0, 27 {IDEA: @311 *** SERIOUS BREACH OF THE SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY DYNAMIC
GIVEN THE INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN DYNAMIC OF 3 APRIL 33 AD}, 54
{IDEA: @348} {ie. REALM OF ITS NATURE AS HEAVEN - *FORMULA* *FOR*
*UNIVERSAL* *LAW*}
+ 0, 9 {IDEA: @282}, 18 {IDEA: @298} {ie. SYSTEM’S COSMOLOGY AS EARTH -
*FORMULA* *OF* *HUMANITY*}
+ 0, 3 {IDEA: @270}, 6 {IDEA: @280} {ie. SELF IDENTITY - *FORMULA* *OF*
*AUTONOMY* *AS* *SUI* *JURIS* / *MEMBRUM* *VIRILE*}
+ 1 {IDEA: @265, @266}, 2 {IDEA: @267, @268, @269, @272, @273 ***
*FORMULA* *FOR* *PRESERVING* *EUROPEAN* *AUTONOMY* ***, @274 - PERFUME AS
*RUSSIAN* *DIALECTS* *OF* #312 - *CONTRADICTIONS* *ON* *NOVICHOK*
*POISONING*}, 3 {IDEA: @265 - PREAMBLE} {ie. *FORMULA* *OF* *PROGRESSION*
OF INDIVIDUAL PHENOMENA: *CONJECTURAL* *ONLY*}
Kant’s implementation of SYMBOLICAL associator to the NOUMENON as having a
#41 - *ONTIC* necessity with CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING which
incontrovertibly conform to a COGNITION of a trinomial as HOMOIOS THEORY OF
NUMBER that has a definitive impetus from 1783 and thusly we can by such
APRIORITY CASCADE against subsequent HISTORY and is capable of BEREAVING
SOVEREIGN STATES of IDENTITY which as MARRIAGE / SOVEREIGN DYNAMIC has been
built on castles of SAND which deploys a microcosm binomial redefinition
(HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER: #17 - Politics; I-Ching: H54 - *MARRIAGEABLE*
*MAID*/*MAIDEN*, *CONVERTING* *THE* *MAIDEN*; Tetra: 65 - Inner) of those
APRIORITY trinomial CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING.
SOVEREIGN ONTIC NECESSITY (6.5.5.41.0)@{
@1: Sup: 41 (#41); Ego: 41 (#41),
@2: Sup: 1 (#42); Ego: 41 (#82),
@3: Sup: 42 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 41 (#123 -
JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY),
@4: Sup: 2 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 41 (#164 -
*PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY*),
@5: Sup: 43 (#129); Ego: 41 (#205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE*
*PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE*),
@6: Sup: 3 (#132); Ego: 41 (#246),
@7: Sup: 44 (#176 - KANT'S IDEA B176: *THE* *TRANSCENDENTAL* *DOCTRINE*
*OF* *THE POWER* *OF* *JUDGMENT* *OR* *ANALYTIC* *OF* *PRINCIPLES*); Ego:
41 (#287),
@8: Sup: 24 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8}); Ego: 61
(#348),
@9: Sup: 66 (#266 - *PRECEPT* / *STATUTE*); Ego: 42 (#390 -
*SOVEREIGNTY* / *CROWN*),
Male: #266; Feme: #390
}
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#266 - *PRECEPT* / *STATUTE* / #390 - *SOVEREIGNTY*
/ *CROWN*} / HETEROS {#238 / #376} / TORAH {#248 / #381}
<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:6,row:5,col:5,nous:41&idea:{m,132}&idea:{f,246}&idea:{m,266}&idea:{f,390}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
HUMAN BEING ONTIC NECESSITY (3.5.5.41.0)@{
@1: Sup: 41 (#41); Ego: 41 (#41),
@2: Sup: 1 (#42); Ego: 41 (#82),
@3: Sup: 42 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 41 (#123 -
JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY),
@4: Sup: 2 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 41 (#164 -
*PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY*),
@5: Sup: 43 (#129); Ego: 41 (#205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE*
*PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE*),
@6: Sup: 3 (#132); Ego: 41 (#246),
@7: Sup: 44 (#176); Ego: 41 (#287),
@8: Sup: 68 (#244); Ego: 24 (#311 *** SERIOUS BREACH OF THE SOVEREIGN /
AUTONOMY DYNAMIC GIVEN THE INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN DYNAMIC OF 3
APRIL 33 AD),
@9: Sup: 67 (#311 *** SERIOUS BREACH OF THE SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY
DYNAMIC GIVEN THE INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN DYNAMIC OF 3 APRIL 33
AD); Ego: 80 (#391),
Male: #311; Feme: #391
} // [LATIN definition: VOLUNTĀTIS (*YES*) / NOLUNTĀTIS (*NO*)]
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#311 / #391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ {29
OCTOBER 1900}) OF QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT TO THE FEDERATION OF THE
AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH 1901} / HETEROS {#283 / #377} / TORAH {#237 - *USE*
*OF* *FORCE* OR *IMMUTABLE* / *STUBBORN* *WILL* / #435}
<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:3,row:5,col:5,nous:41&idea:{m,84}&idea:{f,123}&idea:{m,311}&idea:{f,391}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
#311 as [#70, #10, #20, #10, #1, #200] = oikia (G3614): {UMBRA: #21 as #111
% #41 = #29} 1) a house; 1a) an inhabited edifice, a dwelling; 1b) the
inmates of a house, the family; 1c) property, wealth, goods;
#311 as [#80, #1, #10, #4, #5, #10, #1, #200] = paideia (G3809): {UMBRA:
#22 as #111 % #41 = #29} 1) the whole training and education of children
(which relates to the cultivation of mind and morals, and employs for this
purpose now commands and admonitions, now reproof and punishment) It also
includes the training and care of the body; 2) whatever in adults also
cultivates the soul, esp. by correcting mistakes and curbing passions.; 2a)
instruction which aims at increasing virtue; 2b) chastisement, chastening,
(of the evils with which God visits men for their amendment);
Weary therefore of dogmatism, which teaches us nothing, and also of [IDEA:
@274] skepticism, which promises us absolutely nothing at all, not even the
tranquility of a permitted ignorance; summoned by the importance of the
knowledge that we need, and made mistrustful, through long experience, with
respect to any knowledge that we believe we possess or that offers itself
to us under the title of pure reason, there remains left for us but one
critical question, the answer to which can regulate our future conduct: Is
metaphysics possible at all? But this question must not be answered by
skeptical objections to particular assertions of an actual metaphysics (for
at present we still allow none to be valid), but out of the still
problematic concept of such a science.
In the Critique of Pure Reason I worked on this question synthetically,
namely by inquiring within pure reason itself, and seeking to determine
within this source both the elements and the laws of its pure use,
according to principles. This work is difficult and requires a resolute
reader to think himself little by little into a system that takes no
foundation as given except reason itself, and that therefore tries to
develop cognition out of its original seeds without relying on any fact
whatever. Prolegomena should by contrast be preparatory exercises; they
ought more to indicate what needs to be done in order to bring a science
into existence if possible, than to present the science itself. They must
therefore rely on something [IDEA: @275] already known to be dependable,
from which we can go forward with confidence and ascend to the sources,
which are not yet known, and whose discovery not only will explain what is
known already, but will also exhibit an area with many cognitions that all
arise from these same sources. The methodological procedure of prolegomena,
and especially of those that are to prepare for a future metaphysics, will
therefore be analytic.
Fortunately, it happens that, even though we cannot assume that meta-
physics as science is actual, we can confidently say that some pure
synthetic cognition a priori is actual and given, namely, pure mathematics
and pure natural science; for both contain propositions that are fully
acknowledged, some as apodictically certain through bare reason, some from
universal agreement with experience (though these are still recognized as
independent of experience). We have therefore some at least *UNCONTESTED*
*SYNTHETIC* *COGNITION* *A* *PRIORI*, and we do not need to ask whether it
is possible (for it is actual), but only: how it is possible, in order to
be able to derive, from the principle of the possibility of the given
cognition, the possibility of all other synthetic cognition a priori."
[IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS (1783), IDEA @275]
Thus they cannot legitimately claim as legal defence that Russian #615 -
JURISPRUDENCE is in any manner equivalent to Nazi Germany’s atrocity of
such partial Bible students whom exhibit a disloyalty to the State’s #2184
- ANTHROPOCENTRIC CONCEPTION to #902 - RULE OF LAW which is then causal for
disheartening the #65 - TROOPS.
GNOSIS EX MACHINA {#2184}: @6 - PRINCIPLE OF ENQUIRY {#364 - SAINT ANDREWS
CAUSE CÉLÈBRE: 4 x #364 + #371 - 30 NOVEMBER = #1827}; @7 - PRINCIPLE OF
CONTRADICTION {#312 - *DIALECTICS* *OF* *CONTRADICTIONS* *ON* *NOVICHOK*
*POISONING* / @274 - PERFUME}; @8 - PRINCIPLE OF SYNCRETIC SUCCESSION {#273
- ADOLF HITLER'S IDEA @235 AS VIEW OF BIBLE STUDENTS: "AIDING, WILLINGLY or
UNWILLINGLY THE DISSOLUTION OF THE STATE}
MOSCOW TIMES @ 0902 HOURS ON 8 FEBRUARY 2019: "KREMLIN SAYS DON'T LOOK FOR
COMMON SENSE FROM RUSSIA'S RULERS: Don’t rely on common sense if you want
to understand how modern Russia is run. That’s the advice from President
Vladimir Putin’s spokesman, Dmitry Peskov.
'In governing, we can’t operate on the basis of common sense,' Peskov told
reporters Thursday on a conference call. 'First of all, we operate in terms
of what is legal and illegal.'
It’s unclear whether the law and common sense are entirely separate
concepts in Putin’s Russia, where critics have long alleged that the
Kremlin has bent parliament, the courts and the media to his personal will.
Peskov was responding to a question on a six-year jail term handed to
Dennis Christensen, a Danish Jehovah’s Witness, by a regional Russian court
on Wednesday.
Russia’s Supreme Court banned Jehovah’s Witnesses after declaring it an
extremist organization in 2017. Putin said in December that persecuting
religious groups on grounds of extremism or terrorism is 'complete
nonsense.'
'Common sense is something that, of course, must be present everywhere,
always and constantly, but it can’t be a criterion,' said Peskov, of the
decision. 'The criterion is the understanding of the law and, in that case,
it can only be the decision of the court.'
The Kremlin’s governing philosophy is more subtle in practice: Russians
understand that the state has a monopoly on repression, while never knowing
when and whether it will resort to such methods because the rules don’t
apply equally to everyone."
[<https://themoscowtimes.com/news/kremlin-says-dont-look-for-common-sense-from-russias-rulers-64437>]
THE QUESTION IS WHETHER THIS PRESENT RUSSIAN LEGAL DILEMMA AS IMPASSE IS A
STUBBORN CRITERIA OF DETERMINISM OR A STAGE OF CULTURAL DEVELOPMENT?
What we call 'culture' is actually a series of core beliefs or value
systems, with each level expressing a different understanding of the world
or the church. A “belief” or “value system” is a worldview, a set of
perspectives/priorities/paradigms, a mind-set, an organizing framework for
deep-level decision-making at the bottom line—which is why you can’t
compromise about it. Your value system is the threshold at which you won’t
negotiate.
Each level of cultural and human development represents a value
system, or to use a term coined by Richard Dawkins, a meme. Just as genes
carry the informational codes for our biological DNA, these value systems
supply the codes (or memes, rhymes with “themes”) that determine our
“cultural DNA.” Memes are ideas, beliefs, values, common ways of looking at
the world that, like contagious viruses, spread from brain to brain through
word of mouth, through media, through interaction between people. The third
angel’s message is a meme. Net ’98 was a global memetic event infecting the
world with the divine virus of the gospel.
There are more than 6 billion
people in the world today, and though we all come from some 100,000
genes—all of us—we share only a few basic value systems or memes.
Researchers studying this topic have identified only eight thus far.
But we propose nine given that the #81 - PRINCIPLE OF JUXTAPOSITION AS
SOVEREIGNTY then gives rise to #492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL and IPSO FACTO A
TRINOMIAL RATHER THAN A BINOMIAL CONCEPTION OF NUMBER: @1 {#1} + @2 {#41} +
@3 {#81} + @4 {#369} = #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL {LIBERTÉ: 17 SEPTEMBER
1900 AS ADVICE OF THE PRIVY COUNCIL} IN THE EXERCISE OF THE INTELLECTUS AS
GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS: #205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE* *PERSISTENCE* *OF*
*SUBSTANCE* ☯️ / ✡️ #164 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY*]. For
simplification of understanding, we can colour-code them (Figure A).
PARADIGMATIC (coral)
WHOLISTIC (cyan)
SYSTEMIC (yellow)
HUMANISTIC (green)
MATERIALISTIC (orange)
ABSOLUTISTIC (blue)
EGOCENTRIC (red)
ANIMISTIC (purple)
AUTOMATIC (bronze)
[Figure A (proposed)]
<
Loading Image...
>
[IMAGE: These [nine rather than] eight memes or value systems are the
cultural magnets around which our “stuff” clusters and our lives are
aligned]
When something isn’t right at the surface level—where we interact with
others or with God—or when our priorities are distorted or our lives are
out of balance, we need to remember that we too are shaped by these deep
emotional, social, and spiritual messages we have received. For these
influence how people think and how they respond to the world around them.
These memes equal the whole set of the cultural and spiritual forces that
shape our thinking they tell us from a human perspective what is right,
wrong, and appropriate (Figure B).
Notice how the Focus column alternates
between me-oriented express-the-self (warm colours) and we-oriented
sacrifice-the-self (cool colours). Note also the differences people value
the most in each system as they flow from survival (Bronze), to safety and
security (Purple), to raw power and instant gratification (Red), to purpose
in life (Blue), to strategies for success (Orange), to community awareness
(Green), to alternative forms (Yellow), to global village (Cyan), to
autonomy as its natural form (Coral). The levels are open-ended; there
isn’t a final stage of development in this chart or any other useful one,
for the ideal that God sets before us is “higher than the highest human
thought can reach.” [Courtesy: Caleb Rosado, Ph.D, When We Disagree: Spiral
Dynamics on How Cultural Values Shape Our Conversation, Adventist Review:
27th April 2000]
AUTONOMOUS NATURE {FORM OF NATURE}@[
C, {@1: Sup: 3 (#3); Ego: 3 (#3)},
O, {@2: Sup: 63 (#66); Ego: 60 (#63)},
R, {@3: Sup: 72 (#138: KANT'S METEMPIRICAL PREMISE - *PURE* *CONCEPTS*
*OF* *THE* *UNDERSTANDING*, IN COMPARISON WITH EMPIRICAL INTUITIONS
(INDEED, SENSORY INTUITIONS IN GENERAL), ARE COMPLETELY HETEROGENEOUS: [AS
#205 - MALE / #164 - FEME WITHIN THE #391 - HOMOGENEOUS NOUMENON]); Ego: 9
(#72)},
A, {@4: Sup: 73 (#211); Ego: 1 (#73)},
L] {@5: Sup: 22 (#233: SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA: B233 - PRINCIPLE OF
TIME-SUCCESSION ACCORDING TO THE LAW OF CAUSALITY); Ego: 30 (#103: SEE
KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA: B103 - ON THE PURE CONCEPTS OF THE UNDERSTANDING,
OR CATEGORIES)}
EXCERPT FROM KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) THIRD SECTION: ON THE PURE CONCEPTS
OF THE UNDERSTANDING, OR CATEGORIES AS IDEA @B103: "[IDEA: @A76 / @B102]
General logic (as has already been said several times) abstracts from all
content of cognition, and awaits representations to be given to it from
somewhere else, wherever it may be, so that, proceeding analytically, it
can first transform these representations into concepts. By contrast,
transcendental logic has a manifold of sensibility lying before it a
priori, which transcendental aesthetic offers to it in order to provide
material [IDEA: @A77] for the pure concepts of the understanding, without
which they would be without any content, hence completely empty. Now space
and time contain a manifold of pure a priori intuition, but they
nonetheless belong to the conditions of receptivity of our mind under which
alone representations of objects can be received, and which must therefore
ever affect the concept of objects. But the spontaneity of our thought
demands that the manifold first be gone through, taken up, and conjoined in
a specific manner, in order to make a cognition out of it. I call this act
synthesis.
By synthesis in its most general signification, however, I understand
[IDEA: @B103] the act of adding diverse representations to one another, and
of comprehending their manifoldness in a cognition. Such a synthesis is
pure if the manifold is given, not empirically, but a priori (as is the
manifold in space and time). This synthesis must be given before all
analysis of our representations, and no concepts can, as regards content,
arise through analysis. But the synthesis of a manifold (whether it be
given empirically or a priori) first produces a cognition, which can indeed
still be raw and confused to begin with and therefore requiring analysis;
but synthesis is nonetheless that which actually assembles the elements for
cognitions and unifies them into a specific content; it is therefore the
first [IDEA: @A78] thing to which we must attend if we want to judge the
first origin of our cognition.
Synthesis in general, as we will later see, is an effect of the imagination
alone, a blind but indispensable function of the soul without which we
would have no cognition at all, but of which we are hardly ever conscious.
But, to bring this synthesis to concepts is a function that pertains to the
understanding, and through which it for the first time furnishes us with
cognition in the strict sense.
The pure synthesis, considered generally, yields the pure concept of the
[IDEA: @B104] understanding. Under this synthesis I include that which
rests on a basis of synthetic a priori unity: thus, our counting (as is
especially noticeable with larger numbers) is a synthesis according to
concepts, since this synthesis occurs in accordance with a common basis of
unity (e.g., *THE* *DECADE*). Under this concept the unity in the synthesis
of the manifold is, then, rendered necessary.
<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>
[IMAGE: INVALIDATING THE ORTHODOX AND ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH'S CLAIM TO
JUBILEE2000 AS BEING DELUSIONAL AND FRAUDULENT
This report dated 16th MAY 2000 was prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a
Notice of an Application for Planning Permit
'GOOD DESIGN AND THE CONCEPTION/NOTION OF PARKING AGREEMENT IN A PRIVATE
#371 - SAINT ANDREWS STREET WITHIN AN AREA TO WHICH APPLIES A HISTORIC
OVERLAY']
Various representations are brought under a concept analytically (a matter
treated in general logic). But to bring, not the representations, but the
pure synthesis of representations to concepts, is taught by transcendental
logic. The first thing that must be given a priori for the sake [IDEA:
@A79] of the cognition of all objects is the manifold of pure intuition;
the second is the synthesis of this manifold through imagination, though it
still does not yield cognition. The concepts that give unity to this pure
synthesis, and that consist solely in the representation of this necessary
synthetic unity, make the third requisite for the cognition of an occurrent
object, and they rest on the understanding." [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE
HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, KANT'S PROLEGOMENA TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS, SECOND
ANALOGY of ANALYTIC OF PRINCIPLES, pp 164-166]
EXCERPT FROM KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) ON THE SYSTEM OF PRINCIPLES OF THE
PURE UNDERSTANDING / PRINCIPLE OF TIME-SUCCESSION ACCORDING TO THE LAW OF
CAUSALITY AS IDEA @B233: "ALL ALTERATIONS TAKE PLACE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
LAW OF THE CONNECTION OF CAUSE AND EFFECT.
PROOF: I perceive that appearances succeed one another, that is, that
[IDEA: @B233] one state of a thing exists at one time, the opposite of
which existed in the previous state. I am therefore actually connecting two
perceptions in time. *NOW* *CONNECTION* *IS* *NO* *ACT* *OF* *MERE* *SENSE*
*AND* *INTUITION*, *BUT* *IS* *HERE* *THE* *PRODUCT* *OF* *A* *SYNTHETIC*
*FACULTY* *OF* *THE* *IMAGINATION* *THAT* *DETERMINES* *THE* *INNER*
*SENSE* *WITH* *RESPECT* *TO* *RELATION* *IN* *TIME* {ie. as metempirics
relating to matters beyond the range of empirical knowledge, metaphysical;
(occasionally) affirming the validity of concepts or beliefs not based on
experience which occurs within time}. The imagination can however conjoin
the aforementioned two states in two different ways, so that either one or
the other would precede in time; for time cannot be perceived in itself and
what precedes and what follows in objects determined, as it were
empirically, in relation to it. I am therefore conscious only that my
imagination places one state before, the other after, not that in the
object [IDEA: @B234] one precedes the other; or, in other words, the
objective relation of the appearances that succeed one another remains
undetermined through mere perception. In order then for this relation to be
cognized as determined, the relation between the two states must be so
thought that it is thereby determined with necessity which of them must be
placed before, which after, and not the reverse. However, the concept that
carries with it a necessity of synthetic unity can only be a pure concept
of the understanding, which does not lie in perception – and here it is the
concept of the relation of cause and effect, in which the former determines
the latter in time as consequence, and not merely as something that could
precede it in the imagination (or not be perceived at all). It is, then,
only because we subject the succession of appearances, hence all
alterations, to the law of causality that experience itself – i.e.,
empirical cognition of the appearances – is possible; hence the appearances
themselves as objects of experience are possible only in accordance with
this very law.
The apprehension of the manifold of appearances is always successive.
[IDEA: @A189] The representations of the parts succeed one another. Whether
they also succeed one another in the object is a further point for
reflection, which is not included in the first point. Now one can in fact
call everything, and even every representation insofar as one is conscious
of it, an object; but it is a matter for deeper investigation what this
word is to signify regarding [IDEA: @B235] appearances, not insofar as they
(as representations) [IDEA: @A190] are objects, but only in so far as they
designate an object. In as much as they, merely as representations, are at
the same time objects of consciousness, they are not at all to be
distinguished from apprehension, i.e., reception into the synthesis of the
imagination, and one must then say: that the manifold of appearances is
always generated successively in the mind. Were appearances things in
themselves, then no human being would be able to conclude from the
succession of representations how the manifold of those appearances might
be conjoined in the object. For in the end we have to do only with our own
representations; how things in themselves may be (without regard to
representations through which they affect us) is completely beyond our
sphere of cognition. Now although the appearances are not things in
themselves, and nevertheless are the only thing that can be given to us for
cognition, I still have to show what in the appearances themselves may suit
the manifold for a conjoining in time, notwithstanding that its
representation in apprehension is always successive. Thus, for example, the
apprehension of the manifold in the appearances of a #311 - *HOUSE* that
stands before me is successive. Now the question is: whether the manifold
of this #311 - *HOUSE* itself also is successive in itself, which of course
no one will grant. However, as soon as I raise my concept of an object up
to transcendental significance, the #311 - *HOUSE* is now indeed no thing
in itself, but [IDEA: @B236] only an appearance, i.e., a representation,
whose transcendental object is [IDEA: @A191] unknown; what, then, shall I
understand by the question: how might the manifold be conjoined in the
appearance itself (which is still nothing in itself )? That which lies in
the successive apprehension is here viewed as representation, while the
appearance that is given to me, notwithstanding that it is nothing more
than a sum of such representations, is viewed as their object – with which
my concept, which I extract from the representations of apprehension, has
to agree. Since truth is the agreement of cognition with object, it can
easily be seen that here one can ask only about the formal conditions of
empirical truth, and that appearance, in counter-relation with the
representations of apprehension, can only be represented as their object
that is distinct from them if it falls under a rule that distinguishes it
from every other apprehension and makes one way of conjoining the manifold
necessary. That in the appearance which contains the condition of this
necessary rule of apprehension is the object.
Let us now proceed to our problem. That something happens – i.e., that
something, or some state, comes to be that wasn’t there before – [IDEA:
@B237] cannot be perceived empirically unless preceded by an appearance
that [IDEA: @A192] does not contain this state in itself; for a reality
following upon an empty time, hence, a coming to be that no state of things
precedes, can be apprehended just as little as empty time itself. Every
apprehension of an event is therefore a perception that follows upon
another perception. Since this is, though, the case with every synthesis of
apprehension, as I have shown above in the appearance of a #311 - *HOUSE*,
it does not in this way yet distinguish itself from the others. But I also
note: that if, in an appearance containing a happening, I call the
preceding state of perception A and the succeeding one B, then B can only
follow A in the apprehension, while the perception a cannot follow but only
precede B. I see for example a ship drifting downstream. My perception of
its location further down succeeds the perception of its location further
up the course of the river, and it is impossible that in the apprehension
of this appearance the ship should first be perceived further downstream
but afterwards further upstream. Here, then, the order in the succession of
perceptions in the apprehension is determined, and the apprehension is
bound by that order. In the previous example of a #311 - *HOUSE*, in the
apprehension my perceptions could start at [IDEA: @B238] the top of the
#311 - *HOUSE* and end with the ground, or else start from below and end
above, just as they could apprehend the manifold of empirical intuition
from the right or the left. In the series of these perceptions there [IDEA:
@A193] was, then, no determined order making it necessary when in the
apprehension I had to begin in order to conjoin the manifold empirically.
This rule is, however, always to be met with in the perception of something
that happens, and it makes the order of the perceptions succeeding one
another (in the apprehension of this appearance) necessary.
In our case, therefore, I will have to derive the subjective sequence of
the apprehension from the objective sequence of the appearances, because
otherwise the former is completely undetermined and does not distinguish
any one appearance from the rest. By itself the former proves nothing about
the connection of the manifold in the object, because it is completely
arbitrary. This connection will therefore consist in the order of the
manifold of the appearance according to which the apprehension of the one
(what happens) follows upon that of the other (which precedes) according to
a rule. Only in this way can I gain the right to say of the appearance
itself, and not merely of my apprehension: that in it a sequence is to be
found – which is as much as to say that I cannot institute the apprehension
otherwise than exactly in this sequence. [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF
PHILOSOPHY, KANT'S PROLEGOMENA TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS, SECOND ANALOGY of
ANALYTIC OF PRINCIPLES, pp 184-187]
AS PER MY 31 DECEMBER 2018 CORRESPONDENCE TO THE REGISTRAR OF THE LATROBE
COUNTY COURT WITHIN APPEAL CASE NUMBERS: AP-18-0609 / AP-18-0775 /
AP-18-0794 / AP-18-2201 / AP-18-2202, it is reasonably alleged that the
RESPONDENTS within each of these APPEALS have by determined means conveyed
a lack of #873 - PROBITY as shown BY ONTIC #205 - ABERRATION {@210 / @215 /
@220 / @228} TO PRINCIPLES IN PARTICULAR:
SECTION VIII - PRINCIPLE OF JUXTAPOSITION AS SOVEREIGNTY
SECTION IX - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY AS SUCCESSIVE PRINCIPLE
TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900 AS CONVEYING THE
PERSISTENCE OF SUBSTANCE MADE AGAINST ELIZABETH {THE OATH, FULLNESS OF GOD}
REGINA II and thereby is an impunity of the DIGNITY ROYAL as actions being
facilitated by the abnormal BOER WAR MEMORIAL #390 - WREATH PLACEMENT which
subsequently occurred upon 27 OCTOBER 2018 and #312 - WITHERED STATE
REMOVAL upon MONDAY 5 NOVEMBER 2018 as undertaken by DETERMINED IGNOMINIOUS
ACTIONS of MALEFICENCE PERPETUATED against the DIGNITY ROYAL which is
unambiguously defined by a proximity VICTORIA PARK OAK TREE PLANTING EVENT
OF 27 OCTOBER 1934 as coinciding with the dedication of the WORLD WAR ONE
WAR #288 - MEMORIAL situated within HYDE PARK, SYDNEY.
As a consideration which needs to be firstly addressed by the COURT being a
PROBITY AND DECORUM question of the PERMISSIBILITY AS TO THE LAWFULNESS OF
A FOREIGN POWER CONSTITUTED BY:
'@1 - STATES / @2 - RELIGIONS / @3 - SOLDIERS / @4 - INSTITUTIONS / @5 -
ORGANISATIONS'
HAVING A PARASITIC IMPOST UPON #288 - REMEMBRANCE WORLD WAR ONE 2018
CENTENNIAL COMMEMORATIONS as a #364 - *QUESTION* *OF* #430 - *LAW* which we
have in the past conveyed to the STATE / FEDERAL ATTORNEY GENERALS, ought
to given such gravitas, as conveyed by SECTION VIII to QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT DATED 29 OCTOBER 1900 [then referred with requisite suitable
apriority impetus, to the HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA for consideration, and
over which legal precedents have frequently been made concerning the
legitimacy of FEDERAL MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT holding dual nationality].
- dolf
The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's Ground
Work for the Metaphysics of Morals are now available within the directory:
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>
Initial Post: 8 February 2019
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"
SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*
Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit
<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>
SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]
Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.
It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.
<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>
The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."
That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)
After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
