GNOSIS EX MACHINA {#2184}: @6 - PRINCIPLE OF ENQUIRY {#364 - SAINT
ANDREWS CAUSE CÉLÈBRE: 4 x #364 + #371 - 30 NOVEMBER}; @7 - PRINCIPLE OF
CONTRADICTION {#312 - *DIALECTICS* *OF* *CONTRADICTIONS* *ON* *NOVICHOK*
*POISONING* / @274 - PERFUME}; @8 - PRINCIPLE OF SYNCRETIC SUCCESSION
{#273 - ADOLF HITLER'S IDEA @235 AS VIEW OF BIBLE STUDENTS: "AIDING,
WILLINGLY or UNWILLINGLY THE DISSOLUTION OF THE STATE"}
WE'VE NOW PERMANENTLY INHIBITED THESE CATHOLIC / HETERODOX {
#1827 = 4 x #364 + #371 - LITURGICAL CALENDAR 2ND VATICAN COUNCIL
#1827 = [#5, #400, #600, #1, #100, #10, #200, #300, #10, #1, #200]
eucharistia / ευχαριστιας (G2169): 1) Thanksgiving; 2) *EUCHARIST*; 3)
*TARGETED* *SINCE* *REFUSAL* *OF* *COMMUNION* upon PENTECOST SUNDAY 31
MAY 1998 AND 11 JUNE 2000.
This precinct is a VASSAL ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE and the BOER / ANZAC
DEFAMATION also coincides with ARCHBISHOP GEORGE PELL'S REFUSAL OF
EUCHARIST COMMUNION (*BEING* *AN* *ACT* *OF* *TREASON*) PERPETUATED
AGAINST THE #492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL OF RAINBOW SASH PROTESTORS at
SAINT PATRICK'S CATHEDRAL, EAST MELBOURNE upon PENTECOST SUNDAY 31 MAY
1998 AND 11 JUNE 2000.
<
Loading Image...
>
[IMAGE: *MYSELF* consoling Catholic mother of a gay son & PFLAG
President, Nanette McGregor - The Rainbow Sash Protest (Refusal of
Communion) on 'Pentecost Sunday' 31 May 1998, Saint Patrick's Cathedral,
Melbourne pictured by The Australian newspaper (front page) of 1 June 1998
(c) 1 June 1998 - James Croucher (photographer), News Ltd / Newspix,
Commercial Use, Internal Use For Company Or Organisation, Internal
Newsletter Or Document, Print And Digital, Up To 1,000]
} TRINITARIANS CAPACITY TO ABOMINATE THE TRUTH {#2184 : / 6 = #364; / 7
= #312; /8 = #273} OF EMANATIONISM
SUBJECT WAS: To Him, therefore, let all come who would be made whole
Post by unknownto the end that He might show that the law of the flesh has been subjected
to the law of the mind. He was incarnate, that He, the Teacher of men,
might overcome as man."
St. Ambrose of Milan.
"He that loveth silver shall not be satisfied with silver; nor he that
loveth abundance with increase: this is also vanity." Ecclesiastes 5:10
Draw nigh unto God and He will draw nigh unto you.
— RUSSIAN COURT SENTENCES DANISH JEHOVAH'S WITNESS TO JAIL FOR
'EXTREMISM': THE QUESTION IS WHETHER THIS PRESENT LEGAL DILEMMA AS
IMPASSE IS A STUBBORN CRITERIA OF DETERMINISM OR A STAGE OF CULTURAL
DEVELOPMENT?
(c) 2019 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 9 February 2019
Due to Jehovah’s Witnesses intolerance within Australia, I recently
conveyed (before World War One 2018 Centennial #273 - REMEMBRANCE) a
rescinding to the good grace and assistance I had rendered them with
respects to their depiction within Adolf Hitler’s Table Talk IDEAS: @215
and @235 (from memory).
Their haughty self bestowal of entitlement and lack of appreciation (as
if they were the prerogative benefactors of the wise men from the East
at an infant’s birth) was an appalling #312 - CONTRADICTION of human
dignity as they sit like King Tutankhamen within our clock tower town
square.
H7287@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 16 (#22); Ego: 10 (#16),
@3: Sup: 54 (#76); Ego: 38 (#54),
@4: Sup: 58 (#134); Ego: 4 (#58),
@5: Sup: 27 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 50 (#108),
@6: Sup: 32 (#193); Ego: 5 (#113),
Male: #193; Feme: #113
} // #275 < -- SEE IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA: @275 -
*UNCONTESTED* *SYNTHETIC* *COGNITION* *A* *PRIORI*
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #209 % #41 = #4 - Using Guidance, Sourceless; I-Ching: H27 -
Nourishment, Swallowing, Jaws, Comfort/Security; Tetra: 81 - Fostering;
THOTH MEASURE: #4 - Oh Eater of the Shadow, who makest thine appearance
at Elephantine; I am not rapacious.
#VIRTUE: With Barrier (no. #4), isolation} but
#TOOLS: With Stove (no. #44), neighbours.
#POSITION: As to Strength (no. #36), it is the solidly built.
#TIME: As to Waiting (no. #18), it is the weak.
#CANON: #102
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_102@{
@1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
@2: Sup: 48 (#52); Ego: 44 (#48),
@3: Sup: 3 (#55); Ego: 36 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
@4: Sup: 21 (#76); Ego: 18 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}),
Male: #76; Feme: #102
} // #102
#275 as [#6, #10, #200, #4, #50, #5] = radah (H7287): {UMBRA: #8 as #209
% #41 = #4} 1) to rule, have dominion, dominate, tread down; 2) to
scrape out; 1a) (Qal) to have dominion, rule, subjugate; 1b) (Hiphil) to
cause to dominate; 2a) (Qal) to scrape, scrape out;
In doing so I specifically conveyed the references to the REDUCTIO AD
HITLERUM: "If you wish to wage war successfully or to lead a people
successfully through a difficult period of its history, you must have no
doubts whatever on one point—namely, any individual who in such times
tries, either actively or passively, to exclude himself from the
activities of the community, must be destroyed.
Anyone who for false reasons of mercy deviates from this clear principle
is aiding {H5826: `azar / help: #273}, willingly {H7521: ratsah /
accept: #273} or unwillingly {H7589: she'at / despiteful: #273; H4784:
marah / rebel: #273; H6696: tsuwr / besiege: #273}, the dissolution of
the State." [Adolf Hitler's Table Talk IDEA: @235, page #519]
JEN KELLY (HERALDSUN.COM.AU) ON 18 JULY 2017: "If you’re sifting through
old family memorabilia from before World War II and stumble across a
swastika or two, don’t be alarmed:
<
Loading Image...
>
<
Loading Image...
>
<
Loading Image...
>
This ancient religious symbol [is claimed by some to] simply represented
good luck until HITLER adopted it in the lead-up to World War II and it
became synonymous with the Nazis’ atrocities.”
Anyone who for false reasons of mercy deviates from this clear principle
is aiding {H5826: `azar / help: #273}, willingly {H7521: ratsah /
accept: #273} or unwillingly {H7589: she'at / despiteful: #273; H4784:
marah / rebel: #273; H6696: tsuwr / besiege: #273}, the dissolution of
the State." [Adolf Hitler's Table Talk IDEA: @235, page #519]
<https://www.biblewheel.com/GR/GR_Database.php?SearchBy_Gematria=273>
JEN KELLY (HERALDSUN.COM.AU) ON 18 JULY 2017: “Joan WITHERS of
Mornington, says our story on Echuca’s Swastika Orchestra of the 1930’s
and the original meaning of the symbol solved a longstanding mystery for
her.
She had long wondered about a photo (pictured above) she has of her
mother, Margaret, as a bridesmaid in the early 1930s. ‘The bride (ie. a
neophyte of Pythagorean Babylon Whoredom and anti-semitism / seventh-day
adventism) had a beautiful (ie. Hell-bent) wedding gown and right out
around the front (on the train) was a swastika embroidered into the
lace,’ Joan says.
‘It always fascinated me, and now I know why it was there.’
A swastika also features in this wedding photo (also shown above),
believed to be from the late 1920s, of John KEANE’s (ie. Irish Roman
Catholic heritage) great-aunt Isobel’s wedding, showing his late mother
on the far right, probably as maid of honour. The bride is carrying a
bouquet, a horseshoe—and a swastika.
‘Our thoughts are that it was just something you bought from a bridal
shop as a good-luck charm,’ says John, of Montrose.”
IN EXPLAINING HITLER'S STATEMENT RELATIVE TO SECTION VIII OF QUEEN
VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT DATED 29 OCTOBER 1900 I HAVE ADDED WHAT IS
PERCEIVED TO BE THE COMMON #273 - CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING:
"AIDING {H5826: `azar / help: #273},
WILLINGLY {H7521: ratsah / accept: #273} or
UNWILLINGLY {H7589: she'at / despiteful: #273; H4784: marah / rebel:
#273; H6696: tsuwr / besiege: #273}, THE DISSOLUTION OF THE STATE."
— WE #273 - REMEMBER YOUR FORGET —
“LEST WE FORGET.
TO FIRST #288 - REMEMBER.
THIS NATION’S TUNE.
AS SOVEREIGN BEGET.
ISN’T NAZI DISTEMPER.
BUT BY PRIVY TRIBUNE.
NO #364 - OBEY, #312 - AID, #273 - ASSIST REGRET.”
HISTORICAL CHRISTIAN WEDDING VOW: "I, *NAME* *OF* *BRIDE*, #312 - *TAKE*
*THEE* {ie. A WILLING, WILL}, *NAME* *OF* *GROOM* to be my #2184 -
*LAWFULLY* {ie. LAWS OF NATURE} wedding husband. To have and to hold
#273 - *FROM* *THIS* *DAY* *FORWARD* {ie. SUCCESSIVELY IN ORDER}, for
richer or poorer, in sickness and in health, to love and #364 - *OBEY*
until death do we part, today I pledge my faithfulness."
SECTION VIII: "REQUIRE AND COMMAND ALL OUR OFFICERS AND MINISTERS, CIVIL
AND MILITARY, AND ALL OTHER THE INHABITANTS OF OUR SAID COMMONWEALTH TO
BE #364 - OBEDIENT {#273 - REMEMBRANCE}, #312 - AIDING {#273 -
SEPULCHRE}, AND #273 - ASSISTING {#273 - WEAK} UNTO OUR SAID GOVERNOR
GENERAL {
#2184 - LAWS OF NATURE AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE / 12 =
#182 AS DATE(1996,3,20) + 5 x #364 + #182 = SUNSET 11 SEPTEMBER 2001
<-- *IN* *CASE* *YOU* *MISSED* *THE* *REALITY*
}, OR, IN THE EVENT OF HIS DEATH, #273 - INCAPACITY, OR ABSENCE, TO SUCH
PERSON OR PERSONS AS MAY, FROM TIME TO TIME, UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF
THESE OUR LETTERS PATENT, ADMINISTER {#2184 - LAWS OF NATURE AS
ANTHROPOLOGICAL COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE / 13 = #168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE
OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26 - *YHWH*}} THE GOVERNMENT OF OUR SAID COMMONWEALTH."
SBS NEWS ON 7 FEBRUARY 2019: “Russia has banned the religion under
anti-extremism laws and a crackdown on believers has intensified, with
around 90 criminal trials now reportedly pending across Russia.”
<https://www.sbs.com.au/news/russian-court-sentences-danish-jehovah-s-witness-to-jail-for-extremism>
Those Bible students are a nasty piece of work as American espionage and
so it is little wonder that the Russians are troubled by their
disloyalties to the State as reasonable #364 - QUESTIONS of #430 - LAW.
EXCERPT FROM KANT'S PROLEGOMENA SECTION #4: IS METAPHYSICS POSSIBLE AT
ALL? AS IDEAS @275 - *UNCONTESTED* *SYNTHETIC* *COGNITION* *A* *PRIORI*:
"For long before we began to question nature methodically, we questioned
just our isolated reason, which already was practiced to a certain
extent [IDEA: @272] through common experience: for reason surely is
present to us always, but laws of nature must normally be sought out
painstakingly; and so metaphysics was floating at the top like foam,
though in such a way that as soon as what had been drawn off had
dissolved, more showed itself on the surface, which some *ALWAYS*
*GATHERED* *UP* *EAGERLY*, *WHILE* *OTHERS*, *INSTEAD* *OF* *SEEKING*
*THE* *CAUSE* *OF* *THIS* *PHENOMENON* *IN* *THE* *DEPTHS*, *THOUGHT*
*THEMSELVES* *WISE* *IN* *MOCKING* *THE* *FRUITLESS* *TOIL* *OF* *THE*
*FORMER*.
WITH RESPECTS TO SUBSTANTIATING THE CLAIM OF IMPETUS OF *PRO* *DOMO* BY
A LOGICAL FALLACY OF DUPLICITOUS REDEFINITION BY #288 - UMBRA
MANIPULATION MADE TO CATEGORY OF UNDERSTANDING #311 AGAINST MY
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND THAT OF IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA PUBLISHED
WITHIN 1783 WHICH DUE TO HIS FORMER RELIGIOUS EDUCATION IS AS PREVIOUSLY
SHOWN ALREADY COGNISANT OF THE SPECTRUM AS HEBREW (22 / 7 as RATIONAL
PI) and GREEK (24) IPSO FACTO: #2184 CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING THAT
ARE EXHIBITED WITHIN ASSOCIATIONS MADE TO TETRAGRAMMATON {ARCH KAI TELOS
OIDA: #1 + #2 + #3 +#4 = #10} HIERARCHY VALUE AS THE METAPHYSICAL
CATEGORICAL APRIORITY IMPERATIVE TO THE HOMOIOS THEORY OF *NUMBER*:
+ 0, 27 {IDEA: @311 *** SERIOUS BREACH OF THE SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY
DYNAMIC GIVEN THE INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN DYNAMIC OF 3 APRIL
33 AD}, 54 {IDEA: @348} {ie. REALM OF ITS NATURE AS HEAVEN - *FORMULA*
*FOR* *UNIVERSAL* *LAW*}
+ 0, 9 {IDEA: @282}, 18 {IDEA: @298} {ie. SYSTEM’S COSMOLOGY AS EARTH
- *FORMULA* *OF* *HUMANITY*}
+ 0, 3 {IDEA: @270}, 6 {IDEA: @280} {ie. SELF IDENTITY - *FORMULA*
*OF* *AUTONOMY* *AS* *SUI* *JURIS* / *MEMBRUM* *VIRILE*}
+ 1 {IDEA: @265, @266}, 2 {IDEA: @267, @268, @269, @272, @273 ***
*FORMULA* *FOR* *PRESERVING* *EUROPEAN* *AUTONOMY* ***, @274 - PERFUME
AS *RUSSIAN* *DIALECTS* *OF* #312 - *CONTRADICTIONS* *ON* *NOVICHOK*
*POISONING*}, 3 {IDEA: @265 - PREAMBLE} {ie. *FORMULA* *OF*
*PROGRESSION* OF INDIVIDUAL PHENOMENA: *CONJECTURAL* *ONLY*}
Kant’s implementation of SYMBOLICAL associator to the NOUMENON as having
a #41 - *ONTIC* necessity with CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING which
incontrovertibly conform to a COGNITION of a trinomial as HOMOIOS THEORY
OF NUMBER that has a definitive impetus from 1783 and thusly we can by
such APRIORITY CASCADE against subsequent HISTORY and is capable of
BEREAVING SOVEREIGN STATES of IDENTITY which as MARRIAGE / SOVEREIGN
DYNAMIC has been built on castles of SAND which deploys a microcosm
binomial redefinition (HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER: #17 - Politics;
I-Ching: H54 - *MARRIAGEABLE* *MAID*/*MAIDEN*, *CONVERTING* *THE*
*MAIDEN*; Tetra: 65 - Inner) of those APRIORITY trinomial CATEGORIES OF
UNDERSTANDING.
SOVEREIGN ONTIC NECESSITY (6.5.5.41.0)@{
@1: Sup: 41 (#41); Ego: 41 (#41),
@2: Sup: 1 (#42); Ego: 41 (#82),
@3: Sup: 42 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 41 (#123
- JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY),
@4: Sup: 2 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 41 (#164 -
*PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY*),
@5: Sup: 43 (#129); Ego: 41 (#205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE*
*PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE*),
@6: Sup: 3 (#132); Ego: 41 (#246),
@7: Sup: 44 (#176 - KANT'S IDEA B176: *THE* *TRANSCENDENTAL*
*DOCTRINE* *OF* *THE POWER* *OF* *JUDGMENT* *OR* *ANALYTIC* *OF*
*PRINCIPLES*); Ego: 41 (#287),
@8: Sup: 24 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8});
Ego: 61 (#348),
@9: Sup: 66 (#266 - *PRECEPT* / *STATUTE*); Ego: 42 (#390 -
*SOVEREIGNTY* / *CROWN*),
Male: #266; Feme: #390
}
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#266 - *PRECEPT* / *STATUTE* / #390 -
*SOVEREIGNTY* / *CROWN*} / HETEROS {#238 / #376} / TORAH {#248 / #381}
<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:6,row:5,col:5,nous:41&idea:{m,132}&idea:{f,246}&idea:{m,266}&idea:{f,390}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
HUMAN BEING ONTIC NECESSITY (3.5.5.41.0)@{
@1: Sup: 41 (#41); Ego: 41 (#41),
@2: Sup: 1 (#42); Ego: 41 (#82),
@3: Sup: 42 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 41 (#123
- JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY),
@4: Sup: 2 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 41 (#164 -
*PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY*),
@5: Sup: 43 (#129); Ego: 41 (#205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE*
*PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE*),
@6: Sup: 3 (#132); Ego: 41 (#246),
@7: Sup: 44 (#176); Ego: 41 (#287),
@8: Sup: 68 (#244); Ego: 24 (#311 *** SERIOUS BREACH OF THE
SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY DYNAMIC GIVEN THE INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE
MAIDEN DYNAMIC OF 3 APRIL 33 AD),
@9: Sup: 67 (#311 *** SERIOUS BREACH OF THE SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY
DYNAMIC GIVEN THE INNER MAIDEN / MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN DYNAMIC OF 3 APRIL
33 AD); Ego: 80 (#391),
Male: #311; Feme: #391
} // [LATIN definition: VOLUNTĀTIS (*YES*) / NOLUNTĀTIS (*NO*)]
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#311 / #391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ
{29 OCTOBER 1900}) OF QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT TO THE FEDERATION
OF THE AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH 1901} / HETEROS {#283 / #377} / TORAH
{#237 - *USE* *OF* *FORCE* OR *IMMUTABLE* / *STUBBORN* *WILL* / #435}
<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:3,row:5,col:5,nous:41&idea:{m,84}&idea:{f,123}&idea:{m,311}&idea:{f,391}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
#311 as [#70, #10, #20, #10, #1, #200] = oikia (G3614): {UMBRA: #21 as
#111 % #41 = #29} 1) a house; 1a) an inhabited edifice, a dwelling; 1b)
the inmates of a house, the family; 1c) property, wealth, goods;
#311 as [#80, #1, #10, #4, #5, #10, #1, #200] = paideia (G3809): {UMBRA:
#22 as #111 % #41 = #29} 1) the whole training and education of children
(which relates to the cultivation of mind and morals, and employs for
this purpose now commands and admonitions, now reproof and punishment)
It also includes the training and care of the body; 2) whatever in
adults also cultivates the soul, esp. by correcting mistakes and curbing
passions.; 2a) instruction which aims at increasing virtue; 2b)
chastisement, chastening, (of the evils with which God visits men for
their amendment);
Weary therefore of dogmatism, which teaches us nothing, and also of
[IDEA: @274] skepticism, which promises us absolutely nothing at all,
not even the tranquility of a permitted ignorance; summoned by the
importance of the knowledge that we need, and made mistrustful, through
long experience, with respect to any knowledge that we believe we
possess or that offers itself to us under the title of pure reason,
there remains left for us but one critical question, the answer to which
can regulate our future conduct: Is metaphysics possible at all? But
this question must not be answered by skeptical objections to particular
assertions of an actual metaphysics (for at present we still allow none
to be valid), but out of the still problematic concept of such a science.
In the Critique of Pure Reason I worked on this question synthetically,
namely by inquiring within pure reason itself, and seeking to determine
within this source both the elements and the laws of its pure use,
according to principles. This work is difficult and requires a resolute
reader to think himself little by little into a system that takes no
foundation as given except reason itself, and that therefore tries to
develop cognition out of its original seeds without relying on any fact
whatever. Prolegomena should by contrast be preparatory exercises; they
ought more to indicate what needs to be done in order to bring a science
into existence if possible, than to present the science itself. They
must therefore rely on something [IDEA: @275] already known to be
dependable, from which we can go forward with confidence and ascend to
the sources, which are not yet known, and whose discovery not only will
explain what is known already, but will also exhibit an area with many
cognitions that all arise from these same sources. The methodological
procedure of prolegomena, and especially of those that are to prepare
for a future metaphysics, will therefore be analytic.
Fortunately, it happens that, even though we cannot assume that meta-
physics as science is actual, we can confidently say that some pure
synthetic cognition a priori is actual and given, namely, pure
mathematics and pure natural science; for both contain propositions that
are fully acknowledged, some as apodictically certain through bare
reason, some from universal agreement with experience (though these are
still recognized as independent of experience). We have therefore some
at least *UNCONTESTED* *SYNTHETIC* *COGNITION* *A* *PRIORI*, and we do
not need to ask whether it is possible (for it is actual), but only: how
it is possible, in order to be able to derive, from the principle of the
possibility of the given cognition, the possibility of all other
synthetic cognition a priori." [IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA TO ANY
FUTURE METAPHYSICS (1783), IDEA @275]
Thus they cannot legitimately claim as legal defence that Russian #615 -
JURISPRUDENCE is in any manner equivalent to Nazi Germany’s atrocity of
such partial Bible students whom exhibit a disloyalty to the State’s
#2184 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC CONCEPTION to #902 - RULE OF LAW which is then
causal for disheartening the #65 - TROOPS.
GNOSIS EX MACHINA {#2184}: @6 - PRINCIPLE OF ENQUIRY {#364 - SAINT
ANDREWS CAUSE CÉLÈBRE: 4 x #364 + #371 - 30 NOVEMBER}; @7 - PRINCIPLE OF
CONTRADICTION {#312 - *DIALECTICS* *OF* *CONTRADICTIONS* *ON* *NOVICHOK*
*POISONING* / @274 - PERFUME}; @8 - PRINCIPLE OF SYNCRETIC SUCCESSION
{#273 - ADOLF HITLER'S IDEA @235 AS VIEW OF BIBLE STUDENTS: "AIDING,
WILLINGLY or UNWILLINGLY THE DISSOLUTION OF THE STATE"}
WE'VE NOW PERMANENTLY INHIBITED THESE CATHOLIC / HETERODOX {#1827 = 4 x
#364 + #371 - LITURGICAL CALENDAR 2ND VATICAN COUNCIL
#1827 = [#5, #400, #600, #1, #100, #10, #200, #300, #10, #1, #200]
eucharistia / ευχαριστιας (G2169): 1) Thanksgiving; 2) *EUCHARIST*; 3)
*TARGETED* *SINCE* *REFUSAL* *OF* *COMMUNION* upon PENTECOST SUNDAY 31
MAY 1998 AND 11 JUNE 2000.
This precinct is a VASSAL ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE and the BOER / ANZAC
DEFAMATION also coincides with ARCHBISHOP GEORGE PELL'S REFUSAL OF
EUCHARIST COMMUNION (*BEING* *AN* *ACT* *OF* *TREASON*) PERPETUATED
AGAINST THE #492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL OF RAINBOW SASH PROTESTORS at
SAINT PATRICK'S CATHEDRAL, EAST MELBOURNE upon PENTECOST SUNDAY 31 MAY
1998 AND 11 JUNE 2000.
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/BOERWARS19980531.jpg>
[IMAGE: *MYSELF* consoling Catholic mother of a gay son & PFLAG
President, Nanette McGregor - The Rainbow Sash Protest (Refusal of
Communion) on 'Pentecost Sunday' 31 May 1998, Saint Patrick's Cathedral,
Melbourne pictured by The Australian newspaper (front page) of 1 June 1998
(c) 1 June 1998 - James Croucher (photographer), News Ltd / Newspix,
Commercial Use, Internal Use For Company Or Organisation, Internal
Newsletter Or Document, Print And Digital, Up To 1,000]
} TRINITARIANS CAPACITY TO ABOMINATE THE TRUTH {#2184 : / 6 = #364; / 7
= #312; /8 = #273} OF EMANATIONISM
MOSCOW TIMES @ 0902 HOURS ON 8 FEBRUARY 2019: "KREMLIN SAYS DON'T LOOK
FOR COMMON SENSE FROM RUSSIA'S RULERS: Don’t rely on common sense if you
want to understand how modern Russia is run. That’s the advice from
President Vladimir Putin’s spokesman, Dmitry Peskov.
'In governing, we can’t operate on the basis of common sense,' Peskov
told reporters Thursday on a conference call. 'First of all, we operate
in terms of what is legal and illegal.'
It’s unclear whether the law and common sense are entirely separate
concepts in Putin’s Russia, where critics have long alleged that the
Kremlin has bent parliament, the courts and the media to his personal
will. Peskov was responding to a question on a six-year jail term handed
to Dennis Christensen, a Danish Jehovah’s Witness, by a regional Russian
court on Wednesday.
Russia’s Supreme Court banned Jehovah’s Witnesses after declaring it an
extremist organization in 2017. Putin said in December that persecuting
religious groups on grounds of extremism or terrorism is 'complete
nonsense.'
'Common sense is something that, of course, must be present everywhere,
always and constantly, but it can’t be a criterion,' said Peskov, of the
decision. 'The criterion is the understanding of the law and, in that
case, it can only be the decision of the court.'
The Kremlin’s governing philosophy is more subtle in practice: Russians
understand that the state has a monopoly on repression, while never
knowing when and whether it will resort to such methods because the
rules don’t apply equally to everyone."
[<https://themoscowtimes.com/news/kremlin-says-dont-look-for-common-sense-from-russias-rulers-64437>]
THE QUESTION IS WHETHER THIS PRESENT RUSSIAN LEGAL DILEMMA AS IMPASSE IS
A STUBBORN CRITERIA OF DETERMINISM OR A STAGE OF CULTURAL DEVELOPMENT?
What we call 'culture' is actually a series of core beliefs or value
systems, with each level expressing a different understanding of the
world or the church. A “belief” or “value system” is a worldview, a set
of perspectives/priorities/paradigms, a mind-set, an organizing
framework for deep-level decision-making at the bottom line—which is why
you can’t compromise about it. Your value system is the threshold at
which you won’t negotiate.
Each level of cultural and human development
represents a value system, or to use a term coined by Richard Dawkins, a
meme. Just as genes carry the informational codes for our biological
DNA, these value systems supply the codes (or memes, rhymes with
“themes”) that determine our “cultural DNA.” Memes are ideas, beliefs,
values, common ways of looking at the world that, like contagious
viruses, spread from brain to brain through word of mouth, through
media, through interaction between people. The third angel’s message is
a meme. Net ’98 was a global memetic event infecting the world with the
divine virus of the gospel.
There are more than 6 billion people in the
world today, and though we all come from some 100,000 genes—all of us—we
share only a few basic value systems or memes. Researchers studying this
topic have identified only eight thus far.
But we propose nine given that the #81 - PRINCIPLE OF JUXTAPOSITION AS
SOVEREIGNTY then gives rise to #492 - VOLUNTARY FREEWILL and IPSO FACTO
A TRINOMIAL RATHER THAN A BINOMIAL CONCEPTION OF NUMBER: @1 {#1} + @2
{#41} + @3 {#81} + @4 {#369} = #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL {LIBERTÉ: 17
SEPTEMBER 1900 AS ADVICE OF THE PRIVY COUNCIL} IN THE EXERCISE OF THE
INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS: #205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE*
*PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE* ☯️ / ✡️ #164 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF*
*MATERIALITY*]. For simplification of understanding, we can colour-code
them (Figure A).
PARADIGMATIC (coral)
WHOLISTIC (cyan)
SYSTEMIC (yellow)
HUMANISTIC (green)
MATERIALISTIC (orange)
ABSOLUTISTIC (blue)
EGOCENTRIC (red)
ANIMISTIC (purple)
AUTOMATIC (bronze)
[Figure A (proposed)]
<
Loading Image...
>
[IMAGE: These [nine rather than] eight memes or value systems are the
cultural magnets around which our “stuff” clusters and our lives are
aligned]
When something isn’t right at the surface level—where we interact with
others or with God—or when our priorities are distorted or our lives are
out of balance, we need to remember that we too are shaped by these deep
emotional, social, and spiritual messages we have received. For these
influence how people think and how they respond to the world around
them. These memes equal the whole set of the cultural and spiritual
forces that shape our thinking they tell us from a human perspective
what is right, wrong, and appropriate (Figure B).
Notice how the Focus
column alternates between me-oriented express-the-self (warm colours)
and we-oriented sacrifice-the-self (cool colours). Note also the
differences people value the most in each system as they flow from
survival (Bronze), to safety and security (Purple), to raw power and
instant gratification (Red), to purpose in life (Blue), to strategies
for success (Orange), to community awareness (Green), to alternative
forms (Yellow), to global village (Cyan), to autonomy as its natural
form (Coral). The levels are open-ended; there isn’t a final stage of
development in this chart or any other useful one, for the ideal that
God sets before us is “higher than the highest human thought can reach.”
[Courtesy: Caleb Rosado, Ph.D, When We Disagree: Spiral Dynamics on How
Cultural Values Shape Our Conversation, Adventist Review: 27th April 2000]
AUTONOMOUS NATURE {FORM OF NATURE}@[
C, {@1: Sup: 3 (#3); Ego: 3 (#3)},
O, {@2: Sup: 63 (#66); Ego: 60 (#63)},
R, {@3: Sup: 72 (#138: KANT'S METEMPIRICAL PREMISE - *PURE*
*CONCEPTS* *OF* *THE* *UNDERSTANDING*, IN COMPARISON WITH EMPIRICAL
INTUITIONS (INDEED, SENSORY INTUITIONS IN GENERAL), ARE COMPLETELY
HETEROGENEOUS: [AS #205 - MALE / #164 - FEME WITHIN THE #391 -
HOMOGENEOUS NOUMENON]); Ego: 9 (#72)},
A, {@4: Sup: 73 (#211); Ego: 1 (#73)},
L] {@5: Sup: 22 (#233: SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA: B233 -
PRINCIPLE OF TIME-SUCCESSION ACCORDING TO THE LAW OF CAUSALITY); Ego: 30
(#103: SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA: B103 - ON THE PURE CONCEPTS OF THE
UNDERSTANDING, OR CATEGORIES)}
EXCERPT FROM KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) THIRD SECTION: ON THE PURE
CONCEPTS OF THE UNDERSTANDING, OR CATEGORIES AS IDEA @B103: "[IDEA: @A76
/ @B102] General logic (as has already been said several times)
abstracts from all content of cognition, and awaits representations to
be given to it from somewhere else, wherever it may be, so that,
proceeding analytically, it can first transform these representations
into concepts. By contrast, transcendental logic has a manifold of
sensibility lying before it a priori, which transcendental aesthetic
offers to it in order to provide material [IDEA: @A77] for the pure
concepts of the understanding, without which they would be without any
content, hence completely empty. Now space and time contain a manifold
of pure a priori intuition, but they nonetheless belong to the
conditions of receptivity of our mind under which alone representations
of objects can be received, and which must therefore ever affect the
concept of objects. But the spontaneity of our thought demands that the
manifold first be gone through, taken up, and conjoined in a specific
manner, in order to make a cognition out of it. I call this act synthesis.
By synthesis in its most general signification, however, I understand
[IDEA: @B103] the act of adding diverse representations to one another,
and of comprehending their manifoldness in a cognition. Such a synthesis
is pure if the manifold is given, not empirically, but a priori (as is
the manifold in space and time). This synthesis must be given before all
analysis of our representations, and no concepts can, as regards
content, arise through analysis. But the synthesis of a manifold
(whether it be given empirically or a priori) first produces a
cognition, which can indeed still be raw and confused to begin with and
therefore requiring analysis; but synthesis is nonetheless that which
actually assembles the elements for cognitions and unifies them into a
specific content; it is therefore the first [IDEA: @A78] thing to which
we must attend if we want to judge the first origin of our cognition.
Synthesis in general, as we will later see, is an effect of the
imagination alone, a blind but indispensable function of the soul
without which we would have no cognition at all, but of which we are
hardly ever conscious. But, to bring this synthesis to concepts is a
function that pertains to the understanding, and through which it for
the first time furnishes us with cognition in the strict sense.
The pure synthesis, considered generally, yields the pure concept of the
[IDEA: @B104] understanding. Under this synthesis I include that which
rests on a basis of synthetic a priori unity: thus, our counting (as is
especially noticeable with larger numbers) is a synthesis according to
concepts, since this synthesis occurs in accordance with a common basis
of unity (e.g., *THE* *DECADE*). Under this concept the unity in the
synthesis of the manifold is, then, rendered necessary.
<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>
[IMAGE: INVALIDATING THE ORTHODOX AND ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH'S CLAIM TO
JUBILEE2000 AS BEING DELUSIONAL AND FRAUDULENT
This report dated 16th MAY 2000 was prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit
'GOOD DESIGN AND THE CONCEPTION/NOTION OF PARKING AGREEMENT IN A PRIVATE
#371 - SAINT ANDREWS STREET WITHIN AN AREA TO WHICH APPLIES A HISTORIC
OVERLAY']
Various representations are brought under a concept analytically (a
matter treated in general logic). But to bring, not the representations,
but the pure synthesis of representations to concepts, is taught by
transcendental logic. The first thing that must be given a priori for
the sake [IDEA: @A79] of the cognition of all objects is the manifold of
pure intuition; the second is the synthesis of this manifold through
imagination, though it still does not yield cognition. The concepts that
give unity to this pure synthesis, and that consist solely in the
representation of this necessary synthetic unity, make the third
requisite for the cognition of an occurrent object, and they rest on the
understanding." [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, KANT'S
PROLEGOMENA TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS, SECOND ANALOGY of ANALYTIC OF
PRINCIPLES, pp 164-166]
EXCERPT FROM KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) ON THE SYSTEM OF PRINCIPLES OF
THE PURE UNDERSTANDING / PRINCIPLE OF TIME-SUCCESSION ACCORDING TO THE
LAW OF CAUSALITY AS IDEA @B233: "ALL ALTERATIONS TAKE PLACE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW OF THE CONNECTION OF CAUSE AND EFFECT.
PROOF: I perceive that appearances succeed one another, that is, that
[IDEA: @B233] one state of a thing exists at one time, the opposite of
which existed in the previous state. I am therefore actually connecting
two perceptions in time. *NOW* *CONNECTION* *IS* *NO* *ACT* *OF* *MERE*
*SENSE* *AND* *INTUITION*, *BUT* *IS* *HERE* *THE* *PRODUCT* *OF* *A*
*SYNTHETIC* *FACULTY* *OF* *THE* *IMAGINATION* *THAT* *DETERMINES* *THE*
*INNER* *SENSE* *WITH* *RESPECT* *TO* *RELATION* *IN* *TIME* {ie. as
metempirics relating to matters beyond the range of empirical knowledge,
metaphysical; (occasionally) affirming the validity of concepts or
beliefs not based on experience which occurs within time}. The
imagination can however conjoin the aforementioned two states in two
different ways, so that either one or the other would precede in time;
for time cannot be perceived in itself and what precedes and what
follows in objects determined, as it were empirically, in relation to
it. I am therefore conscious only that my imagination places one state
before, the other after, not that in the object [IDEA: @B234] one
precedes the other; or, in other words, the objective relation of the
appearances that succeed one another remains undetermined through mere
perception. In order then for this relation to be cognized as
determined, the relation between the two states must be so thought that
it is thereby determined with necessity which of them must be placed
before, which after, and not the reverse. However, the concept that
carries with it a necessity of synthetic unity can only be a pure
concept of the understanding, which does not lie in perception – and
here it is the concept of the relation of cause and effect, in which the
former determines the latter in time as consequence, and not merely as
something that could precede it in the imagination (or not be perceived
at all). It is, then, only because we subject the succession of
appearances, hence all alterations, to the law of causality that
experience itself – i.e., empirical cognition of the appearances – is
possible; hence the appearances themselves as objects of experience are
possible only in accordance with this very law.
The apprehension of the manifold of appearances is always successive.
[IDEA: @A189] The representations of the parts succeed one another.
Whether they also succeed one another in the object is a further point
for reflection, which is not included in the first point. Now one can in
fact call everything, and even every representation insofar as one is
conscious of it, an object; but it is a matter for deeper investigation
what this word is to signify regarding [IDEA: @B235] appearances, not
insofar as they (as representations) [IDEA: @A190] are objects, but only
in so far as they designate an object. In as much as they, merely as
representations, are at the same time objects of consciousness, they are
not at all to be distinguished from apprehension, i.e., reception into
the synthesis of the imagination, and one must then say: that the
manifold of appearances is always generated successively in the mind.
Were appearances things in themselves, then no human being would be able
to conclude from the succession of representations how the manifold of
those appearances might be conjoined in the object. For in the end we
have to do only with our own representations; how things in themselves
may be (without regard to representations through which they affect us)
is completely beyond our sphere of cognition. Now although the
appearances are not things in themselves, and nevertheless are the only
thing that can be given to us for cognition, I still have to show what
in the appearances themselves may suit the manifold for a conjoining in
time, notwithstanding that its representation in apprehension is always
successive. Thus, for example, the apprehension of the manifold in the
appearances of a #311 - *HOUSE* that stands before me is successive. Now
the question is: whether the manifold of this #311 - *HOUSE* itself also
is successive in itself, which of course no one will grant. However, as
soon as I raise my concept of an object up to transcendental
significance, the #311 - *HOUSE* is now indeed no thing in itself, but
[IDEA: @B236] only an appearance, i.e., a representation, whose
transcendental object is [IDEA: @A191] unknown; what, then, shall I
understand by the question: how might the manifold be conjoined in the
appearance itself (which is still nothing in itself )? That which lies
in the successive apprehension is here viewed as representation, while
the appearance that is given to me, notwithstanding that it is nothing
more than a sum of such representations, is viewed as their object –
with which my concept, which I extract from the representations of
apprehension, has to agree. Since truth is the agreement of cognition
with object, it can easily be seen that here one can ask only about the
formal conditions of empirical truth, and that appearance, in
counter-relation with the representations of apprehension, can only be
represented as their object that is distinct from them if it falls under
a rule that distinguishes it from every other apprehension and makes one
way of conjoining the manifold necessary. That in the appearance which
contains the condition of this necessary rule of apprehension is the object.
Let us now proceed to our problem. That something happens – i.e., that
something, or some state, comes to be that wasn’t there before – [IDEA:
@B237] cannot be perceived empirically unless preceded by an appearance
that [IDEA: @A192] does not contain this state in itself; for a reality
following upon an empty time, hence, a coming to be that no state of
things precedes, can be apprehended just as little as empty time itself.
Every apprehension of an event is therefore a perception that follows
upon another perception. Since this is, though, the case with every
synthesis of apprehension, as I have shown above in the appearance of a
#311 - *HOUSE*, it does not in this way yet distinguish itself from the
others. But I also note: that if, in an appearance containing a
happening, I call the preceding state of perception A and the succeeding
one B, then B can only follow A in the apprehension, while the
perception a cannot follow but only precede B. I see for example a ship
drifting downstream. My perception of its location further down succeeds
the perception of its location further up the course of the river, and
it is impossible that in the apprehension of this appearance the ship
should first be perceived further downstream but afterwards further
upstream. Here, then, the order in the succession of perceptions in the
apprehension is determined, and the apprehension is bound by that order.
In the previous example of a #311 - *HOUSE*, in the apprehension my
perceptions could start at [IDEA: @B238] the top of the #311 - *HOUSE*
and end with the ground, or else start from below and end above, just as
they could apprehend the manifold of empirical intuition from the right
or the left. In the series of these perceptions there [IDEA: @A193] was,
then, no determined order making it necessary when in the apprehension I
had to begin in order to conjoin the manifold empirically. This rule is,
however, always to be met with in the perception of something that
happens, and it makes the order of the perceptions succeeding one
another (in the apprehension of this appearance) necessary.
In our case, therefore, I will have to derive the subjective sequence of
the apprehension from the objective sequence of the appearances, because
otherwise the former is completely undetermined and does not distinguish
any one appearance from the rest. By itself the former proves nothing
about the connection of the manifold in the object, because it is
completely arbitrary. This connection will therefore consist in the
order of the manifold of the appearance according to which the
apprehension of the one (what happens) follows upon that of the other
(which precedes) according to a rule. Only in this way can I gain the
right to say of the appearance itself, and not merely of my
apprehension: that in it a sequence is to be found – which is as much as
to say that I cannot institute the apprehension otherwise than exactly
in this sequence. [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, KANT'S
PROLEGOMENA TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS, SECOND ANALOGY of ANALYTIC OF
PRINCIPLES, pp 184-187]
AS PER MY 31 DECEMBER 2018 CORRESPONDENCE TO THE REGISTRAR OF THE
LATROBE COUNTY COURT WITHIN APPEAL CASE NUMBERS: AP-18-0609 / AP-18-0775
/ AP-18-0794 / AP-18-2201 / AP-18-2202, it is reasonably alleged that
the RESPONDENTS within each of these APPEALS have by determined means
conveyed a lack of #873 - PROBITY as shown BY ONTIC #205 - ABERRATION
{@210 / @215 / @220 / @228} TO PRINCIPLES IN PARTICULAR:
SECTION VIII - PRINCIPLE OF JUXTAPOSITION AS SOVEREIGNTY
SECTION IX - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY AS SUCCESSIVE PRINCIPLE
TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900 AS CONVEYING THE
PERSISTENCE OF SUBSTANCE MADE AGAINST ELIZABETH {THE OATH, FULLNESS OF
GOD} REGINA II and thereby is an impunity of the DIGNITY ROYAL as
actions being facilitated by the abnormal BOER WAR MEMORIAL #390 -
WREATH PLACEMENT which subsequently occurred upon 27 OCTOBER 2018 and
#312 - WITHERED STATE REMOVAL upon MONDAY 5 NOVEMBER 2018 as undertaken
by DETERMINED IGNOMINIOUS ACTIONS of MALEFICENCE PERPETUATED against the
DIGNITY ROYAL which is unambiguously defined by a proximity VICTORIA
PARK OAK TREE PLANTING EVENT OF 27 OCTOBER 1934 as coinciding with the
dedication of the WORLD WAR ONE WAR #288 - MEMORIAL situated within HYDE
PARK, SYDNEY.
As a consideration which needs to be firstly addressed by the COURT
being a PROBITY AND DECORUM question of the PERMISSIBILITY AS TO THE
LAWFULNESS OF A FOREIGN POWER CONSTITUTED BY:
'@1 - STATES / @2 - RELIGIONS / @3 - SOLDIERS / @4 - INSTITUTIONS / @5 -
ORGANISATIONS'
HAVING A PARASITIC IMPOST UPON #288 - REMEMBRANCE WORLD WAR ONE 2018
CENTENNIAL COMMEMORATIONS as a #364 - *QUESTION* *OF* #430 - *LAW* which
we have in the past conveyed to the STATE / FEDERAL ATTORNEY GENERALS,
ought to given such gravitas, as conveyed by SECTION VIII to QUEEN
VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT DATED 29 OCTOBER 1900 [then referred with
requisite suitable apriority impetus, to the HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA for
consideration, and over which legal precedents have frequently been made
concerning the legitimacy of FEDERAL MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT holding dual
nationality].
- dolf
The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's
Ground Work for the Metaphysics of Morals are now available within the
directory:
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>
Initial Post: 8 February 2019
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"
SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*
Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit
<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>
SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]
Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.
It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.
<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>
The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."
That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)
After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
