No Kernel, the British have their *OWN* dad's arming as standing with
"arms akimbo"
http://youtu.be/Jvr6X054xLY
*THEY* *DON'T* *NEED* *NOR* *WANT* *YOU*
Call 619.371.3851 for the best blowjob ever.
— FIELDS OF LAMENT —
“ONE HUNDRED YEARS,
IS BARELY IN THE GRAVE.
WITH CROCODILE TEARS.
THIS HOW YOU BEHAVE.
SUCH HIGH IDEALS
ARE ONLY NAUGHT.
VALOUR STUPOR REELS.
OVER WHY WE FOUGHT.” {@9: Sup: 29 - DECISIVENESS: TUAN (#494); Ego: 14 -
PENETRATION: JUI (#334: SEE KANT’S PROLEGOMENA IDEA)}
IMMANUEL KANT’S PROLEGOMENA (1783) ON SECTION #46 - PSYCHOLOGICAL IDEAS
/ GUIDING CONTENTMENT, MODERATION OF DESIRE; I-CHING: H1 - PURE YANG,
CREATIVE PRINCIPLE / HEAVEN, FORCE, STRONG ACTION, THE KEY, GOD; TETRA:
37 - PURITY AS IDEA @334: “It has long been observed that in all
substances the true subject – namely that which remains after all
accidents (as predicates) have been removed – and hence the substantial
itself, is unknown to us; and various complaints have been made about
these limits to our insight. But it needs to be said that human
understanding is not to be blamed because it does not know the
substantial in things, i.e., cannot determine it by itself, but rather
because it wants to cognize determinately, like an object that is given,
what is only an idea. Pure reason demands that for each predicate of a
thing we should seek its appropriate subject, but that for this subject,
which is in turn necessarily only a predicate, we should seek its
subject again, and so forth to infinity (or as far as we get).
But from this it follows that we should take nothing that we can attain
for a final subject, and that the substantial itself could never be
thought by our ever-so-deeply penetrating understanding, even if the
whole of nature were laid bare before it; for the specific nature of our
understanding consists in thinking everything discursively, i.e.,
through concepts, hence through mere predicates, among which the
absolute subject must therefore always be absent.
Consequently, all real properties by which we cognize bodies are mere
accidents for which we lack a subject – even impenetrability, which must
always be conceived only as the effect of a force.”
[Pages 85-86]
PROFILE NAME: TRUE ANZAC
QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT: @104 = #71+#1+#11+#21
AUSTRALIA DAY 1788: @184 = #31+#41+#51+#61
COMMONWEALTH: #81
#288 = @104 + @184 AS FAITHFUL REMEMBRANCE
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Union%20Jack.jpeg>
-- THE PASTIE AND HATERSON AFFAIR ...
(c) 2019 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 19 November 2019
I want to give some formulative consideration of the PASTIE and HATERSON
AFFAIR as interoperability terms of #21 - AUTONOMOUS NATURE {PRINCIPLE
OF LIABILITY} to which applies (@84 + @86 + @102 + @104 + @115 = #491 -
PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY) in regards to the @115 - DIGNITY ROYAL.
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/DIALECT-FORMULATION.jpg>
#1, #2, #3 = @6
#8, #9, #4 (*) = @21
#7, #6, #5 = @18
#71, #1, #11 = #83
#61, #81, #21 (*) = (*) #104
#51, #41, #31
21ST HEBREW LETTER AS #SHIN = #300 AND THUS AN APRIORITY AGAINST THEIR
TEMPORAL DERIVATIONS:
@102 - TIME [OPERATIONAL TEMPLATE AS META DESCRIPTOR STORYBOARD: #342 -
'*BODY* *OF* *COGNITION*' / *LEGAL* *DOCUMENT* / *INDICTMENT*] TO
#SHIN {#300} + #42 - ONTIC DESIGNATIONS OF EPISTEMOLOGICAL PREMISE TO
ALL POSSIBLE ACTION:
<http://www.grapple369.com/objects/obligans.json>
@104 - TIME [vEVENT: #315 - '*SCIENCE*' / *MAKE* *A* *JUDGMENT*,
*IMAGINE*, *COUNT* / *TO* *CHARGE*, *IMPUTE*, *RECKON*]
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/reason/ontic.json>
#SHIN {#300} + #15 IS THE BINOMIAL NOMENCLATURE GROUNDING
Thusly one can view Pastie's Nazism remarks {ie. #288 = #24 + #48 + #72
- BINOMIAL PROTOTYPES / #1 + #25 {5x5: #65 - SOLDIER / DODECAHEDRON} +
#49 {7x7: #175 - MARRIAGE / ICOSAHEDRON} x 2 = #150} in terms of a
rationalism and an incongruity against the dialectic of impulsivity, namely:
#168 {24x7: using the #EIGHT #360 prototype for #361 DEMIURGE ACTION}
#215 {#288 - *SELF* *ABROGATION* MINUS #73 - *CANNOT* *BE* *CHANGED*}
#157
#130
That the #21 - AUTONOMOUS NATURE {PRINCIPLE OF LIABILITY} is then also
for the Chinese equally a cohesion issue as to how to with singularity
cohere this as an opportunity of #902 - RULE OF LAW (@84 + @86 + @102 +
@104 + @115 = #491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY) as then CRITERION for #369
- REASONABLE INTEROPERABILITY OF AUTONOMY BETWEEN #81 - SOVEREIGN
JURISDICTIONS BE IT *Pastie* OR *Haterson*
HONG KONG OR CHINA.
Initial Post: 16 November 2019
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"
http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ
SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*
Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit
<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>
SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]
Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.
It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.
<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>
The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."
That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)
After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
