— DOLF? WILL YOU AND JEFF HICKLING
We detect neo-nazis socialism at play here which makes an economy out of
the dignity of persons and eulogises #419 - slaughter.
Let me spell it out to you that these three statements are identical and
can you work out it’s importance?
#34 (@7 - Engendering Nature: #175 - {MARRIAGE} NATURE AMENDED IN ITS
NATURE [#82 - HONOUR YOUR PARENTS]) ...
84: [2 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE]
86: [10 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD]
102: [4 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS]
104: [7 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD]
115: [5 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN]
TOTAL: @84 + @86 + @102 = *ROYALTY*, *REIGN* (*OF* *TIME*), *KINGDOM* /
*DAY*, *TIME*, *YEAR* + @104 = *TO* *GET* *AS* *A* *POSSESSION*, *ACQUIRE*,
*INHERIT*, *POSSESS* / *TO* *POSSESS* *ONESELF* + @115 = *MOSES* *SEAT*
*OF* *HONOUR* (*ROYAL* *DIGNITY*, *AUTHORITY*, *POWER*) = #491 - PRINCIPLE
OF CONTINUITY
SECTION IX: “AND WE DO HEREBY RESERVE TO OURSELVES OUR @104 - HEIRS AND
SUCCESSORS, FULL @115 - POWER AND AUTHORITY FROM @102 - TIME TO @104 - TIME
TO REVOKE, ALTER, OR AMEND THESE OUR LETTERS PATENT, AS TO US OR THEM SHALL
SEEM MEET.”
If this topic of aboriginal assimilation and Roman Catholic exclusion is
too complex for you then don’t reply with any lack of #873 - probity or
#644 - decorum...
YOUTUBE: "What do circles represent in Aboriginal art?"
DOLF @ 1615 HOURS ON 6 JANUARY 2019: "There is no #492 - REASONING {ie.
RATIONAL PI - 22 HEBREW LETTERS / 7 DAYS} with you is there as your #41 -
INNATE prejudice and lack of education is just #451 - ABYSMAL
51 25 74
73 50 27
26 75 49 (NATURAL PROGRESSION {#1 / #73 SUBSTITUTION}) / #450 {#PSEUDO NINE
(*YESOD*: *PROCREATIONAL* *FOUNDATION*) *OF* *JEWISH* *TORAH* *KABBALAH*
*VASSAL* *GOVERNANCE*: #YOD (#10) + #MEM (#40) + #TAU (#400) [+ #ALEPH (#1)
= #451]}
49 9 65 - *SOLDIER*
57 41 25
17 73 33 = #123 / #369 {#PSEUDO NINE *OF* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* *OF* *ROMAN*
*EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*} AS IT'S NATURAL PROGRESSION {#1 / #73 SUBSTITUTION}
<
Loading Image...
>
[IMAGE: The MOBIUS ‘8’ LOOP OF PYTHAGOREAN SOPHISTRY AS WISDOM SO CALLED is
not homoiotic as anthropocentric but rather “homeomorphic to a circle”]
#YOD (#10) {10 SEPTEMBER 2001 - THE HONOURABLE JOHN HOWARD (THEN AUSTRALIAN
PRIME MINISTER) IN NEW YORK}
#MEM (#40) {#41 - #CENTRE: #6000 %22 = 13 - DELIMITED: 13 SEPTEMBER 2001}
#TAU (#400) {CIRCUMSCRIBING : 22 SEPTEMBER 2001}
#ALEPH (#1) {23 CHROMOSOMES: 23 SEPTEMBER 2001} = #451
#451 - *ABYSS* / *PRE-TEMPORAL* *VOID* + #41 x n - ONTIC FACULTY = #492 -
VOLUNTARY FREE WILL {ie. 12 x #41 as CIRCULARITY of BEING} and through
inclusion of #41 x n - ONTIC FACULTY as a cognitive conceptualisation then
allows for stages of development.
THERE CAN BE NO DOUBT ABOUT THE FACT THAT THE GENESIS {ie. DAO-ziran /
COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis: #1, #21, #41, #61, #81 / BIRTHDAY
CELEBRATION-genesia} BIBLICAL TEXT RELATES TO AN #451 - COSMOGONIC PREMISE
FOR NATURE AND #41 - ONTIC NECESSITY BASIS OF HOMOGENEOUS #492 - VOLUNTARY
FREE WILL, TRINOMIAL MORALITY AND JURISPRUDENCE:
#8 - Transforming Nature: {DOUBLE: #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature {#7 -
Engendering Nature}}
#11 x #41 = #451 - COSMOGONY {#KAF {#20} / #M {#40}} as TERRA-FORMING is
the conveyance of discovery as natural secrets which influences the spread
of Light and industry by Government and Non-Government Organisations as
conducive for sustainable #9 - Autonomous Nature
That what MOSES is here cognitive of is clearly a relativity between the
‘OTH CYCLE and #41 - ONTIC necessity which expresses an equivalence by:
#2184 % #41 = #11
Colin Jones a lecturer in Aboriginal History, talking about 'What do
circles represent in Aboriginal art?" his culture, his history and his art
within a similar manner.
ANTHROPOCENTRIC (adjective):
- regarding the human being as the central fact of the universe.
- assuming human beings to be the final aim and end of the universe.
- viewing and interpreting everything in terms of human experience and
values.
In modern Israeli orthography, vowel and consonant pointing is seldom used,
except in specialised texts such as dictionaries, poetry, or texts for
children or for new immigrants. *LIKE* *ENGLISH* Israeli Hebrew has five
vowel phonemes—/i/, /e/, /a/, /o/ and /u/—but many more written symbols for
them.”
DOLF @ 0700 HOURS ON 7 JANUARY 2019: "And as for AUSTRALIA DAY and the
*DISSOLUTION* *OF* *YOUR* *JINGOISTIC* *SOLDIER* *PANTOMIME* which is a
parallax within the #72 - ANTHROPIC PROTOTYPE (ie. #65 - *SOLDIER*) as
historical perspective commonly deployed by ROMAN EMPIRE GOVERNANCE as the
exemplar mapping to each pair of HEXAGRAMS separated by six months (for
example: #9 - SHU {Branching Out} / H19 - 'Approaching, Nearing, The
forest' (27 to 31 January / #65 CE) against #49 - T'AO {Flight} / H33
Withdrawal, Retiring, Retreat, Yielding (26 to 30 July)) are LINE-BY-LINE
POLAR OPPOSITES as a historical lens perspective which is PARTICULAR to
APOSTLE PAUL'S JOURNEY TO ROME FOR AN APPEAL BEFORE NERO CLAUDIUS CAESAR
AUGUSTUS GERMANICUS (REIGN 13 OCTOBER 54 – 9 JUNE 68)
<
Loading Image...
>
[IMAGE: THE #81 TETRAGRAMS from the T'AI HSÜAN CHING corresponding to EIGHT
major transitions of the SOLAR YEAR (#81 x 4.5 days = 364.4 days of NATURAL
YEAR / 325.25 days)
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #91 % #41 = #9 - Inconstancy of Achievement, Practicing Placidity;
I-Ching: H7 - The Army, Leading, Troops; Tetra: 32 - Legion;
THOTH MEASURE: #9 - Oh Breaker of bones, who makest thine appearance in
Sutenhunen; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *TELLER* *OF* *LIES*
#VIRTUE: If it is Branching Out (no. #9), it comes, but
#TOOLS: If it is Flight (no. #49), it flees.
#POSITION: As. to Greatness (no. #45), it is the outside, but
#TIME: As to Closing In (no. #58), it is the inside.
#CANON: #161
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_161@{
@1: Sup: 9 (#9); Ego: 9 (#9),
@2: Sup: 58 (#67); Ego: 49 (#58),
@3: Sup: 22 (#89); Ego: 45 (#103),
@4: Sup: 80 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS {%18});
Ego: 58 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}),
Male: #169; Feme: #161
} // #161
Each of these twelve “waxing and waning” hexagrams, along with 48 other
hexagrams, also correspond to equal intervals of 6 7/80 days (in other
words, 1/60 of the solar year of 365 1/4 days). The remaining four
hexagrams found in the Changes, called “standard hexagrams,” correspond to
the solstices and equinoxes and thus to the four cardinal points of the
sun’s path. They are not segments of the cycle, then, but points fixed in
space, which move back and forth in time. The sun may pass through one of
them on any day of the lunar month in which it is located. From the
astronomer’s point of view, it is the new moons that move back and forth
around them. YANG HSIUNG improved upon earlier approaches to symmetry
within the cyclic structure by substituting the WINTER SOLSTICE as the
#CENTRE STARTING POINT and incorporated references to all 64 HEXAGRAMS in
his own arrangement of #81 TETRAGRAMS. [THE CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY (T'AI
HSUAN CHING) 4 BCE, Michael Nylan 1993, page 15-16]
PUBLICLY @ 0941 HOURS ON 8 JANUARY 2019: "One can readily conclude from the
encapsulation of these specific ONTIC_OBLIGANS_184 / ONTIC_OBLIGANS_171
meta-descriptor prototypes and their cumulative gematria SUB-CATEGORIES OF
UNDERSTANDING expressed within this quintessential BIBLICAL narrative [Acts
23:25-35] that the JEWISH / CHRISTIAN APOSTLES {ie. SECT OF NAZARENES /
#509 - YAHAD DEAD SEA SCROLL COMMUNITY} of 58 CE were acquainted with this
EPISTEMOLOGICAL premise *REALITY* deploying the DAOist REVERSE
TRANSCRIPTASE INHIBITER as T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY
OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE] HAN DYNASTY (206 BC to 220 AD) TRINOMIAL {#81 x 4.5
days = 364.5 day view of the NATURAL YEAR} PERENNIALIST TRADITIONAL *STATE*
PERSPECTIVE of the CHINESE EMPIRE which had its GRAND INCEPTION upon the
new moon / midnight winter solstice of 21 December 103 BCE as that which is
articulated against the 365.25 day / year JULIAN CALENDAR SATURNALIA
perspective of ROMAN BINOMIAL EMPIRE GOVERNANCE.
— BLINKERED DEVOTIONS —
“IF I KNOW GOOD.
AND I KNOW EVIL.
BE IT UNDERSTOOD.
I AIN’T NO DEVIL.
WELL KISS MY *RING*.
YOU ROTTEN SOD.
‘N MOUTH MY DING.
YOU AIN’T NO GOD. {@9: Sup: 21 (#312 - *CONTRACTION*); Ego: 43 (#333 -
#CENTRE OF ROMAN EMPIRE GOVERNANCE BINOMIAL PROTOTYPE)}”
AS THE #1827 - HETERODOX BLASPHEMY WHICH IS THE CORRUPT EMBODIMENT OF THE
ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH (VATICAN CITY STATE) DOES NOT MEET SUCH CRITERIA OF
ACCOUNTABILITY FOR #873 - PROBITY AND #644 - DECORUM IN COMPLIANCE TO #2184
- LAWS OF NATURE WE ARE ABOUT TO WITNESS THIS AUSTRALIA DAY 26 JANUARY 2019
the TRANSITION INTO PERPETUAL *DISSOLUTION* *OF* *YOUR* *JINGOISTIC*
*SOLDIER* *PANTOMIME* which is a parallax within the #72 - ANTHROPIC
PROTOTYPE (ie. #65 - *SOLDIER*) as historical perspective commonly deployed
by ROMAN EMPIRE GOVERNANCE as the exemplar mapping to each pair of
HEXAGRAMS separated by six months (for example: #9 - SHU {Branching Out} /
H19 - 'Approaching, Nearing, The forest' (27 to 31 January / #65 CE)
against #49 - T'AO {Flight} / H33 Withdrawal, Retiring, Retreat, Yielding
(26 to 30 July)) are LINE-BY-LINE POLAR OPPOSITES as a historical lens
perspective which is PARTICULAR to APOSTLE PAUL'S JOURNEY TO ROME FOR AN
APPEAL BEFORE NERO CLAUDIUS CAESAR AUGUSTUS GERMANICUS (REIGN 13 OCTOBER 54
AD – 9 JUNE 68 AD):
— EUROPEAN UNION'S RAPE —
"OH BOUDICA, REGINA HERO
THIS MOMENT TO ALL GAPE.
ETERNAL JUDGMENT OF NERO.
FOR DAUGHTERS DID RAPE. {@6: Sup: 35 (#242); Ego: 1 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT
ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19})
TESTIMONY {#873} BY MORTAL WILL.
VICTORIA REMEMBERS THEE.
WITHIN ROME'S GRASP STILL. {@9: Sup: 11 (#317 - SEE KANT'S IDEA: *THE*
*SENSES* *DO* *NOT* *SUPPLY* *PURE* *CONCEPTS* *OF* *THE* *UNDERSTANDING*
*IN* *CONCRETO*); Ego: 7 (#317 - SEE KANT'S IDEA: *BUT* *ONLY* *THE*
*SCHEMA* *FOR* *THEIR* *USE*)}
ITS TIME TO SET YOU FREE."
YOUTUBE: "Horrible Histories (Boudicca)
<https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2nhi4w>
NOTE: Boudica was a queen of the British Celtic Iceni tribe who led an
uprising against the occupying forces of the Roman Empire in AD 60 or 61,
and died shortly after its failure, having supposedly poisoned herself. She
is considered a British folk hero. Boudica's husband, Prasutagus, ruled as
a nominally independent ally of Rome, and left his kingdom jointly to his
daughters and to the Roman emperor in his will. However, when he died, his
will was ignored, and the kingdom was annexed and his property taken.
According to Tacitus, Boudica was flogged and her daughters raped.
SHOULD I POINT OUT THE OBVIOUS WITH THIS KANT’S 1783 (APRIORITY TO THE
FRENCH REVOLUTION OF 1789) CANONICAL STATEMENT AS IDEA: @B180: "Thus, if I
set down five points in succession, {
#371 - *SAINT* *ANDREWS* *AS* *ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *30* *NOVEMBER* *FIVE*
*YEAR*: 4 x #364 + #371 = #1827 *LITURGICAL* *CALENDAR*,
#288 - *REMEMBRANCE* *USING *ROMAN* *EMPIRE* / *NAZI* *PROTOTYPE*,
#390 - *WREATHS* / *SOVEREIGNTY*,
#312 - *WITHERED* *STATE* *WREATHS* *USING *ROMAN* *EMPIRE* / *NAZI*
*PROTOTYPE*,
#419 - *SLAUGHTER*}, this is an image of the number five:
As unconscionable attempts to impose a substituted ethic @5 {HETEROS: #FIVE
[#111/#333 ***] / TORAH: #FIVE [#114/#342 ***]} against the INTELLECTUS AS
GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS whether by NEGLECT or forced WILL.
In contrast, if I think only a number in general, which may be five or one
hundred, then this thought is rather the representation of a method for
representing a multitude (e.g., one thousand) in an image according to a
certain concept than the image itself, which in this last case I could
hardly survey and compare with the concept. I call this representation of a
universal procedure of the imagination for providing a concept with its
image, then, the schema for this concept. [IDEA: @B180]
- dolf
Initial Post: 10 January 2019
- dolf
be my calendar girlz for 2019?
Say yes, you silly savage.
-- UNDERSTANDING THE ONTIC PREMISE TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT
SECTION IX - SUCCESSION: @84 + @86 + @102 = *ROYALTY*, *REIGN* (*OF*
*TIME*), *KINGDOM* / *DAY*, *TIME*, *YEAR* + @104 = *TO* *GET* *AS* *A*
*POSSESSION*, *ACQUIRE*, *INHERIT*, *POSSESS* / *TO* *POSSESS* *ONESELF* +
@115 = *MOSES* *SEAT* *OF* *HONOUR* (*ROYAL* *DIGNITY*, *AUTHORITY*,
*POWER*) = #491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY
REGISTRAR'S OFFICE
COUNTY COURT OF VICTORIA
COUNTY COURT APPEAL CASE NUMBERS:
AP-18-0609 / AP-18-0775 / AP-18-0794 / AP-18-2201 / AP-18-2202
9 JANUARY 2019
***@zen: 4, row: 8, col: 4, nous: 60 [Date: 2019.1.9, Time: 1915 hrs,
Super: #313 / #49 - Sage's Constancy, Trust in Virtue; I-Ching: H3 - Birth
Throes, Initial Difficulties, Sprouting, Gathering support, Hoarding;
Tetra: 4 - Barrier, Ego: #517 / #60 - Skill Rulership, Maintain One's
Place; I-Ching: H15 - Modesty, Humbling; Tetra: 5 - Keeping Small]
Further to my letter dated 31 DECEMBER 2018 [made to] your HONOUR in
consideration of these matters, I have [with] respects to my some 24 years
informal research into technologizing the existential substance {#2184 -
LAWS OF NATURE v's #1827 - ECCLESIASTICAL LITURGICAL CYCLES} of QUEEN
VICTORIA's LETTERS PATENT as instrumentation to the FEDERATION of the
AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH sought from such a privilege to proffer an
advantageous opinion upon BREXIT negotiations through the news media avenue
as a subject which is designated for British Parliamentary voting on 15
January 2019 and probable occurrence on 29 March 2019.
TO BBC NEWSWATCH / THE AGE NEWSDESK @ 0811 HOURS ON 7 JANUARY 2019: "ON A
#364 - QUESTION OF #430 - LAW MADE IN RELATION TO #2184 v's #1827 AS
COSMOLOGICAL CONSIDERATION OF THE STATE / COMMONWEALTH MADE IN FAVOUR OF
THE BRITISH IMPERIAL GOVERNANCE (vis a vis QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT)
THE BREXIT DIVORCE BILL CAN BE SUBJECT TO A #237 - DETERMINED WILL
REDUCTION OF ANY REMITTANCE (DESPITE PROTESTS FROM THE EUROPEAN UNION)
SOLELY IN LIGHT OF IMPENDING DISSOLUTION OF THE ROMAN 'CONCRETE' {ie.
#FIVE: #111 / #333} STATE."
PUBLICLY @ 0941 HOURS ON 8 JANUARY 2019: "One can readily conclude from the
encapsulation of these specific ONTIC_OBLIGANS_184 / ONTIC_OBLIGANS_171
meta-descriptor prototypes and their cumulative gematria SUB-CATEGORIES OF
UNDERSTANDING expressed within this quintessential BIBLICAL narrative [Acts
23:25-35] that the JEWISH / CHRISTIAN APOSTLES {ie. SECT OF NAZARENES /
#509 - YAHAD DEAD SEA SCROLL COMMUNITY} of 58 CE were acquainted with this
EPISTEMOLOGICAL premise *REALITY* deploying the DAOist REVERSE
TRANSCRIPTASE INHIBITER as T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY
OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE] HAN DYNASTY (206 BC to 220 AD) TRINOMIAL {#81 x 4.5
days = 364.5 day view of the NATURAL YEAR} PERENNIALIST TRADITIONAL *STATE*
PERSPECTIVE of the CHINESE EMPIRE which had its GRAND INCEPTION upon the
new moon / midnight winter solstice of 21 December 103 BCE as that which is
articulated against the 365.25 day / year JULIAN CALENDAR SATURNALIA
perspective of ROMAN BINOMIAL EMPIRE GOVERNANCE.
— BLINKERED DEVOTIONS —
“IF I KNOW GOOD.
AND I KNOW EVIL.
BE IT UNDERSTOOD.
I AIN’T NO DEVIL.
WELL KISS MY *RING*.
YOU ROTTEN SOD.
‘N MOUTH MY DING.
YOU AIN’T NO GOD. {@9: Sup: 21 (#312 - *CONTRACTION*); Ego: 43 (#333 -
#CENTRE OF ROMAN EMPIRE GOVERNANCE BINOMIAL PROTOTYPE)}”
AS THE #1827 - HETERODOX BLASPHEMY WHICH IS THE CORRUPT EMBODIMENT OF THE
ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH (VATICAN CITY STATE) DOES NOT MEET SUCH CRITERIA OF
ACCOUNTABILITY FOR #873 - PROBITY AND #644 - DECORUM IN COMPLIANCE TO #2184
- LAWS OF NATURE WE ARE ABOUT TO WITNESS THIS AUSTRALIA DAY 26 JANUARY 2019
the TRANSITION INTO PERPETUAL *DISSOLUTION* *OF* *YOUR* *JINGOISTIC*
*SOLDIER* *PANTOMIME* which is a parallax within the #72 - ANTHROPIC
PROTOTYPE (ie. #65 - *SOLDIER*) as historical perspective commonly deployed
by ROMAN EMPIRE GOVERNANCE as the exemplar mapping to each pair of
HEXAGRAMS separated by six months (for example: #9 - SHU {Branching Out} /
H19 - 'Approaching, Nearing, The forest' (27 to 31 January / #65 CE)
against #49 - T'AO {Flight} / H33 Withdrawal, Retiring, Retreat, Yielding
(26 to 30 July)) are LINE-BY-LINE POLAR OPPOSITES as a historical lens
perspective which is PARTICULAR to APOSTLE PAUL'S JOURNEY TO ROME FOR AN
APPEAL BEFORE NERO CLAUDIUS CAESAR AUGUSTUS GERMANICUS (REIGN 13 OCTOBER 54
AD – 9 JUNE 68 AD):
— EUROPEAN UNION'S RAPE —
"OH BOUDICA, REGINA HERO
THIS MOMENT TO ALL GAPE.
ETERNAL JUDGMENT OF NERO.
FOR DAUGHTERS DID RAPE. {@6: Sup: 35 (#242); Ego: 1 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT
ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19})
TESTIMONY {#873} BY MORTAL WILL.
VICTORIA REMEMBERS THEE.
WITHIN ROME'S GRASP STILL. {@9: Sup: 11 (#317 - SEE KANT'S IDEA: *THE*
*SENSES* *DO* *NOT* *SUPPLY* *PURE* *CONCEPTS* *OF* *THE* *UNDERSTANDING*
*IN* *CONCRETO*); Ego: 7 (#317 - SEE KANT'S IDEA: *BUT* *ONLY* *THE*
*SCHEMA* *FOR* *THEIR* *USE*)}
ITS TIME TO SET YOU FREE."
YOUTUBE: "Horrible Histories (Boudicca)
<https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2nhi4w>
NOTE: Boudica was a queen of the British Celtic Iceni tribe who led an
uprising against the occupying forces of the Roman Empire in AD 60 or 61,
and died shortly after its failure, having supposedly poisoned herself. She
is considered a British folk hero. Boudica's husband, Prasutagus, ruled as
a nominally independent ally of Rome, and left his kingdom jointly to his
daughters and to the Roman emperor in his will. However, when he died, his
will was ignored, and the kingdom was annexed and his property taken.
According to Tacitus, Boudica was flogged and her daughters raped.
SHOULD I POINT OUT THE OBVIOUS WITH THIS KANT’S 1783 (APRIORITY TO THE
FRENCH REVOLUTION OF 1789) CANONICAL STATEMENT AS IDEA: @B180: "Thus, if I
set down five points in succession, {
#371 - *SAINT* *ANDREWS* *AS* *ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *30* *NOVEMBER* *FIVE*
*YEAR*: 4 x #364 + #371 = #1827 *LITURGICAL* *CALENDAR*,
#288 - *REMEMBRANCE* *USING *ROMAN* *EMPIRE* / *NAZI* *PROTOTYPE*,
#390 - *WREATHS* / *SOVEREIGNTY*,
#312 - *WITHERED* *STATE* *WREATHS* *USING *ROMAN* *EMPIRE* / *NAZI*
*PROTOTYPE*,
#419 - *SLAUGHTER*}, this is an image of the number five:
As unconscionable attempts to impose a substituted ethic @5 {HETEROS: #FIVE
[#111/#333 ***] / TORAH: #FIVE [#114/#342 ***]} against the INTELLECTUS AS
GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS whether by NEGLECT or forced WILL.
In contrast, if I think only a number in general, which may be five or one
hundred, then this thought is rather the representation of a method for
representing a multitude (e.g., one thousand) in an image according to a
certain concept than the image itself, which in this last case I could
hardly survey and compare with the concept. I call this representation of a
universal procedure of the imagination for providing a concept with its
image, then, the schema for this concept. [IDEA: @B180]
#1) λ, {@3: Sup: 34 (#41 - ONTIC NECESSITY ); Ego: 30 (#34)}
#2) λ, {@4: Sup: 64 (#105 - ROMAN HETEROS GOVERNANCE PROTOTYPE #THREE /
JEWISH KABBALAH PROTOTYPE #FOUR / #315);
#3) Ego: 30 (#64 - @5 #CENTRE)}
YOUTUBE: "Monkey Sees A Magic Trick"
Although we are considering #64 v’s #65 here the reality is that the
apriority dynamic of a trinomial number is NINE elements whereas the
binomial conception is EIGHT elements as CARDINAL NUMBER...
A cardinal number is a number such as 1, 3, or 10 that tells you how many
things there are in a group but not what order they are in.
An ordinal number or an ordinal is a word such as 'first', 'third', and
'tenth' that tells you where a particular thing occurs in a sequence of
things.
If I then retain ONE as functional #231 - juxtaposition control and then
deploy a CANON OF TRANSPOSITION between its trinomial / binomial meta state
my concept of it at the dialectic level may be different.
#4) ι, {@5: Sup: 74 (#179); Ego: 10 (#74 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL)}
#5) α] {@6: Sup: 75 (#254); Ego: 1 (#75 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL)}
It would take research worthy of a PhD to resolve such an impetus upon
French history if only made by a hypothetical postulation and impudent
presupposition
In fact, not images of objects but schemata underlie our pure sensory
concepts. No image of a triangle would ever be adequate to the concept of a
triangle in general. For it would not match the generality of the concept,
which makes it valid for all triangles, right or acute, etc.; rather, it
would always be limited to only a portion of this sphere. The schema of a
triangle can never exist anywhere except in thought, and it signifies a
rule of synthesis of the imagination with respect to pure shapes in space.
Still less does an object of experience or an image of the object match an
empirical concept, but such a concept always relates immediately to the
schema of the imagination, as a rule for determining our intuition
according to a certain general concept. The concept of *DOG* signifies a
rule according to which my imagination can specify the figure of a
four-footed animal in general, without being restricted to any one
particular shape presented to me by experience, or even to any possible
image that I can exhibit *IN* *CONCRETO*.” [IDEA: B179]" [pages 173-174]
PROPOSITION MADE TO SALE HOSPITAL ON 19 DECEMBER 2018 REGARDING
TRANSITIONING THE BINOMIAL METHODOLOGY OF TRIAGE TOWARDS A TRINOMIAL
SAPIENT {EPISTEMOLOGICAL PREMISE, KNOWLEDGE PRAGMATICS AND ARTIFICIAL
INTELLIGENCE} PARADIGM FOR THE ECONOMICAL SUSTAINABILITY OF AUTONOMY AND
VIABILITY OF FISCAL OPPORTUNITY BY PRODUCTIVITY GAINS:
<
Loading Image...
>
@1 {#451 - INCEPTION} +
@2 {#41 - AN ETHICAL / MORAL PRESCRIPTION “HAS TO CARRY ABSOLUTE [#41 -
*ONTIC* X N] NECESSITY WITH IT” WHICH IMPLIES A TRINOMIAL WORLDVIEW} EQUALS
@3 {#492 - *VOLUNTARY* *FREEWILL* {LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900}: #41 = #12
- CIRCULARITY OF BEING} IN THE EXERCISE OF THE INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE
VOLUNTĀTIS: #205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE* *PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE* ☯️
/ ✡️ #164 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY* } +
@4 {#123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY} EQUALS
@10 {#615 - TO PRONOUNCE JUDGMENT AND TO SUBJECT TO PROCEDURES / #41 = #15
{#113 as [#6, #5, #2, #50, #10, #600] = ben (H1121): {UMBRA: #6 as #113 %
#41 = #31} 1) *A* *MEMBER* *OF* *A* *GUILD*, *ORDER*, *CLASS*}}
DOLF @ 1117 HOURS ON 6 JANUARY 2019: "NO I'M ACTUALLY GIVING A VALID
EXPLANATION WHICH CONVEYS PRINCIPLES OF EXISTENTIAL PHENOMENOLOGY THAT
EXCEEDS MARTIN HEIDEGGER'S BRAND OF PHENOMENOLOGY:
Wanting to determine the reality of the notion: 'this is a test' as a
criteria of existentiality, this would then require a resolution of the
criteria of enquiry being the hierarchy pairing as: #61 / #122 against the
default neurological and personalistic disposition:
THUS I CONVEY THE EPISTEMOLOGICAL PREMISE as an INTUITION of the
ONTOLOGICAL EXPERIENCE in being DEPENDENT upon ONTIC necessity expressed
by:
#205 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE* *PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE* ARE THE ONTIC
DEFINITIONS:
@45 + @68 = #113 - PRINCIPLE OF JUXTAPOSITION
@84 + @86 + @102 + @104 + @115 = #491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY
@130 + @139 + #140 + @146 + @148 + @150 + @156 + @157 + @158 + @161 = #2188
- AUTONOMOUS PRINCIPLE OF COHESION
@166 + @168 + @169 + @171 + @173 + @175 @177 + @180 + @181 + @182 + @184 +
@185 + @186 + @191 + @192 + @196 + @197 + @200 = #3273 - PRINCIPLE OF
MATERIALITY {3 x #1091: THAT #1092 = 3 x #364 IS THE 'OTH CYCLE OF THE
JERUSALEM TEMPLE FROM 1550 BCE}: "WHO HATH TAKEN THIS *COUNSEL* {
@1 (#1) + @2 (#41) + @3 (#81) + @4 (#369) = #10 (#492) / #12 = #41 - ONTIC
NECESSITY ESPOUSED BY 'ADVICE OF THE PRIVY COUNCIL' (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER
1900}) WHICH IMPLIES A TRINOMIAL BASIS TO EMPIRE GOVERNANCE
#2184 - (#390 + #312 + #390) = #1092 as ‘OTH CYCLE of 3 x #364 / 4 = #273 -
*MOMENT*
As an IDEA that the #2184 - NATURE AND SO TO SPEAK THE *LEGAL*
*CONSTITUTION* *OF* *THIS* *PROVINCE* *OUGHT* *REST* *ON* *COMPLETELY*
*DIFFERENT* *PRINCIPLES*, namely solely on the principle of #312 -
CONTRADICTION:
#364 - ADMITTANCE +
#312 - RESISTANCE {
*WITHERED* *STATE* *WREATHS* / RUSSIAN DIALECTS OF CONTRADICTIONS ON
NOVICHOK #274 - PERFUME POISONING
v's
#364 x 4 + #371 = #1827 - ROMAN CATHOLIC LITURGICAL CYCLE BLASPHEMY CENTRED
UPON 30 NOVEMBER AS SAINT ANDREWS CAUSE CÉLÈBRE} +
#728 - REACTANCE {8 x #91 = 2 x #273 + #182 - *LIMIT*}+
#390 - BRITISH CROWN (CALENDAR (NEW STYLE) ACT 1750 / ROYAL ASSENT: 27 MAY
1751) / AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE (4 JULY 1776) +
#390 - *WREATHS* / ROBBERS / EXTORTION = #2184 {#24 x #7 x #13 - PRIESTLY
SERVICE DIVISIONS TO JERUSALEM TEMPLE FROM 1550 BCE - [LUKE 1:5]}
} AGAINST TYRE {strength; rock; sharp}, THE CROWNING CITY, WHOSE MERCHANTS
ARE PRINCES, WHOSE TRAFFICKERS ARE THE HONOURABLE OF THE EARTH?" [Isaiah
23:8]
@210 + @215 + @220 + @228 = #873 - PRINCIPLE OF THE PERSISTENCE OF
SUBSTANCE
#164 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY* ARE THE DIALECTICS OF TEMPORALITY
#2184 {#24 x #7 x #13} AS EITHER:
#6 x #364 - PRINCIPLE OF ENQUIRY
#7 x #312 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTRADICTION
#8 x #273 - PRINCIPLE OF SYNCRETIC SUCCESSION
And its CRITERIA of #277 - RIGHT TO PLACE A TEST / #237 - IMMUTABLE WILL /
#nnn - CATEGORY OF UNDERSTANDING as an outcome of AUTONOMOUS BEING.
Which although outside time or preceding instantiation within TIME as an
IDEA:
[I, {@1: Sup: 9 (#9); Ego: 9 (#9)},
D, {@2: Sup: 13 (#22); Ego: 4 (#13)},
E, {@3: Sup: 18 (#40); Ego: 5 (#18)},
A] {@4: Sup: 19 (#59); Ego: 1 (#19)},
Nevertheless conforms {#9 + #22 + #40 + #59 = #130 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED
{%3}} to the ANTHROPOCENTRIC characteristic of TIME.
H3117@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 40 (#70); Ego: 10 (#40),
@3: Sup: 80 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}); Ego: 40 (#80),
@4: Sup: 9 (#159); Ego: 10 (#90),
@5: Sup: 42 (#201); Ego: 33 (#123),
Male: #201; Feme: #123
} // #130
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #130 % #41 = #7 - Intentional Reversal, Dimming Radiance; I-Ching:
H12 - Obstruction, Stagnation, Selfish persons; Tetra: 56 - Closed Mouth;
THOTH MEASURE: #7 - Oh thou whose eyes pierce like swords, who makest thine
appearance in Sechem; I commit no fraud.
#VIRTUE: With Ascent (no. #7), coming up against plainness?
#TOOLS: With Pattern (no. #47), increasing artifice.
#POSITION: With Youthfulness (no. #12), having no knowledge, but
#TIME: With Fullness (no. #38), having a surplus.
#CANON: #104
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_104@{
@1: Sup: 7 (#7); Ego: 7 (#7),
@2: Sup: 54 (#61); Ego: 47 (#54),
@3: Sup: 66 (#127); Ego: 12 (#66),
@4: Sup: 23 (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}); Ego: 38 (#104 - I
COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
Male: #150; Feme: #104
} // #104 <-- DIGNITY ROYAL AS SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM VIRILE #390 -
*SOVEREIGN* *ENTITLEMENT* {#2184 - LAWS OF NATURE AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL
COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE / 21 = #104 - COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}}
#130 as [#30, #10, #40, #10, #600] = yowm (H3117): {UMBRA: #2 as #130 % #41
= #7} 1) *DAY*, *TIME*, *YEAR*; 1a) day (as opposed to night); 1b) day (24
hour period); 1b1) as defined by evening and morning in Genesis 1; 1b2) as
a division of time; 1b2a) a working day, a day's journey; 1c) days,
lifetime (pl.); 1d) *TIME*, *PERIOD* (*GENERAL*); 1e) *YEAR*; 1f) temporal
references; 1f1) today; 1f2) yesterday; 1f3) tomorrow;
[T, {@1: Sup: 38 (#38); Ego: 38 (#38)},
I, {@2: Sup: 47 (#85); Ego: 9 (#47)},
M, {@3: Sup: 6 (#91); Ego: 40 (#87)},
E] {@4: Sup: 11 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}); Ego: 5 (#92)}
H3117@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 46 (#52); Ego: 40 (#46),
@3: Sup: 56 (#108); Ego: 10 (#56),
@4: Sup: 62 (#170); Ego: 6 (#62),
@5: Sup: 14 (#184 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS FLOW {%36});
Ego: 33 (#95),
Male: #184; Feme: #95
} // #102
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #102 % #41 = #20 - Left without Language, Different From the Vulgar;
I-Ching: H33 - Withdrawal, Retiring, Retreat, Yielding; Tetra: 50 -
Vastness/Wasting;
THOTH MEASURE: #20 - Oh Maa-antu-f, who makest thine appearance in Pa-Amsu,
I am not unchaste with any one.
#VIRTUE: With Advance (no. #20), many plans.
#TOOLS: With Accumulation (no. #60), much wealth.
#POSITION: With Decisiveness (no. #29), many decisions, but
#TIME: With Doubt (no. #62), some hesitation.
#CANON: #171
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_171@{
@1: Sup: 20 (#20); Ego: 20 (#20),
@2: Sup: 80 (#100); Ego: 60 (#80),
@3: Sup: 28 (#128); Ego: 29 (#109),
@4: Sup: 9 (#137); Ego: 62 (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE
{%20}),
Male: #137; Feme: #171
} // #171
#102 as [#6, #40, #10, #6, #600] = yowm (H3117): {UMBRA: #22 as #102 % #41
= #20} 1) *DAY*, *TIME*, *YEAR*; 1a) day (as opposed to night); 1b) day (24
hour period); 1b1) as defined by evening and morning in Genesis 1; 1b2) as
a division of time; 1b2a) a working day, a day's journey; 1c) days,
lifetime (pl.); 1d) *TIME*, *PERIOD* (*GENERAL*); 1e) *YEAR*; 1f) temporal
references; 1f1) today; 1f2) yesterday; 1f3) tomorrow;
H4437@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 46 (#52); Ego: 40 (#46),
@3: Sup: 76 (#128); Ego: 30 (#76),
@4: Sup: 15 (#143); Ego: 20 (#96),
@5: Sup: 21 (#164 - *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *MATERIALITY* ARE THE DIALECTICS OF
TEMPORALITY); Ego: 6 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}),
Male: #164; Feme: #102
} // #102
#102 as [#6, #40, #30, #20, #6] = malkuw (H4437): {UMBRA: #75 as #102 % #41
= #20} 1) *ROYALTY*, *REIGN*, *KINGDOM*; 1a) royalty, kingship, kingly
authority; 1b) kingdom; 1c) realm (of territory); 1d) *REIGN* (*OF*
*TIME*);
THAT THE QUEEN VICTORIA'S #873 - LETTERS PATENT OF 29 OCTOBER 1900 CONFORM
{ie. WHETHER THIS IS BY DELIBERATE KNOWLEDGE OR BY COGNISING THE MATTER AS
INTELLECTUS IS AN AHISTORICAL CONSIDERATION IN NEED FOR FURTHER RESEARCH}
TO A WORLDVIEW OF #2184 {12 x 6J = 72J as circa 472 BCE sovereign
perspective whereby 6J = #2184 x 49 = 294 years x 364 days = 107016 days /
293 = 365.242320819112628 TROPICAL YEARS} AS BEING A *PRINCIPLE* *OF* *THE*
*PERSISTENCE* *OF* *SUBSTANCE*:
#175 {MARRIAGE} (@4 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE: #369 - Autonomous
Nature [#205 - DO NOT STEAL]) ...
210: [30 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND]
215: [34 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER OF MISCHIEF]
220: [38 - I CURSE NOT A GOD]
228: [40 - I HAVE NO UNJUST PREFERENCES]
TOTAL: @210 + @215 + @220 + @228 = #873 - PRINCIPLE OF THE PERSISTENCE OF
SUBSTANCE as [#80, #5, #100, #10, #70, #600, #8] = perioche (G4042):
{UMBRA: #873 % #41 = #12} 1) an encompassing, compass, circuit; 2) that
which is contained; 2a) the contents of any writing SUCH AS QUEEN VICTORIAS
LETTERS PATENT OF 29 OCTOBER 1900 AS DICTUM OF #2184 - FREEDOM from #1827 -
OPPRESSION is:
#902 - RULE OF LAW (EGALITÉ {9 JULY 1900}: #22 x #41 as *ONTIC* necessity
comprising a subset of 21 consonants with #VOWELS of Semitic origins),
#492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ {17 SEPTEMBER 1900}: #12 X #41), and
#391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ {29 OCTOBER 1900}) OF CIVIL
SOCIETY
AND IS ALSO COGNISANT OF THE CHRISTOLOGICAL ONTIC DEFINITIONS: "*I* *WISH*
*JESUS* *WOULD* *COME* *IN* *MY* *DAY*. *I* *WOULD* *SO* *LOVE* *TO* *LAY*
*MY* *CROWN* *AT* *HIS* *FEET*." [Queen Victoria]
#34 (@7 - Engendering Nature: #175 - NATURE AMENDED IN ITS NATURE [#82 -
HONOUR YOUR PARENTS]) ...
84: [2 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE]
86: [10 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD]
102: [4 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS]
104: [7 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD]
115: [5 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN]
TOTAL: @84 + @86 + @102 = *ROYALTY*, *REIGN* (*OF* *TIME*), *KINGDOM* /
*DAY*, *TIME*, *YEAR* + @104 = *TO* *GET* *AS* *A* *POSSESSION*, *ACQUIRE*,
*INHERIT*, *POSSESS* / *TO* *POSSESS* *ONESELF* + @115 = *MOSES* *SEAT*
*OF* *HONOUR* (*ROYAL* *DIGNITY*, *AUTHORITY*, *POWER*) = #491 - PRINCIPLE
OF CONTINUITY
SECTION IX: “AND WE DO HEREBY RESERVE TO OURSELVES OUR @104 - HEIRS AND
SUCCESSORS, FULL @115 - POWER AND AUTHORITY FROM @102 - TIME TO @104 - TIME
TO REVOKE, ALTER, OR AMEND THESE OUR LETTERS PATENT, AS TO US OR THEM SHALL
SEEM MEET.”
DIGNITY ROYAL AS SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM VIRILE #390 - *SOVEREIGN*
*ENTITLEMENT* {#2184 - LAWS OF NATURE AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL COSMOLOGICAL
PRINCIPLE / 21 = #104 - COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}} AND BECOMES IN THE
CIRCUMSTANCE OF #343 - RIGHTS OF SUCCESSION A POTENTIAL FOR HABITUAL
CONTEMPT BY OTHERS AS TREASON FOR WHICH A DEATH PENALY MAY APPLY BY THESE
LETTERS PATENTS DEMANDING SUCH FROM THE SOVEREIGN AUTHORITY.
H3947@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 7 (#13); Ego: 1 (#7),
@3: Sup: 26 (#39); Ego: 19 (#26),
@4: Sup: 34 (#73); Ego: 8 (#34),
Male: #73; Feme: #34
} // #115
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #115 % #41 = #33 - Achievable Goals, Virtue of Discrimination;
I-Ching: H9 - Lesser Domestication, Minor Restraint, Small Accumulating,
The taming power of the small, Small harvest; Tetra: 35 - Gathering;
THOTH MEASURE: #33 - Oh thou Horned one, who makest thine appearance at
Sais; I am not noisy in my speech.
#VIRTUE: With Closeness (no. #33), no possible gap, but
#TOOLS: With Completion (no. #73), no possible change.
#POSITION: With Massing (no. #59), affairs emptying.
#TIME: With Legion (no. #32), affairs filling.
#CANON: #197
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_197@{
@1: Sup: 33 (#33); Ego: 33 (#33),
@2: Sup: 25 (#58); Ego: 73 (#106),
@3: Sup: 3 (#61); Ego: 59 (#165),
@4: Sup: 35 (#96); Ego: 32 (#197 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH {%33}),
Male: #96; Feme: #197
} // #197
#115 as [#6, #1, #100, #8] = laqach (H3947): {UMBRA: #3 as #115 % #41 =
#33} 1) to take, get, fetch, lay hold of, seize, receive, acquire, buy,
bring, marry, take a wife, snatch, take away; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to take, take
in the hand; 1a2) to take and carry along; 1a3) to take from, take out of,
take, carry away, take away; 1a4) *TO* *TAKE* *TO* *OR* *FOR* *A* *PERSON*,
*PROCURE*, *GET*, *TAKE* *POSSESSION* *OF*, *SELECT*, *CHOOSE*, *TAKE* *IN*
*MARRIAGE*, *RECEIVE*, *ACCEPT*; 1a5) to take up or upon, put upon; 1a6) to
fetch; 1a7) to take, lead, conduct; 1a8) to take, capture, seize; 1a9) to
take, carry off; 1a10) to take (vengeance); 1b) (Niphal); 1b1) to be
captured; 1b2) to be taken away, be removed; 1b3) to be taken, brought
unto; 1c) (Pual); 1c1) to be taken from or out of; 1c2) to be stolen from;
1c3) to be taken captive; 1c4) to be taken away, be removed; 1d) (Hophal);
1d1) to be taken unto, be brought unto; 1d2) to be taken out of; 1d3) to be
taken away; 1e) (Hithpael); 1e1) to take hold of oneself; 1e2) to flash
about (of lightning);
H3678@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 50 (#80); Ego: 20 (#50),
@3: Sup: 29 (#109); Ego: 60 (#110),
@4: Sup: 34 (#143); Ego: 5 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}),
Male: #143; Feme: #115
} // #115
#115 as [#30, #20, #60, #5] = kicce' (H3678): {UMBRA: #40 as #115 % #41 =
#33} 1) seat (of honour), throne, seat, stool; 1a) seat (of honour),
throne; 1b) *ROYAL* *DIGNITY*, *AUTHORITY*, *POWER* (fig.);
H113@{
@1: Sup: 30 (#30); Ego: 30 (#30),
@2: Sup: 31 (#61); Ego: 1 (#31),
@3: Sup: 35 (#96); Ego: 4 (#35),
@4: Sup: 4 (#100); Ego: 50 (#85),
@5: Sup: 14 (#114); Ego: 10 (#95),
@6: Sup: 28 (#142); Ego: 14 (#109),
Male: #142; Feme: #109
} // #115
#115 as [#30, #1, #4, #50, #10, #500] = 'adown (H113): {UMBRA: #42 as #115
% #41 = #33} 1) firm, strong, lord, master; 1a) lord, master; 1a1)
reference to men; 1a1a) *SUPERINTENDENT* *OF* *HOUSEHOLD*, *OF* *AFFAIRS*;
1a1b) master; 1a1c) king; 1a2) reference to God; 1a2a) the Lord God; 1a2b)
Lord of the whole earth; 1b) lords, kings; 1b1) reference to men; 1b1a)
proprietor of hill of Samaria; 1b1b) master; 1b1c) husband; 1b1d) prophet;
1b1e) *GOVERNOR*; 1b1f) prince; 1b1g) king; 1b2) reference to God; 1b2a)
Lord of lords (probably = 'thy husband, Yahweh'); 1c) my lord, my master;
1c1) reference to men; 1c1a) master; 1c1b) husband; 1c1c) prophet; 1c1d)
prince; 1c1e) king; 1c1f) *FATHER*; 1c1g) *MOSES*; 1c1h) priest; 1c1i)
theophanic angel; 1c1j) captain; 1c1k) *GENERAL* *RECOGNITION* *OF*
*SUPERIORITY*; 1c2) reference to God; 1c2a) *MY* *LORD*, *MY* *LORD* *AND*
*MY* *GOD*; 1c2b) *ADONAI* (*PARALLEL* *WITH* *YAHWEH*);
"BUT I HAVE GREATER WITNESS THAN THAT OF JOHN: FOR THE WORKS WHICH THE #115
- *FATHER* HATH GIVEN ME TO FINISH, THE SAME WORKS THAT I DO, BEAR WITNESS
OF ME, THAT THE #115 - *FATHER* HATH SENT ME. AND THE #115 - *FATHER*
HIMSELF, WHICH HATH SENT ME, HATH BORNE WITNESS OF ME. YE HAVE NEITHER
HEARD HIS VOICE AT ANY TIME, NOR SEEN HIS SHAPE.
AND YE HAVE NOT HIS WORD ABIDING IN YOU: FOR WHOM HE HATH SENT, HIM YE
BELIEVE NOT. SEARCH THE SCRIPTURES; FOR IN THEM YE THINK YE HAVE ETERNAL
LIFE: AND THEY ARE THEY WHICH TESTIFY OF ME.
AND YE WILL NOT COME TO ME, THAT YE MIGHT HAVE LIFE.
I RECEIVE NOT HONOUR {#115 - *GENERAL* *RECOGNITION* *OF* *SUPERIORITY*}
FROM MEN {#115 - *REFERENCE* *TO* *MEN*}. BUT I KNOW YOU, THAT YE HAVE NOT
THE LOVE OF GOD IN YOU. I AM COME IN MY FATHER’S NAME {#115 - *ADONAI*
(*PARALLEL* *WITH* *YAHWEH*)}, AND YE RECEIVE ME NOT: IF ANOTHER SHALL COME
IN HIS OWN NAME, HIM YE WILL RECEIVE {#115 - *HUSBAND*}. HOW CAN YE
BELIEVE, WHICH RECEIVE HONOUR ONE OF ANOTHER, AND SEEK NOT THE HONOUR THAT
COMETH FROM #115 - *GOD* ONLY?
DO NOT THINK THAT I WILL ACCUSE YOU TO THE #115 - *FATHER*: THERE IS ONE
THAT ACCUSETH YOU, EVEN #115 - *MOSES*, IN WHOM YE TRUST. FOR HAD YE
BELIEVED #115 - *MOSES*, YE WOULD HAVE BELIEVED ME: FOR HE WROTE OF ME.
BUT IF YE BELIEVE NOT HIS WRITINGS {TOTAL: @210 + @215 + @220 + @228 = #873
- PRINCIPLE OF THE PERSISTENCE OF SUBSTANCE}, HOW SHALL YE BELIEVE MY
WORDS?" [John 5:36-47 (KJV)]
"THINK NOT THAT I AM COME TO DESTROY THE LAW, OR THE PROPHETS: I AM NOT
COME TO DESTROY, BUT TO FULFIL. FOR VERILY I SAY UNTO YOU, TILL HEAVEN AND
EARTH PASS, ONE JOT OR ONE TITTLE SHALL IN NO WISE PASS FROM THE LAW, TILL
ALL BE FULFILLED.
WHOSOEVER THEREFORE SHALL BREAK ONE OF THESE LEAST COMMANDMENTS, AND SHALL
TEACH MEN SO, HE SHALL BE CALLED THE LEAST IN THE KINGDOM OF HEAVEN: BUT
WHOSOEVER SHALL DO AND TEACH THEM, THE SAME SHALL BE CALLED GREAT IN THE
KINGDOM OF HEAVEN. FOR I SAY UNTO YOU, THAT EXCEPT YOUR RIGHTEOUSNESS SHALL
EXCEED THE RIGHTEOUSNESS OF THE SCRIBES AND PHARISEES, YE SHALL IN NO CASE
ENTER INTO THE KINGDOM OF HEAVEN.
YE HAVE HEARD THAT IT WAS SAID BY THEM OF OLD TIME, THOU SHALT NOT KILL;
AND WHOSOEVER SHALL KILL SHALL BE IN DANGER OF THE JUDGMENT: BUT I SAY UNTO
YOU, THAT WHOSOEVER IS ANGRY WITH HIS BROTHER WITHOUT A CAUSE SHALL BE IN
DANGER OF THE JUDGMENT: AND WHOSOEVER SHALL SAY TO HIS BROTHER, RACA ,
SHALL BE IN DANGER OF THE COUNCIL: BUT WHOSOEVER SHALL SAY, THOU FOOL,
SHALL BE IN DANGER OF HELL FIRE.
THEREFORE IF THOU BRING THY GIFT TO THE ALTAR, AND THERE REMEMBEREST THAT
THY BROTHER HATH OUGHT AGAINST THEE; LEAVE THERE THY GIFT BEFORE THE ALTAR,
AND GO THY WAY; FIRST BE RECONCILED TO THY BROTHER, AND THEN COME AND OFFER
THY GIFT.
AGREE WITH THINE ADVERSARY QUICKLY, WHILES THOU ART IN THE WAY WITH HIM;
LEST AT ANY TIME THE ADVERSARY DELIVER THEE TO THE JUDGE, AND THE JUDGE
DELIVER THEE TO THE OFFICER, AND THOU BE CAST INTO PRISON. VERILY I SAY
UNTO THEE, THOU SHALT BY NO MEANS COME OUT THENCE, TILL THOU HAST PAID THE
UTTERMOST FARTHING." [Matthew 5:17-26 (KJV)]
SECTION VIII: "REQUIRE AND COMMAND ALL OUR OFFICERS AND MINISTERS, CIVIL
AND MILITARY, AND ALL OTHER THE INHABITANTS OF OUR SAID COMMONWEALTH TO BE
#364 - OBEDIENT {#273 - REMEMBRANCE}, #312 - AIDING {#273 - SEPULCHRE}, AND
#273 - ASSISTING {#273 - WEAK} UNTO OUR SAID GOVERNOR GENERAL {#2184 - LAWS
OF NATURE AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE / 12 = #182 AS
DATE(1996,3,20) + 5 x #364 + #182 = SUNSET 11 SEPTEMBER 2001}, OR, IN THE
EVENT OF HIS DEATH, #273 - INCAPACITY, OR ABSENCE, TO SUCH PERSON OR
PERSONS AS MAY, FROM TIME TO TIME, UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THESE OUR
LETTERS PATENT, ADMINISTER {#2184 - LAWS OF NATURE AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL
COSMOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE / 13 = #168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY
{%26 - *YHWH*}} THE GOVERNMENT OF OUR SAID COMMONWEALTH."
DOLF @ 1643 HOURS ON 8 JANUARY 2019: "What else would you ... like to talk
about relative to the #873 - *PROBITY* and #644 - *DECORUM* accorded to
DIGNITY ROYAL AS SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM VIRILE #390 - *SOVEREIGN*
*ENTITLEMENT* {#2184 - LAWS OF NATURE AS ANTHROPOLOGICAL COSMOLOGICAL
PRINCIPLE / 21 = #104 - COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}} AND BECOMES IN THE
CIRCUMSTANCE OF #343 - RIGHTS OF SUCCESSION (TELOS) A TREASONOUS
TRANSGRESSION?"
IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783 *AS* *APRIORITY* *TO* *THE* *FRENCH*
*REVOLUTION*) SECTION #34 AS IDEA @317: Two important, nay completely
indispensable, though utterly dry investigations were therefore needed,
which were carried out in the Critique, pp. 137 ff. and 235 ff.14 Through
the first of these it was shown that *THE* *SENSES* *DO* *NOT* *SUPPLY*
*PURE* *CONCEPTS* *OF* *THE* *UNDERSTANDING* *IN* *CONCRETO*, *BUT* *ONLY*
*THE* *SCHEMA* *FOR* *THEIR* *USE*, and that the object appropriate to this
schema is found only in experience (as the product of the understanding
from materials of sensibility). In the second investigation (Critique, p.
235) it is shown: that notwithstanding the independence from experience of
our pure concepts of the understanding and principles, and even their
apparently larger sphere of use, nonetheless, outside the field of
experience nothing at all can be thought by means of them, because they can
do nothing but merely determine the logical form of judgment with respect
to given intuitions; but since beyond the field of sensibility there is no
intuition at all, these pure concepts lack completely all significance, in
that there are no means through which they can be exhibited *IN*
*CONCRETO*, and so all such noumena, together with their aggregate – an
intelligible world – are nothing but representations of a problem, whose
object is in itself perfectly possible, but whose solution, given the
nature of our understanding, is completely impossible, since our
understanding is no faculty of intuition but only of the connection of
given intuitions in an [IDEA: @317] experience; and experience therefore
has to contain all the objects for our concepts, whereas apart from it all
concepts will be without significance, since no intuition can be put under
them." [pages 67-68]
Whilst I have not yet returned to completing by 26 JANUARY 2019 the
undertaking of the submission document titled: 'SPECIFICITIES OF
NON-FACTUALITY BEING THEN GROUNDS FOR COUNTY COURT APPEAL AS CASE NUMBER:
AP-18-0609 AGAINST A PUBLIC AUTHORITY'S INFIDELITY TO WAR #288 - MEMORIAL
COMMEMORATIONS DUE TO ALIGNMENT WITH A FOREIGN POWER'
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/SPECIFICITIES%20OF%20NON-FACTUALITY%20AP-18-0609%20%28Censored%29.pdf>
However to assist the COURT within the interim, we have a further
provisional document titled:
YOUTUBE: "Your Army Needs You, and Your Resilience"
"OH BOUDICA REGINA HERO THIS MOMENT TO ALL GAPE: ETERNAL JUDGMENT OF NERO
FOR DAUGHTERS DID RAPE" as former working title 'YOUR ARMY NEEDS YOU AND
YOUR RESILIENCE (DON’T ***@CK YOUR COUNTRY WITH #325 - DETRUDE {5x5 = #65 -
*SOLDIER*})' which took advantage of the BRITISH ARMY RECRUITMENT CAMPAIGN
before the MEDIA COULD PUBLICISE IT comprising some #68 pages and dated 4
to 8 January 2019
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Army.pdf>
The media responses to my GOODWILL GESTURE which I have received within the
subsequent news cycles have all been UNIVERSALLY FAVOURABLE and accordingly
I wish to advise the COUNTY COURT with respects to the further FILE LISTING
HEARING within these APPEAL MATTERS which are scheduled for 3 APRIL 2019,
that out of regard for the avoidance of UNNECESSARY LEGAL COSTS, I will
withhold seeking LEGAL COUNSEL in these MATTERS until I have received
DIRECTIONS from your HONOUR with RESPECTS to the QUESTION AS LACK OF
PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS ACCORDED BY THE INFERIOR COURTS WITHIN THESE MATTERS AS
THEIR GROUNDS FOR APPEAL. If they are STRUCK OUT, then LEGAL COSTS will
not be incurred.
dolf
Initial Post: 9 January 2018
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"
SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*
Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit
<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>
SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]
Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.
It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.
<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>
The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."
That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)
After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
