-- (DRAFT) I WOKE UP THIS MORNING FROM THE STRANGEST DREAM
Finally these journalists have written the TRUTH about their dark souls...
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Quest%20for%20the%20Holy%20Grail.pdf>
Nous: #63
Time: 10:20 hrs
Date: 2019.8.29
Torah: [#20, #6, #100]@{
@1: Sup: 20 (#20); Ego: 20 (#20),
@2: Sup: 26 (#46); Ego: 6 (#26),
@3: Sup: 45 (#91); Ego: 19 (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}),
Male: #91; Feme: #45
} // #126
Dao: Origins in Reversal, Consider Beginnings
Tetra: #62 - Doubt
I-Ching: H51 - Quake, Thunderclap, Shake, The arousing (shock, thunder)
Latin: Decantatus {God of virtues} Alt: Yzalel {Deliverance of God} {
1. HELPS CONQUER & TO OBTAIN RELEASE FROM SIEGE
2. THE SCIENCES & ARTS
3. THE MEDITATION OF THE WISE
4. Souchoe
}
Asa {Physician; cure}
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#346 / #470} / HETEROS {#324 / #459} / TORAH {#282
/ #438}
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:1,row:4,col:2,nous:63&idea:{m,63}&idea:{f,63}&idea:{m,346}&idea:{f,470}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
***@zen: 1, row: 4, col: 2, nous: 63 [Date: 2019.8.29, Time: 10:20
hrs, Super: #346 / #63 - Origins in Reversal, Consider Beginnings;
I-Ching: H51 - Quake, Thunderclap, Shake, The arousing (shock, thunder);
Tetra: 62 - Doubt, Ego: #470 / #63 - Origins in Reversal, Consider
Beginnings; I-Ching: H51 - Quake, Thunderclap, Shake, The arousing
(shock, thunder); Tetra: 62 - Doubt]
Watch0: 1.4.2.63.0@{
@1: Sup: 63 (#63); Ego: 63 (#63),
@2: Sup: 54 (#117); Ego: 72 (#135),
@3: Sup: 7 (#124); Ego: 34 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY
OWN AFFAIRS {%18}),
@4: Sup: 32 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 25 (#194),
@5: Sup: 20 (#176); Ego: 69 (#263),
@6: Sup: 9 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR {%25}); Ego: 70
(#333),
@7: Sup: 54 (#239); Ego: 45 (#378: *I* *WOKE* *UP* *THIS* *MORNING*
*FROM* *THE* *STRANGEST* *DREAM*),
@8: Sup: 42 (#281); Ego: 69 (#447),
@9: Sup: 65 (#346: *I* *WOKE* *UP* *THIS* *MORNING* *FROM* *THE*
*STRANGEST* *DREAM*); Ego: 23 (#470),
Male: #346; Feme: #470
}
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #346 % #41 = #18 - Origin of Ethical Concepts, Palliation of
Vulgarity; I-Ching: H33 - Withdrawal, Retiring, Retreat, Yielding;
Tetra: 49 - Flight;
THOTH MEASURE: #18 - Oh Tutuf, who makest thine appearance in Ati; I
trouble myself only with my own affairs.
#VIRTUE: As to Waiting (no. #18), it exits.
#TOOLS: As to Closing in (no. #58), it enters.
#POSITION: As to Release (no. #21), it is softness, but
#TIME: As to Hardness (no. #72), it is leathery toughness.
#CANON: #169
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_169@{
@1: Sup: 18 - WAITING: HSI (#18); Ego: 18 - WAITING: HSI (#18),
@2: Sup: 76 - AGGRAVATION: CHU (#94); Ego: 58 - GATHERING IN: HSI (#76),
@3: Sup: 16 - CONTACT: CHIAO (#110); Ego: 21 - RELEASE: SHIH (#97),
@4: Sup: 7 - ASCENT: SHANG (#117); Ego: 72 - HARDNESS: CHIEN (#169 -
I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS {%18}),
Male: #117; Feme: #169
} // #169
H6794@{
@1: Sup: 9 - BRANCHING OUT: SHU (#9); Ego: 9 - BRANCHING OUT: SHU (#9),
@2: Sup: 59 - MASSING: CHU (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE
GOD OF MY DOMAIN {%42}); Ego: 50 - VASTNESS / WASTING: T'ANG (#59),
@3: Sup: 65 - INNER: NEI (#133); Ego: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#65),
@4: Sup: 22 - RESISTANCE: KE (#155); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#103),
Male: #155; Feme: #103
} // #346
#346 as [#90, #50, #6, #200] = tsinnûwr (H6794): {UMBRA: #0 as #346 %
#41 = #18} 1) *PIPE*, spout, *CONDUIT*, water conduit;
"DEEP CALLETH UNTO DEEP AT THE NOISE OF THY WATERSPOUTS-H6794: ALL THY
WAVES AND THY BILLOWS ARE GONE OVER ME." [Psalm 42:7]
[I, {@1: Sup: 9 - BRANCHING OUT: SHU (#9); Ego: 9 - BRANCHING OUT: SHU
(#9)},
WOKE, {@2: Sup: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#10); Ego: 18 - WAITING: HSI (#27)},
UP, {@3: Sup: 23 - EASE: YI (#33); Ego: 46 - ENLARGEMENT: K'UO (#73)},
THIS, {@4: Sup: 72 - HARDNESS: CHIEN (#105); Ego: 74 - CLOSURE: CHIH
(#147)},
MORNING, {@5: Sup: 55 - DIMINISHMENT: CHIEN (#160); Ego: 63 - WATCH:
SHIH (#210 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND {%30})},
FROM, {@6: Sup: 56 - CLOSED MOUTH: CHIN (#216); Ego: 34 - KINSHIP: CH'IN
(#244)},
THE, {@7: Sup: 67 - DARKENING: HUI (#283); Ego: 51 - CONSTANCY: CH'ANG
(#295)},
STRANGEST, {@8: Sup: 15 - REACH: TA (#298); Ego: 24 - JOY: LE (#319)},
DREAM] {@9: Sup: 51 - CONSTANCY: CH'ANG (#349); Ego: 59 - MASSING: CHU
(#378)}
VIKI GEROVA (10 DAILY NEWS) @ 1603 HOURS ON 19 OCTOBER 2019: "WORKERS
INJURED AFTER CEMENT TRUCK PUMP EXPLODES IN MELBOURNE:
Four men at a worksite in Melbourne's CBD have been taken to hospital
after a cement truck pump exploded at a construction site.
Emergency services were called to the worksite at Southbank just before
1pm where they found the injured workers.
Police believe a cement truck pump at the construction site dislodged
whilst pouring cement, injuring the four men.
All four have been taken to hospital and police said two of the men are
in a serious but stable condition.
A witness told 10 News First he saw two workers on the ground as others
from the site ran to help them.
"All the other construction men ran towards them yelling 'someone call
an ambulance,'" Sam Carapella said.
"It wasn't looking too good."
Carapella said within minutes the site was packed with police, ambulance
and fire crews.
Victoria Police said a vehicle that had been travelling past the
construction site at the time of the incident was also hit by cement,
but no one inside the car was physically injured."
[<https://10daily.com.au/news/australia/a191019yenxt/workers-injured-after-cement-truck-pipe-explodes-in-melbourne-20191019>]
IMMANUEL KANT’S PROLEGOMENA (1783) ON SECTION #56 - ABSTRUSE MYSTERIOUS
VIRTUOSITY; I-CHING: H55 - ABUNDANCE, ABOUNDING, FULLNESS; TETRA: 46 -
ENLARGEMENT AS IDEA @349: “The objects that are given to us through
experience are incomprehensible to us in many respects, and there are
many questions to which natural law carries us, which, if pursued to a
certain height (yet always in conformity with those laws) cannot be
solved at all; e.g., how pieces of matter attract one another. But if we
completely abandon nature, or transcend all possible experience in
advancing the connection of nature and so lose ourselves in mere ideas,
then we are unable to say that the object is incomprehensible to us and
that the nature of things presents us with unsolvable problems; for then
we are not concerned with nature or in general with objects that are
given, but merely with concepts that have their origin solely in our
reason, and with mere beings of thought, with respect to which all
problems, which must originate from the concepts of those very beings,
can be solved, since reason certainly can and must be held fully
accountable for its own proceedings.
Because the psychological, cosmological, and theological ideas are
nothing but pure concepts of reason, which cannot be given in any
experience, the questions that reason puts before us with respect to
them are not set for us through objects, but rather through mere maxims
of reason for the sake of its self-satisfaction, and these questions
must one and all be capable of sufficient answer – which occurs by its
being shown that they are principles for bringing the use of our
understanding into thoroughgoing harmony, completeness, and synthetic
unity, and to that extent are valid only for experience, though in the
totality of that experience. But although an absolute totality of
experience is not possible, nonetheless the idea of a totality of
cognition according to principles in general is what alone can provide
it with a special kind of unity, namely that of a system, without which
unity our cognition is nothing but piecework and cannot be used for the
highest end (which is nothing other than the [IDEA: @350] system of all
ends); and here I mean not only the practical use of reason, but also
the highest end of its speculative use.
Therefore the transcendental *IDEAS* *EXPRESS* *THE* *PECULIAR*
*VOCATION* *OF* *REASON*, *NAMELY* *TO* *BE* *A* *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE*
*SYSTEMATIC* *UNITY* *OF* *THE* *USE* *OF* *THE* *UNDERSTANDING*. But if
one looks upon this unity in the manner of cognition as if it were
inhering in the object of cognition {ie. the *HOLY* *GRAIL*}, if one
takes that which really is only regulative to be constitutive, and
becomes convinced that by means of these ideas one’s knowledge can be
expanded far beyond all possible experience, hence can be expanded
transcendently, even though this unity serves only to bring experience
in itself as near as possible to completeness (i.e., to have its advance
constrained by nothing that cannot belong to experience), then this is a
mere misunderstanding in judging the true vocation of our reason and its
principles, and it is a dialectic, which partly confounds the use of
reason in experience, and partly divides reason against itself." [pages
100 to 101]
IMMANUEL KANT"S PROLEGOMENA (1783) IDEA: @378: "There is still a great
deal needed for a learned gazette, however well-chosen [IDEA: @378] and
carefully selected its contributors may be, to be able to uphold its
otherwise well-deserved reputation in the field of metaphysics just as
elsewhere. Other sciences and areas of learning have their standards.
Mathematics has its standard within itself, history and theology in
secular or sacred books, natural science and medicine in mathematics and
experience, jurisprudence in law books, and even matters of taste in
ancient paradigms. But in order to assess the thing called metaphysics,
the standard must first be found (I have made an attempt to determine
this standard as well as its use). Until it is ascertained, what is to
be done when works of this kind must be judged? If they are of the
dogmatic kind, one may do as one likes; no one will for long play the
master over others in this without finding someone who repays him in
kind. But if they are of the critical kind, and indeed not with regard
to other writings but to reason itself, so that the standard of
appraisal cannot be already assumed but must first be sought: then
objection and censure are not to be forbidden, but they must be rooted
in tolerance, since the need is common to us all, and the lack of the
required insight makes an air of judicial decisiveness unsuitable.
But in order at the *SAME* *TIME* *TO* *TIE* *THIS* *MY* *DEFENSE* to
the interest of the philosophizing community, I propose a test, which is
decisive as to the way in which all metaphysical investigations must be
directed toward their common end. This is nothing else than what
mathematicians have done before, in order to decide the merits of their
methods in a contest – that is, a challenge to my reviewer to prove in
his own way any single truly metaphysical (i.e., synthetic, and cognized
a priori from concepts) proposition he holds, and at best one of the
most indispensable, such as the principle of the persistence of
substance or of the necessary determination of the events in the world
through their cause – but, as is fitting, to prove it on a priori
grounds. If he can’t do this (and silence is confession), then he must
admit: that, since metaphysics is absolutely nothing with-out the
apodictic certainty of propositions of this sort, their possibility or
[IDEA: @379] impossibility would first, be fore all else, have to be
settled in a critique of pure reason, and hence he is obliged either to
acknowledge that my principles of critique are correct or to prove their
invalidity. Since, however, I already foresee that, as heedlessly as he
has hitherto been relying on the certainty of his principles, still, now
that it comes down to a rigorous test, he will not find a single
principle in the whole compass of metaphysics with which he can dare
come forward, I will therefore grant him the most favourable terms that
can ever be expected in a competition; namely, I will take the onus
probandi ('Burden Of Proof') from him and will have it put on me.
[CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, IMMANUEL KANT'S
PROLEGOMENA (1783), pages: 129-130]
-- I WOKE UP THIS MORNING FROM THE STRANGEST DREAM
(c) 2019 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 19 October, 2019
It’s the Sabbath hours here already and I thought to share this ONTIC
JURISPRUDENCE consideration upon AB INITIO with yourselves which I think
will solve many of your problems and have done so before the elapse of
the centennial 2018 commemoration year of ARMISTICE on 11 NOVEMBER 2019
PREMISE: That nazism is defined by their support as AB INITIO
perspective of marriage being first principles of religious belief...
"AND WAS THERE UNTIL THE DEATH OF HEROD: THAT IT MIGHT BE FULFILLED
WHICH WAS SPOKEN OF THE LORD BY THE PROPHET, SAYING, *OUT* *OF* *EGYPT*
{THAT TROUBLES OR OPPRESSES; ANGUISH} *HAVE* *I* *CALLED* *MY* *SON*.
THEN HEROD, WHEN HE SAW-G1492 THAT HE WAS MOCKED OF THE WISE MEN, WAS
EXCEEDING WROTH, AND SENT FORTH, AND SLEW ALL THE CHILDREN THAT WERE IN
BETHLEHEM {house of bread}, AND IN ALL THE COASTS THEREOF, FROM TWO
YEARS OLD AND UNDER, ACCORDING TO THE TIME WHICH HE HAD DILIGENTLY
INQUIRED OF THE WISE MEN." [Matthew 2:15-16]
Given this CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE {APO: G575, DIDOMI: G1325, POIEO:
G4160, APODIDOMI: G591} which is QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT dated
29 OCTOBER 1900 as instrumentation to the FEDERATION OF THE COMMONWEALTH
OF AUSTRALIA 1901:
APO: G575 (@150 - ONTIC JURISPRUDENT CRITERIA) <-- BIBLE GREEK LEXICON
DIDOMI: G1325 (@104 - PRESENTS) <-- BIBLE GREEK LEXICON
POIEO: G4160 (@175 - CONSTITUTE ORDER AND DECLARE: QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT dated 29 OCTOBER 1900) <-- BIBLE GREEK LEXICON
APODIDOMI: G591 (@181 - RESERVE) <-- BIBLE GREEK LEXICON
EIDOMAI: G1492: (@228 - FORCE & DEFINITE MEANING) <-- BIBLE GREEK LEXICON
YOUTUBE: "JERUSALEM performed by the Cadet Glee Club of West Point"
http://youtu.be/5yaxVYNGaUU
ONTIC CHECKSUM: @150 + @104 + @175 + @181 + @228 = #838 as [#30, #5, #3,
#800] = légō (G3004): {UMBRA: #1 as #838 % #41 = #18} 1) to say, to
speak; 1a) affirm over, maintain; 1b) to teach; 1c) to exhort, advise,
to command, direct; 1d) to point out with words, intend, mean, mean to
say; 1e) to call by name, to call, name; 1f) to speak out, speak of,
mention;
@175 / #175
#348
#339 - *ARMISTICE* *DAY* 11 NOVEMBER
#369
#434 - BY ONTIC CHECKSUM: @182 + @102 + @150 ON *ANZAC* *DAY* 25 APRIL
#424 - FULL MOON {#38 + #73 + #111 + #117 = 3 x #111 + #6 = #339 -
INTEROPERABILITY (BINOMIAL / TRINOMIAL) AB INITIO (GET-GO) AGREEMENT FOR
*BREXIT*} @ 0432 HRS ON SAT 14 SEPTEMBER 2001 AS POIEO: G4160 (@175 -
CONSTITUTE ORDER AND DECLARE)
#838 as [#4, #10, #1, #30, #70, #3, #10, #200, #40, #70, #400] =
dialogismós (G1261): {UMBRA: #19 as #638 % #41 = #23} 1) the thinking of
a man deliberating with himself; 1a) a thought, inward reasoning; 1b)
purpose, design; 2) a deliberating, questioning about what is true; 2a)
hesitation, doubting; 2b) disputing, arguing;
#838 as [#5, #400, #200, #5, #2, #5, #10, #1, #10, #200] = eusébeia
(G2150): {UMBRA: #20 as #628 % #41 = #13} 1) reverence, respect; 2)
piety towards God, godliness;
The APRIORITY of #175 - MARRIAGE as an ONTIC JURISPRUDENT concept is
defined and subject to the impetus of ONTIC_OBLIGANS_150 as the APO:
G575 RIGHT of the SOVEREIGN entitlement which:
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_150@{
@1: Sup: 28 - CHANGE: KENG (#28); Ego: 28 - CHANGE: KENG (#28),
@2: Sup: 15 - REACH: TA (#43); Ego: 68 - DIMMING: MENG (#96),
@3: Sup: 65 - INNER: NEI (#108); Ego: 50 - VASTNESS / WASTING: T'ANG
(#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
@4: Sup: 69 - EXHAUSTION: CH'IUNG (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING
{%29}); Ego: 4 - BARRIER: HSIEN (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
Male: #177; Feme: #150
} // #150 <-- #1 + #25 {5x5: #65 - SOLDIER / DODECAHEDRON} + #49 {7x7:
#175 - MARRIAGE / ICOSAHEDRON} x 2
By the subsequent impetus of ONTIC_OBLIGANS_175 then in accordance with
#902 - RULE OF LAW prudently "CONSTITUTE, ORDER, and DECLARE, and do by
these PRESENTS CONSTITUTE ORDER, and DECLARE" such principle of MARRIAGE
as being both an ONTIC / FUNCTIONARY capacity:
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_175@{
@1: Sup: 22 - RESISTANCE: KE (#22); Ego: 22 - RESISTANCE: KE (#22),
@2: Sup: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#25); Ego: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#84 - I AM NOT
A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
@3: Sup: 23 - EASE: YI (#48); Ego: 20 - ADVANCE: CHIN (#104 - I
COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
@4: Sup: 13 - INCREASE: TSENG (#61); Ego: 71 - STOPPAGE: CHIH (#175
- I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
Male: #61; Feme: #175
} // #175
#175 as [#80, #70, #10, #5, #10] /
#328 as [#80, #5, #80, #70, #10, #8, #20, #5, #50] /
#339 - *ARMISTICE* *DAY* 11 NOVEMBER as [#80, #5, #80, #70, #10, #8,
#20, #5, #50, #1, #10] /
#369 as [#80, #5, #80, #70, #10, #8, #20, #1, #40, #5, #50] /
#434 - BY ONTIC CHECKSUM: @182 + @102 + @150 ON *ANZAC* *DAY* 25 APRIL
as [#80, #70, #10, #8, #200, #5, #10, #1, #50] = poiéō (G4160): {UMBRA:
#42 as #965 % #41 = #22} 1) to make; 1a) with the names of things made,
to produce, construct, form, fashion, etc.; 1b) to be the authors of,
the cause; 1c) to make ready, to prepare; 1d) to produce, bear, shoot
forth; 1e) to acquire, to provide a thing for one's self; 1f) to make a
thing out of something; 1g) to (make i.e.) render one anything; 1g1)
*TO* (*MAKE* ie.) *CONSTITUTE* *OR* *APPOINT* *ONE* *ANYTHING*, *TO*
*APPOINT* *OR* *ORDAIN* *ONE* *THAT*; 1g2) *TO* (*MAKE* ie.) *DECLARE*
*ONE* *ANYTHING*; 1h) to put one forth, to lead him out; 1i) to make one
do something; 1i1) cause one to; 1j) to be the authors of a thing (to
cause, bring about); 2) to do; 2a) to act rightly, do well; 2a1) to
carry out, to execute; 2b) to do a thing unto one; 2b1) to do to one;
2c) *WITH* *DESIGNATION* *OF* *TIME*: to pass, spend; 2d) to celebrate,
keep; 2d1) to make ready, and so *AT* *THE* *SAME* *TIME* *TO*
*INSTITUTE*, the celebration of the passover; 2e) to perform: to a promise;
That #175 - MARRIAGE which is defined by any AB INITIO authority granted
to neophytes in emulation {#1827 - EUCHARIST / MARRIAGE} of the LATIN
PROTOTYPES:
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Papal%20War%20Commemorations%20Intellectual%20Property%20Theft%202.png>
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Papal%20War%20Commemorations%20Intellectual%20Property%20Theft%201.png>
AB: #ONE PROTOTYPE (#234 + #297 = #531 - *TO* *TREAT* *VIOLENTLY*,
*MALTREAT*): #1 + #25 {5x5: #65 - SOLDIER / DODECAHEDRON: 28 MAY 2017:
#1827 - LITURGICAL CALENDAR} + #49 {7x7: #175 - MARRIAGE / ICOSAHEDRON:
31 MAY 1998: #1827 - EUCHARIST} x 2 = #150 - IMAGE, STATUE, IDOL;
INITIO: #EIGHT PROTOTYPE (#423 + #360 = #783 - *SABBATH* AS
ANTI-SEMITISM): #24 + #48 + #72 x 2 = #288 - REMEMBRANCE MEMORIALS AS
HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
1) (law) From the time when a legal document comes into force. [Early
17th century]
2) (sciences) Calculated from first principles, i.e. from basic laws
without any further additional assumptions.
i) initium: (in the plural) rites, mysteries
ii) initiō: initiate, consecrate
- A new member of an organization
- One who has been through a ceremony of initiation
3) (of an academic course) Taken with no prior qualifications.
PREMISE: That nazism is defined by their support as AB INITIO
perspective of marriage being first principles of religious belief...
— POUTING SNOUT —
“THAT’LL DO PIG...
HAVE SOME SWILL.
GIVE IT A WHIRL.
WITH YOUR FORK.
GRUE[L]SOME JIG.
FOR SUCH A DILL.
WORTHLESS PEARL.
AND ENDLESS PORK.”
YOUTUBE: “That'll do pig, that'll do (Babe)”
http://youtu.be/rjQtzV9IZ0Q
IS THEN ENTIRELY SECONDARY SINCE ROMAN CATHOLIC PRIESTS THEMSELVES CLAIM
A HIGHER PREROGATIVE TO STATEHOOD AND CARDINAL GEORGE PELL BY SUCH
THINKS HIMSELF ABOVE THE LAW WITH THEIR TREASON
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/County%20Court%20Filing%2020191012.pdf>
Initial Post: 18 October 2019
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"
http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ
SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*
Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit
<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>
SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]
Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.
It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.
<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>
The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."
That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)
After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
