-- VOX POPULI VOX DEI
(c) 2019 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 17 February 2019
ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1326 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY
2019: "Show some evidence of wit. Borrow some."
FRAN (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 1833 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY 2019: "YAWN."
DOLF @ 1855 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY 2019: "Your ideas are *CONSTIPATED* ...
— HEY GIBLET —
“DANG YOU ***@THOLE
A CAPED CRUSADER.
MEATHEAD PARASOL.
MY SPACE INVADER.
HYENAS EACH ONE.
ON A PICNIC TREAT.
CONGREGATING FUN.
GROWLING CONCEIT.
YOU’RE NO TROJAN.
JUST TURKEY ARSE.
A FORAGING BOGAN.
FEVERISH FOR FARCE.”
YOUTUBE: "African Safari Oleg"
ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1835 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY
2019: "Truly witless people, programmed to babble whatever rubbish they
hear from approved sources, can have no comprehension of wit."
RACHEL [COCKROACH] BEN LEVI: “Excuse me, Bob?
Do you remember where I hid the K-Y Jelly?”
DOLF: “You dry old twat {ie. a person regarded as stupid or obnoxious} who
is still living in the 80’s...
Silicon based lubricants gives a better glide.
And afterwards you can polish the linoleum floors.”
RACHEL [COCKROACH] BEN LEVI: “Okay, i'll try the WD-40.
thanks for all your continued great advice.”
— LOVE IS AN OPEN DOOR —
“NO DEAR, HERE’S SOME ADVICE.
WD-40 IS FOR YOUR DRY HINGE.
AND KEEN FOR TRYST AS TO VICE.
IT’S NO VALUE FOR A LONG BINGE.
WHEN YOU CAN’T EVEN PLAY NICE.
BECAUSE YOU’RE ONLY UNHINGED.”
ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1937 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY
2019: "Gad, a strange creature here, makes no sense at all. Is this
supposed to be comic relief?"
DOLF @ 2009 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY 2019: "You’re Indian mate and don’t believe
in sapient human rights due to your mentally deficient binomial paradigm:
*ADOLF* *HITLER* & *ROMAN* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*: @1 - FASCIST MOVEMENT IS
A SPONTANEOUS RETURN TO THE TRADITIONS OF ANCIENT ROME, @5 - ROMAN EMPIRE
GREAT POLITICAL CREATION OF STATE, #65 - *SOLDIER*, #175 - *MARRIAGE*
Since our superior democracy is established upon a trinomial paradigm:
@1 {#1} + @2 {#41} + @3 {#81} + @4 {#369} = #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL
YOUR SHIT HOLE NATION CANNOT PROVIDE FLUSHING TOILETS OR HUMAN RIGHTS FOR
THE UNTOUCHABLES..."
YOUTUBE: "Coldplay - Hymn For The Weekend (Official Video)"
ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 2154 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY
2019: "Bad comic."
DOLF @ 0611 HOURS ON 18 FEBRUARY 2019: "Noting that the PRE-PLATONIC
advocate Philolaus (470-385 BCE) a principle proponent of the PYTHAGOREAN
doctrine considered the Natural Year to be 364.5 days which is identical to
the Chinese trinomial conception of number that by its circularity conveys
an #41 - ONTIC necessity proscriptions: #205 - Principle of Persistent
Substance ✡️ / ☯️ #164 - Principle of Materiality = #369 - Discriminating
Norm (Human Nature) being organisation as premise of #123 - JUDGMENT
SENSIBILITY for #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL.
<
Loading Image...
>
A reasonable question in regard to this is made of EMANATION theology in
relation to the perspective that ASYLUM INFLUX may be viewed as an
irrationality of the LATIN / PYTHAGOREAN binomial construct of imperial
governance as perspective of SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMY dynamic.
Emanation of the state is a term used in European law to describe any body
which provides a public service under the control of government. The term
was defined by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in Foster, A and others
v. British Gas plc. The ECJ's ruling defines the term as:
A body, whatever its legal form, which has been made responsible, pursuant
to a measure adopted by the state, for providing a public service under the
control of the state and has for that purpose special powers beyond that
which result from the normal rules applicable in relations between
individuals.
The term is most obviously used to describe public sector employers, such
as the police, fire service, local government bodies or schools.
[<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emanation_of_the_state>]
Thusly can we not therefore consider antisemitism as emanation within the
state as similar to such issues of Institutional corruption or of an
emerging contagious shooting dynamic whether in police services,
educational institutions or the norm within society as a sociological
accountability phenomenon first observed in military and police personnel,
in which one person firing on a target can induce others to begin shooting.
In my view EMANATION theology presents to us a circularity which as
intuited from the TORAH has as #4 - Principle of Materiality as it’s
grounding that as temporality is anchored within 49J1W2D as Jewish Exodus
from Egypt and 40 years sojourn = 50J"
FRAN (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 1857 HOURS ON 26 JANUARY 2019: "Says the
person who said good things about Trump thus revealing his own babbling
sources.... "
DOLF @ 0611 HOURS ON 18 FEBRUARY 2019: "Well may you say with regards to
antisemitism and holocaust never again, let us be lambs to the slaughter
however bleating “unacceptable” is not an adequate reasoned response.
Unacceptable is when you provide a comprehensive solution to the “WORLD
JEWISH CONGRESS” and they refuse to engage within any dialog (not even
acknowledgement let alone appreciation) and continue to send you
solicitations for money saying the matter is URGENT.
A case in point is President TRUMP's foresight in establishing a BORDER
WALL due to the risk of a RIPPLE or CONTAGION EFFECT from basket case
ECONOMIES and failed STATES within LATIN AMERICA.
When you consider that implicit within the notion of LATIN AMERICA is a
conception of SOVEREIGN STATES which are a reliance upon ROMAN EMPIRE
GOVERNANCE: *ADOLF* *HITLER* & *ROMAN* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*: @1 - FASCIST
MOVEMENT IS A SPONTANEOUS RETURN TO THE TRADITIONS OF ANCIENT ROME, @5 -
ROMAN EMPIRE GREAT POLITICAL CREATION OF STATE, #65 - *SOLDIER*, #175 -
*MARRIAGE* that apart from a demiurge existential impost {eg: alleged
Russian interference within the American political system} always has
inherent dichotomies, irrationality and irreconcilability.
This is distinct from a SAPIENT / KNOWLEDGE economy which as conveyed by
the GRAPPLE PROTOTYPE as DATA SET comprised of #729 = #9 x #9 x #9 / 2 =
#364.5 BIFURCATED APPRAISALS as being a SUB-SET of the available 14,298
RECORDS.
We are now meeting the requirement for the development of some program
functions against that originating DATA SET. Before we commence the actual
process of generating our individual LEXICON JSON resource files and
GEMATRIA aggregation of them we will make the 14,298 REFERENCE SOURCE
OBJECTS available for the exigency of GOVERNMENT and NEWS MEDIA:
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/scripts/Strongs.zip>
LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 2026 HOURS ON
27 JANUARY 2019: "Have you suddenly and without warning switched to
describing the people in India?"
ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 2347 HOURS ON 27 JANUARY
2019: "Indians, especially Bengalis, are very witty. They have the best
jokes. Facebook provides them for me, galore.
I was talking in general, about the brainwashed masses, and their robotic
minds that being so robotic can have no comprehension of wit."
— OUR SHINDIG —
“OH FOR THE LOVE
OF PUSSY DEAR.
TRUTH SO PLAIN.
TO GOD {#86} ABOVE. {@5: Sup: 41 (#98); Ego: 70 (#305 - SEE KANT'S
PROLEGOMENA IDEA: @305)}
AND ALL HERE.
WE’RE JUST VAIN.” {@7: Sup: 15 (#118 - SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA: @B118);
Ego: 50 (#417)}
YOUTUBE: "PUSSY GALORE"
ÖRDÖG (***@YOUR.SCARY.SHADOW.EDU) @ 0733 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY 2019: "This
should be interesting to watch: a lowlife racist alt-right wanker against
this strange newbie!"
KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) SECTION #22 AS IDEA @305: "To sum this up: the
*BUSINESS* *OF* *THE* *SENSES* is to intuit; that of the understanding, to
think. To think, however, is to unite representations in a consciousness.
This unification either arises merely relative to the subject and is
contingent and subjective, or it occurs without condition and is necessary
or objective. The unification of representations in a consciousness is
judgment. Therefore, thinking is the same as judging or as relating
representations to judgments in general. Judgments are therefore either
merely subjective, if representations are related to one consciousness in
one subject alone and are united in it, or they are objective, if they are
united in a consciousness in general, i.e., are united necessarily therein.
[IDEA: @305] The logical moments of all judgments are so many possible ways
of uniting representations in a consciousness.
If, however, the very same moments serve as concepts, they are concepts of
the necessary unification of these representations in a consciousness, and
so are principles of objectively valid judgments. This unification in a
consciousness is either analytic, through identity, or synthetic, through
combination and addition of various representations with one another.
Experience consists in the synthetic connection of appearances
(perceptions) in a consciousness, insofar as this connection is necessary.
Therefore pure concepts of the understanding are those under which all
perceptions must first be subsumed before they can serve in judgments of
experience, in which the synthetic unity of perceptions is represented as
necessary and universally valid." [pages 56-57]
ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0922 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY
2019: "So what are you? You have been described as a marxist. At their
best, marxists are *RIPE*-arse idiot-intellectuals, lazy, envious,
pretentious, mendacious and overall worthless in every way."
FRAN (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 0927 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY 2019: "For
God's sake try to use some brains if you have any! It should be obvious
even to an idiot that he was described as being a 'marxist' by a known
troll. Or didn't you understand the responses that were given about that
troll?
At their best, marxists are *RIPE*-arse idiot-intellectuals, lazy, envious,
pretentious, mendacious and overall worthless in every way.
Now you're turning you attention to him (thus making a lie of your comments
about how unworthy he was of your attnetion [snort]) your insults are still
lame and pathetic."
KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) AS IDEA @B118: "Hence I call the explanation of
the way in which concepts can relate a priori to objects the transcendental
deduction of those concepts, and I distinguish it from an empirical
deduction, which shows how a concept is acquired through experience and
reflection on experience, and which concerns therefore not the legitimacy
of the possession, but the fact of how possession came about.
Now we have indeed two sorts of concepts, completely different in [IDEA:
@B118] kind, that nonetheless agree with one another in that both of them
relate to objects entirely a priori: namely, the concepts of space and
time, as forms of #123 - SENSIBILITY, and the categories {
#118 / #417 as [#5, #300, #1, #60, #1, #50] = tasso (G5021): {UMBRA: #19 as
#1501 % #41 = #25} 1) to put in order, to station; 1a) to place in a
certain order, to arrange, to assign a place, to appoint; 1a1) to assign
(appoint) a thing to one; 1b) to appoint, ordain, order; 1b1) to appoint on
one's own responsibility or authority; 1b2) *TO* *APPOINT* *MUTUALLY*, ie.
*AGREE* *UPON*;
}, as concepts of the understanding.
To attempt an empirical deduction of these concepts would be completely
idle labor, because the differentia of their nature consists in the [IDEA:
@A86] very fact that they relate to their objects without having to borrow
anything from experience for the representation of those objects. If
therefore a deduction of these concepts is needed, it will always have to
be transcendental." [page 212]
ÖRDÖG (***@YOUR.SCARY.SHADOW.EDU) @ 1005 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY 2019: "It
looks like some people's idea what a discussion of a topic should look like
is quite different from what this newbie thinks.
There are those like "*DOLF*" for instance who loves ranting on and on and
on but rational readers can never work out what he is on about. I am afraid
the same goes for this poster.
I am still unable to work out why he insists on posting to this newsgroup.
Why he insists posting at all!"
ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1143 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY
2019: "Is there someone high up in this n[ews]g[roup] who has signed a
document showing who is a troll and who is not? Even if he did, that would
not be binding upon anyone in any free society.
As far as I am concerned, all are equal here, *EXCEPT* *THOSE* *LIKE*
*DOLF* *WHO* *WRITE* [TO] *HARASS* *ME* *WITH* *HATE* *SPEECH*. Those I
regard as the real scum, and will report to the police about them if they
continue with such harassment. Cybercrime involving hate speech, that is
hateful to minorities, is an offence that is taken seriously these days.
Anyway why are you speaking for this dog character? Can't he decide for
himself what he is? I suppose you all are suffering severe identity
crises."
DE NUN CHUCKA (***@HOTMAIL.COM) @ 1148 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY 2019:
"Really, I might take [*DOLF*] out of the bozo bin as he sound like a
sensible fellow now.
Anyhow why is a US west coast Indian posting in this n[ews]g[roup],
shouldn't you be on a reservation sitting in a tee-pee?"
FRAN (***@LOONYNUTTERS.COM) @ 1348 HOURS ON 28 JANUARY 2019: "I was
waiting for someone else to pick up on that. Now he says he's in Melbourne
and has been since 1989................"
DANIEL60 (***@ETERNAL-SEPTEMBER.ORG) @ 2349 HOURS ON 17 FEBRUARY 2019:
"What?? Did you actually bother to read the tripe??"
-- CONSTIPATED IDEAS --
"OH SUCH NUGGET OF WISDOM.
BESTOWAL OF TURGID REALITY.
BIRTHED BY IGNORANT SCUM.
INFINITE AGE GIVING BANALITY.
HEY MISSUS NOW WIPE MY BUM.
ENDLESS REACH MY STUPIDITY." {@7: Sup: 33 (#325: MAGIC SUM OF 5x5 = #65 -
*SOLDIER*); Ego: 60 (#318: SEE KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA)}
KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) EXCERPT OF IDEA: @318 FROM SECTION #36 - HOW IS
NATURE ITSELF POSSIBLE?
This question, which is the highest point that transcendental philosophy
*CAN* *EVER* *REACH*, *AND* *UP* *TO* *WHICH*, *AS* *ITS* *BOUNDARY* *AND*
*COMPLETION*, it must be taken, actually contains two questions.
FIRST: How is nature possible in general in the material sense, namely,
according to intuition, as the sum total of appearances; how are space,
time {#325: MAGIC SUM OF 5x5 = #65 - SOLDIER {*DODECAHEDRON*} as Principle
of Syncretic Progression {#273} - *DO* *NOT* *KILL*
#1827 = 4 x #364 + #371 - ROMAN CATHOLIC LITURGICAL CALENDAR 2ND VATICAN
COUNCIL / SAINT ANDREWS CAUSE CELEBRE FIVE YEAR CYCLE
}, and that which fills them both, the object of sensation {
#175 - MARRIAGE {*ICOSAHEDRON*} as Principle of Persistent Substance {#205}
- Discriminating Norm {#369} / Principle of Enquiry {#364} - *DO* *NOT*
*STEAL*
#1827 = [#5, #400, #600, #1, #100, #10, #200, #300, #10, #1, #200]
eucharistia / ευχαριστιας (G2169): 1) Thanksgiving; 2) *EUCHARIST*; 3)
*TARGETED* *SINCE* *REFUSAL* *OF* *COMMUNION* upon PENTECOST SUNDAY 31 MAY
1998 AND 11 JUNE 2000.
After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist {ie.
*ADOLF* *HITLER* & *ROMAN* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*: @1 - FASCIST MOVEMENT IS
A SPONTANEOUS RETURN TO THE TRADITIONS OF ANCIENT ROME, @5 - ROMAN EMPIRE
GREAT POLITICAL CREATION OF STATE, #65 - *SOLDIER*, #175 - *MARRIAGE*:
*DODECAHEDRON* + *ICOSAHEDRON* = TETRAD / *TETRACTYS*}, expresses an
Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its geometric
conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean TETRAD / TETRACTYS
<
Loading Image...
>
[IMAGE: TRUTH IS A COSMOGONIC CONSIDERATION AFTER ALL:
1) Telos (6,000 as 122J3W1D) = Arch (#0 as 22/7 = 3W1D) + c² is a genuine
Sabbath based PARADIGM [Exodus 20:8; Deuteronomy 5:15]
As the relativity and grounding of the Infinite to the temporal reality
(ie. the phenomenology as the deterministic unfolding of history) which is
implied by the notion of rational PI and the cosmogonical Genesis reprise
{#0} of the lunar / solar cycle occurring on the equinox of Wednesday 20th
March 1996 / New Moon on Thursday 21st March 1996.
2) Pythagorean Theorem: c² = a² + b² is fascist (see discussion below) and
now redundant as only a METHODOLOGY]
ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0945 HOURS ON 18 FEBRUARY
2019: "Small minded, when not idiotic."
"AND PILATE WROTE A TITLE, AND PUT IT ON THE CROSS. AND THE WRITING WAS,
JESUS OF NAZARETH THE KING OF THE JEWS {
#I {#10} - THE LEATHERS. "MADE OF THE HIDE OF MNEVIS, WHICH SUTU HATH
SCORCHED," IS THY NAME {#10 - Totality of Nature / #7 - Engendering Nature}
#N {#50} - THE LOOK-OUT. "MASTER OF THE GROUNDS" IS THY NAME {#2 - Nature
Rejoices in its Nature [#34 / #7 - Engendering Nature]}
#R {#200} - THE STREAM, SINCE THOU SAILEST UPON ME: "THEIR MIRROR" IS THY
NAME {#8 - Transforming Nature {DOUBLE: #6 - Form of Nature {#9 -
Autonomous Nature} [#505 / #1 - Nature Contains Nature] AS IMPLEMENTATION:
{GRAVITAS: ASSISTING (#RESH to #TAU)} AND DEFINE THE @1 SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLE
CHARACTERISTIC HERE}
#I {#10} is an anagram assigned from the PYTHAGOREAN usage of TERNIO which
is derived from the Latin phrase ''IESUS NAZARENUS REX IUDAEORUM''}
INRI@{
@1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
@2: Sup: 60 (#70); Ego: 50 (#60),
@3: Sup: 17 (#87); Ego: 38 (#98),
@4: Sup: 27 (#114); Ego: 10 (#108),
Male: #114 {#5 {#114 / #342 - TORAH} #6 {114 / #342 - ANKH / ROMAN}};
Feme: #108 - *PROGENITOR*
} // #270
THIS TITLE THEN READ MANY OF THE JEWS: FOR THE PLACE WHERE JESUS WAS
CRUCIFIED WAS NIGH TO THE CITY: AND IT WAS WRITTEN IN HEBREW, AND GREEK,
AND LATIN. THEN SAID THE CHIEF PRIESTS OF THE JEWS TO PILATE, WRITE NOT,
THE KING OF THE JEWS; BUT THAT HE SAID, I AM KING OF THE JEWS. PILATE
ANSWERED, WHAT I HAVE WRITTEN I HAVE WRITTEN." [John 19:19-22 KJV]
MIRROR OF ARINDAM BANERJEE (BRAINDEAD-***@GMAIL.COM.INVALID) @ 1018
HOURS ON 18 FEBRUARY 2019: "Idiotic is an alternate officially approved
signature of Arindam Banerjee
[Believe me since I am Arindam Banerjee (or we are, or, what the ***@ck, who
really knows)]"
HITLER HIMSELF SAID OF FASCISM: 'WE MUST DISTINGUISH BETWEEN THE FASCIST
POPULAR MOVEMENT AND THE POPULAR {#312 - *CONTRADICTION* *DIALECTIC*}
MOVEMENT IN RUSSIA. THE FASCIST MOVEMENT IS A SPONTANEOUS RETURN TO THE
TRADITIONS OF ANCIENT ROME' [ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE TALK IDEA: @1 ON SATURDAY
5 JULY 1941]
'If the Duce were to die, it would be a great misfortune for Italy. As I
walked with him in the gardens of the Villa Borghese, I could easily
compare his profile with that of the Roman busts, and I realised he was one
of the *CAESARS*. There's no doubt at all that Mussolini is the heir of the
great men of that period. Despite their weaknesses, the Italians have so
many qualities that make us like them.
Italy is the country where intelligence created the notion of the *STATE*.
THE ROMAN EMPIRE IS A GREAT POLITICAL CREATION, THE GREATEST OF ALL.'
[ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE TALK IDEA: @5 ON 21-22 JULY 1941]
}, possible in general? The answer is: by means of the constitution of our
sensibility, in accordance with which our #123 - *SENSIBILITY* is affected
in its characteristic way by objects that are in themselves unknown to it
and that are wholly distinct from said appearances. This answer is, in the
book itself, given in the Transcendental Aesthetic, but here in the
Prolegomena through the solution of the first main question.
— EUROPEAN UNION'S RAPE —
"OH BOUDICA, REGINA HERO
THIS MOMENT TO ALL GAPE.
ETERNAL JUDGMENT OF NERO.
FOR DAUGHTERS DID RAPE. {@6: Sup: 35 (#242); Ego: 1 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT
ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19})
TESTIMONY {#873} BY MORTAL WILL.
VICTORIA REMEMBERS THEE.
WITHIN ROME'S GRASP STILL. {@9: Sup: 11 (#317 - SEE KANT'S IDEA: *THE*
*SENSES* *DO* *NOT* *SUPPLY* *PURE* *CONCEPTS* *OF* *THE* *UNDERSTANDING*
*IN* *CONCRETO*); Ego: 7 (#317 - SEE KANT'S IDEA: *BUT* *ONLY* *THE*
*SCHEMA* *FOR* *THEIR* *USE*)}
ITS TIME TO SET YOU FREE."
YOUTUBE: "Horrible Histories (Boudicca)
<https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2nhi4w>
SECOND: How is nature possible in the formal sense, as the sum total of the
rules to which all appearances must be subject if they are to be thought as
connected in one experience? The answer cannot come out otherwise than: it
is possible only by means of the constitution of our understanding, in
accordance with which all these representations of sensibility are
necessarily referred to one consciousness, and through which, first, the
characteristic manner of our thinking, namely by means of rules, is
possible, and then, by means of these rules, experience is possible – which
is to be wholly distinguished from insight into objects in themselves. This
answer is, in the book itself, given in the Transcendental Logic, but here
in the Prolegomena, in the course of solving the second main question.
"THEN PILATE {ARMED WITH A DART} THEREFORE TOOK JESUS {HE IS SAVED/A
SAVIOUR; A DELIVERER} OF NAZARETH {SOVEREIGN; ONE CHOSEN OR SET APART;
SEPARATED; CROWNED; SANCTIFIED}, AND SCOURGED HIM.
AND THE #65 - *SOLDIERS* PLATTED A CROWN OF THORNS, AND PUT IT ON HIS HEAD,
AND THEY PUT ON HIM A PURPLE ROBE, AND SAID, HAIL, KING OF THE JEWS! AND
THEY SMOTE HIM WITH THEIR HANDS.
PILATE THEREFORE WENT FORTH AGAIN, AND SAITH UNTO THEM, BEHOLD, I BRING HIM
FORTH TO YOU, THAT YE MAY KNOW THAT I FIND NO FAULT IN HIM. THEN CAME JESUS
FORTH, WEARING THE CROWN OF THORNS, AND THE PURPLE ROBE. AND PILATE SAITH
UNTO THEM, BEHOLD THE MAN!
WHEN THE CHIEF PRIESTS THEREFORE AND OFFICERS SAW HIM, THEY CRIED OUT,
SAYING, CRUCIFY HIM, CRUCIFY HIM. PILATE SAITH UNTO THEM, TAKE YE HIM, AND
CRUCIFY HIM: FOR I FIND NO FAULT IN HIM.
THE JEWS ANSWERED HIM, WE HAVE A LAW, AND BY OUR LAW HE OUGHT TO DIE,
BECAUSE HE MADE HIMSELF THE SON OF GOD. WHEN PILATE THEREFORE HEARD THAT
SAYING, HE WAS THE MORE AFRAID; AND WENT AGAIN INTO THE JUDGMENT HALL, AND
SAITH UNTO JESUS, WHENCE ART THOU? BUT JESUS GAVE HIM NO ANSWER.
THEN SAITH PILATE UNTO HIM, SPEAKEST THOU NOT UNTO ME? KNOWEST THOU NOT
THAT I HAVE POWER TO CRUCIFY THEE, AND HAVE POWER TO RELEASE THEE?
JESUS ANSWERED, THOU COULDEST HAVE NO POWER AT ALL AGAINST ME, EXCEPT IT
WERE GIVEN THEE FROM ABOVE: THEREFORE HE {ie.
"ALWAYS BEARING ABOUT IN THE BODY THE DYING OF THE LORD JESUS, THAT THE
LIFE ALSO OF JESUS MIGHT BE MADE MANIFEST IN OUR BODY. FOR WE WHICH LIVE
ARE ALWAY DELIVERED {
G3860@{
@1: Sup: 80 (#80); Ego: 80 (#80),
@2: Sup: 81 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 1 (#81),
@3: Sup: 19 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19});
Ego: 19 (#100),
@4: Sup: 20 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY {%8}); Ego: 1
(#101),
@5: Sup: 24 (#224); Ego: 4 (#105),
@6: Sup: 34 (#258); Ego: 10 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}),
@7: Sup: 38 (#296); Ego: 4 (#119),
@8: Sup: 28 (#324); Ego: 71 (#190),
@9: Sup: 68 (#392); Ego: 40 (#230),
@10: Sup: 78 (#470); Ego: 10 (#240),
Male: #470; Feme: #240
}
#325 {MAGIC SUM OF 5x5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} as [#80, #1, #100, #1, #4, #10,
#4, #70, #40, #5, #9, #1] / #1050 as [#80, #1, #100, #1, #4, #10, #4, #800,
#40, #10] = paradidomi (3860): {UMBRA: #43 as #582 % #41 = #8} 1) to give
into the hands (of another); 2) to give over into (one's) power or use; 3)
to commit, to commend; 4) to deliver verbally; 5) to permit allow; 2a) to
deliver to one something to keep, use, take care of, manage; 2b) to deliver
up one to custody, to be judged, condemned, punished, scourged, tormented,
put to death; 2c) to deliver up treacherously; 2c1) by betrayal to cause
one to be taken; 2c2) to deliver one to be taught, moulded; 4a) commands,
rites; 4b) to deliver by narrating, to report; 5a) when the fruit will
allow that is when its *RIPENESS* permits; 5b) gives itself up, presents
itself;
} UNTO DEATH FOR JESUS’ SAKE, THAT THE LIFE ALSO OF JESUS MIGHT BE MADE
MANIFEST IN OUR MORTAL FLESH." [2 Corinthians 4:10 -11 (KJV)]
} THAT DELIVERED {
G3860@{
@1: Sup: 80 (#80); Ego: 80 (#80),
@2: Sup: 81 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 1 (#81),
@3: Sup: 19 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19});
Ego: 19 (#100),
@4: Sup: 24 (#204); Ego: 5 (#105),
@5: Sup: 28 (#232); Ego: 4 (#109),
@6: Sup: 17 (#249); Ego: 70 (#179),
@7: Sup: 26 (#275); Ego: 9 (#188),
@8: Sup: 34 (#309); Ego: 8 (#196 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE {%37}),
@9: Sup: 10 (#319); Ego: 57 (#253),
@10: Sup: 15 (#334); Ego: 5 (#258),
Male: #334; Feme: #258
} // #582
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #582 % #41 = #8 - Worth of Water, Easy By Nature; I-Ching: H48 - The
Well, Welling; Tetra: 40 - Law/Model;
THOTH MEASURE: #8 - Oh thou of fiery face, whose motion is backwards; *I*
*AM* *NOT* *A* *ROBBER* *OF* *SACRED* *PROPERTY*.
#VIRTUE: Opposition (no. #8) means recklessness.
#TOOLS: Ritual (no. #48) means squareness the correspondence between
word and deed.
#POSITION: With Departure (no. #66), leaving the old, but
#TIME: With On the Verge (no. #78), coming to a new start.
#CANON: #200
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_200@{
@1: Sup: 8 (#8); Ego: 8 (#8),
@2: Sup: 56 (#64); Ego: 48 (#56),
@3: Sup: 41 (#105); Ego: 66 (#122),
@4: Sup: 38 (#143); Ego: 78 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY
{%8}),
Male: #143; Feme: #200
} // #200
#582 as [#80, #1, #100, #5, #4, #70, #9, #8, #300, #5] = paradidomi
(G3860): {UMBRA: #43 as #582 % #41 = #8} 1) to give into the hands (of
another); 2) to give over into (one's) power or use; 3) to commit, to
commend; 4) to deliver verbally; 5) to permit allow; 2a) to deliver to one
something to keep, use, take care of, manage; 2b) to deliver up one to
custody, to be judged, condemned, punished, scourged, tormented, put to
death; 2c) to deliver up treacherously; 2c1) by betrayal to cause one to be
taken; 2c2) to deliver one to be taught, moulded; 4a) commands, rites; 4b)
to deliver by narrating, to report; 5a) when the fruit will allow that is
when its *RIPENESS* permits; 5b) gives itself up, presents itself;
} ME UNTO THEE HATH THE GREATER SIN.
AND FROM THENCEFORTH PILATE SOUGHT TO RELEASE HIM: BUT THE JEWS CRIED OUT,
SAYING, IF THOU LET THIS MAN GO, THOU ART NOT CAESAR’S FRIEND: WHOSOEVER
MAKETH HIMSELF A KING SPEAKETH AGAINST CAESAR." [John 19:1-12 (KJV)]
But how this characteristic property of our sensibility itself may be
possible, or that of our understanding and of the necessary apperception
that underlies it and all thinking, cannot be further solved and answered,
because we always have need of them in turn for all answering and for all
thinking of objects:
Thusly the question which I have in relation to such an interpretation
given to Moses depiction of GENESIS is an existential and immaterial
consideration of its consequence in being viewed as a trinomial rationality
in light of both #2184 and derivations of #41 - ONTIC necessity as
conveying the Anthropological Cosmogonic Principle (Dialectic):
6 x #364 - Principle of Enquiry
7 x #312 - Principle of Contradiction
8 x #273 - Principle of Syncretic Progression
What then is A-U-M?
“FOR I SAY UNTO YOU, THAT EXCEPT YOUR RIGHTEOUSNESS SHALL EXCEED [THE
RIGHTEOUSNESS] OF THE SCRIBES AND PHARISEES, YE SHALL IN NO CASE ENTER INTO
THE KINGDOM {ie. #2184} OF HEAVEN.” [Matthew 5:20 (KJV)]
Whom is holier than thou?
There are many #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE* that we can know only through
experience, but lawfulness in the connection of appearances, i.e., nature
in [IDEA: @319] general, we cannot come to know through any experience,
because experience itself has need of such laws, which lie a priori at the
basis of its possibility.
The possibility of experience in general is thus at the same time the
universal law of nature, and the principles of the former are themselves
the laws of the latter. For we are not acquainted with nature except as the
sum total of appearances, i.e., of the representations in us, and so we
cannot get the laws of their connection from anywhere else except the
principles of their connection in us, i.e., from the conditions of
necessary unification in one consciousness, which unification constitutes
the possibility of experience.
Even the main proposition that has been elaborated throughout this entire
part, that universal #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE* can be cognized a priori,
already leads by itself to the proposition: that the highest legislation
for nature must lie in our self, i.e., in our understanding, and that we
must not seek the *UNIVERSAL* #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE* from nature by
means of experience, but, conversely, must seek nature, as regards its
universal conformity to law, solely in the conditions of the possibility of
experience that lie in our sensibility and understanding; for how would it
otherwise be possible to become acquainted with these laws a priori, since
they are surely not rules of analytic cognition, but are genuine synthetic
amplifications of cognition? Such agreement, and indeed necessary
agreement, between the principles of possible experience and the laws of
the possibility of nature, can come about from only two causes: either
these laws are taken from nature by means of experience, or, conversely,
nature is derived from the laws of the possibility of experience in general
and is fully identical with the mere universal lawfulness of experience.
The first one contradicts itself, for the *UNIVERSAL* #2184 - *LAWS* *OF*
*NATURE* can and must be cognized a priori (i.e., independently of all
experience) and set at the foundation of all empirical use of the
understanding; so only the second remains.
We must, however, distinguish empirical #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*, which
always [IDEA: @320] presuppose particular perceptions, from the pure or
*UNIVERSAL* #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*:
CAN GENESIS AND THE TEN COMMANDMENTS ALSO BE VIEWED IN THESE TERMS OF #451
= Y-M-T-A CIRCULARITY?:
DAY #1: Principle of Enquiry {#364 x 6 = #2184} - *REMEMBER* *THE*
*SABBATH*
DAY #2: Principle of Contradiction {#312 x 7 = #2184} - *HONOUR*
*PARENTS*
DAY #3: Principle of Syncretic Progression {#273 x 8 = #2184} - *DO* *NOT*
*KILL*
DAY #4: Principle of Materiality {#164} - *AVOID* *HETERONOMY* *AGAINST*
*AUTONOMY*
DAY #5: Principle of Persistent Substance {#205} - Discriminating Norm
{#369} / Principle of Enquiry {#364} - *DO* *NOT* *STEAL*
DAY #6: Norma Obligans (Obligating Norm: #246} / Principle of Contradiction
{#312} - *BEAR* *NO* *FALSE* *WITNESS*
DAY #7: Manifesting Norm {#287} / Principle of Syncretic Progression {#273}
- *COVET* *NOT*
Which, without having particular *PERCEPTIONS* *UNDERLYING* *THEM*,
*CONTAIN* *MERELY* *THE* *CONDITIONS* *FOR* *THE* *NECESSARY* *UNIFICATION*
*OF* *SUCH* *PERCEPTIONS* *IN* *ONE* *EXPERIENCE*; with respect to the
latter laws, nature and possible experience are one and the same, and since
in *POSSIBLE* *EXPERIENCE* *THE* *LAWFULNESS* *RESTS* on the necessary
connection of appearances in one experience (without which we would not be
able to cognize any object of the sensible world at all), and so on the
original laws of the understanding, then, even though it sounds strange at
first, it is nonetheless certain, if I say with respect to the *UNIVERSAL*
#2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*: the understanding does not draw its (a
priori) #2184 - *LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*, but prescribes them to it."
[CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's Prolegomena to Any
Future Metaphysics, IDEA: @320, pages 69-71]
ARINDAM BANERJEE (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0655 HOURS ON 18 FEBRUARY
2019: "[Being educated as a Roman Catholic] I live and thrive on and for
this kind of shite, didn't you know?"
MIRROR OF ARINDAM BANERJEE (BRAINDEAD-***@GMAIL.COM.INVALID) @ 1037
HOURS ON 18 FEBRUARY 2019: "Sure I know. I suspected as much about you
right from the beginning!
Anglo-Celtic racist pigs must be a special breed!
How otherwise could one account for your 'special quality/quantity' Usenet
output?
Cheer up! It won't be long before your utter mental decline has almost run
its course."
LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0931 HOURS ON
18 FEBRUARY 2019: "Over a billion of them live among and thrive on shite,
didn't you know?."
- dolf
The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's Ground
Work for the Metaphysics of Morals are now available within the directory:
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>
Initial Post: 18 February 2019
Post by unknown"The ship in which he embarked, and which was tempest-tossed, is this brief
and hard life in the present time. Just as though we had turned and removed
from that blessed and secure life, to that which was most tempestuous and
unstable, as from solid land to a ship. For what a ship is to the land,
that our present life is to eternal life."
The Mystery of Jonah by St. Methodius
"If You, Lord, should mark iniquities, O Lord, who could stand? But there
is forgiveness with You, That You may be feared." Psalm 130:3-4
Draw nigh unto God and He will draw nigh unto you.
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"
SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*
Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit
<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>
SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]
Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.
It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.
<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>
The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."
That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)
After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
